On 01.02.2015 13:13, g wrote:
On 02/01/2015 04:03 AM, poma wrote:
On 01.02.2015 08:59, g wrote:
pppss
On 02/01/2015 01:53 AM, g wrote:
On 01/31/2015 10:12 PM, jd1008 wrote:
Often I want to attach a file that is larger than what google will
allow, a limit I configured in TB. And TB
On 02/01/2015 11:03 AM, poma wrote:
On 01.02.2015 13:13, g wrote:
On 02/01/2015 04:03 AM, poma wrote:
On 01.02.2015 08:59, g wrote:
Is not it enough to paste the URL in the message, without these
complications with attachments?
to what attachments do you refer?
if i have a short
On 02/01/2015 02:57 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
On 01/31/2015 10:12 PM, jd1008 wrote:
Often I want to attach a file that is larger than what google will allow,
a limit I configured in TB. And TB will prompt me to use a file share
service.
The problem is I do not want to use the 2 file share
On 02/01/2015 04:04 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 02/01/2015 02:57 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
On 01/31/2015 10:12 PM, jd1008 wrote:
Often I want to attach a file that is larger than what google will
allow,
a limit I configured in TB. And TB will prompt me to use a file share
service.
The problem is
On 01/31/2015 10:12 PM, jd1008 wrote:
Often I want to attach a file that is larger than what google will allow,
a limit I configured in TB. And TB will prompt me to use a file share
service.
The problem is I do not want to use the 2 file share services that TB is
showing,
and none of the
/thunderbird/addon/dropbox-for-filelink/
I tried to install it. TB's Tools-Add-On-Get Extensions shows this banner:
Secure connection failed
An error occurred during a connection to services.addons.mozilla.org.
Peer's Certificate has been revoked. (Error code:
sec_error_revoked_certificate
On 02/01/2015 04:11 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
On 02/01/2015 04:04 PM, jd1008 wrote:
On 02/01/2015 02:57 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
On 01/31/2015 10:12 PM, jd1008 wrote:
Often I want to attach a file that is larger than what google will
allow,
a limit I configured in TB. And TB will prompt me to
://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/filelink-large-attachments
I did indeed install dropbox, and restarted TB.
It still does not show dropbox as one of the share
services.
So, perhaps you could clue me in on how to make it work.
I installed this:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon
it work.
I installed this:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/dropbox-for-filelink/
I tried to install it. TB's Tools-Add-On-Get Extensions shows this
banner:
Secure connection failed
An error occurred during a connection to services.addons.mozilla.org.
Peer's
On 01/31/2015 10:12 PM, jd1008 wrote:
Often I want to attach a file that is larger than what google will
allow, a limit I configured in TB. And TB will prompt me to use a
file share service.
The problem is I do not want to use the 2 file share services that TB
is showing, and none of the
Fedora 20 / KDE
Moving old setting of Thunderbird and Firefox into a new setup of Fedora
20 KDE.
Thunderbird: In new setup of thunderbird Send contents of the Mail
folder to Trash Can.
Thunderbird: Take contents of Old Thunderbird Mail folder , Copy and
Drag into the new Mail Folder
Often I want to attach a file that is larger than what google will allow,
a limit I configured in TB. And TB will prompt me to use a file share
service.
The problem is I do not want to use the 2 file share services that TB is
showing,
and none of the add-on have my preferred file share
pppss
On 02/01/2015 01:53 AM, g wrote:
On 01/31/2015 10:12 PM, jd1008 wrote:
Often I want to attach a file that is larger than what google will
allow, a limit I configured in TB. And TB will prompt me to use a
file share service.
The problem is I do not want to use the 2 file share
Before I file a bug against TB, I would like to know what
would cause TB to not display photos in messages. When I view
the same message in Firefox (my gmail account), the photos
are displayed.
What TB does display are squares and rectangles where the photos
ought to be.
Sometime, the
On 01/10/15 08:49, jd1008 wrote:
Before I file a bug against TB, I would like to know what
would cause TB to not display photos in messages. When I view
the same message in Firefox (my gmail account), the photos
are displayed.
What TB does display are squares and rectangles where the photos
On 01/09/2015 06:02 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 01/10/15 08:49, jd1008 wrote:
Before I file a bug against TB, I would like to know what would cause
TB to not display photos in messages. When I view the same message in
Firefox (my gmail account), the photos are displayed. What TB does
display
/thunderbird
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
On 01/10/15 08:49, jd1008 wrote:
Before I file a bug against TB, I would like to know what
would cause TB to not display photos in messages. When I view
the same message in Firefox (my gmail account), the photos
are displayed.
What TB does display are squares and rectangles where the photos
Running current TB thunderbird-31.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64
Received a message from a vendor I deal with, via paypal.
The message content was alright as I expected it to be.
However, TB displayed the From field as some other name,
other than vendor's name via paypal
which is usually how invoices come
On 12/10/14 11:55, jd1008 wrote:
Running current TB thunderbird-31.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64
Received a message from a vendor I deal with, via paypal.
The message content was alright as I expected it to be.
However, TB displayed the From field as some other name,
other than vendor's name via paypal
On 10/12/14 08:55, jd1008 wrote:
Running current TB thunderbird-31.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64
Received a message from a vendor I deal with, via paypal.
The message content was alright as I expected it to be.
However, TB displayed the From field as some other name,
other than vendor's name via paypal
On 10/11/2014 07:19 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/12/14 08:55, jd1008 wrote:
Running current TB thunderbird-31.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64
Received a message from a vendor I deal with, via paypal.
The message content was alright as I expected it to be.
However, TB displayed the From field as some other
On 10/12/14 09:30, jd1008 wrote:
On 10/11/2014 07:19 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 10/12/14 08:55, jd1008 wrote:
Running current TB thunderbird-31.1.1-1.fc20.x86_64
Received a message from a vendor I deal with, via paypal.
The message content was alright as I expected it to be.
However, TB
On 10/12/14 10:31, jd1008 wrote:
Seems like TB was at a loss what to do with the display field
because of the collected contacts list.
You're welcome.
--
If you can't laugh at yourself, others will gladly oblige.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Steven Rosenberg:
I have Thunderbird 31.1.0 in Fedora 20. I think the update came
through yesterday.
That is what I said as well in my previous email:
Thunderbird 31.1.0 is already in fc20 (fc19 still comes with
Thunderbird 24.7).
but I
On 12.09.2014 10:19, Joonas wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Steven Rosenberg:
I have Thunderbird 31.1.0 in Fedora 20. I think the update came
through yesterday.
That is what I said as well in my previous email:
Thunderbird 31.1.0 is already in fc20 (fc19 still
it makes no sense to have v.31.0 and v.24.8.0 if we have
v.24.7.0 - v.31.1.0.
I missed the fact that Thunderbird has ESR releases as well.
Sorry for the noise.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJUE1zuAAoJEG58zmw5nc+vonIP+wQ9Xp3YQRwddg09lBQmwGgl
hgJ0Wv4uu6IQ6I56haMpRx3COhrJKax
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
did these Thunderbird versions really never reach Fedora repos?
31.0
24.8
or am I overlooking something?
I concluded that after having a look at:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/thunderbird
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Joonas joonas.lehto...@openmailbox.org wrote:
Hi,
did these Thunderbird versions really never reach Fedora repos?
31.0
24.8
or am I overlooking something?
I have Thunderbird 31.1.0 in Fedora 20. I think the update came
through yesterday.
--
Steven
I have some messages that Thunderbird is not displaying. And I looked
back in a couple folder archives and messages that use to display are
now not displaying.
So obviously something changed. Anyone else seeing this? ANy tips?
Anyone interested, I could forward one of the messages off
On 08/06/14 20:50, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have some messages that Thunderbird is not displaying. And I looked back
in a couple folder archives and messages that use to display are now not
displaying.
So obviously something changed. Anyone else seeing this? ANy tips? Anyone
On 08/06/2014 09:12 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/06/14 20:50, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have some messages that Thunderbird is not displaying. And I looked back in
a couple folder archives and messages that use to display are now not
displaying.
So obviously something changed. Anyone else
On 08/06/14 21:44, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 08/06/2014 09:12 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 08/06/14 20:50, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have some messages that Thunderbird is not displaying. And I looked back
in a couple folder archives and messages that use to display are now not
displaying
some messages that Thunderbird is not displaying. And I
looked back in a couple folder archives and messages that use to
display are now not displaying.
So obviously something changed. Anyone else seeing this? ANy
tips? Anyone interested, I could forward one of the messages off-list.
I'm
it with the TBird upgrade, however man,
do not stay on Fedora 17, upgrade or start fresh with the CentOS, really.
Well, I have managed to upgrade Thunderbird, modulo a wee glitch (which
may be irrelevant anyway) with which Ed Greshko may be able to help me.
It remains to be seen whether this will have any impact
half-arsed job at restore and backup, mangling things
terribly.
Though I am not experiencing the OP's issue, I am also experiencing
thunderbird IMAP access issues. ATM I suspect (Note: Wild guess, no
proof!) to be related to systemd and NetworkManager restarts, esp.
upon
updates.
Have you tried
On 07/13/2014 08:53 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Sometimes, thunderbird becomes non-reactive for minutes longer periods
(several minutes), but is back afterwards.
Next time that happens, run top to see if it's working its little ass
off or just taking a nap.
--
users mailing list
users
On 07/13/2014 06:06 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 07/13/2014 08:53 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Sometimes, thunderbird becomes non-reactive for minutes longer periods
(several minutes), but is back afterwards.
Next time that happens, run top to see if it's working its little ass
off or just taking
Allegedly, on or about 12 July 2014, Rolf Turner sent:
(1) From time to time, for no reason that I can discern, Thunderbird
spontaneously unsubscribes all (or perhaps most of) my email folders
and subfolders.
You might want to try and find out if those times coincide with your
system
On 12.07.2014, Rolf Turner wrote:
(1) From time to time, for no reason that I can discern, Thunderbird
spontaneously unsubscribes all (or perhaps most of) my email folders and
subfolders.
[]
This is surely not an answer you would expect, but: Thunderbird is
badly suited to handle big
On Jul 12, 2014 3:57 PM, Heinz Diehl h...@fritha.org wrote:
On 12.07.2014, Rolf Turner wrote:
(1) From time to time, for no reason that I can discern, Thunderbird
spontaneously unsubscribes all (or perhaps most of) my email folders and
subfolders.
[]
This is surely not an answer
On 07/12/2014 08:34 AM, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 12 July 2014, Rolf Turner sent:
(1) From time to time, for no reason that I can discern, Thunderbird
spontaneously unsubscribes all (or perhaps most of) my email folders
and subfolders.
You might want to try and find out if those times
On 12/07/14 17:32, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/12/14 12:51, Rolf Turner wrote:
XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/lib64/thunderbird/libxul.so:
libdbus-glib-1.so.2: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
Couldn't load XPCOM.
Naturally I have no idea what this really means, or what if anything
can be done
On 12/07/14 17:41, poma wrote:
On 12.07.2014 06:51, Rolf Turner wrote:
...
***Is*** there anything that can be done about it? If so, what? Please
keep it simple and explicit, if you would be so kind. I need a *recipe*
--- Do this, and then this, and then this I understand a fair
bit of
not experiencing the OP's issue, I am also experiencing
thunderbird IMAP access issues. ATM I suspect (Note: Wild guess, no
proof!) to be related to systemd and NetworkManager restarts, esp.
upon
updates.
Have you tried connecting to the same IMAP server with a different
client, e.g. Evolution
On 12.07.2014 15:28, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 12/07/14 17:41, poma wrote:
On 12.07.2014 06:51, Rolf Turner wrote:
...
***Is*** there anything that can be done about it? If so, what? Please
keep it simple and explicit, if you would be so kind. I need a *recipe*
--- Do this, and then this, and
On 07/12/14 21:18, Rolf Turner wrote:
Nearly there I think. I downloaded the second tarball (I *do* prefer British
English) and unpacked it; I cd-ed to the resulting thunderbird directory and
executed ./thunderbird. The program started OK --- I am now using it (i.e. I
am using thunderbird
, mangling things
terribly.
Though I am not experiencing the OP's issue, I am also experiencing
thunderbird IMAP access issues. ATM I suspect (Note: Wild guess, no
proof!) to be related to systemd and NetworkManager restarts, esp.
upon
updates.
Have you tried connecting to the same IMAP server
On 13/07/14 12:14, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 07/13/14 07:35, Rolf Turner wrote:
Yes, I had to muck around a bit to get Adobe Reader installed; yum
didn't directly work (probably because my Fedora 17 is EOL).
According to notes that I kept, the recipe (found somewhere on the
web) that I used was:
on Fedora 17, upgrade or start fresh with the CentOS, really.
Well, I have managed to upgrade Thunderbird, modulo a wee glitch (which
may be irrelevant anyway) with which Ed Greshko may be able to help me.
It remains to be seen whether this will have any impact upon the
subscribe problems that I have
On 07/13/14 08:32, Rolf Turner wrote:
Now, you probably will run into a bit of difficulty or
inconvenience.You have 2 copies of t-bird installed. One is well integrated
with
Fedora. The other not. So, if you were to click on a mailto: link in a
web page, the older version of T-Bird will
is actually two-fold:
(1) From time to time, for no reason that I can discern, Thunderbird
spontaneously unsubscribes all (or perhaps most of) my email folders and
subfolders.
I can of course re-subscribe to them, but since I have a rather large
number of folders and subfolders (and subsubfolders
*knowledgeable*) I thought I would ask here.
The question is actually two-fold:
(1) From time to time, for no reason that I can discern, Thunderbird
spontaneously unsubscribes all (or perhaps most of) my email folders and
subfolders.
I can of course re-subscribe to them, but since I have a rather large
thought I would ask here.
The question is actually two-fold:
(1) From time to time, for no reason that I can discern, Thunderbird
spontaneously unsubscribes all (or perhaps most of) my email folders and
subfolders.
I can of course re-subscribe to them, but since I have a rather large number
, cranky, cryptic,
but above all *knowledgeable*) I thought I would ask here.
The question is actually two-fold:
(1) From time to time, for no reason that I can discern, Thunderbird
spontaneously unsubscribes all (or perhaps most of) my email folders and
subfolders.
I can of course re-subscribe
On 07/11/2014 04:54 PM, Rolf Turner wrote:
Has anyone any insight into why this unsubscription phenomenon should
occur and how one might prevent it from occurring?
That's a good question. Have you tried asking here:
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/products/thunderbird
--
users mailing
, but above
all *knowledgeable*) I thought I would ask here.
The question is actually two-fold:
(1) From time to time, for no reason that I can discern, Thunderbird
spontaneously unsubscribes all (or perhaps most of) my email folders and
subfolders.
I can of course re-subscribe to them, but since
/products/thunderbird
Well, I ***hadn't*** but I have just tried. Signed up an posted my
question. Wish me luck!
cheers,
Rolf
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code
* knowledgeable (abrasive, cranky, cryptic, but above
all *knowledgeable*) I thought I would ask here.
The question is actually two-fold:
(1) From time to time, for no reason that I can discern, Thunderbird
spontaneously unsubscribes all (or perhaps most of) my email folders and
subfolders.
I can
://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=39t=2068757
cheers,
Rolf Turner
P. S. I am running Thunderbird 17.0.7, if that is of any relevance.
It should not matterbut that is a very old version.
So how might I upgrade to the latest version? I must confess that I am
running a very elderly version
with such upgrades. I cannot
afford to be stuck with a broken system. I am not sufficiently
knowledgeable to be able to fix a broken system and I have no local
resources to give me assistance.
Would I need a more recent version of Fedora in order to get a more
recent version of Thunderbird
a more
recent version of Thunderbird to run?
Get CentOS 7 Now
https://www.centos.org/download/
CentOS mailing list
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
poma
I'm no expert, but in my experience, Thunderbird runs on just about
anything.
I have run it on a bunch of different Linux distros
On 12/07/14 14:44, Ed Greshko wrote:
SNIP
P. S. I am running Thunderbird 17.0.7, if that is of any relevance.
It should not matterbut that is a very old version.
So how might I upgrade to the latest version? I must confess that
Iam running a very elderly version of Fedora (17
On 12.07.2014 06:51, Rolf Turner wrote:
On 12/07/14 14:44, Ed Greshko wrote:
SNIP
P. S. I am running Thunderbird 17.0.7, if that is of any relevance.
It should not matterbut that is a very old version.
So how might I upgrade to the latest version? I must confess that
Iam running
On 07/12/14 12:51, Rolf Turner wrote:
XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/lib64/thunderbird/libxul.so:
libdbus-glib-1.so.2: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64
Couldn't load XPCOM.
Naturally I have no idea what this really means, or what if anything can be
done about it.
***Is*** there anything
On 12.07.2014 06:51, Rolf Turner wrote:
...
***Is*** there anything that can be done about it? If so, what? Please
keep it simple and explicit, if you would be so kind. I need a *recipe*
--- Do this, and then this, and then this I understand a fair
bit of Linux jargon, but there is a
Hi all,
I'M running thunderbird-24.6.0-1.fc20.x86_64. Sometimes (rather often,
but not always) having problems with threads in thunderbird: After
opening a thread, all opened sublines are unvisible, until I move the
mouse pointer over them (without click): then they will appear.
This happens
On 07/09/14 03:12, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi all,
I'M running thunderbird-24.6.0-1.fc20.x86_64. Sometimes (rather often,
but not always) having problems with threads in thunderbird: After
opening a thread, all opened sublines are unvisible, until I move the
mouse pointer over them (without
On 09.07.2014 09:12, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi all,
I'M running thunderbird-24.6.0-1.fc20.x86_64. Sometimes (rather often,
but not always) having problems with threads in thunderbird: After
opening a thread, all opened sublines are unvisible, until I move the
mouse pointer over them (without
On 07/09/2014 10:29 AM, poma wrote:
On 09.07.2014 09:12, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi all,
I'M running thunderbird-24.6.0-1.fc20.x86_64. Sometimes (rather often,
but not always) having problems with threads in thunderbird: After
opening a thread, all opened sublines are unvisible, until I move
On 07/09/14 15:12, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi all,
I'M running thunderbird-24.6.0-1.fc20.x86_64. Sometimes (rather often,
but not always) having problems with threads in thunderbird: After
opening a thread, all opened sublines are unvisible, until I move the
mouse pointer over them (without
On 09.07.2014 11:12, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 07/09/2014 10:29 AM, poma wrote:
On 09.07.2014 09:12, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi all,
I'M running thunderbird-24.6.0-1.fc20.x86_64. Sometimes (rather often,
but not always) having problems with threads in thunderbird: After
opening a thread, all
On 07/09/2014 11:35 AM, poma wrote:
On 09.07.2014 11:12, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 07/09/2014 10:29 AM, poma wrote:
On 09.07.2014 09:12, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi all,
I'M running thunderbird-24.6.0-1.fc20.x86_64. Sometimes (rather often,
but not always) having problems with threads
On 09.07.2014 11:50, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 07/09/2014 11:35 AM, poma wrote:
On 09.07.2014 11:12, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 07/09/2014 10:29 AM, poma wrote:
On 09.07.2014 09:12, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi all,
I'M running thunderbird-24.6.0-1.fc20.x86_64. Sometimes (rather often
On 07/09/2014 12:01 PM, poma wrote:
On 09.07.2014 11:50, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 07/09/2014 11:35 AM, poma wrote:
On 09.07.2014 11:12, Joachim Backes wrote:
On 07/09/2014 10:29 AM, poma wrote:
On 09.07.2014 09:12, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi all,
I'M running thunderbird-24.6.0-1.fc20.x86_64
You can also play around with 'layers.acceleration.*', and moglich
'gfx.xrender.enabled'
in Prefs/Adv/Conf Ed.
No guarantee. ;)
poma
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
,
I'M running thunderbird-24.6.0-1.fc20.x86_64. Sometimes (rather often,
but not always) having problems with threads in thunderbird: After
opening a thread, all opened sublines are unvisible, until I move the
mouse pointer over them (without click): then they will appear.
This happens both with ati
:12, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi all,
I'M running thunderbird-24.6.0-1.fc20.x86_64. Sometimes (rather often,
but not always) having problems with threads in thunderbird: After
opening a thread, all opened sublines are unvisible, until I move the
mouse pointer over them (without click
/09/2014 10:29 AM, poma wrote:
On 09.07.2014 09:12, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi all,
I'M running thunderbird-24.6.0-1.fc20.x86_64. Sometimes (rather often,
but not always) having problems with threads in thunderbird: After
opening a thread, all opened sublines are unvisible, until I move the
mouse
On 07/09/2014 02:12 AM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Hi all,
I'M running thunderbird-24.6.0-1.fc20.x86_64. Sometimes (rather often,
but not always) having problems with threads in thunderbird: After
opening a thread, all opened sublines are unvisible, until I move the
mouse pointer over them (without
Oh boy do I ever have this problem.
I hadn't noticed before but since you mentioned threads I've noticed
that what I see is entirely dependent on a thread being collapsed.
If all threads are expanded I can move up and down in the message list
without trouble.
If a thread is collapsed, then
On 07/01/2014 02:21 AM, Mike Wright wrote:
ps. Could you not use html mail? I can barely read the pale gray text. Thx.
Of course, it's better not to use HTML e-mail. But BTW, Allow HTML
Temp is a nice Thunderbird Extension, especially for this case. It's
also nice to see, who is using which MUA
On 07/01/14 09:06, Chris wrote:
On 07/01/2014 02:21 AM, Mike Wright wrote:
ps. Could you not use html mail? I can barely read the pale gray text. Thx.
Of course, it's better not to use HTML e-mail. But BTW, Allow HTML
Temp is a nice Thunderbird Extension, especially for this case. It's
also
Hi all,
I'm running thunderbird-24.5.0-2.fc20.x86_64 and seeing the following
effect: sometimes I'm receiving emails with a lot of recepients (about
86) in the TO-header-entry of this email. If I set *view-headers-all*,
thunderbird needs a lot of time (about 3-4 secs) to open and display
and find these 20 emails,
which are scattered among perhaps 100 or more messages in the list
which have been read already.
this is not a fault of thunderbird and something one has to contend
with.
It would be nice if there were a button somewhere that would go to
the highlighted messages, one
Am 17.05.2014 10:31, schrieb g:
On 05/17/14 04:52, Doug wrote:
I didn't know what list to send this to, but since there has been
some discussion about Mozilla products here, I'll try this one.
I get a large number of messages every day, in addition to those I
filter out and don't see.
Allegedly, on or about 17 May 2014, Doug sent:
I get a large number of messages every day, in addition to those I
filter out and don't see. Unfortunately, some of these messages seem
to come in out of time sync, for one reason or another.
If you want to see messages listed in a logical and
On 05/17/2014 01:19 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/17/14 12:52, Doug wrote:
I get a large number of messages every day, in addition to those I filter out
and don't see. Unfortunately, some of these
messages seem to come in out of time sync, for one reason or another. I don't
send everything
On 05/17/14 11:39, Klaus-Peter Schrage wrote:
Am 17.05.2014 10:31, schrieb g:
If you want to sort your emails by date received, you can set this in
the View | Sort by | Order Received-
this is true. i did not show such separately when showing using
threaded and untheaded.
--
peace
that would go to the
highlighted messages, one at a time, starting at the
top and working its way down, until they have all been opened and/or
deleted.
Maybe someone from Mozilla (or Pale Moon, which is said to be working on
a Thunderbird clone) will see this here.
sorry if it's far off topic--doug
On 05/17/14 12:52, Doug wrote:
I get a large number of messages every day, in addition to those I filter out
and don't see. Unfortunately, some of these
messages seem to come in out of time sync, for one reason or another. I
don't send everything on the incoming list to
trash as soon as I
Hasn't anyone else come across the problem with a corrupted
current thunderbird-24.5.0-1.fc19.i686.rpm package in the updates
repository ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093927
Big issue here is that it has a duff MD5 checksum but
yum/rpm still tries to install it ...
--
users
On 06/05/14 03:26 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Hasn't anyone else come across the problem with a corrupted
current thunderbird-24.5.0-1.fc19.i686.rpm package in the updates
repository ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093927
Big issue here is that it has a duff MD5 checksum but
yum
On 06.05.2014 15:35, Franklin McCormick wrote:
On 06/05/14 03:26 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Hasn't anyone else come across the problem with a corrupted
current thunderbird-24.5.0-1.fc19.i686.rpm package in the updates
repository ?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093927
Big issue
On 05/06/2014 12:26 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Hasn't anyone else come across the problem with a corrupted
current thunderbird-24.5.0-1.fc19.i686.rpm package in the updates
repository ?
Yeah. It's an inconvenience, but as long as yumex handles the rest of
the daily updates correctly, I'm
On 05/06/2014 08:02 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/06/2014 12:26 AM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Hasn't anyone else come across the problem with a corrupted
current thunderbird-24.5.0-1.fc19.i686.rpm package in the updates
repository ?
Yeah. It's an inconvenience, but as long as yumex handles the rest
On 05/06/2014 12:49 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Shouldn't yum/rpm refuse to install if the MD5 checksum is wrong ?
Yes, I'd think that it should. Open a Bugzilla.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 06/05/14 04:37 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/06/2014 12:49 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Shouldn't yum/rpm refuse to install if the MD5 checksum is wrong ?
Yes, I'd think that it should. Open a Bugzilla.
One has been opened already.
--
When the rich get richer they get more powerful
and that
On 06/05/14 05:40 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
On 06/05/14 04:37 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/06/2014 12:49 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Shouldn't yum/rpm refuse to install if the MD5 checksum is wrong ?
Yes, I'd think that it should. Open a Bugzilla.
One has been opened already.
Just in case
On 05/06/2014 03:00 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
On 06/05/14 05:40 PM, Frank McCormick wrote:
On 06/05/14 04:37 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 05/06/2014 12:49 PM, Terry Barnaby wrote:
Shouldn't yum/rpm refuse to install if the MD5 checksum is wrong ?
Yes, I'd think that it should. Open a Bugzilla.
801 - 900 of 1785 matches
Mail list logo
