Am 11.09.2012 11:19, schrieb Sophie Sperner:
how to unsubscribe from this mail listing? Please leave me alone.
like from every other mailing-list on this world
* read the list-footer each message contgains
* read mail-headers
how did you manage to get subscribed?
the same way you unsubscribe
Am 07.04.2012 05:02, schrieb Charles Zeitler:
Do what thou wilt
shall be the whole of the Law.
not if you are generating thousands of mails
do what you will if it only affects you
oh, and after some verification i saw that
this is a childish footer on top
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:20 AM,
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 08:20, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
would you PLEASE send replies only back to the
list and ONLY to ONE incarnation of this list
the first To and the Cc are useless
in thunderbird you can even drag a reoply to list
button to your icon-bar that can handle
Am 07.04.2012 11:13, schrieb Fernando Cassia:
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 08:20, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
would you PLEASE send replies only back to the
list and ONLY to ONE incarnation of this list
the first To and the Cc are useless
in thunderbird you can even drag a reoply
On 7 April 2012 10:25, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 07.04.2012 11:13, schrieb Fernando Cassia:
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 08:20, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
would you PLEASE send replies only back to the
list and ONLY to ONE incarnation of this list
the first To
On 07/04/12 11:43, Sam Sharpe wrote:
The fix for this is to disable the old list address and bounce it with
a message indicating the correct new list address, instead of
forwarding it on to the real list address. It's been a while since the
list hosting was moved, perhaps now it's worth severing
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 10:51:53 +0200,
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
but at least i am talking to everybody who is not
aware how to use a mailprogram - i can not verify
if you are one of them because i do the work
removing duplicates in my mail-archive
If you don't want
Am 07.04.2012 15:24, schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 10:51:53 +0200,
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
but at least i am talking to everybody who is not
aware how to use a mailprogram - i can not verify
if you are one of them because i do the work
removing
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 15:38:29 +0200,
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 07.04.2012 15:24, schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 10:51:53 +0200,
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
but at least i am talking to everybody who is not
aware how to use a
Am 07.04.2012 15:50, schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
it is not the job of my mail-client repair mistakes of others
They are only mistakes in your mind. The normal way to reply is to use reply
all. This covers people who want to have their address in the recipient
headers so they can treat the
On 04/07/2012 04:50 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
it is not the job of my mail-client repair mistakes of others
They are only mistakes in your mind. The normal way to reply is to use
reply all
Completely wrong.
- The normal way to answer to all is reply all
- The normal way to answer on the
On 7 April 2012 14:57, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
really, as long you do not understand the headers in
a mail and the fact the no one needs multiple copies
of the same mails do not explain people the normal way
Scroll up a few messages. I've already stated that the problem was
Am 07.04.2012 16:04, schrieb Mihamina Rakotomandimby:
On 04/07/2012 04:50 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
it is not the job of my mail-client repair mistakes of others
They are only mistakes in your mind. The normal way to reply is to use
reply all
Completely wrong.
- The normal way to
Am 07.04.2012 16:48, schrieb Sam Sharpe:
On 7 April 2012 14:57, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
really, as long you do not understand the headers in
a mail and the fact the no one needs multiple copies
of the same mails do not explain people the normal way
Scroll up a few
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 10:51 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
oh, and after some verification i saw that
this is a childish footer on top
This guy is the only person I've seen in 20 years of using mailing lists
who puts his signature on top. At least other people's pet obsessions
are easier to
On 04/07/2012 11:22 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
This guy is the only person I've seen in 20 years of using mailing lists
who puts his signature on top. At least other people's pet obsessions
are easier to ignore; this one get in the way of every one of his posts.
I wonder when he'll realize
On 04/07/2012 08:22 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I wonder when he'll realize it's counter-productive.
Considering the anti-social nature of the quote, I rather doubt he cares.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 7 April 2012 15:52, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 07.04.2012 16:48, schrieb Sam Sharpe:
On 7 April 2012 14:57, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
really, as long you do not understand the headers in
a mail and the fact the no one needs multiple copies
of the
Am 07.04.2012 18:07, schrieb Sam Sharpe:
Ok, you're not getting this. Let me explain simply so that you
understand and we can end this tedious argument you seem to want to
spend a lot of effort on a weekend to perpetuate.
There were three email addresses in the reply:
1) The sender of
On 7 April 2012 17:21, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
some stuff
Hi,
You don't get my point; you seem to want to keep an argument going. I
don't understand why, but I know for certain you can't sustain an
argument on your own, so I'll just cut you off at this end. Have a
pleasant
On 04/08/2012 12:30 AM, Sam Sharpe wrote:
On 7 April 2012 17:21, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
some stuff
Hi,
You don't get my point; you seem to want to keep an argument going. I
don't understand why, but I know for certain you can't sustain an
argument on your own, so I'll
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Sam Sharpe lists.red...@samsharpe.net wrote:
The fix for this is to disable the old list address and bounce it with
a message indicating the correct new list address, instead of
forwarding it on to the real list address. It's been a while since the
list hosting
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 18:21:09 +0200,
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
because i get often enough mails twice as reply
and i can not remember that i configured anything
in a way imply that i want this
I already told you how to do that. You either have your email client
send a
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 00:35:25 +0800,
Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
I would lobby the fedora list managers to deactivate the fedora-l...@redhat.com
address and return an error message to anyone sending to that list address.
Everyone who has expressed an opinion in this thread
On 04/08/2012 12:41 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Sam Sharpe lists.red...@samsharpe.net wrote:
The fix for this is to disable the old list address and bounce it with
a message indicating the correct new list address, instead of
forwarding it on to the real list
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
On 04/08/2012 12:41 AM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Sam Sharpe lists.red...@samsharpe.net
wrote:
The fix for this is to disable the old list address and bounce it with
a message indicating
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 18:21 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
register on a mailing-list usually means people
are sending and replying to the list-adress and
that there is no reason for reply all
there is no i want mails twice setting
so nobody can imply reply all is the right action
just
Am 07.04.2012 19:31, schrieb Craig White:
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 18:21 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
register on a mailing-list usually means people
are sending and replying to the list-adress and
that there is no reason for reply all
there is no i want mails twice setting
so nobody can
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 17:07 +0100, Sam Sharpe wrote:
Fernando has the
same on his Gmail I would guess, so he didn't hit Reply to All - he
has no such option.
Actually Gmail has both Reply and Reply to All. What it doesn't have is
Reply to List. That's one reason I access my lists via
Am 07.04.2012 20:21, schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 17:07 +0100, Sam Sharpe wrote:
Fernando has the
same on his Gmail I would guess, so he didn't hit Reply to All - he
has no such option.
Actually Gmail has both Reply and Reply to All. What it doesn't have is
Reply to
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 21:04:38 +0200,
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
well, reply is enough to act correct
each list-message has a Reply-To-header
No each list doesn't have that. Many Fedora lists do. Doing this (lists
munging reply-to headers) is also a bad idea, as it breaks
Am 07.04.2012 21:08, schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 21:04:38 +0200,
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
well, reply is enough to act correct
each list-message has a Reply-To-header
No each list doesn't have that. Many Fedora lists do.
so what, we are
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 21:20:31 +0200,
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
set reply-to headers is for people who are unable for
reply-to-list by their bad mail-program or ignorance
Not exactly. The reason people started doing this as people were meaning
to reply to list messages,
Am 07.04.2012 21:27, schrieb Bruno Wolff III:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 21:20:31 +0200,
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
set reply-to headers is for people who are unable for
reply-to-list by their bad mail-program or ignorance
Not exactly. The reason people started doing this
On 2012/04/07 10:55, Reindl Harald wrote:
correct, but there will always be Reindl, you are a useful
new users which are not member of this list. Please
realizing that they are doing drop this nonsense so this
something wrong and they can
{^_^} (With malice aforethought.)
partly understood what they are doing
wrong that they do not
the only childish things are funny replies like yours
i only try to explain how to use really simple things
like a mailing list and how to use a mailprogram
if this is a problem for you i can not really help you
On 7 April 2012 19:21, Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 17:07 +0100, Sam Sharpe wrote:
Fernando has the
same on his Gmail I would guess, so he didn't hit Reply to All - he
has no such option.
Actually Gmail has both Reply and Reply to All. What it
On 7 April 2012 20:04, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
well, reply is enough to act correct
each list-message has a Reply-To-header
so everyone even with gmail must be ignorant to
say it is not the fault of the user
-
X-BeenThere: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Am 07.04.2012 23:41, schrieb Sam Sharpe:
Fascinating as these headers are, lets look back at the headers of the
message Fernando replied to and you called him out for bad etiquette:
To: Fedora List fedora-l...@redhat.com
Reply-To: p...@pricom.com.au,
Community support for Fedora
Am 07.04.2012 23:41, schrieb Sam Sharpe:
Fascinating as these headers are, lets look back at the headers of the
message Fernando replied to and you called him out for bad etiquette:
To: Fedora List fedora-l...@redhat.com
Reply-To: p...@pricom.com.au,
Community support for Fedora
On 7 April 2012 23:03, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
so no, you can not impress me with any reference and the fact that
you stil do not understand why reply all is idiotic (to say it clear)
shows that you are one more of the big but failing
At no point have I discussed whether
Am 08.04.2012 00:28, schrieb Sam Sharpe:
All I want is for you to agree that you were wrong to make that
initial personal accusation and to get on with you life, stop name
dropping Wietse and grow up, you are 34 years old, so start acting it.
I only dropped my credentials in there because
On 7 April 2012 23:36, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 08.04.2012 00:28, schrieb Sam Sharpe:
All I want is for you to agree that you were wrong to make that
initial personal accusation and to get on with you life, stop name
dropping Wietse and grow up, you are 34 years old, so
Am 08.04.2012 00:47, schrieb Sam Sharpe:
On 7 April 2012 23:36, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
Am 08.04.2012 00:28, schrieb Sam Sharpe:
All I want is for you to agree that you were wrong to make that
initial personal accusation and to get on with you life, stop name
dropping
On 7 April 2012 23:56, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
so may have not - but the will even not if you paint
them a picture - so hwat exactly is your danmed problem?
I've been trying to work out what your problem is all day, you started
this thread, not me. You could have ended it
On 4/7/2012 6:03 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.04.2012 23:41, schrieb Sam Sharpe:
Fascinating as these headers are, lets look back at the headers
of the message Fernando replied to and you called him out for bad
etiquette:
To: Fedora List fedora-l...@redhat.com Reply-To:
On 04/07/2012 03:47 PM, Sam Sharpe wrote:
Changing
the subject has little relevance to how mail clients thread the
messages. But then I'm guessing you're going to say that's wrong too.
Not everybody has their mail client thread messages. Personally, I've
always preferred to read them in
On 04/07/2012 07:20 PM, David wrote:
Honest to goodness people!
There are some people that will never let the truth, the facts, or
reality interfere with what they have been told to believe.
Ah! So this is where you've been hiding. Just in lurk mode, I
re-subscribed just to see how
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 22:20 +0100, Sam Sharpe wrote:
On 7 April 2012 19:21, Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 17:07 +0100, Sam Sharpe wrote:
Fernando has the
same on his Gmail I would guess, so he didn't hit Reply to All - he
has no such option.
would you PLEASE send replies only back to the
list and ONLY to ONE incarnation of this list
everybody receive your messages twice and the
people you answer THREE times - this is really
a bad mailing-style wasting space and bandwith
the first To and the Cc are useless
in thunderbird you can even
Do what thou wilt
shall be the whole of the Law.
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
would you PLEASE send replies only back to the
list and ONLY to ONE incarnation of this list
are _you_ talkin' to _me_ ?
charles zeitler
Love is the law, love
51 matches
Mail list logo
