Re: Oh God! More helpful software :-).

On 20201107 13:21:47, Cameron Simpson wrote: On 06Nov2020 21:50, Tom Horsley wrote: For as long as I can remember I've run dnf update in a root xterm and when all the akmod activity and wot-not is finished, I've run reboot from another terminal. Now, it won't reboot "because root is l

Re: Oh God! More helpful software :-).

On 07Nov2020 17:28, jdow wrote: >On 20201107 16:47:03, Samuel Sieb wrote: >>On 11/7/20 3:16 PM, jdow wrote: >>>On 20201107 13:21:47, Cameron Simpson wrote: >>>>On 06Nov2020 21:50, Tom Horsley  wrote: >>>>>For as long as I can remember I've run

Re: USB error: vendor cannot be 0

On 2020-11-06 13:21, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Anyone know a work around for this?    Fedroa 32, x64    $ rpm -qa virt-manager    virt-manager-3.1.0-1.fc32.noarch    $ rpm -qa qemu-device-usb-redirect    qemu-device-usb-redirect-5.1.0-7.fc32.x86_64 Bug I filed on

Re: (fedora) Re: second ethernet device not "seen"

On 08/11/2020 08:28, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 11/7/20 5:03 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sat, 2020-11-07 at 09:45 +0100, Jouk Jansen wrote: On 11/6/20 11:54 PM, Jouk Jansen wrote: I'm running Fedora 32. I have a Mobo with 2 internet connectors. However, the second one I do not "see" when I'm

Re: Oh God! More helpful software :-).

On 20201107 16:47:03, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 11/7/20 3:16 PM, jdow wrote: On 20201107 13:21:47, Cameron Simpson wrote: On 06Nov2020 21:50, Tom Horsley  wrote: For as long as I can remember I've run dnf update in a root xterm and when all the akmod activity and wot-not is finished, I've run

Re: (fedora) Re: second ethernet device not "seen"

On 11/7/20 5:02 PM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 08/11/2020 08:28, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 11/7/20 5:03 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sat, 2020-11-07 at 09:45 +0100, Jouk Jansen wrote: On 11/6/20 11:54 PM, Jouk Jansen wrote: I'm running Fedora 32. I have a Mobo with 2 internet connectors. However,

Re: USB error: vendor cannot be 0

On 2020-11-07 18:16, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 2020-11-06 13:21, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Anyone know a work around for this?     Fedroa 32, x64     $ rpm -qa virt-manager     virt-manager-3.1.0-1.fc32.noarch     $ rpm -qa qemu-device-usb-redirect    

Re: Oh God! More helpful software :-).

On 11/7/20 3:16 PM, jdow wrote: On 20201107 13:21:47, Cameron Simpson wrote: On 06Nov2020 21:50, Tom Horsley wrote: For as long as I can remember I've run dnf update in a root xterm and when all the akmod activity and wot-not is finished, I've run reboot from another terminal. Now, it won't

Re: (fedora) Re: second ethernet device not "seen"

On 11/7/20 5:03 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sat, 2020-11-07 at 09:45 +0100, Jouk Jansen wrote: On 11/6/20 11:54 PM, Jouk Jansen wrote: I'm running Fedora 32. I have a Mobo with 2 internet connectors. However, the second one I do not "see" when I'm running Fedora 32. Not an answer to

Re: USB error: vendor cannot be 0

On 2020-11-06 13:21, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Anyone know a work around for this?    Fedroa 32, x64    $ rpm -qa virt-manager    virt-manager-3.1.0-1.fc32.noarch    $ rpm -qa qemu-device-usb-redirect    qemu-device-usb-redirect-5.1.0-7.fc32.x86_64 Bug I filed on

Re: USB error: vendor cannot be 0

On 2020-11-07 00:01, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 2020-11-06 13:21, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: Hi All, Anyone know a work around for this?     Fedroa 32, x64     $ rpm -qa virt-manager     virt-manager-3.1.0-1.fc32.noarch     $ rpm -qa qemu-device-usb-redirect    

Re: (fedora) Re: second ethernet device not "seen"

Samuel Sieb wrote on 7-NOV-2020 09:40:05.79 >On 11/6/20 11:54 PM, Jouk Jansen wrote: >> I'm running Fedora 32. I have a Mobo with 2 internet connectors. However, >> the second one I do not "see" when I'm running Fedora 32. >> >> I already checked the following: >> >> - Bios : 2 devices

second ethernet device not "seen"

Hi all, I'm running Fedora 32. I have a Mobo with 2 internet connectors. However, the second one I do not "see" when I'm running Fedora 32. I already checked the following: - Bios : 2 devices enabled - lspci | grep -i eth gives: 04:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell

Re: second ethernet device not "seen"

On 11/6/20 11:54 PM, Jouk Jansen wrote: I'm running Fedora 32. I have a Mobo with 2 internet connectors. However, the second one I do not "see" when I'm running Fedora 32. I already checked the following: - Bios : 2 devices enabled - lspci | grep -i eth gives:

Re: (fedora) second ethernet device not "seen"

joukj wrote on 7-NOV-2020 09:14:16.24 >I'm running Fedora 32. I have a Mobo with 2 internet connectors. However, >the second one I do not "see" when I'm running Fedora 32. >I already checked the following: > - Bios : 2 devices enabled > - lspci | grep -i eth >gives: >

Re: Oh God! More helpful software :-).

On Fri, 2020-11-06 at 21:50 -0500, Tom Horsley wrote: > For as long as I can remember I've run dnf update in a root > xterm and when all the akmod activity and wot-not is finished, > I've run reboot from another terminal. > > Now, it won't reboot "because root is logged in". > > Gah! Who cares

Re: Oh God! More helpful software :-).

Tom Horsley writes: For as long as I can remember I've run dnf update in a root xterm and when all the akmod activity and wot-not is finished, I've run reboot from another terminal. Now, it won't reboot "because root is logged in". Gah! Who cares if root is logged in? Can I disable this

Re: (fedora) Re: second ethernet device not "seen"

On Sat, 2020-11-07 at 09:45 +0100, Jouk Jansen wrote: > > On 11/6/20 11:54 PM, Jouk Jansen wrote: > > > I'm running Fedora 32. I have a Mobo with 2 internet connectors. > > > However, > > > the second one I do not "see" when I'm running Fedora 32. Not an answer to your question, but why aren't

Re: (fedora) second ethernet device not "seen"

On 11/7/20 4:13 AM, Jouk Jansen wrote: > Why is much more done for enp4s0 than for enp6s0? do you have an ethernet cable plugged into both? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Unsafe paste notice -

Hon can I eliminate the unsafe paste notification in Fedora 32 xfce? -- Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA FEDORA-32/64bit LINUX XFCE Fastmail POP3 ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Unsafe paste notice -

07.11.20, 15:00 +0100 Bob Goodwin: > Hon can I eliminate the unsafe paste notification in Fedora 32 xfce? You asked this before: and Ed answered. Here's your reply to his

Re: The (bad) state of Qt on GNOME / Wayland

Thread is old, but makes me wonder, is there any current status on Qt with Wayland? In F33 with GNOME Workstation, several Qt applications don't work correctly with Wayland, but do work if switching to Xorg. avidemux-qt, for example, displays a video preview area that doesn't update. Audacious

Re: Unsafe paste notice -

On 2020-11-07 09:11, Markus Schönhaber wrote: 07.11.20, 15:00 +0100 Bob Goodwin: Hon can I eliminate the unsafe paste notification in Fedora 32 xfce? You asked this before:

Re: The (bad) state of Qt on GNOME / Wayland

On Sat, 2020-11-07 at 16:26 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Thread is old, but makes me wonder, is there any current status on Qt with > Wayland? > > In F33 with GNOME Workstation, several Qt applications don't work correctly > with Wayland, but do work if switching to Xorg. > > avidemux-qt,

Re: Unsafe paste notice -

07.11.20, 16:27 +0100 Bob Goodwin: > On 2020-11-07 09:11, Markus Schönhaber wrote: >> 07.11.20, 15:00 +0100 Bob Goodwin: >> >>> Hon can I eliminate the unsafe paste notification in Fedora 32 xfce? >> You asked this before: >>

Re: Oh God! More helpful software :-).

On 06Nov2020 21:50, Tom Horsley wrote: >For as long as I can remember I've run dnf update in a root >xterm and when all the akmod activity and wot-not is finished, >I've run reboot from another terminal. > >Now, it won't reboot "because root is logged in". > >Gah! Who cares if root is logged in?

Re: second ethernet device not "seen"

try ifconfig -a , ifconfig only shows interfaces that are "up", ifconfig XXX up will do it, or networkmanager can set it up if it has a config or having a network-scripts file for it saying onboot=yes or a ifup with a network-scripts ifcfg-dev file defining it. Otherwise the device is down and