On 18 December 2013 20:42, bitlord bitlord0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 12:49 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Well here comes the questions on 'where is it now'. Of course since I
skipped f18 f19, these may be 'old' issues
So with gedit, where 'preferences'? I need to turn
On Dec 19, 2013, at 12:10 AM, Ranjan Maitra maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com
wrote:
Hello,
I have been putting my F20 laptop to hibernate using systemctl
hibernate: everything works fine, except that starting up has usually
ended up doing a reboot and going to the login screen.
Make sure
On 12/19/2013 09:39 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 19, 2013, at 12:10 AM, Ranjan Maitra maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com
wrote:
Hello,
I have been putting my F20 laptop to hibernate using systemctl
hibernate: everything works fine, except that starting up has usually
ended up doing a
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 07:32:44 +0100
M. Fioretti mfiore...@nexaima.net wrote:
This is why, while being perfectly aware that Fedora 17 is
unsupported, that even those other packages may stop working etc..
I'd really like to know what, exactly, makes gmvault fail in that
way, on that system.
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 01:16:03 -0600
Ranjan Maitra maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com wrote:
which is what would happen if we just had a rolling
release model
That was argued to death on @devel
it lost
--
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:24:07 -0500
Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
when I edited the yum.repos.d files to point to my local repos, I
got the following error doing a yum update:
Error: Package: gnutls-utils-3.1.17-3.fc20.i686 (updates)
Requires: libopts.so.25
You
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:07:01 +0200
Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 December 2013 20:42, bitlord bitlord0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 12:49 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Well here comes the questions on 'where is it now'. Of course
since I skipped f18 f19,
On 19.12.2013 07:46, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 12/18/2013 10:42 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
Off a fresh install of F20 because upgrade did not work spectacularly,
I noticed that there are a number of F19 packages (including some from
rpmfusion) on my machine.
That just means that there's not a newer
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:17:46 +0100
Mateusz Marzantowicz mmarzantow...@osdf.com.pl wrote:
ownload for an upgrade if they did.
That just means that someone haven done his job or there was an
error during package rebuild which hasn't been fixed yet (correct
me if I'm wrong but there is something
Did you insert the RESUME disk (i.e. your swap partition) into your
linux statement in the grub menu?
e,g,
linux /vmlinuz-3.11.9-100.fc18.x86_64
root=UUID=722d9f6f-867b-4c04-a340-ba3caa23c42f ro rd.md=0 rd.lvm=0
rd.dm=0 vconsole.keymap=sg rd.luks=0 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
On 12/19/2013 03:07 AM, Ahmad Samir wrote:
On 18 December 2013 20:42, bitlord bitlord0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 12:49 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Well here comes the questions on 'where is it now'. Of course since I
skipped f18 f19, these may be 'old' issues
So with
while i appreciate the formalization of the Filesystem Hierarchy
Standard (FHS), it's certainly been a while since it's been updated:
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/
is it still used as a file/directory layout standard? how *is* it
used these days? surely things have changed somewhat since
On 12/19/2013 09:02 PM, Edward M wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:07:01 +0200
Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 December 2013 20:42, bitlord bitlord0...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 12:49 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Well here comes the questions on 'where is it
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 07:51:59 -0500
Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
is it still used as a file/directory layout standard? how *is* it
used these days? surely things have changed somewhat since 2004,
although the general concepts of the FHS are still totally valid.
rday
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:05:49AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Confirm
used dconf-editor instead to set the overrides and now those entries
appear within gedit.
What did you change? I just went through all of dconf-editor listed
items and did not recognize anything to change that would
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:22:14 + Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:17:46 +0100
Mateusz Marzantowicz mmarzantow...@osdf.com.pl wrote:
ownload for an upgrade if they did.
That just means that someone haven done his job or there was an
error during package
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 07:36:39 -0600
Ranjan Maitra maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com wrote:
Actually not in this case. It was a clean install.
I would still run yum --releasever=20 distro-sync --skip-broken
--
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
users mailing list
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:13:59 +0100 Joachim Backes
joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote:
On 12/19/2013 09:39 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 19, 2013, at 12:10 AM, Ranjan Maitra maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com
wrote:
Hello,
I have been putting my F20 laptop to hibernate using
On 12/19/13 21:36, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:22:14 + Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:17:46 +0100
Mateusz Marzantowicz mmarzantow...@osdf.com.pl wrote:
ownload for an upgrade if they did.
That just means that someone haven done his job or
On 12/19/2013 02:47 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:13:59 +0100 Joachim Backes
joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote:
On 12/19/2013 09:39 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 19, 2013, at 12:10 AM, Ranjan Maitra maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com
wrote:
Hello,
I have been putting
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:51:33 +0100 Joachim Backes
joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote:
On 12/19/2013 02:47 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:13:59 +0100 Joachim Backes
joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote:
On 12/19/2013 09:39 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 19, 2013, at
On 19.12.2013 11:22, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:17:46 +0100
Mateusz Marzantowicz mmarzantow...@osdf.com.pl wrote:
ownload for an upgrade if they did.
That just means that someone haven done his job or there was an
error during package rebuild which hasn't been fixed yet
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 15:18:18 +0100
Mateusz Marzantowicz mmarzantow...@osdf.com.pl wrote:
On 19.12.2013 11:22, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 11:17:46 +0100
Mateusz Marzantowicz mmarzantow...@osdf.com.pl wrote:
ownload for an upgrade if they did.
That just means that someone
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 09:50:01 AM +, Frank Murphy wrote:
Fedora 17 has python 2.7 as can be seen
and python modules built against 2.7 (normal practise)
Check the src, and see if you need to install some lib*
https://github.com/gaubert/gmvault/tree/v1.8-beta-20130321
You won't get
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 07:59:45 -0600 Ranjan Maitra
maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:51:33 +0100 Joachim Backes
joachim.bac...@rhrk.uni-kl.de wrote:
On 12/19/2013 02:47 PM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:13:59 +0100 Joachim Backes
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 08:50:04 -0600
Ranjan Maitra maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com wrote:
You can also use resume=/dev/sdxy (your swap partition).
That's more simple :-)
Absolutely, thanks!
But where do I find this value? I can't see it on my df:
Answering my own question: after
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:52:04 + Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 08:50:04 -0600
Ranjan Maitra maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com wrote:
You can also use resume=/dev/sdxy (your swap partition).
That's more simple :-)
Absolutely, thanks!
But where
On Wed, 2013-12-18 at 17:32 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/18/2013 05:20 PM, Dennis Kaptain wrote:
Mate is a fork of Gnome2. I use it and like it a lot.
This is selectable at install?
The desktop environments that you can select at install time are pretty
limited; I don't think
HI
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
while i appreciate the formalization of the Filesystem Hierarchy
Standard (FHS), it's certainly been a while since it's been updated:
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/
is it still used as a file/directory layout standard? how
Allegedly, on or about 18 December 2013, Rick Stevens sent:
3. Make sure you enforce complex passwords and require them to be
rotated at least every 90 days.
I take issue with the continually changing passwords idea.
If you get hacked, changing the password after the event is too late.
And if
I just updated from Fedora 18 to 19 with fedup.
After the update I have many orphaned packages :
# package-cleanup --orphans | wc -l
635
When I examine them I see things like fedora-release, zlib, and such.
They mostly exist alongside their identical fedora 19 versions :
# package-cleanup
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 12:16:16 -0500
Kevin H. Hobbs hob...@ohio.edu wrote:
I just updated from Fedora 18 to 19 with fedup.
Any idea what's going on?
package-cleanup --dupes
packagecleanup --cleandupes
--
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
users mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/19/2013 12:16 PM, Tim wrote:
You really need something that detects attempt to crack passwords,
responds appropriately to thwart the attacks while they happen,
and immediately notifies you that an attempt is happening as it
happens (e.g.
Allegedly, on or about 19 December 2013, Ranjan Maitra sent:
According to this bug report, I need to add
resume=swapdevice
to the grub line.
I have to ask: We should *we* have to do that? Surely, the
*installation* *routine* should be setting that up.
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
These issues are happening on a Solaris Sparc server, most of our
infrastructure is Solaris Sparc, with some Solaris X86 servers.
The Solaris equivalent of NSCD called
svc:/system/name-service-cache:default is running.
I am not familiar with authconfig, I can look for the Solaris equivalent
If you have not installed it, install denyhosts...it watches for ssh
password attacks and locks out hosts automatically.
It does limit the number of attempts someone gets before being
completely locked out.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Mark Haney mha...@practichem.com wrote:
-BEGIN
I have an SD card all the time in my Asus ee900 that I have just put f20
i386 on. I close the system regularly then open it up, unlock and do
something. On f17, this was not a problem. I just realized that the SD
card would become read-only after resume. i have to unmount it, remove
it,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/19/2013 12:44 PM, Roger Heflin wrote:
If you have not installed it, install denyhosts...it watches for
ssh password attacks and locks out hosts automatically.
Yes, denyhosts is also a good package and one I've forgotten about.
Thanks for
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
I have to ask: We should *we* have to do that? Surely, the
*installation* *routine* should be setting that up.
And how!
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 12/18/2013 11:05 AM, bruce wrote:
Hey guys. - subject says it all!!
For a basic centos/fedora install. Need to have
pointers/docs/suggestions/solid steps to actually harden/secure a
system.
I've looked at a bunch of different articles/sites, so I'm also turning here.
Also, are there
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:00:16 -0800 Steven Rosenberg
stevenhrosenb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
I have to ask: We should *we* have to do that? Surely, the
*installation* *routine* should be setting that up.
And how!
Like
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
If you get hacked, changing the password after the event is too late.
And if they installed a backdoor, changing your password will be
completely pointless.
If you haven't been hacked, you're just making life harder for
guys..
The project that the corrupt system is going to be driving will create
a distributed network of systems, where the edge systems, are tied
back into the central server(s). Think of the BOINC/SETI project,
where you have a bunch of edge systems doing work and communicating
back to the master
Frank wrote:
package-cleanup --dupes
packagecleanup --cleandupes
Somewhere in there some some dependency leaves fc18 and starts ripping
out large parts of fc19..
It looks to be perl
# yum remove `package-cleanup --dupes | grep perl | grep fc18`
...
Remove 67 Packages (+32 Dependent
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013, Kevin H. Hobbs wrote:
I just updated from Fedora 18 to 19 with fedup.
After the update I have many orphaned packages :
# package-cleanup --orphans | wc -l
635
When I examine them I see things like fedora-release, zlib, and such.
They mostly exist alongside their
On Friday 20 of December 2013 03:46:13 Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 18 December 2013, Rick Stevens sent:
3. Make sure you enforce complex passwords and require them to be
rotated at least every 90 days.
I take issue with the continually changing passwords idea.
using rotated
On 12/18/2013 06:01 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/18/2013 05:43 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 12/19/13 05:30, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/18/2013 04:08 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 12/19/13 03:57, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Yes. I have notes on this, and did the change. But past installs
let
Is this for real? Did they really dumb it down like this? For Gnome,
all I can do is select things like include admin tools. Nothing about
what admin tools. I cannot remove Evolution and substitute
Thunderbird. I could go on, but you get the point.
They made it too dumb. Or I am missing
Not figured out yet...
On 12/18/2013 06:18 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I see in
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/20/html/Installation_Guide/index.html
sec 8.1.4 that I am suppose to add:
repo=http://fqdn/os/i386/ to the install command (pressing tab at boot
time). My notes for
Michael wrote:
You may also need to use yum or rpm to remove some of the duplicates
by hand if package-cleanup can't work out how to solve all the
dependencies.
The only bits of perl that I could not clean up seem to be perl and perl
libs.
I did :
# rpm -q --provides
Fedora 20 (from fedup)
Dell Inspiron N7110
Intel Integrated Graphics Controller
With Fedora 19, the GDM login screen would blank after a certain amount of
time. With Fedora 20, this no longer happens.
I would like to restore Fedora 19's behaviour, so I can leave the laptop
on and access it
On 12/19/2013 04:55 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:24:07 -0500
Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
when I edited the yum.repos.d files to point to my local repos, I
got the following error doing a yum update:
Error: Package: gnutls-utils-3.1.17-3.fc20.i686 (updates)
Hi,
I don't think I'll need to have PA enabled on my NAS. What is the easiest
way to *disable* it?
-- john
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On 18Dec2013 00:43, Jonathan Ryshpan jonr...@pacbell.net wrote:
* Frequently, I start the system, check my email and leave for
breakfast; on these days, I'd like backup to start when I leave;
I would invoke it by a shell script or whatever.
* Other days, I stay on
On 18Dec2013 10:17, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
Thanks for clarifying this for me. I suspected directories, but did
not think I had THAT many! Obviously it was more than just
directories. I will save this little find in my notes of things to
check.
Symlinks maybe.
Or
On 12/19/2013 01:16 PM, John Obaterspok issued this missive:
Hi,
I don't think I'll need to have PA enabled on my NAS. What is the
easiest way to *disable* it?
Unless you log into a desktop environment, it shouldn't run. If you do
log into a desktop, then go to the session startup config for
On 12/19/2013 08:35 AM, Alexander Volovics wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:05:49AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Confirm
used dconf-editor instead to set the overrides and now those entries
appear within gedit.
What did you change? I just went through all of dconf-editor listed
items and
On my Asus 900.
I just started a yum update fire* libre* that took next ot no time to
download from my local repo, but took over 10 min to build the local
delta. Seems I am better of NOT having drpms available.
hmmm...
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:30:08 -0500
Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On my Asus 900.
I just started a yum update fire* libre* that took next ot no time
to download from my local repo, but took over 10 min to build the
local delta. Seems I am better of NOT having drpms available.
On Dec 19, 2013, at 11:16 AM, Ranjan Maitra maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com
wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 10:00:16 -0800 Steven Rosenberg
stevenhrosenb...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
I have to ask: We should *we* have to do that?
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
I just started a yum update fire* libre* that took next ot no time to
download from my local repo, but took over 10 min to build the local delta.
Seems I am better of NOT having drpms available.
Yeah, if you have a
On 12/19/2013 05:36 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 17:30:08 -0500
Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
On my Asus 900.
I just started a yum update fire* libre* that took next ot no time
to download from my local repo, but took over 10 min to build the
local delta. Seems
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013, Kevin H. Hobbs wrote:
# yum install perl-autodie
...
Transaction check error:
file /usr/share/man/man3/Fatal.3pm.gz from install of
perl-autodie-2.16-1.fc19.noarch conflicts with file from package
perl-4:5.16.3-245.fc18.x86_64
file /usr/share/man/man3/autodie.3pm.gz from
On 12/19/2013 05:42 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
I just started a yum update fire* libre* that took next ot no time to
download from my local repo, but took over 10 min to build the local delta.
Seems I am better of
On Dec 19, 2013, at 3:42 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
wrote:
I just started a yum update fire* libre* that took next ot no time to
download from my local repo, but took over 10 min to build
So I have been reading up release notes on f20 which leads me to release
notes of gnome 3.10 and
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/20/html/Release_Notes/sect-Release_Notes-Changes_for_Desktop.html
3.1.4 discusses gnome-tweak-tool
No gnome-tweak-tool installed.
so
yum provides
When Adobe acroread is run from a terminal, ctrl/z doesn't suspend it.
^Z appears on the terminal, which hangs until acroread terminates itself
or ctrl/c is pressed on the terminal. However $ acroread starts
acroread in the background and ctrl/z suspends all other programs, as
expected. System
HI.
Took a drive from an older FC13 system, put it in a usb drive bay to
read from a centos 6.5 system
centos sees the drive, but only reports the drive as 350 M free, of a
640G drive..
centos doesn't show all the folders/files on the drive. I'm only
seeing the vm/image files...
any pointers
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at a4:01 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
Does anyone know exactly what's happening during the rebuild? I understand
from light documentation how deltarpm works, what I'm not sure is if most of
the time is spent reconstructing a virtual oldrpm from an
On 12/19/2013 05:05 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
So I have been reading up release notes on f20 which leads me to release
notes of gnome 3.10 and
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/20/html/Release_Notes/sect-Release_Notes-Changes_for_Desktop.html
3.1.4 discusses
On Dec 19, 2013, at 4:14 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at a4:01 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com
wrote:
Does anyone know exactly what's happening during the rebuild? I understand
from light documentation how deltarpm works, what I'm
I am running VirtualBox under F19, and I wanted to try F20 in a VM, but
I can't get it to install. With both the Live ISO and the full DVD iso,
if I point the virtual DVD drive at the ISO, it boots into the main
syslinux/Anaconda menu, but as soon as I select Install Fedora, the
screen goes black
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Jonathan Ryshpan jonr...@pacbell.netwrote:
When Adobe acroread is run from a terminal, ctrl/z doesn't suspend it.
^Z appears on the terminal, which hangs until acroread terminates itself
or ctrl/c is pressed on the terminal. However $ acroread starts
On Dec 19, 2013, at 4:50 PM, Greg Woods wo...@ucar.edu wrote:
I am running VirtualBox under F19, and I wanted to try F20 in a VM, but
I can't get it to install. With both the Live ISO and the full DVD iso,
if I point the virtual DVD drive at the ISO, it boots into the main
syslinux/Anaconda
On 12/20/13 07:50, Greg Woods wrote:
I am running VirtualBox under F19, and I wanted to try F20 in a VM, but
I can't get it to install. With both the Live ISO and the full DVD iso,
if I point the virtual DVD drive at the ISO, it boots into the main
syslinux/Anaconda menu, but as soon as I
On 12/19/2013 07:22 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/19/2013 08:35 AM, Alexander Volovics wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:05:49AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Confirm
used dconf-editor instead to set the overrides and now those entries
appear within gedit.
What did you change? I just
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 03:07:49PM -0800, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote:
When Adobe acroread is run from a terminal, ctrl/z doesn't suspend it.
^Z appears on the terminal, which hangs until acroread terminates itself
or ctrl/c is pressed on the terminal. However $ acroread starts
acroread in the
On 12/19/2013 06:15 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
On 12/19/2013 05:05 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
So I have been reading up release notes on f20 which leads me to release
notes of gnome 3.10 and
On 12/19/2013 07:16 PM, Germán A. Racca wrote:
On 12/19/2013 07:22 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/19/2013 08:35 AM, Alexander Volovics wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:05:49AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Confirm
used dconf-editor instead to set the overrides and now those entries
On 12/19/2013 09:32 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/19/2013 07:16 PM, Germán A. Racca wrote:
On 12/19/2013 07:22 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/19/2013 08:35 AM, Alexander Volovics wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:05:49AM -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Confirm
used dconf-editor
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 03:46 +1030, Tim wrote:
Allegedly, on or about 18 December 2013, Rick Stevens sent:
3. Make sure you enforce complex passwords and require them to be
rotated at least every 90 days.
I take issue with the continually changing passwords idea.
I agree with you on this
On 12/19/2013 07:45 PM, Germán A. Racca wrote:
On 12/19/2013 09:32 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/19/2013 07:16 PM, Germán A. Racca wrote:
On 12/19/2013 07:22 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/19/2013 08:35 AM, Alexander Volovics wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 08:05:49AM -0500, Robert
On 12/19/2013 05:05 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/19/2013 07:45 PM, Germán A. Racca wrote:
On 12/19/2013 09:32 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/19/2013 07:16 PM, Germán A. Racca wrote:
On 12/19/2013 07:22 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/19/2013 08:35 AM, Alexander Volovics wrote:
On 12/19/2013 03:25 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/19/2013 04:55 AM, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 18:24:07 -0500
Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
when I edited the yum.repos.d files to point to my local repos, I
got the following error doing a yum update:
Error:
On 12/19/2013 08:13 PM, Dan Thurman wrote:
On 12/19/2013 05:05 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/19/2013 07:45 PM, Germán A. Racca wrote:
On 12/19/2013 09:32 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/19/2013 07:16 PM, Germán A. Racca wrote:
On 12/19/2013 07:22 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 08:04 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
Yes. Been installing and testing F20 on a VM for a while now.
But make sure you're running VirtualBox 4.3.6
Thanks for the tip, I was on 4.3.4 . So I upgraded to 4.3.6, installed
the extension pack, and... I still get a black screen
On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 18:26 -0700, Greg Woods wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 08:04 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
Yes. Been installing and testing F20 on a VM for a while now.
But make sure you're running VirtualBox 4.3.6
Thanks for the tip, I was on 4.3.4 . So I upgraded to 4.3.6,
On 12/20/13 09:26, Greg Woods wrote:
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 08:04 +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
Yes. Been installing and testing F20 on a VM for a while now.
But make sure you're running VirtualBox 4.3.6
Thanks for the tip, I was on 4.3.4 . So I upgraded to 4.3.6, installed
the extension pack,
I have a Gateway NV53A laptop that has Centos 6.5 installed and
performing without a problem. I tried to install the x64 f20 on this
machine, but have not been able to get the discs to install.
I checksumed the disc and it passed
I tested the disc with the boot process, and could not figure
Anyway, it is safer to use something like VIM to edit files as root,
I
only tested gedit because I saw your email, but as root I use only
VIM
to edit files :)
Why?
- Original Message -
On 12/19/2013 10:05 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/19/2013 07:45 PM, Germán A. Racca
On 12/19/2013 09:26 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/19/2013 06:15 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
On 12/19/2013 05:05 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
So I have been reading up release notes on f20 which leads me to release
notes of gnome 3.10 and
On Thu, 2013-12-19 at 16:43 -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 19, 2013, at 4:14 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at a4:01 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com
wrote:
Does anyone know exactly what's happening during the rebuild? I
antonio ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 18/12/2013 20:53:
Chris Murphy ha scritto / said the followingil giorno/on 18/12/2013
20:48:
On Dec 18, 2013, at 5:11 AM, antonio montagnani
antonio.montagn...@alice.it wrote:
when I want to poweroff/reboot the machine I get this
93 matches
Mail list logo
