Re: IFCONFIG

On Sun, 2016-08-21 at 11:59 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote: > Where do you get the gigabit from? Misread the data... -- tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp Linux 3.19.8-100.fc20.i686 #1 SMP Tue May 12 17:42:35 UTC 2015 i686 All mail to my mailbox is automatically deleted, there is no point trying to

Re: IFCONFIG

On 08/20/2016 08:29 AM, Tim wrote: Allegedly, on or about 20 August 2016, Angelo Moreschini sent: wlp3s0: flags=4163 mtu 1500 inet 10.0.0.4 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.0.0.255 inet6 fe80::d253:49ff:fe32:3254 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20 ether

Re: IFCONFIG

gt; in order to use the ssh services, I looked for the internet address of > > my computer, and the ifconfig command gave the following output that I > > have difficulty 'to interpret : > > > > --- > > > > [angelo_dev@localhost ~]$ sudo ifconfig > > >

Re: IFCONFIG

Allegedly, on or about 20 August 2016, Angelo Moreschini sent: > enp4s0: flags=4099 mtu 1500 > ether 60:02:92:2d:2a:1f txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) Going by the device name, enp4s0 would be wired ethernet, but not in use (because it had no assigned addresses, that string of

Re: IFCONFIG

Le 20/08/2016 12:09, Angelo Moreschini a écrit : > Hi, > > in order to use the ssh services, I looked for the internet address of > my computer, and the ifconfig command gave the following output that I > have difficulty 'to interpret : > > --- > > [an

Re: IFCONFIG

hi enp4s0 is wire NIC and wlp3s0 is wireless NIC On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Angelo Moreschini < mrangelo.fed...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > in order to use the ssh services, I looked for the internet address of my > computer, and the ifconfig command gave the follo

Re: IFCONFIG

Den 2016-08-20 kl. 12:09, skrev Angelo Moreschini: > Hi, > > in order to use the ssh services, I looked for the internet address of > my computer, and the ifconfig command gave the following output that I > have difficulty 'to interpret : > > --- > > [an

IFCONFIG

Hi, in order to use the ssh services, I looked for the internet address of my computer, and the ifconfig command gave the following output that I have difficulty 'to interpret : --- [angelo_dev@localhost ~]$ sudo ifconfig enp4s0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 ether

ifconfig

Hello, I am using a 3G connection, ie ppp0 I wish to have information about this interface (by using ifconfig) when I connect and disconnect to the network. However, when it disconnect the network, the interface is already gone when I make the ifconfig. I use /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d

Re: [UPDATED:] Re: confusion on /sbin/ifconfig on F16

Once upon a time, Paul Allen Newell pnew...@cs.cmu.edu said: Problem is solved as far as I am concerned, even though I am certain there is probably some way to get a unique token. Since my goal is to get the machine up and running so I can be a user on it, I learned from all the material

Re: [UPDATED:] Re: confusion on /sbin/ifconfig on F16

on my part or a potential problem I have three F16 machines, one x86_64 and two i383/686. If I run /sbin/ifconfig on them, I get (short summary of): x86_64: eth0 i686: em1 Looking in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts, I can see only ifcfg-em1 and no ifcfg-eth0 on all the machines (x86_64 and i686

Re: [UPDATED:] Re: confusion on /sbin/ifconfig on F16

Am 27.05.2012 14:59, schrieb Bill Davidsen: The problem with naming is that for every server run by experienced sysadmins experienced sysadmins should not have a problem to open /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules and define eth0 SUBSYSTEM==net, ACTION==add, DRIVERS==?*,

Re: [UPDATED:] Re: confusion on /sbin/ifconfig on F16

On 05/27/2012 08:59 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote: I really want to be able to put any card in any slot and match the label on the cable to the label on the NIC, and have scripts which don't have to be needlessly complex to discover the name of the interface OK, but you do realize that you are

Re: [UPDATED:] Re: confusion on /sbin/ifconfig on F16

On Sun, 27 May 2012 23:39:06 +0800 Ed Greshko wrote: If, for example, you (or someone who works for you) change a network card whose cable was labeled eth0 you will need to remember to edit the 70-persistent-net.rules. That always seemed dumb to me. It can tell (or make a good guess) if the

Re: [UPDATED:] Re: confusion on /sbin/ifconfig on F16

On 5/27/2012 5:59 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote: I think he wants the single, known interface to have a single known name, and not some random characters determined by the whichness of what. Bill (and Reindl, Ed, and Tom who replied to Bill): Thanks for the addition comments. The statement

Re: [UPDATED:] Re: confusion on /sbin/ifconfig on F16

issue. All that aside If you have a system with a single interface you can always do [egreshko@meimei test]$ /sbin/ifconfig | grep 'inet ' | grep -v '127.0.0.1' | cut -d : -f 2 | awk '{ print $1}' 192.168.0.18 Ed: With all due respect, its become clear to me that ifconfig is obsolete

Re: [UPDATED:] Re: confusion on /sbin/ifconfig on F16

on system architecture. That seems to be your main issue. All that aside If you have a system with a single interface you can always do [egreshko@meimei test]$ /sbin/ifconfig | grep 'inet ' | grep -v '127.0.0.1' | cut -d : -f 2 | awk '{ print $1}' 192.168.0.18 Ed: With all

Re: [UPDATED:] Re: confusion on /sbin/ifconfig on F16

On 5/22/2012 11:33 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: Maybe the question you should be asking is this? I don't like the names that have been assigned to my network interfaces. How can I change them to be what I want them to be? Ed: Okay, that's a good question that I hadn't considered. So do you happen

Re: [UPDATED:] Re: confusion on /sbin/ifconfig on F16

On 05/23/2012 02:46 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote: Okay, that's a good question that I hadn't considered. So do you happen to know how to change the names? No. Not something that I've needed or wanted to do. -- Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on

Re: [UPDATED:] Re: confusion on /sbin/ifconfig on F16

Am 23.05.2012 08:17, schrieb Paul Allen Newell: With all due respect, its become clear to me that ifconfig is obsolete and a solution which uses it doesn't have a future. Can you try to get the ip address with command ip on a i686 and x86_64 system without having to run a different

Re: [UPDATED:] Re: confusion on /sbin/ifconfig on F16

On 5/23/2012 1:07 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: edit /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules (ONE LINE, replace MAC with yours) SUBSYSTEM==net, ACTION==add, DRIVERS==?*, ATTR{address}==00:50:56:bd:00:27, ATTR{dev_id}==0x0, ATTR{type}==1, KERNEL==eth*, NAME=eth0 __ this

Re: confusion on /sbin/ifconfig on F16

On 05/22/2012 09:12 PM, Paul Allen Newell wrote: Hello: As I continue dealing with iptables, another issue has come up that I can't tell is a mis-understanding on my part or a potential problem I have three F16 machines, one x86_64 and two i383/686. If I run /sbin/ifconfig on them, I get

Re: confusion on /sbin/ifconfig on F16

[comments inline] On 5/23/2012 1:53 PM, Phil Meyer wrote: Just to add fuel to the fire: Soon more and more systems will have UEFI as well as, or instead of the old BIOS. On most newer sever class systems, the traditional BIOS is *emulated* in the EUFI. The EUFI, and, therefore, newer

[UPDATED:] Re: confusion on /sbin/ifconfig on F16

x86_64 and two i383/686. If I run /sbin/ifconfig on them, I get (short summary of): x86_64: eth0 i686: em1 Looking in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts, I can see only ifcfg-em1 and no ifcfg-eth0 on all the machines (x86_64 and i686). The closest bugzilla I can see if 784314 but it looks like

Re: [UPDATED:] Re: confusion on /sbin/ifconfig on F16

or a potential problem I have three F16 machines, one x86_64 and two i383/686. If I run /sbin/ifconfig on them, I get (short summary of): x86_64: eth0 i686: em1 Looking in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts, I can see only ifcfg-em1 and no ifcfg-eth0 on all the machines (x86_64 and i686

Re: [UPDATED:] Re: confusion on /sbin/ifconfig on F16

this? [egreshko@meimei net]$ /sbin/ifconfig p128p1 | grep 'inet ' | cut -d : -f 2 | awk '{ print $1}' 192.168.0.18 Maybe if you posted the output of commands on your system and asked questions based on the output it would make more senseat least to me. Ed: Thanks for reply. First problem

Re: [UPDATED:] Re: confusion on /sbin/ifconfig on F16

]$ /sbin/ifconfig | grep 'inet ' | grep -v '127.0.0.1' | cut -d : -f 2 | awk '{ print $1}' 192.168.0.18 -- Never be afraid to laugh at yourself, after all, you could be missing out on the joke of the century. -- Dame Edna Everage -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org

Resetting network devices between ifconfig level and desktop level

I have got inconsistent eth devices between what Fedora Gnome Desktop is telling me and what ifconfig is telling me and what 'service network restart' is telling me. Do I have to do a reinstall or is there some way of resetting things ? Many thanks in advance, Aaron -- users mailing list users

ralink rt3070 802.x driver, ifconfig, arp

count. Also, two device interfaces, eth0 and ra0 calculate two different broadcast addresses even when given the exact same netmask and ip address? (as reported by ifconfig). Are these computed by the kernel or the driver? Anyone seen something similar in the past? Thank You Fred Farleigh