Am 27.01.2012 15:34, schrieb Kaushik Guha:
Dear Friends,
While upgrading through Yumex ,everything is running well,except a problem
is
occurring while upgrading packages.
19:46:52 : YUM: warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature,
key ID 8296fa0f: NOKEY
/19:46:52 :
On 01/27/2012 07:25 AM, Dan H. Eicher wrote:
Is the result of having slapd die the normal behavior, or should a
bug report be filled?
slapd is dying or crashing? That is not normal.
Yes, an invalid key value pair in the ldif file being being imported
from fedora-idm-console with
On 01/27/2012 08:51 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.01.2012 15:34, schrieb Kaushik Guha:
Dear Friends,
While upgrading through Yumex ,everything is running well,except a problem
is
occurring while upgrading packages.
19:46:52 : YUM: warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: Header V3 RSA/SHA256
list!
just found this today:
Datei: mail.exe
Virus: W32.Mydoom.M
Es folgen Details zu der betroffenen E-Mail:
Von: arch...@mail-archive.com
An: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Datum: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:12:56 +0500
Betreff: Mail System Error - Returned Mail
have
Am 27.01.2012 16:15, schrieb Kevin Martin:
On 01/27/2012 08:51 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.01.2012 15:34, schrieb Kaushik Guha:
Dear Friends,
While upgrading through Yumex ,everything is running well,except a
problem is
occurring while upgrading packages.
19:46:52 : YUM:
On 27/01/12 15:55, DRSp. wrote:
list!
just found this today:
Datei: mail.exe
Virus: W32.Mydoom.M
Then don't use Windows.
and You'mm be fine.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy, friend of fedoraproject
UTF_8 Encoded
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On 01/27/2012 09:56 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.01.2012 16:15, schrieb Kevin Martin:
On 01/27/2012 08:51 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.01.2012 15:34, schrieb Kaushik Guha:
Dear Friends,
While upgrading through Yumex ,everything is running well,except a
problem is
occurring
The 389 Project team is pleased to announce the release of
389-ds-base-1.2.10.a8. 1.2.10 has some new features and fixes for bugs
found in 1.2.10 testing and bugs from earlier releases. There is also a
389-admin package in testing
NEW: EL6 support
Beginning with RHEL 6.2, the 389-ds-base
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 3:42 PM, Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
linux guy wrote:
I updated our server (i5, 8 GB, F16-KDE-64) from F16-32 last week.
So, if I understand correctly, on the server side went from 32 to 64 bit,
and then remotes are now slow?
Sorry for the late reply, but
Thanks Kevin.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Kevin Martin kevi...@ameritech.net wrote:
On 01/27/2012 09:56 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.01.2012 16:15, schrieb Kevin Martin:
On 01/27/2012 08:51 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.01.2012 15:34, schrieb Kaushik Guha:
Dear Friends,
Am 27.01.2012 17:14, schrieb Kevin Martin:
On 01/27/2012 09:56 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.01.2012 16:15, schrieb Kevin Martin:
On 01/27/2012 08:51 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.01.2012 15:34, schrieb Kaushik Guha:
Dear Friends,
While upgrading through Yumex ,everything is
yum install flash-plugins fixed the problem.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away:
Am 27.01.2012 17:28, schrieb Kevin Martin:
yum clean all and yum upgrade will solve some problems, but certainly not 99%
of them. For example, I *am* a
tester of rawhide and have been fighting a battle with the x11 updates. I
finally removed about 25 x11 packages
that I determined
I think I just traced it to a network issue. Don't spend any time on
this until I update the thread.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines:
On 01/27/2012 10:42 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 27.01.2012 17:28, schrieb Kevin Martin:
yum clean all and yum upgrade will solve some problems, but certainly not
99% of them. For example, I *am* a
tester of rawhide and have been fighting a battle with the x11 updates. I
finally removed
We have the community for you...
Join Now!
http://www.linuxexpertcommunity.com/
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines:
On 27/01/12 17:55, Francesco Principe wrote:
We have the community for you...
Join Now!
http://www.linuxexpertcommunity.com/
Ah no, I'm happhy here.
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy, friend of fedoraproject
UTF_8 Encoded
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On 01/27/2012 08:21 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
tell someone he should disable gpgcheck is dumb, because you suggest if people
have problems they should do this - WTF do you understand why this exists and
what damage are hapenning if you get a bad core-package on your system which
was only
On 01/27/2012 08:42 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
so tell him yum --nogpgcheck upgrade because this is temporary, tell
people disable it per option will mostly result in permanently disabled
I don't know about anybody else, but I had the impression that this was
exactly what he was suggesting.
The following happens quite frequently:
A few days ago, I plugged into HDMI. When I was done I manually
returned the audio hardware setup to the analog output (once upon a
time it did this automagically). A couple of boots since then - all is
fine.
Today, I have no sound. The ONLY choices I have
Am 27.01.2012 20:07, schrieb Joe Zeff:
On 01/27/2012 08:42 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
so tell him yum --nogpgcheck upgrade because this is temporary, tell
people disable it per option will mostly result in permanently disabled
I don't know about anybody else, but I had the impression that
On 01/28/2012 12:42 AM, Fedora User wrote:
The following happens quite frequently:
A few days ago, I plugged into HDMI. When I was done I manually
returned the audio hardware setup to the analog output (once upon a
time it did this automagically). A couple of boots since then - all is
fine.
SELinux is preventing /bin/bash from execute access on the None
/opt/brother/Printers/mfcj615w/cupswrapper/brcupsconfpt1.
* Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests
***
If you believe that bash should be allowed execute access on the
brcupsconfpt1 Unknown by
SELinux is preventing /bin/bash from execute_no_trans access on the None
/opt/brother/Printers/mfcj615w/lpd/filtermfcj615w.
* Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests
***
If you believe that bash should be allowed execute_no_trans access on
the filtermfcj615w
SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/brprintconf_mfcj615w from write access on
the None /opt/brother/Printers/mfcj615w/inf.
* Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests
***
If you believe that brprintconf_mfcj615w should be allowed write access
on the inf Unknown by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/27/2012 02:41 PM, Lawrence Graves wrote:
SELinux is preventing /usr/bin/brprintconf_mfcj615w from write
access on the None /opt/brother/Printers/mfcj615w/inf.
* Plugin catchall (100. confidence) suggests
***
On 01/27/2012 11:12 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
without EXPLICIT warning that it is generally not a good idea and
why tjhere may be enough uneducated users who starts thinking
well if something does not run disbale gpgcheck is a solution
I agree that the only time skipping the check is a good
On 01/27/2012 11:37 AM, Lawrence Graves wrote:
SELinux is preventing /bin/bash from execute_no_trans access on the None
/opt/brother/Printers/mfcj615w/lpd/filtermfcj615w.
I'm not sure what you want from us; are you asking for advice, or just
reporting the issue? If the former, I'd suggest
linux guy wrote:
I think I just traced it to a network issue. Don't spend any time on
this until I update the thread.
OK, interesting. looking forward to your followup details. :)
-- rex
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
This drive uses 4KB sectors.
My older 750GB Seagate drive uses 512 sectors.
Do the current Linux filesystems and partitioners support this new 4K
sector drive?
Thanx,
JD
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 00:50:26 +0530
Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
Have you filed a bug report? If not, that would be the first step
Rahul
I was waiting for someone to tell me first what idiotic thing I
overlooked. I will be a good citizen and file a bug report this evening.
--
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27/01/12 17:55, Francesco Principe wrote:
We have the community for you...
Join Now!
http://www.**linuxexpertcommunity.com/http://www.linuxexpertcommunity.com/
Ah no, I'm happhy here.
What Linux expert would
On 01/27/2012 07:05 PM, Robert Myers wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com
mailto:frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
On 27/01/12 17:55, Francesco Principe wrote:
We have the community for you...
Join Now!
On 01/28/2012 01:55 AM, Francesco Principe wrote:
We have the community for you...
Join Now!
http://www.linuxexpertcommunity.com/
Your message, as well as your website doesn't provide sufficient (any)
information that would make me curious enough to request admission.
--
Do not condemn the
What Linux expert would click on a link with unknown side-effects at a
previously unknown site?
Hey! I've used my linux expertise to prepare for just such
an occasion (but that doesn't mean I plan to click on
the link no matter how safe I've made it :-)
Ya know, I asked myself the same question, kinda! Then thought...
Why would I not treat this as yet another rubbish attempt to gather
information?
Roger
What Linux expert would click on a link with unknown side-effects at a
previously unknown site?
Hey! I've used my linux expertise to prepare
On 28/01/12 13:55, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 18:35, Rogerare...@bigpond.com wrote:
Ya know, I asked myself the same question, kinda! Then thought...
Why would I not treat this as yet another rubbish attempt to gather
information?
Roger
What Linux expert would click on a
On 01/27/2012 10:05 PM, Roger wrote:
On 28/01/12 13:55, Kenneth Wolcott wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 18:35, Rogerare...@bigpond.com wrote:
Ya know, I asked myself the same question, kinda! Then thought...
Why would I not treat this as yet another rubbish attempt to gather
information?
Roger
Agreed Friends,about the comments.
I request you people,not to make a war of words amongst each other.
I Thank very much to: Reindl Harald;
Kevin Martin;
Joe Zeff ;for the valuable suggestions
given by you.
I did uncheck/disable the
Hi,
I have a question with regard to the sylpheed installation in F16. I
was wondering where the plugins are? (Specifically, the According to
the source file, the plugins are to be installed by make install-plugin,
however the created .so file(s) do not appear to be there. Does that
mean that
Am 28.01.2012 06:11, schrieb Kaushik Guha:
I did uncheck/disable the Fedora Rawhide repos
why were they enabled?
this is a road to hell!
What about the ATrpms repositories? I've disabled it
earlier...should I enable it?
only if you want to kill yur system over the long
ATrpms is known to
Thank you again Reindl.
Oh! It was a mistake on my part to enable a hell lot of repos. list.
Sorry,to bother you Friend.
What I'm doing now is,whenever any update/upgrade is available,I uncheck
those packages which has ending as *.fc17 .The rest packages with
updates(*.fc16) are fine in
I've been using Gmail and thought you might like to try it out. Here's an
invitation to create an account.
You're Invited to Gmail!
Kaushik Guha has invited you to open a Gmail account.
Gmail is Google's free email service, built on the idea that email can be
intuitive, efficient, and fun.
On 1/26/2012 3:23 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:42:54 +0200
Panu Matilainen wrote:
Sounds like 'yum-plugin-post-transaction-actions' package is what you're
looking for.
Yep, even found actual documentation for it once I knew what
to search for. Thanks!
This is something I
On 1/26/2012 10:03 AM, Paul Allen Newell wrote:
On 1/26/2012 6:43 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 26/01/12 14:35, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
If it shows to be stopped or killed, start it:
# systemctl start clamd.service
It appears to be selinux currenlty preventing:
systemctl start
45 matches
Mail list logo
