On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 21:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
Antonio Olivares olivares14...@yahoo.com wrote:
snip
Could show me how to set the paths correctly on a default
LXDE F-15
install? Thanks.
--
In ~/ your home directory create a file ~/.bash_profile if it does
not exist, or edit it if it
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 05:40, nomnex nom...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:46:26 +0100
Piscium grok...@gmail.com wrote:
It is also possible to download it. I did that last week (TexLive 2011
from upstream via mirror). It was straightforward, the only special
thing needed is to set
On 30 March 2012 02:11, Antonio Olivares olivares14...@yahoo.com wrote:
If I want some real work done, I just install TeXLive from DVD and I am good
to go.
It is also possible to download it. I did that last week (TexLive 2011
from upstream via mirror). It was straightforward, the only
--- On Fri, 3/30/12, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
From: Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu
Subject: Re: in case you did not know about kerTeX distribution
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Friday, March 30, 2012, 8:56 PM
Antonio Olivares wrote:
``The packaging and patents
You can have texlive 2011 if you like:
[texlive]
name=TeX Live
baseurl=http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2011/packages.fc16/
enabled=1
metadata_expire=1d
gpgcheck=0
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
--- On Sat, 3/31/12, Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Neal Becker ndbeck...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: in case you did not know about kerTeX distribution
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Saturday, March 31, 2012, 8:33 AM
You can have texlive 2011 if you
like:
[texlive
Antonio Olivares wrote:
I know that, but it* is unofficial :(, it is crippled*, it is = official
TeXLive :(, It will be because of patents*
You continue to make the assertion that fedora's (official or unofficial)
texlive is crippled, particularly due to patents.
Can you provide details or
Matthew Saltzman wrote:
On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 03:30 -0700, Antonio Olivares wrote:
KerTeX is not the one being reviewed or is it?
KerTeX is just another packaging of all the components that have been
collected around TeX and LaTeX. It's not the packaging that's of
concern here, it's the
On 03/31/2012 11:54 AM, Rex Dieter wrote:
Exactly, and in particular, any complaint about items removed from texlive
due to this would apply equally to any KerTeX fedora packaging as well.
One thought: is it important that you use TeX or just that you be able
to format/typeset long documents,
--- On Sat, 3/31/12, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
From: Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu
Subject: Re: in case you did not know about kerTeX distribution
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Saturday, March 31, 2012, 11:53 AM
Antonio Olivares wrote:
I know
Hi Rex,
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 20:53, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
You continue to make the assertion that fedora's (official or unofficial)
texlive is crippled, particularly due to patents.
Can you provide details or evidence of that?
I use the TeXLive DVD because among other
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 23:48, suvayu ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Rex,
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 20:53, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
You continue to make the assertion that fedora's (official or unofficial)
texlive is crippled, particularly due to patents.
Can you
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:46:26 +0100
Piscium grok...@gmail.com wrote:
It is also possible to download it. I did that last week (TexLive 2011
from upstream via mirror). It was straightforward, the only special
thing needed is to set the paths, and the install tool at the very end
helpfully
It is also possible to download it. I did that last
week (TexLive 2011
from upstream via mirror). It was straightforward, the
only special
thing needed is to set the paths, and the install tool
at the very end
helpfully reminds one to do it.
When installing from the DVD, the setup
Antonio Olivares wrote:
``The packaging and patents are issues that hold TeXLive in Fedora back''
Imo, this is a mischaracterization. Read for yourself:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Features/TeXLiveLegalAudit#Why_and_how_to_do_a_legal_audit.3F
-- rex
--
users mailing list
Antonio Olivares wrote:
Since Fedora still uses texlive2007 on fedora[except the ones using
texlive-repos by J Novy
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/TeXLive ]
The packaging and patents are issues that hold TeXLive in Fedora back.
KerTEX is BSD licensed and has no such issues.
Are
--- On Thu, 3/29/12, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
From: Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu
Subject: Re: in case you did not know about kerTeX distribution
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Thursday, March 29, 2012, 4:22 PM
Antonio Olivares wrote:
Since Fedora still uses
@all who have tried to install kerTeX and have failed, what is needed?
1) make sure that Development Tools is installed, if it is not then, as root
user
# yum groupinstall Development Tools
2) install flex-static, flex and bison are installed but libl.a, or libfl.a are
not in /usr/lib/ or
--- On Tue, 3/27/12, Antonio Olivares olivares14...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Antonio Olivares olivares14...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: in case you did not know about kerTeX distribution
To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Tuesday, March 27, 2012, 4:23 PM
Dear folks,
This is an FYI, there is a new lightweight simple TeX/LaTeX distrubution called
KerTeX.
http://www.kergis.com/en/kertex.html
It is lightweight, requires few things like bison, flex, ed, lftp, all of which
are available in Fedora. It does not have pdflatex, pdftex, dvipdfm,
2012/3/14, Antonio Olivares olivares14...@yahoo.com:
NOTES:
User texifies, latexifies file, tex filename.tex, latex filename.tex, then
runs
$ dvips -o filename.dvi filename.ps
You probably meant
dvips -o filename.ps filename.dvi
or
$ dvips -t letter filename.dvi filename.ps
then can
--- On Wed, 3/14/12, Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Andras Simon sza...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: in case you did not know about kerTeX distribution
To: Community support for Fedora users users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Date: Wednesday, March 14, 2012, 11:42 AM
2012/3/14, Antonio
2012/3/14, Antonio Olivares olivares14...@yahoo.com:
$ ps2pdf filename.ps
ps2pdf filename.ps filename.pdf
In this case,
$ psd2pdf filename.ps
will work by itself unless you want to give (output pdf) a new name
$ ps2pdf filename.ps other-name.pdf
I didn't know that! (Well, yes,
23 matches
Mail list logo
