Why SIGKILL signal not terminate a process?

2013-11-29 Thread Frantisek Hanzlik
On my Fedora 19 i686 I see weird thing - when killing processes (by commands as: killall -9 kactivitymanagerd killall -9 gam_server killall -9 kded4 killall -9 systemd killall -9 atril or with PID: kill -9 1 1322 10612 10619 ), then processes stay running - they are not zombies (for PID=1 be

Re: Why SIGKILL signal not terminate a process?

2013-11-29 Thread poma
On 29.11.2013 20:41, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: It is bad glibc signal() implementation or what else? What else. Bee awesome.:! poma -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: Why SIGKILL signal not terminate a process?

2013-11-29 Thread Mateusz Marzantowicz
On 29.11.2013 20:41, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: On my Fedora 19 i686 I see weird thing - when killing processes (by commands as: killall -9 kactivitymanagerd killall -9 gam_server killall -9 kded4 killall -9 systemd killall -9 atril or with PID: kill -9 1 1322 10612 10619 ), then

Re: Why SIGKILL signal not terminate a process?

2013-11-29 Thread Frantisek Hanzlik
Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: On 29.11.2013 20:41, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: On my Fedora 19 i686 I see weird thing - when killing processes (by commands as: killall -9 kactivitymanagerd killall -9 gam_server killall -9 kded4 killall -9 systemd killall -9 atril or with PID: kill -9 1

Re: Why SIGKILL signal not terminate a process?

2013-11-29 Thread Mateusz Marzantowicz
On 30.11.2013 00:10, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: Mateusz Marzantowicz wrote: On 29.11.2013 20:41, Frantisek Hanzlik wrote: On my Fedora 19 i686 I see weird thing - when killing processes (by commands as: killall -9 kactivitymanagerd killall -9 gam_server killall -9 kded4 killall -9 systemd