Hi mark.
I have a series of php apps that are async, and modify different tbls
within a mysql db. The php apps also perform other tasks as well.
The process needs to be able to periodically run the php apps. The
shell scripts are used to run the individual php apps. During testing,
I wanted to
On 03/27/2012 10:35 PM, bruce wrote:
Hi mark.
I have a series of php apps that are async, and modify different tbls
within a mysql db. The php apps also perform other tasks as well.
The process needs to be able to periodically run the php apps. The
shell scripts are used to run the individual
I solved a similar problem by installing gnu parallel on my system.
It did everything that I wanted, and better than I would have coded.
Ali
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Mark LaPierre marklap...@aol.com wrote:
Check out the redirection at the end of each command. 12 redirects
the
On 3/28/2012 4:39 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Mark LaPierre marklap...@aol.com
wrote:
Check out the redirection at the end of each command. 12 redirects
the standard out of your child command to the standard error which then
appears in the parent shell.
Is
On 03/29/2012 11:15 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 3/28/2012 4:39 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Mark LaPierre marklap...@aol.com wrote:
Check out the redirection at the end of each command. 12 redirects
the standard out of your child command to the standard
On 3/28/2012 8:27 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/29/2012 11:15 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 3/28/2012 4:39 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Mark LaPierremarklap...@aol.com wrote:
Check out the redirection at the end of each command. 12 redirects
the standard out
On 03/29/2012 11:33 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
I've done enough googles to be pretty certain I was right (as your link does
confirm), but I was asking for a confirm of what knew. Too much reading this
thread
of 21 and making myself confused.
That being said, your suggested link does give
On 3/28/2012 8:43 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/29/2012 11:33 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
I've done enough googles to be pretty certain I was right (as your link does
confirm), but I was asking for a confirm of what knew. Too much reading this
thread
of 21 and making myself confused.
That
On 03/29/2012 11:47 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
I apologize for taking up the bandwidth by asking,
Yeah, it does some like a waste of bandwidth to ask questions to which you
already
know the answer and then have it read by hundreds of people that may feel
they want
to answer and
On 3/28/2012 8:53 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 03/29/2012 11:47 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
I apologize for taking up the bandwidth by asking,
Yeah, it does some like a waste of bandwidth to ask questions to which you
already
know the answer and then have it read by hundreds of people that may
hi.
got a couple of test bash scripts.
dog.sh, cat.sh
each script runs the underlying php in an endless loop.
I'm trying to figure out how to run the scripts in parallel, from the
same parent shell script. something like:
test.sh
dog.sh 2
cat.sh 2
where dog.sh would be :
W dniu 27.03.2012 23:25, bruce pisze:
hi.
got a couple of test bash scripts.
dog.sh, cat.sh
each script runs the underlying php in an endless loop.
I'm trying to figure out how to run the scripts in parallel, from the
same parent shell script. something like:
test.sh
dog.sh 2
HI Mateusz
Yeah, tried the basic ... but the issue is the shell scripts run
as infinite loops.. and therefore, the dog.sh doesn't really
exit/complete.
So I can't really run them sequentially.
If I open up separate term/windows, then of course, I can manually run
them (one in each window)..
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 05:25:56PM -0400, bruce wrote:
got a couple of test bash scripts.
...
I'm trying to figure out how to run the scripts in parallel, from the
same parent shell script. something like:
Have you tried
nohup cat.sh 21
nohup dog.sh 21
Cheers,
--
Dave Ihnat
--
hey dave...
anyway i can redirect the err/out to the stdout.. instead of the
nohut.out file??
it appears that the processes are running in the ps tb.. the nohut.out
file also has input/data..
i'd like to be able to see the output of the processes scroll on the
term/screen if possible
thanks
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 06:06:56PM -0400, bruce wrote:
anyway i can redirect the err/out to the stdout.. instead of the
nohut.out file??
The usual way would be to do a tail -f on the output file, e.g.,
nohup cat.sh 21 cat.log
tail -f cat.log
If you're using bash, IIRC, you could reap the
dave..
thanks.
but the script is a long running script, and i want to see the output
as the script is running without having to hit the keyboard..
so doing a tail of the file while the process is running isn't what
i'm looking for.
anything else?
thanks
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Dave
On 03/27/2012 04:06 PM, bruce wrote:
dave..
thanks.
but the script is a long running script, and i want to see the output
as the script is running without having to hit the keyboard..
so doing a tail of the file while the process is running isn't what
i'm looking for.
anything else?
The
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 01:06, bruce badoug...@gmail.com wrote:
but the script is a long running script, and i want to see the output
as the script is running without having to hit the keyboard..
I'm not sure what you mean. Do you mean to say you want to run the
script and start seeing the
On 03/27/2012 05:25 PM, bruce wrote:
hi.
got a couple of test bash scripts.
dog.sh, cat.sh
each script runs the underlying php in an endless loop.
I'm trying to figure out how to run the scripts in parallel, from the
same parent shell script. something like:
test.sh
where dog.sh would be :
hey rick...
haven't talked to you in a very long time!
--
i tried the nohup, but couldn't get it to work because of the fact
that my processes have infinite loops.. so my test never got beyond
running the 1st test shell script that's running an infinite loop...
i can do a paste of what i'm
On 03/27/2012 09:37 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
Check out the redirection at the end of each command. 12 redirects the
standard out of your child command to the standard error which then
appears in the parent shell. At the end the last launches your command
into a background shell and then moves
I don't understand what you are trying to do.
Do you want to run these commands in series? Run one, wait for it to
complete, then start the other?
If that's where you want to go then leave off the trailing ampersand but
keep the redirection. The output of the first program will appear in
On 27Mar2012 17:56, Rick Stevens rstev...@corp.alldigital.com wrote:
| On 03/27/2012 04:06 PM, bruce wrote:
| The problem is that a script wants a stdin, stdout and stderr.
No evidence so far that they use stdin.
| If
| you're going to run them in parallel, you can't very well have both
|
24 matches
Mail list logo
