Hi,
On 07/02/12 21:43, Reindl Harald wrote:
why is this ignored in the latest kernels?
I don't know, but...
i do not like to see any ipv6-configuration/IP as long the WAN
is ipv4 only and this may be a long time
... this is how I do it (Fedora 16):
sysctl -w
Am 08.02.2012 10:28, schrieb Rich Boyce:
Hi,
On 07/02/12 21:43, Reindl Harald wrote:
why is this ignored in the latest kernels?
I don't know, but...
i do not like to see any ipv6-configuration/IP as long the WAN
is ipv4 only and this may be a long time
... this is how I do it
Dear all,
does anyone know if there is any way (by plugin or otherwise) to get
horizontal workspaces that can have windows stretched across them in
Gnome3? This could be done with compiz in Gnome2, and it was a huge part of
my Eclipse perspective setups...I miss it, but have not seen any way to
Installation appears to go fine until it tries to start the admin
server:
Configuration directory server URL [ldap://local
FQDN:389/o=NetscapeRoot]: ldaps://Config Server
FQDN:636/o=NetscapeRoot
...
CA certificate filename: /etc/openldap/cacerts/base64 cert file
...
output: Server
Am 08.02.2012 10:33, schrieb Reindl Harald:
Am 08.02.2012 10:28, schrieb Rich Boyce:
Hi,
On 07/02/12 21:43, Reindl Harald wrote:
why is this ignored in the latest kernels?
I don't know, but...
i do not like to see any ipv6-configuration/IP as long the WAN
is ipv4 only and this may
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/08/2012 04:59 AM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
The output of F16 mount is somewhat confusing. Is there a way to
confine it to just the output of interest to the average user?
Thanks. Sorry for the FAQ.
You may find findmnt provides a more
Thanks the update to the wiki solved the wrong attribute type error on
nsAdminAccessHosts.
Configuration as it stands, with no nsAdminAccessHosts attribure:
# configuration, admin-serv-host, 389 Administration Server, Server Gro
up, fqdn, admins.unix, NetscapeRoot
dn:
On 02/08/2012 09:10 AM, Bryn M. Reeves wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/08/2012 04:59 AM, Geoffrey Leach wrote:
The output of F16 mount is somewhat confusing. Is there a way to
confine it to just the output of interest to the average user?
Thanks. Sorry for the FAQ.
On 02/07/12 22:05, linux guy wrote:
I got around all this mess by upgrading from the full install DVD. I
found the problem to exist only when updating from the live CDs or pre
upgrading. If I did my upgrade from the full install DVD, everything
worked out OK.
If you need more information, I
Greg Woods wrote:
This is the area at the beginning of the disk, before the first
partition. Grub2 needs the first partition to start at 2048, but default
partition layouts from Grub-1 systems start at 63. I have run into this
several times and it is a royal pain. There may be some games you can
Currently I'm using Fedora 14, but after upgrading my PC I decided to
try and install Fedora 16 from the KDE spin, (no problem). The problem
arises when trying to do yum updates, I get multiple errors, some of
which stop Fedora 16 from shutting down. Sadly, based on this
experience, and previous
On 02/08/2012 12:48 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Greg Woods wrote:
This is the area at the beginning of the disk, before the first
partition. Grub2 needs the first partition to start at 2048, but default
partition layouts from Grub-1 systems start at 63. I have run into this
several times and
Am 08.02.2012 19:27, schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930:
Currently I'm using Fedora 14, but after upgrading my PC I decided to
try and install Fedora 16 from the KDE spin, (no problem). The problem
arises when trying to do yum updates, I get multiple errors, some of
which stop Fedora 16 from
Am 08.02.2012 19:36, schrieb sean darcy:
On 02/08/2012 12:48 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Greg Woods wrote:
This is the area at the beginning of the disk, before the first
partition. Grub2 needs the first partition to start at 2048, but default
partition layouts from Grub-1 systems start
On 08/02/12 18:37, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.02.2012 19:27, schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930:
Currently I'm using Fedora 14, but after upgrading my PC I decided to
try and install Fedora 16 from the KDE spin, (no problem). The problem
arises when trying to do yum updates, I get multiple
Am 08.02.2012 19:50, schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930:
On 08/02/12 18:37, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.02.2012 19:27, schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930:
Currently I'm using Fedora 14, but after upgrading my PC I decided to
try and install Fedora 16 from the KDE spin, (no problem). The problem
arises
Hi Rick,
I restarted both dirsrv and dirsrv-admin, problem persists though.
De : Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 8 février 2012 16:39
À : General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Cc : MATON Brett
Objet : Re: [389-users]
Thanks for your help Rich,
LDAPTLS_CACERTDIR=/etc/dirsrv/admin-serv
ldapsearch -x -H ldaps://config server FQDN -D cn=Directory Manager -W -s
base -b
# extended LDIF
#
# LDAPv3
# base with scope baseObject
# filter: (objectclass=*)
# requesting: ALL
#
#
dn:
objectClass: top
On 08/02/12 18:27, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
Currently I'm using Fedora 14, but after upgrading my PC I decided to
try and install Fedora 16 from the KDE spin, (no problem). The problem
arises when trying to do yum updates, I get multiple errors, some of
which stop Fedora 16 from shutting
On 08/02/12 19:31, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
On 08/02/12 18:27, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
Currently I'm using Fedora 14, but after upgrading my PC I decided to
try and install Fedora 16 from the KDE spin, (no problem). The problem
arises when trying to do yum updates, I get multiple errors,
On 08/02/12 19:31, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
On 08/02/12 18:27, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
Currently I'm using Fedora 14, but after upgrading my PC I decided to
try and install Fedora 16 from the KDE spin, (no problem). The problem
arises when trying to do yum updates, I get multiple errors,
If one discovers a missing piece in the system, to which mailing list
should it be reported? For example, trying to run grub2-mkrescue results
in the error:
/usr/bin/grub2-mkrescue: line 310: xorriso: command not found
I assume that when grub2-mkrescue was loaded, it was assumed that
xorriso
On 02/08/2012 12:09 PM, MATON Brett wrote:
Hi Rick,
I restarted both dirsrv and dirsrv-admin, problem persists though.
ok - try this
service dirsrv-admin stop
edit /etc/dirsrv/admin-serv/local.conf - remove any nsAdminAccessHost lines
service dirsrv-admin start
*De :*Rich Megginson
On 02/08/2012 12:18 PM, MATON Brett wrote:
Thanks for your help Rich,
LDAPTLS_CACERTDIR=/etc/dirsrv/admin-serv
ldapsearch -x -H ldaps://config server FQDN -D cn=Directory
Manager --W --s base --b
# extended LDIF
#
# LDAPv3
# base with scope baseObject
# filter: (objectclass=*)
#
Hi Rich,
I've got no nsAdminAccessHost lines in that config file, only a
configuration.nsAdminAccessAddresses entry.
Cheers,
Brett
De : Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 8 février 2012 21:15
À : MATON Brett
Cc : General discussion list for the 389
Steven Stern wrote:
I keep meaning to edit the sudo config files to block things like
sudo su -
sudo bash
but I get lazy. Someday, this will bite me in the ***.
Note for anyone considering this: it’s virtually impossible to make this
watertight, because there are too many ways for
On 02/08/2012 10:57 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i know that the release quality get more and more worse and hope
the people resposible for that will relize this as soon as possible
but it doe snot help screaming and running away because changes in
fedora will hit most distributons sooner or later
don fisher wrote:
If one discovers a missing piece in the system, to which mailing
list should it be reported? For example, trying to run
grub2-mkrescue results in the error:
/usr/bin/grub2-mkrescue: line 310: xorriso: command not found
http://bugzilla.redhat.com , except
On 02/08/2012 01:53 PM, MATON Brett wrote:
*De :*Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com]
*Envoyé :* mercredi 8 février 2012 21:49
*À :* MATON Brett
*Cc :* General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
*Objet :* Re: [389-users] dirsrv-admin with existing (remote)
On 02/08/2012 02:49 PM, James Wilkinson wrote:
Steven Stern wrote:
I keep meaning to edit the sudo config files to block things like
sudo su -
sudo bash
but I get lazy. Someday, this will bite me in the ***.
Note for anyone considering this: itâs virtually impossible to make this
Hi,
I need to load a kernel on my system but I've got a raid device which
needs a new driver added to initrd in order for it to be picked on
bootup when the kernel loads.
I've created the initrd by placing the module in a directory I created
in the initrd filesystem under: /lib/modules/`uname
On 08/02/12 20:51, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/08/2012 10:57 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i know that the release quality get more and more worse and hope
the people resposible for that will relize this as soon as possible
but it doe snot help screaming and running away because changes in
fedora will
On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:51:08 -0800
Joe Zeff j...@zeff.us wrote:
On 02/08/2012 10:57 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i know that the release quality get more and more worse and hope
the people resposible for that will relize this as soon as possible
but it doe snot help screaming and running
On 2/8/2012 3:51 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 02/08/2012 10:57 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
i know that the release quality get more and more worse and hope
the people resposible for that will relize this as soon as possible
but it doe snot help screaming and running away because changes in
fedora
When I execute pwck to verify integrity of password files and received
the following:
sudo pwck
user 'adm': directory '/var/adm' does not exist
user 'uucp': directory '/var/spool/uucp' does not exist
user 'gopher': directory '/var/gopher' does not exist
user 'avahi-autoipd': directory
On 02/08/2012 02:17 PM, David wrote:
If you 'liked' Fedora 16 you will just 'love' the new/moved filesystem. :-)
Let's just say that when I ask for help on the Fedoraforum, I'm careful
to point out that $FOO worked until I upgraded from F14 to F16. Why I
always put quotation marks around
On Feb 8, 2012 11:50 AM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930
n2xssvv.g02gfr12...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On 08/02/12 18:37, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.02.2012 19:27, schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930:
Currently I'm using Fedora 14, but after upgrading my PC I decided to
try and install Fedora 16 from the KDE
Hello,
When I run:
systemctl enable nxsensor.service
I get:
ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on
:1.1:/org/freedesktop/systemd1/unit/httpd_2eservice:
dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.UnknownObject:
Unknown unit
ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on
On 2/8/12, don fisher h...@comcast.net wrote:
When I execute pwck to verify integrity of password files and received
the following:
sudo pwck
user 'adm': directory '/var/adm' does not exist
user 'uucp': directory '/var/spool/uucp' does not exist
user 'gopher': directory '/var/gopher' does
Saludos.
A continuación los enlaces a los logs de la reunión:
Meeting ended Wed Feb 8 23:05:23 2012 UTC.
- Minuta:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-latam/2012-02-08/fedora-latam.2012-02-08-21.51.html
- Minuta (texto):
The computer is setup for Mythtv. I have recently upgraded from F14 to
F15. The lirc works only after many reboots on F15.
Lirc worked perfectly on F14. Searching the archives on Fedora has
yielded no information.
I have found others that have the same problem by doing web search but
there
On 08/02/12 22:36, Pete Travis wrote:
On Feb 8, 2012 11:50 AM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930
n2xssvv.g02gfr12...@ntlworld.com
mailto:n2xssvv.g02gfr12...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On 08/02/12 18:37, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 08.02.2012 19:27, schrieb n2xssvv.g02gfr12930:
Currently I'm using Fedora
This error has already been flagged, but I have yet to find a safe and
reliable method for solving it. On exiting the dracut message Fedora 16
boots successfully.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
I don't see any other posts like this so it is reasonable to assume
that this is not a bug. For over a week now, yum update doesn't see
any updates unless I do a yum clean all first.
I was tempted to start deleting stuff in /var/lib/yum. My saner side
stopped that misadventure. Yum check is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/08/2012 07:34 PM, Fedora User wrote:
I don't see any other posts like this so it is reasonable to assume
that this is not a bug. For over a week now, yum update doesn't see
any updates unless I do a yum clean all first.
I was tempted to
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 13:36 -0500, sean darcy wrote:
Almost all (all?) users of preupgrade are using grub1.
As I understand it, most (all?) grub1 systems have the first partition
starting at 63.
Any system with a first partition starting at 63 will be bricked if it
runs preupgrade to
On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 18:57 -0700, Greg Woods wrote:
This last part seems not to be true. Someone else pointed out that there
is a way to force grub2 to install on a disk with only 63 free blocks at
the beginning
Which brings up another related question. Is it possible to install
grub2 into a
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 02:47, Mikkel L. Ellertson mellert...@gmail.com wrote:
Dumb question - is you system time/date correct? Before downloading
the package list, yum checks the time stamp, and if it is older then
the data it already has, it does not update its list. When you do a
clean all,
On Tuesday 07 February 2012 04:32:10 pm Mark LaPierre wrote:
On 02/07/2012 07:17 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:15 PM, david
walcroftdwalcr...@bigpond.com wrote:
My yum update today updated this program,I cannot find any
doc's, only schroedinger's cat on google.
On Feb 8, 2012 5:27 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930
n2xssvv.g02gfr12...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On 08/02/12 22:36, Pete Travis wrote:
On Feb 8, 2012 11:50 AM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930
n2xssvv.g02gfr12...@ntlworld.com
mailto:n2xssvv.g02gfr12...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On 08/02/12 18:37, Reindl Harald
On 02/08/2012 11:17 PM, David wrote:
On 2/8/2012 3:51 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
I'm hoping that by the time Fedora 17 is ready, most, if not all of
these issues will be corrected and that things will be back to normal.
In closing, I'd just like to point out that there are very few threads
about
On 2/8/2012 12:51 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
As far as systemd goes, more thought should have been done (IMAO) on
making the transition as smooth and transparent as possible. You
shouldn't expect the average non-techy user to know how to do
whatever's needed to find out if all of the services that
On 2/8/2012 2:17 PM, David wrote:
If you 'liked' Fedora 16 you will just 'love' the new/moved
filesystem. :-)
David:
I'll take the bait ... can you tell me what love is in the future?
Thanks,
Paul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription
Patrick Dupre napsal(a):
Hello,
When I run:
systemctl enable nxsensor.service
I get:
ERROR:dbus.proxies:Introspect error on
:1.1:/org/freedesktop/systemd1/unit/httpd_2eservice:
dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.UnknownObject:
Unknown unit
On 02/08/2012 08:19 AM, MATON Brett wrote:
Thanks the update to the wiki solved the wrong attribute type error
on nsAdminAccessHosts.
Configuration as it stands, with no nsAdminAccessHosts attribure:
# configuration, admin-serv-host, 389 Administration Server, Server Gro
up, fqdn,
On 02/08/2012 07:20 AM, MATON Brett wrote:
Installation appears to go fine until it tries to start the admin server:
Configuration directory server URL [ldap://local
FQDN:389/o=NetscapeRoot]: ldaps://Config Server FQDN:636/o=NetscapeRoot
...
CA certificate filename:
Hello folks,
We recently updated our dirsrv instances to 1.2.10-0.6.a6.fc15.x86_64,
and had it crash repeatedly one of our more loaded servers. We haven't
debugged in depth but were curious whether or not anyone else had seen
this problem. There were no error logs, but we weren't add loglevel
On 02/08/2012 08:53 AM, Edward Z. Yang wrote:
Hello folks,
We recently updated our dirsrv instances to 1.2.10-0.6.a6.fc15.x86_64,
and had it crash repeatedly one of our more loaded servers. We haven't
debugged in depth but were curious whether or not anyone else had seen
this problem. There
Platform is RHEL6.2 x64
$ rpm -qa|grep 389
389-admin-console-doc-1.1.8-1.el6.noarch
389-ds-base-libs-1.2.9.14-1.el6_2.2.x86_64
389-admin-console-1.1.8-1.el6.noarch
389-adminutil-1.1.14-2.el6.x86_64
389-ds-console-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch
389-ds-1.2.2-1.el6.noarch
On 02/08/2012 01:27 PM, MATON Brett wrote:
Hi Rich,
I've got no nsAdminAccessHost lines in that config file, only a
configuration.nsAdminAccessAddresses entry.
Ok. Looks like it will refuse to leave nsAdminAccessHost - if missing,
it defaults to your local hostname.
The error message
On 02/08/2012 01:31 PM, MATON Brett wrote:
Platform is RHEL6.2 x64
$ rpm -qa|grep 389
389-admin-console-doc-1.1.8-1.el6.noarch
389-ds-base-libs-1.2.9.14-1.el6_2.2.x86_64
389-admin-console-1.1.8-1.el6.noarch
389-adminutil-1.1.14-2.el6.x86_64
389-ds-console-1.2.6-1.el6.noarch
De : Rich Megginson [mailto:rmegg...@redhat.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 8 février 2012 21:49
À : MATON Brett
Cc : General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Objet : Re: [389-users] dirsrv-admin with existing (remote) configuration
server using SSL
On 02/08/2012 01:31 PM,
On 02/08/2012 06:41 PM, Craig T wrote:
hi,
Has anyone setup 389-ds on a OpenVZ VPS yet? I'm attempting to setup IPA 2.x on
my VPS and it's giving odd errors when starting the 389 Directory Server.
Spec;
Centos 6.2 (x86-64)
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5645 @ 2.40GHz
Linux
no selinux;
-bash-4.1$ sudo sestatus
SELinux status: disabled
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 07:28:33PM -0800, Marc Sauton wrote:
On 02/08/2012 06:41 PM, Craig T wrote:
hi,
Has anyone setup 389-ds on a OpenVZ VPS yet? I'm attempting to setup IPA 2.x
on my VPS and it's giving odd
Some time ago, I have tested this on Solaris Branded Zone and it did not work,
because there was an not mapped/implemented system call for semaphore or shared
memory. The Centos itself has worked on Solaris Branded Zone
Because that helps.
Carsten
Am 09.02.12, schrieb Craig T
65 matches
Mail list logo
