On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 19:37:28 -0300
Fernando Cassia wrote:
> Next time just press Alt-F and the menu bar becomes viewable.
>
> That's the beauty of CUA (Common User Access) menus...
>
> Every item usually has an associated hotkey.
Thanks, wasn't aware of this.
On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 13:33:30 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 10/5/20 1:20 PM, Beartooth wrote:
>> On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 12:50:51 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>> [...]
> Edit -> Preferences ?
Sounds good -- except that I don't see Edit ...
>>>
>>> Do you see the menu bar at all?
e:
> > On my Seamonkey, I see that each line at the top starts with white
> > dots. When I click in them, that line is hidden, and the white
dots
> > migrate below the top items. If I then click the dots for that
> > line, it re-opens the line whose dots I
On Mon, Oct 5, 2020, 18:43 stan via users
wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 13:59:10 -0700
> Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> > On 10/5/20 1:32 PM, stan via users wrote:
>
> > > On my Seamonkey, I see that each line at the top starts with white
> > > dots. When
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 13:59:10 -0700
Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 10/5/20 1:32 PM, stan via users wrote:
> > On my Seamonkey, I see that each line at the top starts with white
> > dots. When I click in them, that line is hidden, and the white dots
> > migrate below the top it
On 10/5/20 1:32 PM, stan via users wrote:
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 19:26:58 - (UTC)
Beartooth wrote:
On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 12:18:08 -0700, stan via users wrote:
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 18:54:20 - (UTC)
Beartooth wrote:
Where are the settings for Seamonkey?
Edit -> Preferen
On 10/5/20 1:20 PM, Beartooth wrote:
On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 12:50:51 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
[...]
Edit -> Preferences ?
Sounds good -- except that I don't see Edit ...
Do you see the menu bar at all? Did you hide it?
Certainly not on purpose. Where would it be,
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 19:26:58 - (UTC)
Beartooth wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 12:18:08 -0700, stan via users wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 18:54:20 - (UTC)
> > Beartooth wrote:
> >
> >>Where are the settings for Seamonkey?
> >
> > E
On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 12:50:51 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
[...]
>>> Edit -> Preferences ?
>>
>> Sounds good -- except that I don't see Edit ...
>
> Do you see the menu bar at all? Did you hide it?
Certainly not on purpose. Where would it be, and how would I unhide
it? What
On 10/5/20 12:26 PM, Beartooth wrote:
On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 12:18:08 -0700, stan via users wrote:
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 18:54:20 - (UTC)
Beartooth wrote:
Where are the settings for Seamonkey?
Edit -> Preferences ?
Sounds good -- except that I don't see Edit ...
Do
On Mon, 05 Oct 2020 12:18:08 -0700, stan via users wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 18:54:20 - (UTC)
> Beartooth wrote:
>
>> Where are the settings for Seamonkey?
>
> Edit -> Preferences ?
Sounds good -- except that I don't see Edit ...
--
Beartoot
On Mon, 5 Oct 2020 18:54:20 - (UTC)
Beartooth wrote:
> Where are the settings for Seamonkey?
Edit -> Preferences ?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproje
Where are the settings for Seamonkey? I'm running
seamonkey-2.53.4-1.fc32.x86_64 under F32 fully updated. I've right- and
left-clicked all over it, and I can't seem to get into any configuration
worth doing. What am I missing? TIA!
--
Beartooth Staffwright, Not Quite Clueless Power
"Kevin Cummings" <cummi...@kjchome.homeip.net>
> To: "Community support for Fedora users" <users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Subject: Re: seamonkey
>
> On 03/18/16 12:18, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is there a plan to distribute the
On 03/18/16 12:18, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there a plan to distribute the last version of seamonkey (2.40)
> with fedora ?
Looks to me like its already in updates-testing (at least for F2
Hello,
Is there a plan to distribute the last version of seamonkey (2.40)
with fedora ?
Thank.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère
===
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2015 at 9:56 AM
From: Patrick O'Callaghan pocallag...@gmail.com
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: seamonkey crashes
On Sat, 2015-08-01 at 02:04 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
In fedora 22 (i686) seamonkey web!
core dump.
What do you expect
On Sat, 2015-08-01 at 02:04 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
In fedora 22 (i686) seamonkey web!
core dump.
What do you expect people to do with that information? You don't say
what URL it crashed on, if you're using a nightly, if you have
extensions loaded, if there's a backtrace, if you
Hello,
In fedora 22 (i686) seamonkey web!
core dump.
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale
On 17 May 2014 17:42, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Paul Cartwright pbcartwri...@gmail.com
wrote:
I am beginning to like Pale moon.. pulled in all my Chrome bookmarks (
awesome, automatic!), and it is VERY snappy!
What's the track record of this
Gary Stainburn gary.stainb...@ringways.co.uk writes:
On Friday 16 May 2014 06:57:57 lee wrote:
Hi,
are we going to need a replacement for seamonkey which comes without
restrictions management, and will there be one in Fedora?
--
Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)
I've obviously missed
Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au writes:
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 07:57 +0200, lee wrote:
are we going to need a replacement for seamonkey which comes without
restrictions management,
Care to clarify that double negative? You want something with
restrictions?
No, just seamonkey
On Friday 16 May 2014 06:57:57 lee wrote:
Hi,
are we going to need a replacement for seamonkey which comes without
restrictions management, and will there be one in Fedora?
--
Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)
I've obviously missed something. Can someone please tell me exactly which
package
On 05/18/14 01:53, Bob Marcan wrote:
Still have problem with tabs.
Not sure what you are having trouble with but, again from m notes, I do
this:
2013-11-17
To clear the ugly New Tab screen of button-blocks ~
In the Location bar, type about:config and press Enter.
Type browser.newtab.url
On 05/16/2014 11:50 AM, Doug wrote:
If Seamonkey is the thing you call Firefox (pffft!) then go get Pale
Moon.
--doug
I am beginning to like Pale moon.. pulled in all my Chrome bookmarks (
awesome, automatic!), and it is VERY snappy!
I haven't figured out yet how to view flash videos.. I don't
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Paul Cartwright pbcartwri...@gmail.comwrote:
I am beginning to like Pale moon.. pulled in all my Chrome bookmarks (
awesome, automatic!), and it is VERY snappy!
What's the track record of this fork for security fixes?
Do they patch in hours, days or weeks
On 05/17/2014 11:42 AM, Fernando Cassia
wrote:
What's the track record of this fork for security fixes?
Do they patch in hours, days or weeks after a 0day is discovered
for FF?
from the Pale moon site:
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Paul Cartwright pbcartwri...@gmail.comwrote:
Absolutely! Pale Moon is built from the Firefox release source code that
has a large community of developers and security-aware people, next to
having seen over a decade of development by now. It includes, among
On 5/17/2014 4:00 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Paul Cartwright pbcartwri...@gmail.com
mailto:pbcartwri...@gmail.com wrote:
Absolutely! Pale Moon is built from the Firefox release source code
that has a large community of developers and security-aware
On 5/17/2014 4:37 PM, David wrote:
On 5/17/2014 4:00 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Paul Cartwright pbcartwri...@gmail.com
mailto:pbcartwri...@gmail.com wrote:
Absolutely! Pale Moon is built from the Firefox release source code
that has a large community
The latest Firefox (v.29) is for me indigestible (putting it mildly).
So this looks promising.
Does anybody knows how to disable tabbed browsing?
Changed preferenced the same way as in firefox.
Middle button still open window in tabs instead of new window.
TIA, Bob
--
users mailing list
On 05/17/14 21:07, Bob Marcan wrote:
The latest Firefox (v.29) is for me indigestible (putting it mildly).
So this looks promising.
Does anybody knows how to disable tabbed browsing?
Changed preferenced the same way as in firefox.
Middle button still open window in tabs instead of new window.
On Sat, 17 May 2014 21:19:18 -0400
Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA bobgood...@wildblue.net wrote:
From my notes:
2014-05-10
Firefox 29 requires the following add-on if it is to be made usable.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/classicthemerestorer/
then see:
On 05/16/2014 01:57 AM, lee wrote:
Hi,
are we going to need a replacement for seamonkey which comes without
restrictions management, and will there be one in Fedora?
If Seamonkey is the thing you call Firefox (pffft!) then go get Pale Moon.
--doug
--
users mailing list
users
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:50:50AM -0400, Doug wrote:
On 05/16/2014 01:57 AM, lee wrote:
Hi,
are we going to need a replacement for seamonkey which comes without
restrictions management, and will there be one in Fedora?
If Seamonkey is the thing you call Firefox (pffft!) then go get
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:57 AM, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
are we going to need a replacement for seamonkey which comes without
restrictions management, and will there be one in Fedora?
Take your concerns to the Seamonkey Council
http://www.seamonkey-project.org/about#contact
I
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 13:19 -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
I personally use Seamonkey suite and prefer it to Firefox. But while I
have
no issues with DRM, maybe the SM devs can put the DRM bits in an
optional
package or at least make it user-configurable to disable the feature.
AFAIK that's
On 05/16/2014 11:50 AM, Doug wrote:
If Seamonkey is the thing you call Firefox (pffft!) then go get Pale
Moon.
--doug
according to the Pale Moon website it requires:
* Windows Vista x64/Windows 7 x64/Windows 8 x64/Server 2008 x64 or later
--
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux User #367800
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Fred Smith
fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.uswrote:
Seamonkey is the name given to the old Mozilla browser/email/kitchen-sink
suite that was developed by Mozilla prior to firefox. (Not the
older/original
Netscape.
Yes Seamonkey suite was born first as Mozilla
On 05/16/2014 12:29 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On 05/16/2014 11:50 AM, Doug wrote:
If Seamonkey is the thing you call Firefox (pffft!) then go get Pale
Moon.
--doug
according to the Pale Moon website it requires:
* Windows Vista x64/Windows 7 x64/Windows 8 x64/Server 2008 x64 or later
On 05/16/2014 02:43 PM, Doug wrote:
You haven't read the right pages, I guess. It runs on Windows and
Linux, and I thik even on Mac.
I have a copy running right here on PCLinuxOS-32 KDE. I have
another copy running on Windows 8.1.
On 05/16/2014 12:34 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On 05/16/2014 02:43 PM, Doug wrote:
You haven't read the right pages, I guess. It runs on Windows and
Linux, and I thik even on Mac.
I have a copy running right here on PCLinuxOS-32 KDE. I have another
copy running on Windows 8.1. (64-bit.)
On 05/16/2014 03:52 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
See: http://www.palemoon.org/contributed-builds.shtml
thanks, got it, installed it! when I finished it opened up a web page
said:
You have successfully installed the Pale Moon web browser for Windows.
--
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux User
On 05/16/2014 12:34 PM, Paul Cartwright issued this missive:
On 05/16/2014 02:43 PM, Doug wrote:
You haven't read the right pages, I guess. It runs on Windows and
Linux, and I thik even on Mac.
I have a copy running right here on PCLinuxOS-32 KDE. I have another
copy running on Windows 8.1.
On 05/16/2014 12:56 PM, Paul Cartwright wrote:
On 05/16/2014 03:52 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
See: http://www.palemoon.org/contributed-builds.shtml
thanks, got it, installed it! when I finished it opened up a web page
said:
You have successfully installed the Pale Moon web browser for Windows.
On 05/16/2014 03:56 PM, Rick Stevens wrote:
If you look at the Downloads page, you'd find a link to:
http://www.palemoon.org/contributed-builds.shtml
and on that page, PM4Linux.
if you hoover over the downloads tab, THEN scroll past Pale Moon
language packs, you get to OTHER. from
Fernando Cassia writes:
Yes Seamonkey suite was born first as Mozilla. But it isn't old. I mean,
it incoporates the latest technologies and Firefox Gecko engine
And as I understand it, this conversation shouldn't *just* be about
Seamonkey. Since Mozilla is doing the dirty deed
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 07:57 +0200, lee wrote:
are we going to need a replacement for seamonkey which comes without
restrictions management,
Care to clarify that double negative? You want something with
restrictions?
--
tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.14.3-200.fc20.i686 #1 SMP Tue May
Hi,
are we going to need a replacement for seamonkey which comes without
restrictions management, and will there be one in Fedora?
--
Fedora release 20 (Heisenbug)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https
Bill Davidsen wrote:
I suggest you D/L the Mozilla version, unpack it (generates seamonkey
dir), and move the directory to a reasonable place (/usr/local for me)
and generate a custom icon for it. That seems solid.
Seamonkey users,
I'm happy to announce that the bug that made Seamonkey crash
this bugreport).
Is anyone aware of any potential issue when using Mozilla's private
libcairo on Fedora 13?
I suggest you D/L the Mozilla version, unpack it (generates seamonkey dir),
and move the directory to a reasonable place (/usr/local for me) and generate a
custom icon for it. That seems solid
library, and hence fix all applications against that issue. If there
was no such policy, then it would essentially be impossible to fix any
security issue against the library, because it becomes hidden in N
application binaries.
Given that the libraries needed by Seamonkey *are* packaged
David Timms wrote:
Mason wrote:
What can I do to make it happen?
Help the maintainer, by testing the proposed fix yourself with an rpmbuild:
1. yum downloader --source name-of-package(or parent package)
2. extract the rpm
3. test your rpmbuild capability works with the existing
this bugreport).
Is anyone aware of any potential issue when using Mozilla's private
libcairo on Fedora 13?
No, I gave up and pulled the 2.0.8 build off the mozilla.org site and installed
it in /usr/local/seamonkey-2.0.8, and then added a custom launcher for it. Life
is too short to waste time
On 07/10/10 20:07, Mason wrote:
Is anyone aware of any potential issue when using Mozilla's private
libcairo on Fedora 13?
Fedora packaging guidelines [1] prevents bundling external libraries.
Main reason [2] is that security and bug fixes should be fixed in the
one library, and hence fix all
Hello everyone,
The Seamonkey 2.0.x package in Fedora 13 is unusable,
as it crashes randomly, sometimes within seconds.
This problem has been well-known for months.
Fedora bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602437
Mozilla bug report:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org
On 06/10/10 20:04, Mason wrote:
What can I do to make it happen?
Help the maintainer, by testing the proposed fix yourself with an rpmbuild:
1. yum downloader --source name-of-package(or parent package)
2. extract the rpm
3. test your rpmbuild capability works with the existing packages as is
4.
57 matches
Mail list logo
