On Saturday 06 February 2010 05:44:07 Tim wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 12:37 -0500, William Case wrote:
I now find that Epiphany takes about 40 to 80 seconds to load a site
while Firefox is still almost instantaneous.
If you mentioned the site, someone may be able to look at it and say why
Hi;
On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 16:14 +1030, Tim wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 12:37 -0500, William Case wrote:
I now find that Epiphany takes about 40 to 80 seconds to load a site
while Firefox is still almost instantaneous.
If you mentioned the site, someone may be able to look at it and say
On Saturday 06 February 2010 11:32 AM, William Case wrote:
Hi;
On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 16:14 +1030, Tim wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 12:37 -0500, William Case wrote:
I now find that Epiphany takes about 40 to 80 seconds to load a site
while Firefox is still almost instantaneous.
If you
Hi;
Is there a way to use abrt to report bugs that do not involve an actual
crash of an application?
For example:
I use both Firefox and Epiphany as web browsers. Epiphany I reserved as
my Linux stuff browser because in the past it was so fast. Firefox (in
F12 Linux) I use for most media
On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 12:37 -0500, William Case wrote:
I now find that Epiphany takes about 40 to 80 seconds to load a site
while Firefox is still almost instantaneous.
If you mentioned the site, someone may be able to look at it and say why
that browser has problems. Otherwise, we're left
