On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 7:21 PM Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
> Chris Murphy wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 4:17 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 16:03 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> >>> Just a heads up that this can be an issue, but I'm not sure how common
> >>> it
On 5/1/19 12:15 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/30/19 8:01 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
If you are upgrade from 29 to 30, make sure you
update dnf and libdnf first do to a bug that has
been fixed (my procedure below takes care of this).
Due to previous issues, I always make sure that at
On 4/30/19 8:01 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
If you are upgrade from 29 to 30, make sure you
update dnf and libdnf first do to a bug that has
been fixed (my procedure below takes care of this).
Due to previous issues, I always make sure that at least dnf and systemd
are fully updated
Hi,
I recently recovered my home partition from some corruption. Most of everything
is working OK but my spamprobe database appears not to be
I use spam probe in a procmail recipe, from their examples in the man page:
:0
SCORE=| /bin/spamprobe train
:0 wf
| formail -I "X-SpamProbe:
On 4/30/19 11:30 PM, Scott van Looy via users wrote:
What format does spamprobe use for the db and is it repairable somehow?
Try running the "file" command on the database file and see what it
says. What is the filename?
Alternatively - I set this up about 750,000 years ago, I can see
> On 1. May 2019, at 09:22, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> On 4/30/19 11:30 PM, Scott van Looy via users wrote:
>> What format does spamprobe use for the db and is it repairable somehow?
>
> Try running the "file" command on the database file and see what it says.
> What is the filename?
sp_words:
I spotted an article on another site indicating release of F30. I wasn't
expecting it for a week! Thus caught unprepared, for the first time ever, I did
a dnf system-upgrade on my UEFI system. I had to remove cclive and, for some
odd reason, there was a problem with getting the updates repo, so
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 2:49 AM Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 4:17 PM Patrick O'Callaghan
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2019-04-30 at 16:03 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>>
>>> Just a heads up that this can be an issue, but I'm not sure how
>>> common it is. It applies to BIOS (not UEFI)
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 3:21 AM Todd Zullinger wrote:
>
> What I took from the prior wording is that if you installed Fedora
> 20 or earlier and then only updated the OS since (and had not
> manually run grub2-update), that you would hit this bug.
"grub2-install" not "grub2-update".
On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 02:48 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> On 5/1/19 12:15 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 4/30/19 8:01 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
> > > If you are upgrade from 29 to 30, make sure you
> > > update dnf and libdnf first do to a bug that has
> > > been fixed (my
Hi all
I just upgraded from F29 to F30. All looks fine except printing from the
system. The printer is configured in /etc/cups/printers.conf (see details
below). I noticed that in a previous file the "Shared" was set to Yes, but
all the other lines are exactly the same.
if I try to pront from
On 5/1/19 5:25 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 3:21 AM Todd Zullinger wrote:
>>
>> What I took from the prior wording is that if you installed Fedora
>> 20 or earlier and then only updated the OS since (and had not
>> manually run grub2-update), that you would hit this bug.
>
>
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 8:12 PM Sam Varshavchik wrote:
>
> Chris Murphy writes:
>
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 9:53 AM Sjoerd Mullender wrote:
> > >
> > > Now that the release announcement has been done, I can say that
> > > upgrading for me (on a VM) also failed. After the final reboot, I just
On 4/30/19 3:21 PM, Rafael Leiva-Ochoa wrote:
I got it from Fedora 28 Repo: freeradius-3.0.19-1.fc28.armv7hl. After a
lot of digging, I found that a "bootstrap" script on the
/etc/raddb/certs/ directory was being called on
the /usr/lib/systemd/system/radiusd.service. This script overwrote my
On 5/1/19 8:08 PM, SternData wrote:
> Wait a day or ???
No. Take note of the errors, then do as suggested. Add --allowerasing and
--skip-broken
to the update commands.
Then take note of what was erased and/or skipped and deal with them after the
upgrade.
I've had issues like that in the
Wait a day or ???
Problem 1: package python2-hawkey-0.31.0-2.fc29.x86_64 requires
libdnf(x86-64) = 0.31.0-2.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed
- libdnf-0.31.0-2.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- problem with installed package
On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 11:48 +0200, Jouk Jansen wrote:
>
> If I try to reconfigure the printer via cups and indicate that the
> printer
> is to be shared, I get the message that sharing is not possible for a
> Kerberos-printer. On this system I never configured Kerberos. So what
> is
> happening
On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 12:48 PM Charles R. Dennett wrote:
> On 5/1/19 5:25 AM, Tom H wrote:
>> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 3:21 AM Todd Zullinger wrote:
>>>
>>> What I took from the prior wording is that if you installed Fedora
>>> 20 or earlier and then only updated the OS since (and had not
>>>
Ulf Volmer wrote:
> On 29.04.19 15:43, Neal Becker wrote:
>> I just attempted update f29->f30 using
>> sudo dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=30
>>
>> After reboot
>> sudo dnf system-upgrade reboot
>>
>> The system got to
>> running transaction
>>
>> But then seemed to hang.
On 5/1/19 11:07 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2019 at 12:48 PM Charles R. Dennett wrote:
>>
>> Is there any way to tell just by looking for the presence or absence
>> of any particular file or directory that you would run into this
>> bug?
>
> Unless you're multi-booting and grub's managed
On 5/1/19 3:06 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Wed, 2019-05-01 at 02:48 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
On 5/1/19 12:15 AM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/30/19 8:01 PM, ToddAndMargo via users wrote:
If you are upgrade from 29 to 30, make sure you
update dnf and libdnf first do to a bug that
On 01/05/2019 17.50, Neal Becker wrote:
> It's too bad you can't get a bash prompt during the upgrade so you could run
> ps or something. My laptop doesn't have a disk activity light, so there's
> no way to tell if it's doing anything.
I've been able to go to another virtual terminal by type
On 5/1/19 1:22 AM, Scott van Looy via users wrote:
On 1. May 2019, at 09:22, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 4/30/19 11:30 PM, Scott van Looy via users wrote:
What format does spamprobe use for the db and is it repairable somehow?
Try running the "file" command on the database file and see what it
Il giorno mar, 30/04/2019 alle 17.28 +0200, Louis Lagendijk ha scritto:
> I can confirm the extremely long delay here. I have not tried to
> debug it, so no solution
Then? I must fill a bugzilla?
The only work around I have fount is create a local application
launcher with "-noupdate" option
Hi All,
I have a Fedora 30 flash drive set up for dual booting
from Legacy or UEFI. It boots beautifully from UEFI.
(It also have a bios_grub partition).
It booted perfectly from both under Fedora 29.
Now when booting from legacy, it go into "System Setup".
If you press system Setup, I get a
On Wed, 01 May 2019 23:04:42 +0200
Dario Lesca wrote:
> Il giorno mar, 30/04/2019 alle 17.28 +0200, Louis Lagendijk ha
> scritto:
> > I can confirm the extremely long delay here. I have not tried to
> > debug it, so no solution
> Then? I must fill a bugzilla?
>
> The only work around I
db_verify sp_words
Lots of lines like:
db_verify: BDB1087 Page 5308: Btree level incorrect: got 0, expected 1
db_verify: BDB0501 Page 5309: btree or recno page is of inappropriate type 0
db_verify: BDB0502 Page 5309: totally zeroed page
Then
db_verify: sp_words: BDB0090 DB_VERIFY_BAD: Database
My very first update on my newly installed fedora 30 workstation:
Running scriptlet: systemd-241-8.git9ef65cb.fc30.x86_64 284/284
warning: %triggerin(systemd-241-8.git9ef65cb.fc30.x86_64) scriptlet failed,
exit status 65
Error in scriptlet in rpm package systemd
I can only hope
28 matches
Mail list logo
