Hi,
I need some help urgnelty.. as no idea why its acting funy.
as far I belive, I have setup ldap server properly in test
environment, but actiting wired.. no idea why ...
example
[root@test ~]# id tuser
id: tuser: No such user
bellow command shows the correct info :
[root@test ~]#
-D 'cn=Directory Manager'
It looks like your ldapsearch is using Directory Manager (the 389 equivalent to
the root user). However I do not see where you have specified a bind DN in an
ldap.conf file so possibly PAM is binding anonymously and an ACL is prohibiting
the search?
If this is a
Hi
Thanks for the quick Reply. I was thinking that same that some where
its missing the Bind dn
and I can conferm that, its working with definning
binddn and bindpw in ldap.conf
but ,
I confiered this before and I never had to define binddn and bindpw
in any where in ldap.conf and as you said
Hi
Thanks for the quick Reply. I was thinking that same that some where
its missing the Bind dn
and I can conferm that, its working with definning
binddn and bindpw in ldap.conf
but ,
I confiered this before and I never had to define binddn and bindpw
in any where in ldap.conf and as you said
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 05:33:09PM +, fosiul alam wrote:
Hi
Thanks for the quick Reply. I was thinking that same that some where
its missing the Bind dn
and I can conferm that, its working with definning
binddn and bindpw in ldap.conf
but ,
I confiered this before and I never had
The thread with the subject of gnome-terminal in F20 defaults to / for the
initial directory prompted me to do some testing and I've found an oddity.
The desktop file is as follows...
[egreshko@f20f ]$ cat Desktop/gnome-terminal.desktop
[Desktop Entry]
Comment[en_US]=
Comment=
On 29.12.2013, Tim wrote:
I've always considered having to check your spam for false positives to
make having anti-spam filtering a waste of time.
It depends. I've been receiving about 30 spam emails daily, on
average. A quick look into my spam-folder is enough to check if any
serious email
On 12/29/2013 04:36 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
It means that the release version is, or should be, 19. However, I'd
suggest that you use package-cleanup --dupes and check to see if you
have duplicate versions of fedora-release-noarch.
You can use 'package-cleanup --cleandupes' to remove any old
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 12:52:12PM +0100, Suvayu Ali wrote:
On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 08:49:23AM +, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Wed, 25 Dec 2013 14:17:17 +0100
Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote:
I know I can always look in the logs, but I would probably miss
something if I
Hello,
I have a SSD disk as system disk and a:
- HDD as backup drive that is used a couple of times each week
- HDD as media disk that is perhaps used a couple of times each day
I've tried to set the spindown to 1 hour of being idle via gnome-disks.
Problem is that it never spins down.
- I've
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 13:02:06 +0100
Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote:
rpm -q exim sendmail postfix mailx
package exim is not installed
package sendmail is not installed
package postfix is not installed
mailx-12.5-10.fc20.x86_64
As I stated mailx allows me to read system-mail in
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 12:24:14 +
Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote:
Forgot a link:
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/pseries/v5r3/index.jsp?topic=/com.ibm.aix.files/doc/aixfiles/mailrc.htm
--
Regards,
Frank
www.frankly3d.com
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 12/29/2013 03:00 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
The thread with the subject of gnome-terminal in F20 defaults to / for the initial
directory prompted me to do some testing and I've found an oddity.
The desktop file is as follows...
[egreshko@f20f ]$ cat Desktop/gnome-terminal.desktop
But for me:
On 12/29/2013 01:24 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
As I stated mailx allows me to read system-mail in claws-mail.
Have you changed anything in the mailx setup? /etc/mail.rc ?
As far as I can tell I can only get system mail when using an MTA, mailx
without any changes seem to do nothing here.
Lars
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 14:30:29 +0100
Lars E. Pettersson l...@homer.se wrote:
On 12/29/2013 01:24 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
As I stated mailx allows me to read system-mail in claws-mail.
Have you changed anything in the mailx setup? /etc/mail.rc ?
As far as I can tell I can only get system
Hello,
After cloning a distribution fedora 19, I have to set selinux=0
to be able to boot.
How can I do to avoid this option?
I tried:
fixfiles relabel
system-config-selinux
But I never get a relabelling!
What should I do?
Thank.
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 07:55:12 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But for me:
[rgm@lx120e ~]$ cat Desktop/gnome-terminal.desktop
cat: Desktop/gnome-terminal.desktop: No such file or directory
You need to create it (copy it there) first:
cp /usr/share/applications/gnome-terminal.desktop
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 14:40:26 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
After cloning a distribution fedora 19, I have to set selinux=0
to be able to boot.
How can I do to avoid this option?
I tried:
fixfiles relabel
system-config-selinux
But I never get a relabelling!
What should I do?
On Sat, 28 Dec 2013 23:56:30 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
What dependency error did it report?
And how did you query the installed packages as well as the remote
repos for what would be available_after_ the upgrade?
Many users still misread such error messages and don't manage to work
Hi
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Brian Hanks wrote:
In response I removed kmod-VirtualBox, akmod-VirtualBox, and VirtualBox.
Then I did a fedup --clean and reattempted fedup --network 20. This went
well until the reboot. Following the reboot I select the Fedup option, but
nothing
Allegedly, on or about 29 December 2013, John Obaterspok sent:
Any hints on how I get the disks to spin down?
Do a manual unmount, and leave it unmounted, perhaps?
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -rsvp
Linux 3.9.10-100.fc17.x86_64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 14 01:31:27 UTC 2013 x86_64
All mail to my mailbox
--
Mark C. Allman, PMP, CSM
Founder, See How You Ski, www.seehowyouski.com
Sr. Project Manager, Allman Professional Consulting, Inc.,
www.allmanpc.com
617-947-4263, Twitter: @allmanpc
Follow allmanpc on Twitter View Mark Allman, PMP, CSM's profile on
LinkedIn
On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 13:39
Tim:
I've always considered having to check your spam for false positives to
make having anti-spam filtering a waste of time.
Heinz Diehl:
It depends. I've been receiving about 30 spam emails daily, on
average. A quick look into my spam-folder is enough to check if any
serious email
Thank,
It works.
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 14:40:26 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Hello,
After cloning a distribution fedora 19, I have to set selinux=0
to be able to boot.
How can I do to avoid this option?
I tried:
fixfiles relabel
system-config-selinux
But I never get a
Michael Schwendt writes:
It may not even be a bug in Nautilus either, since other components take
care of stopping/starting it (e.g. gnome-tweak-tool and gnome-shell).
What happens if you kill all nautilus processes, then start a terminal
(e.g. gnome-terminal) in a way that it starts in
Hello,
I burnt a DVD fedora 20 to update my distro.
However, it fails the test at 12.6%.
It there a risk to make an update using fedup?
I always have the option to download a package which may
be damaged.
Thank.
===
Hi
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote:
Hello,
I burnt a DVD fedora 20 to update my distro.
However, it fails the test at 12.6%.
It there a risk to make an update using fedup?
I always have the option to download a package which may
be damaged.
If you
On 12/29/2013 3:29 AM, Heinz Diehl wrote:
On 29.12.2013, Tim wrote:
I've always considered having to check your spam for false positives to
make having anti-spam filtering a waste of time.
It depends. I've been receiving about 30 spam emails daily, on
average. A quick look into my
- Original Message -
From: Rahul Sundaram
Sent: 12/29/13 04:39 PM
To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Re: fedora update
Hi
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote:
Hello,
I burnt a DVD fedora 20 to update my distro.
However,
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Which version of fedup? Make sure you have the latest
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp#Why_does_my_upgrade_to_Fedora_20_fail_.28immediately_reboot_to_my_old_Fedora.29.3F
I read this before I made my first attempt and I validated
Hi
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Of course. However, I only have a 3G+ connection!!!
I guess you can try fedup with the media option. It won't install any
broken packages. You should be able to download specific packages off the
network if necessary. I would
On 12/29/2013 08:43 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 07:55:12 -0500, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
But for me:
[rgm@lx120e ~]$ cat Desktop/gnome-terminal.desktop
cat: Desktop/gnome-terminal.desktop: No such file or directory
You need to create it (copy it there) first:
cp
2013/12/29 Tim ignored_mail...@yahoo.com.au
Allegedly, on or about 29 December 2013, John Obaterspok sent:
Any hints on how I get the disks to spin down?
Do a manual unmount, and leave it unmounted, perhaps?
Well, then it's easier to force them to suspend. The media disk is used via
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 03:58:12AM -0500, David wrote:
Wow! 30 per day? Just wow! You must have a spam magnet or something. :-)
I use seven different accounts regularly and I don't get 20 in a month.
Heh. Some people change accounts to get away from spam. I've used
the same couple of
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 01:41:40AM +1030, Tim wrote:
But you don't trust it enough, not to check...
Even as good as my SA rules are, I check on a spot basis.
If I had to check up on it, I don't consider it trustworthy.
Again I'll say--no matter how good any anti-spam software is, there
will
Patrick Dupre writes:
Hello,
I burnt a DVD fedora 20 to update my distro.
I do not believe that updating via the distro DVD images is implemented any
more. You must use fedup to update.
However, it fails the test at 12.6%.
It there a risk to make an update using fedup?
Yes.
I always
On 29.12.2013, Tim wrote:
[CRM-114..]
But you don't trust it enough, not to check...
No. Because email loss is strictly not acceptable. I always check back
manually. CRM-114, once trained, is pretty good, and it takes no more
than 10-15 secs to see if there's real email amongst all the spam.
On Sun, 2013-12-29 at 08:49 +1030, Tim wrote:
I've always considered having to check your spam for false positives to
make having anti-spam filtering a waste of time.
I don't think so. The spam filtering system we use at work (based on
SpamAssassin with a web interface to view suspected spam)
When I have a bluetooth device (jambox) connected, there's a bluetooth
indicator on the upper right of the screen, next to the network
connection indicator. When the device is disconnected, the bluetooth
indicator goes away. Is there a way to keep it visible whether there's a
device connected or
On 12/28/2013 01:12 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Steven Stern
subscribed-li...@sterndata.com mailto:subscribed-li...@sterndata.com
wrote:
On 12/28/2013 11:32 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 28/12/13 12:13, Eddie G.
Since I can access to all the rpm files on the DVD, I expected to find a tool
to
verify the *.rpm files!
Does it not exist?
Something like rpm -Vp
Patrick Dupre writes:
Hello,
I burnt a DVD fedora 20 to update my distro.
I do not believe that updating via the distro DVD images is
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 01:41:40AM +1030, Tim wrote:
Tim:
I've always considered having to check your spam for false positives to
make having anti-spam filtering a waste of time.
Heinz Diehl:
It depends. I've been receiving about 30 spam emails daily, on
average. A quick look into my
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:16:19AM -0600, Dave Ihnat wrote:
snip...
It's not uncommon for SpamAssassin to catch 400-700 a *day*. When really
bad new campaigns start up, sometimes it can go over a thousand. Usually,
only 5-10 get through, whereupon I feed 'em to
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 21:30:40 +0100, Patrick Dupre wrote:
Since I can access to all the rpm files on the DVD, I expected to find a tool
to
verify the *.rpm files!
Does it not exist?
Something like rpm -Vp
rpm -K file.rpm
Or for many files: find . -name \*.rpm | xargs rpm -K
You could
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
Oh, and I have lost ctl-alt-l to lock my desktop.
super-l
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
On 12/29/2013 04:40 AM, Lars E. Pettersson wrote:
On 12/29/2013 04:36 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
It means that the release version is, or should be, 19. However, I'd
suggest that you use package-cleanup --dupes and check to see if you
have duplicate versions of fedora-release-noarch.
You can use
Updated to F19, kernel-3.12.5-200.fc19.x86_64.
On boot I get a kernel panic around [2.2]. The trace that's on the
screen is about smp, timers, hpet. Can't read quickly enough to see what
actually happened.
/var/log/messages has no log of the kernel boot. Shouldn't there be one?
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 12:24:14PM +, Frank Murphy wrote:
On Sun, 29 Dec 2013 13:02:06 +0100
Suvayu Ali fatkasuvayu+li...@gmail.com wrote:
rpm -q exim sendmail postfix mailx
package exim is not installed
package sendmail is not installed
package postfix is not installed
On 12/29/2013 05:04 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
Oh, and I have lost ctl-alt-l to lock my desktop.
super-l
Got it thanks.
I only started seeing reference to the 'super' key with f20. Seems I
was blissfully ignorant until
On 12/29/2013 08:08 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 12/29/2013 05:04 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Robert Moskowitz
r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
Oh, and I have lost ctl-alt-l to lock my desktop.
super-l
Got it thanks.
I only started seeing reference to the 'super' key
Allegedly, on or about 29 December 2013, Robert Moskowitz sent:
it sure seems like at first install, ctl-alt-l was working,
but could have just been another of those senior moments.
For several years, through different incarnations of Fedora, and on
different hardware, I've had computers
I'm trying to install intel xdk software . Has any one got it to to
work ? If so how . it is asking for libudev.so.0 . I can not find it
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Tim:
If I had to check up on it, I don't consider it trustworthy.
Dave Ihnat:
Again I'll say--no matter how good any anti-spam software is, there
will ALWAYS be false positives. So on that basis, you don't like any
of it?
If I have to double-check, what's the point of it? Seriously! How
Tim:
If I had to check up on it, I don't consider it trustworthy.
Robert Holtzman:
You don't entertain the possibility that not all spam filters are 100%
correct or that no software is 100% reliable, given the fact that it's
all developed by humans, none of whom are 100% infallible?
I don't
On 12/29/2013 07:37 PM, Tim wrote:
In the past, I've emailed friends, and my first or second posting has
gone into their spam bucket, without them doing anything about it.
I have a friend who's email service sporadically bounces my email. Why?
Because I own my own domain, I use my hosting
On 12/30/13 11:26, William Biggs wrote:
I'm trying to install intel xdk software . Has any one got it to to
work ? If so how . it is asking for libudev.so.0 . I can not find it
Delete the symbolic link for libudev.so.0 in /opt/intel/XDK. Then.
ln -s /usr/lib64/libudev.so.1 libudev.so.0
On 12/29/2013 10:53 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 12/29/2013 07:37 PM, Tim wrote:
In the past, I've emailed friends, and my first or second posting has
gone into their spam bucket, without them doing anything about it.
I have a friend who's email service sporadically bounces my email.
Why?
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 02:25:41PM -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
Doesn't your ISP have spam filters or are you the ISP?
Effectively, I am. I run my own mail server, and just use my ISP as a
pipe.
Cheers,
--
Dave Ihnat
dih...@dminet.com
--
users mailing list
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 01:57:52PM +1030, Tim wrote:
If I have to double-check, what's the point of it? Seriously! How
different is that than just hitting delete on the way through reading
your mail?
Nothing--if you've only, say, 10 messages. If you're talking about dozens
or hundreds, it
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 07:53:53PM -0800, Joe Zeff wrote:
I have a friend who's email service sporadically bounces my email.
Why? Because I own my own domain, I use my hosting company's email
servers instead of my ISP's and a small number of their customers
are spammers. Whenever their spam
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 03:59:47PM +1100, Roger wrote:
I don't know if this may help but there is another possibility.
Much of my Inbox spam/annoying garbage emails used similar words
such as ...
True. But...
I set up 3 filters, ...
You're reinventing. Spamassassin has provision for all
On Dec 29, 2013, at 7:51 AM, Brian Hanks bha...@bhanks.net wrote:
This went well until the reboot. Following the reboot I select the Fedup
option, but nothing really happened. I ended up back in my Fedora 19 system
while running the new Fedora 20 kernel.
You chose the fedup option in
The system is unable to work with Centos 6.5 for connecting to the
network. Currently downloading FC20 to see if that makes a diffference
with the updated Kernel, or updated drivers.
Right now, when I do a centos install, the page that has the network
config is greyed out, so the install isn't
On 12/28/2013 08:13 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
I literally spent a whole hour and a half ...JUST adding email
addresses to the Block list...
Do you know that a big ratio of SPAM are with forged sender address?
Just try it in Thunderbird: manage identities, add, and setup a fake sender.
On 12/28/2013 08:32 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
That's strange, all my mail comes through gmail and I rarely see any
spam unless I go in and look at what they've filtered out. I only use
Thunderbird filters to sort messages into categories/directories.
SPAM is very
On Dec 28, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote:
Hello,
I tried to set relabel by using system-config-selinux,
but nothing happens I have to keep selinux=0 to be able to boot!
Try autorelabel=1, and in the future if you have selinux problems you don't
want to troubeleshoot
On 12/30/2013 07:01 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Dec 28, 2013, at 8:15 PM, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote:
Hello,
I tried to set relabel by using system-config-selinux,
but nothing happens I have to keep selinux=0 to be able to boot!
Try autorelabel=1, and in the future if you have
Hi Team,
As one of the best digital library software we want to implement Fedora for
setting up digital library for our organization. However before starting I
would like to know about a few features of Fedora which are essential parts of
our requirements for setting up a library . Kindly
68 matches
Mail list logo
