Re: procmail testing

2014-01-23 Thread Frank Murphy
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:20:36 -0800 Rick Stevens wrote: > You'd need to modify the job that cron runs to send out the email when > it's complete. Yes, it's bitten me in the past. or go outside the box: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/cronwrap The openSUSE rpm installed (here) without a hitch) __

Re: procmail testing

2014-01-22 Thread Rick Stevens
On 01/22/2014 02:44 PM, Robert Moskowitz issued this missive: On 01/22/2014 02:09 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 01/22/14 23:37, Robert Moskowitz wrote: So you are correct that the formail is needed, as the reader does not have a date to show on displaying the message. It does use the date in the f

Re: procmail testing

2014-01-22 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 01/22/2014 02:09 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 01/22/14 23:37, Robert Moskowitz wrote: So you are correct that the formail is needed, as the reader does not have a date to show on displaying the message. It does use the date in the first 'From ' line for the list of messages, and that mislead

Re: procmail testing

2014-01-22 Thread Ed Greshko
On 01/22/14 23:37, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > So you are correct that the formail is needed, as the reader does not have a > date to show on displaying the message. It does use the date in the first > 'From ' line for the list of messages, and that mislead me yesterday. > > But I am having a prob

Re: procmail testing

2014-01-22 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 01/21/2014 02:06 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 01/22/14 03:37, Robert Moskowitz wrote: So I changed the run time to 11am, and procmail DID drop something into /var/spool/mail/rgm, but mutt says it is not a valid mailbox. I have emailed one of my smtp oldtimers for help, but meanwhile here is wh

Re: procmail testing

2014-01-21 Thread Garry T. Williams
On 1-21-14 11:37:25 Robert Moskowitz wrote: > So I changed the run time to 11am, and procmail DID drop something into > /var/spool/mail/rgm, but mutt says it is not a valid mailbox. I have > emailed one of my smtp oldtimers for help, but meanwhile here is what is > going into my mail (anyone see an

Re: procmail testing

2014-01-21 Thread Joe Zeff
On 01/21/2014 03:43 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: (I had plenty of time during the last session; the chair was developing his PAR 'live' on the projector. Bad use of a lot of people's time.) I trust that you use the classic method of deciding who the moderator is for any panel discussion: if y

Re: procmail testing

2014-01-21 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 01/21/2014 03:33 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 01/22/14 07:27, Robert Moskowitz wrote: The following seems to work: # cat /etc/sysconfig/crond # Settings for the CRON daemon. # CRONDARGS= : any extra command-line startup arguments for crond CRONDARGS=-m "/usr/bin/procmail -f cron" This produce

Re: procmail testing

2014-01-21 Thread Ed Greshko
On 01/22/14 07:27, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > The following seems to work: > > # cat /etc/sysconfig/crond > # Settings for the CRON daemon. > # CRONDARGS= : any extra command-line startup arguments for crond > CRONDARGS=-m "/usr/bin/procmail -f cron" > > This produced a valid mailbox. At least so

Re: procmail testing

2014-01-21 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 01/21/2014 02:06 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 01/22/14 03:37, Robert Moskowitz wrote: So I changed the run time to 11am, and procmail DID drop something into /var/spool/mail/rgm, but mutt says it is not a valid mailbox. I have emailed one of my smtp oldtimers for help, but meanwhile here is wh

Re: procmail testing

2014-01-21 Thread Joe Zeff
On 01/21/2014 02:51 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 01/21/2014 02:40 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 01/21/2014 02:29 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: yes. One of my favorite user ids. I have a few others, like 'abba', but I like rgm, as I grew up with it. :) Just to be obscure, do you ever use "emah"

Re: procmail testing

2014-01-21 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 01/21/2014 02:40 PM, Joe Zeff wrote: On 01/21/2014 02:29 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: yes. One of my favorite user ids. I have a few others, like 'abba', but I like rgm, as I grew up with it. :) Just to be obscure, do you ever use "emah" as a user ID? My wife uses 'imma' as one of her

Re: procmail testing

2014-01-21 Thread Joe Zeff
On 01/21/2014 02:29 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: yes. One of my favorite user ids. I have a few others, like 'abba', but I like rgm, as I grew up with it. :) Just to be obscure, do you ever use "emah" as a user ID? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change

Re: procmail testing

2014-01-21 Thread Ed Greshko
On 01/22/14 06:23, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I have read the post, but the fact that the result would not be a valid > mailbox escaped me. The line above works. I will have to figure out what to > put in /etc/sysconfig/crond. Meanwhile, I posted this issue to the procmail > list to see if any

Re: procmail testing

2014-01-21 Thread Tony Nelson
On 14-01-21 14:37:25, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > On 01/21/2014 08:49 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: ... > > ls -l /var/spool/mail/ > > total 4 > > -rw-rw. 1 rgm mail 663 Jan 21 08:19 rgm > > -rw-rw. 1 rpc mail 0 Jan 6 07:03 rpc ... > From: "(Cron Daemon)" > To: rgm ... Are you logge

Re: procmail testing

2014-01-21 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 01/21/2014 02:21 PM, Tony Nelson wrote: On 14-01-21 14:37:25, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 01/21/2014 08:49 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: ... ls -l /var/spool/mail/ total 4 -rw-rw. 1 rgm mail 663 Jan 21 08:19 rgm -rw-rw. 1 rpc mail 0 Jan 6 07:03 rpc ... From: "(Cron Daemon)"

Re: procmail testing

2014-01-21 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 01/21/2014 02:06 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 01/22/14 03:37, Robert Moskowitz wrote: So I changed the run time to 11am, and procmail DID drop something into /var/spool/mail/rgm, but mutt says it is not a valid mailbox. I have emailed one of my smtp oldtimers for help, but meanwhile here is wh

Re: procmail testing

2014-01-21 Thread Ed Greshko
On 01/22/14 03:37, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > So I changed the run time to 11am, and procmail DID drop something into > /var/spool/mail/rgm, but mutt says it is not a valid mailbox. I have emailed > one of my smtp oldtimers for help, but meanwhile here is what is going into > my mail (anyone see

Re: procmail testing

2014-01-21 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 01/21/2014 08:49 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 01/21/2014 08:39 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote: On 21.01.2014, Robert Moskowitz wrote: cat d1.letter |procmail You can also re-run existing mails through the whole system, e.g. by piping the mail into "formail -ds | procmail". You can do that in mu

Re: procmail testing

2014-01-21 Thread Robert Moskowitz
On 01/21/2014 08:39 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote: On 21.01.2014, Robert Moskowitz wrote: cat d1.letter |procmail You can also re-run existing mails through the whole system, e.g. by piping the mail into "formail -ds | procmail". You can do that in mutt by pressing the "|" and writing the command in

Re: procmail testing

2014-01-21 Thread Heinz Diehl
On 21.01.2014, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > cat d1.letter |procmail You can also re-run existing mails through the whole system, e.g. by piping the mail into "formail -ds | procmail". You can do that in mutt by pressing the "|" and writing the command in the field which opened up. > So what is mi

procmail testing

2014-01-21 Thread Robert Moskowitz
From old message: On 12/30/2013 06:50 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: First of all, let me reiterate one thing. "sendmail" does not do local delivery by itself. It relies on another program to do this. In the default configuration (sendmail.mc) on Fedora it is defined to use procmail for local deli