On 2020-04-22 21:47, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-23 08:31, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
You any good at shutdown problems?
Probably a good idea to start a new post on that subject if you're having
issues.
Just did: Slow down in operation and shutdown issue
On 2020-04-23 08:31, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> You any good at shutdown problems?
Probably a good idea to start a new post on that subject if you're having
issues.
--
The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions.
___
users mailing
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 6:57 PM ToddAndMargo via users
wrote:
On 2020-04-22 16:24, Roger Heflin wrote:
One question, it your os install on a spinning disk or on a ssd?
depending on how much a given rpm is touching it could take a long
time for some installs on spinning disks. I gave up
I have only bought Samsung or Crucial(micron) (prior to samsung really
being serious about ssd's), for home. Work buys from a large
enterprise vendor, who sources things from various ssd makers.
I have been putting a small unmirrored ssd in for OS and then whatever
else for the other one if you
On 2020-04-22 17:11, stan via users wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:11:56 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
It FINALLY went past that point and completed. Yippee!!
And
# dnf upgrade
went perfectly
And it even installed, wait for it, wait for it, Brave Browser
Thank you all for the
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 16:11:56 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> It FINALLY went past that point and completed. Yippee!!
>
> And
> # dnf upgrade
> went perfectly
>
> And it even installed, wait for it, wait for it, Brave Browser
>
> Thank you all for the help!
Great feeling when the
On 2020-04-22 16:24, Roger Heflin wrote:
One question, it your os install on a spinning disk or on a ssd?
depending on how much a given rpm is touching it could take a long
time for some installs on spinning disks. I gave up and just about
all of the machines I have have a 64gb ssd or larger
One question, it your os install on a spinning disk or on a ssd?
depending on how much a given rpm is touching it could take a long
time for some installs on spinning disks. I gave up and just about
all of the machines I have have a 64gb ssd or larger just so the
upgrades are nice and fast.
On
On 2020-04-22 15:24, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/22/20 3:00 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-22 14:43, Samuel Sieb wrote:
"ps -elf" will let you search by parent process. Try finding out
what the script is doing that is getting stuck.
Still jammed
# ps -elf | grep -i [d]nf
4 S root
On 4/22/20 3:00 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-22 14:43, Samuel Sieb wrote:
"ps -elf" will let you search by parent process. Try finding out what
the script is doing that is getting stuck.
Still jammed
# ps -elf | grep -i [d]nf
4 S root 8553 5032 7 80 0 - 167759 -
On 2020-04-22 14:43, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/22/20 2:40 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Jammed at the same point that started this all:
Upgrading : gimp-2:2.10.14-1.module_f30+6995+c35e2138.x86_
434/1470
Running scriptlet: selinux-policy-targeted-3.14.3-57.fc30.noarch
On 4/22/20 2:40 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Jammed at the same point that started this all:
Upgrading : gimp-2:2.10.14-1.module_f30+6995+c35e2138.x86_
434/1470
Running scriptlet: selinux-policy-targeted-3.14.3-57.fc30.noarch
435/1470
Reinstalling :
On 2020-04-22 14:28, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/22/20 2:25 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-22 14:22, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-22 14:18, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Did you see my earlier suggestion about using distro-sync from a
live boot? If it worked, it would be a lot
On 2020-04-22 14:26, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-22 14:24, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-22 14:21, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-22 14:03, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-22 13:42, stan via users wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:58:06 -0700
On 4/22/20 2:25 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-22 14:22, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-22 14:18, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Did you see my earlier suggestion about using distro-sync from a live
boot? If it worked, it would be a lot easier than trying to track
down a
On 4/22/20 2:24 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
I am running
#dnf remove --duplicates
right now. It has 523 to do
Careful, I have had some real bad results with that.
If dnf is working now, just use "distro-sync".
___
users mailing list --
On 2020-04-22 14:24, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-22 14:21, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-22 14:03, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-22 13:42, stan via users wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:58:06 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
[root@server dnf]# rpm -Uvf
On 2020-04-22 14:22, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-22 14:18, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Did you see my earlier suggestion about using distro-sync from a live
boot? If it worked, it would be a lot easier than trying to track
down a consistent set of rpms which might not even be the right
On 2020-04-22 14:21, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-22 14:03, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-22 13:42, stan via users wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:58:06 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
[root@server dnf]# rpm -Uvf *.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
On 2020-04-22 14:18, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Did you see my earlier suggestion about using distro-sync from a live
boot? If it worked, it would be a lot easier than trying to track down
a consistent set of rpms which might not even be the right ones. I
noticed pcre2 in the list of possible
On 2020-04-22 14:03, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-22 13:42, stan via users wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:58:06 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
[root@server dnf]# rpm -Uvf *.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
python3-dnf-plugins-core < 4.0.12 conflicts with
Did you see my earlier suggestion about using distro-sync from a live
boot? If it worked, it would be a lot easier than trying to track down
a consistent set of rpms which might not even be the right ones. I
noticed pcre2 in the list of possible problems from your verification
check. If you
On 2020-04-22 13:51, stan via users wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:42:46 -0700
stan via users wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:58:06 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
[root@server dnf]# rpm -Uvf *.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
python3-dnf-plugins-core < 4.0.12 conflicts with
On 2020-04-22 13:42, stan via users wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:58:06 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
[root@server dnf]# rpm -Uvf *.rpm
error: Failed dependencies:
python3-dnf-plugins-core < 4.0.12 conflicts with
dnf-4.2.18-1.fc30.noarch libsolv-devel(x86-64) >= 0.7.7 is needed
On 2020-04-22 13:32, Roger Heflin wrote:
I am guessing when it hung and you ctrl-c'ed
It did nto responce to numerous Ctrl-C's. I had
to ps and kill.
it that some packages
were installed but the cleanup's were not done yet (all installs are
done and then cleanups and other stuff). Some
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:42:46 -0700
stan via users wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:58:06 -0700
> ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>
> > [root@server dnf]# rpm -Uvf *.rpm
> > error: Failed dependencies:
> > python3-dnf-plugins-core < 4.0.12 conflicts with
> > dnf-4.2.18-1.fc30.noarch
On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 12:58:06 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> [root@server dnf]# rpm -Uvf *.rpm
> error: Failed dependencies:
> python3-dnf-plugins-core < 4.0.12 conflicts with
> dnf-4.2.18-1.fc30.noarch libsolv-devel(x86-64) >= 0.7.7 is needed by
> libdnf-devel-0.43.1-5.fc30.x86_64
I am guessing when it hung and you ctrl-c'ed it that some packages
were installed but the cleanup's were not done yet (all installs are
done and then cleanups and other stuff). Some weird things happen
when dnf gets aborted the wrong time.
This command would remove the dups (assuming you can
On 2020-04-22 12:59, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Some of those might go away when you have the right release, but
otherwise you might need to download the other dependencies or dependent
packages.
I made another post with the right release.
I think a few went away, but not many
On 4/22/20 12:46 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
[root@server dnf]# ls
dnf-4.2.21-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
dnf-automatic-4.2.21-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
dnf-data-4.2.21-1.fc31.noarch.rpm
libdnf-0.47.0-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm
libdnf-debuginfo-0.47.0-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm
libdnf-debugsource-0.47.0-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm
On 2020-04-22 07:34, stan via users wrote:
3. If that fails, go to
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1487421
and
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1487494
and download all the dnf and libdnf rpms that you have installed. Then,
in the directory where they
On 2020-04-22 12:47, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-22 07:34, stan via users wrote:
3. If that fails, go to
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1487421
and
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1487494
Just noticed these were for Fedora 31.
Do you
On 2020-04-22 07:34, stan via users wrote:
3. If that fails, go to
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1487421
and
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1487494
Just noticed these were for Fedora 31.
Do you have these for Fedora 30?
On 2020-04-22 07:34, stan via users wrote:
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 22:45:02 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
Hi All,
Fedora 30
How do I fix this?
# dnf upgrade --refresh --disablerepo=brave*
Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 2.9 kB/s | 16 kB
00:05
Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 -
I am picking an rpm at random, try this command:
rpm -qa | grep libsss_sudo (and any other rpm with conflicts).
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 1:11 PM Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 4/21/20 11:11 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> > On 2020-04-21 23:05, Ed Greshko wrote:
> >> On 2020-04-22 14:00,
On 4/21/20 11:11 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-21 23:05, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-22 14:00, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-21 22:55, Ed Greshko wrote:
rpm --rebuilddb
Hi Ed,
I happened after doing a
# dnf upgrade
and the upgrade froze for an hour on
On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 22:45:02 -0700
ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Fedora 30
>
> How do I fix this?
>
> # dnf upgrade --refresh --disablerepo=brave*
> Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 2.9 kB/s | 16 kB
> 00:05
> Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 - Updates 32
On 2020-04-22 01:10, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-22 14:11, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
# rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
return about 50 conflicts
Forgot to ask, what are the errors?
# rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
Unsatisfied dependencies for kernel-headers-5.5.16-100.fc30.x86_64:
On 2020-04-22 14:11, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> # rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest
>
> return about 50 conflicts
Forgot to ask, what are the errors?
--
The key to getting good answers is to ask good questions.
___
users mailing list --
On 2020-04-21 23:21, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-22 14:11, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-21 23:05, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-22 14:00, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-21 22:55, Ed Greshko wrote:
rpm --rebuilddb
Hi Ed,
I happened after doing a
# dnf upgrade
On 2020-04-22 14:11, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 2020-04-21 23:05, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> On 2020-04-22 14:00, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
>>> On 2020-04-21 22:55, Ed Greshko wrote:
rpm --rebuilddb
>>>
>>> Hi Ed,
>>>
>>> I happened after doing a
>>> # dnf upgrade
>>> and the
On 2020-04-21 23:05, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 2020-04-22 14:00, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 2020-04-21 22:55, Ed Greshko wrote:
rpm --rebuilddb
Hi Ed,
I happened after doing a
# dnf upgrade
and the upgrade froze for an hour on selinux policies
What did you do when it "froze"?
I
On 2020-04-22 14:00, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 2020-04-21 22:55, Ed Greshko wrote:
>> rpm --rebuilddb
>
> Hi Ed,
>
> I happened after doing a
> # dnf upgrade
> and the upgrade froze for an hour on selinux policies
What did you do when it "froze"?
>
> Now I get:
>
> # rpm --rebuilddb
On 2020-04-21 22:55, Ed Greshko wrote:
rpm --rebuilddb
Hi Ed,
I happened after doing a
# dnf upgrade
and the upgrade froze for an hour on selinux policies
Now I get:
# rpm --rebuilddb
# dnf upgrade --refresh --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=fedora
Fedora 30 - x86_64
On 2020-04-22 13:45, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Fedora 30
>
> How do I fix this?
>
> # dnf upgrade --refresh --disablerepo=brave*
> Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 2.9 kB/s | 16 kB 00:05
> Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 - Updates 32 kB/s | 14 kB 00:00
>
Hi All,
Fedora 30
How do I fix this?
# dnf upgrade --refresh --disablerepo=brave*
Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 2.9 kB/s | 16 kB
00:05
Fedora Modular 30 - x86_64 - Updates 32 kB/s | 14 kB
00:00
Fedora 30 - x86_64 - Updates 34 kB/s | 15 kB
46 matches
Mail list logo
