Re: [389-users] Upgraded to RHDS 9.1 but Console is Still Looking for 9.0 JAR
On 01/08/2014 10:31 AM, Paul Whitney wrote: Hi, I recently updated RHDS 9.0 servers to 9.1. I am getting mixed results with the update. Steps taken: 1. Stop all dirsrv and dirsrv-admin services 2. Executed yum localupdate *.rpm 3. After the yum completes. Execute setup-ds.pl --debug --update (no errors generated, status is databases updated successfully. 4. Reinstall openldap (based on RHBA-2013-0778). 5. Reboot system. (I do this because restarting the dirsrv-admin service still generates the NSS error in the error log, but with a reboot it does not.) 6. connect to system and see jars have not loaded. I select Admin and an error states I do not have 9.0jar and cannot install. You have to run setup-ds-admin.pl -u to update the version information used by the .jar file locator. I checked the master and it no longer has the 9.0 jar, but rather the 9.1 But for some reason the admin server is still looking for 9.0 jars. I tried to change the /etc/dirsv/admin-serv/local.conf file to look like a working 9.1 local.conf file, but it seems that file is ignored. That is a read-only file. It is basically just a cache of the information stored under o=NetscapeRoot, used for bootstrap purposes, or if the directory server is down. Looking for ideas on what else I can do upgrade the directory server. Paul M. Whitney E-mail: paul.whit...@mac.com -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: [389-users] Upgraded to RHDS 9.1 but Console is Still Looking for 9.0 JAR
Hi Rich, thank you for the quick response.I ran the script as you suggested and after the interview process (server, credentials, etc) the update stops on error:Error adding entry 'cn=PAM Pass Through Auth,cn=plugins,cn=config'. Error: Already exists.I did not run this setup-ds-admin script on the other servers in my development environment, but they were able to update successfully with just the setup-ds.pl -u script.Also, as a test, I created a new instance on the server and the new instances does show that it is using version 9.1.Paul M. Whitney E-mail: paul.whit...@mac.com On Jan 08, 2014, at 12:31 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote:On 01/08/2014 10:31 AM, Paul Whitney wrote:Hi, I recently updated RHDS 9.0 servers to 9.1. I am getting mixed results with the update. Steps taken: 1. Stop all dirsrv and dirsrv-admin services 2. Executed yum localupdate *.rpm 3. After the yum completes. Execute setup-ds.pl --debug --update (no errors generated, status is databases updated successfully. 4. Reinstall openldap (based on RHBA-2013-0778). 5. Reboot system. (I do this because restarting the dirsrv-admin service still generates the NSS error in the error log, but with a reboot it does not.) 6. connect to system and see jars have not loaded. I select Admin and an error states I do not have 9.0jar and cannot install. You have to run setup-ds-admin.pl -u to update the version information used by the .jar file locator. I checked the master and it no longer has the 9.0 jar, but rather the 9.1 But for some reason the admin server is still looking for 9.0 jars. I tried to change the /etc/dirsv/admin-serv/local.conf file to look like a working 9.1 local.conf file, but it seems that file is ignored. That is a read-only file. It is basically just a "cache" of the information stored under o=NetscapeRoot, used for bootstrap purposes, or if the directory server is down. Looking for ideas on what else I can do "upgrade" the directory server. Paul M. Whitney E-mail: paul.whit...@mac.com -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: FYI: Centos joins RedHat
On Tue, 07 Jan 2014 15:26:03 -0600 Steven Stern subscribed-li...@sterndata.com wrote: From the CENTOS user mailing list snipped Would this be a ready made base, for fedora.next server? ___ Regards, Frank www.frankly3d.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: OT: procmailrc question
On 2014/01/07 23:44, Cameron Simpson wrote:
On 07Jan2014 23:14, Ranjan Maitra maitra.mbox.igno...@inbox.com wrote:
Example (untested, needed adapting):
# Get rid of duplicates
:0 Wc
| sylfilter ...
:0 a
/dev/null
So, I tried this, but without the (I guessed that you were
suggesting this for arguments, is this correct, and the default
versions are just fine for using sylfilter).
Therefore, I put in this:
:0 Wc
| /usr/local/bin/sylfilter
:0 a
$HOME/Mail/Junk/.
However, I still get the same error in my procmail.log file:
No input file.
The web page shows:
sylfilter ~/Mail/inbox/1234
as the example to classify a message. So I believe you want:
:0 Wc
| /usr/local/bin/sylfilter /dev/stdin
:0 a
$HOME/Mail/Junk/.
because the message will be in the standard input and sylfilter
wants a filename.
Cheers,
Shouldn't this simpler invocation work?
:0 Wc
| /usr/local/bin/sylfilter -
:0 a
$HOME/Mail/Junk
{^_^}
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: OT: procmailrc question
On 08Jan2014 01:14, jdow j...@earthlink.net wrote: On 2014/01/07 23:44, Cameron Simpson wrote: The web page shows: sylfilter ~/Mail/inbox/1234 as the example to classify a message. So I believe you want: :0 Wc | /usr/local/bin/sylfilter /dev/stdin :0 a $HOME/Mail/Junk/. because the message will be in the standard input and sylfilter wants a filename. Shouldn't this simpler invocation work? :0 Wc | /usr/local/bin/sylfilter - :0 a $HOME/Mail/Junk Perhaps; it is certainly nicer is accepted. I don't have sylfilter to play with. Either way, sylfilter without a filename of any kind seems invalid. Cheers, -- Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au I had a wierd dream with Ken Thompson in it once. - George Politis geo...@research.canon.com.au -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
installing chrome on fedora 20 (64 bit) failed
Hello, When trying to install chrome I get the following error: yum install google-chrome-stable ... Trying other mirror. Error downloading packages: google-chrome-stable-31.0.1650.63-1.x86_64: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. Trying the same procedure a few days ago on a Fedora 20 machine did the job. Any ideas ? did something change? I am following the procedure on this page: http://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2010/install-google-chrome-with-yum-on-fedora-red-hat-rhel/ An I have: cat /etc/yum.repos.d/google-chrome.repo [google-chrome] name=google-chrome - 64-bit baseurl=http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/rpm/stable/x86_64 enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=https://dl-ssl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub I am not the only one having this problem: http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/chrome/qxtn6tvKHD0 regards, DavidS -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: installing chrome on fedora 20 (64 bit) failed
On Wed, 8 Jan 2014 11:28:43 +0200 David Shwatrz dshwa...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, When trying to install chrome I get the following error: yum install google-chrome-stable Problem with chrome mirrors, give it some time try again. If problem persists contact google. ___ Regards, Frank www.frankly3d.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Stale /var/run/nologin
On Sat, 4 Jan 2014 19:42:16 -0600 Steven Ulrick meow8...@gmail.com wrote: On Saturday, January 4, 2014, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote: About ten hours after a reboot, a chance attempt to log in back to the server was rather rudely rejected with a: System is booting up. See pam_nologin(8) Connection closed by 192.168.0.2 A quick run back to the console revealed the existence of a ten hour old /var/run/nologin file as the culprit. Removing it put everything back in working order. Two things: 1. You are not alone! 2. Thanks for the workaround... OK... I guess #2 was a bit premature. I just had reason to log out of my KDE session. When I logged back in (or tried to), I was greeted with the dreaded System is booting up. See pam_nologin(8) When my system is in this state, I can get to a console, but it will not let me log in. I even tried to ssh from another system. The other system informs me of the following: System is booting up. See pam_nologin(8) For clarification, the remote system that I am attempting to ssh FROM is telling me that the system that I am trying to ssh INTO is in the following state: System is booting up. See pam_nologin(8) So, it appears that I have no workaround to this issue other than rebooting... Steven P. Ulrick -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Accessing a Samsung galaxy mini from Fedora 20 via USB.
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.comwrote: What you mean is that Android devices don't present themselves as a block device, i.e. we don't have access to either logical or physical sectors, therefore we can't load a partition table or even find file system superblocks. It's kinda like only being able to mount a share via NFS, rather than as iSCSI. Correct, I meant as a block device. However MTP isn't even as capable as NFS since it doesn't allow random access for writes (not sure about reads). Files can only be written in their entirety or deleted. mtpfs and similar interfaces try to make it look as filesystem-like as possible using caching, but it's still important to keep this in mind. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: yumex auto checks for updates even though not checked
On 01/08/2014 01:49 AM, David wrote: On 1/7/2014 4:52 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: This is a long-time question for me When I start yumex, it looks for what updates are waiting to be installed. If there are none, that screen is empty. I want yumex for new things. I want it just to go to 'Available' packages. The preferences are the defaults. The 'Autocheck for Updates' is NOT selected. What gives here? Perhaps you should write your own yumex package that does exactly what you, personally, want? Another option could be to offer to support the developers (means send money) to request that they write you a special. personal package. Huh? There is an option in yumex preferences that is to 'Autocheck for Updates'. This options default is unchecked. Yet for me, it seems that yumex always autochecks for updates. This seems likea bug. I ask here what others see before submitting a bug report. This has nothing to do with wanting something the program is not documented at providing. At least my reading of the perference options. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Invisible cursor?
On 08/01/14 00:34, Tom Horsley wrote: So, I just tried logging into fedora 20 after restoring my old /home, and I discover that my X pointer is invisible :-). Some drivers offer a hardware or software generated cursor. Depending on which driver you're using, it might be worth setting the appropriate option in xorg.conf. Unless it's a 3rd party driver, there's usually a man page for it. For example, for the nouveau driver Option HWCursor boolean Enable or disable the HW cursor. Default: on. Otherwise could it be that you've had custom cursors installed in the past any maybe they aren't installed/available anymore? -- Ian Chapman. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: lyx in fedora 20
- Original Message - From: Aradenatorix Veckhom Vacelaevus Sent: 01/08/14 02:22 AM To: Community support for Fedora users Subject: Re: lyx in fedora 20 Hi: What's your TeX distribution inside Fedora 20? Texlive 2013-4 That coming with the distribution === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Invisible cursor?
On Wed, 08 Jan 2014 19:21:24 +0800 Ian Chapman wrote: Some drivers offer a hardware or software generated cursor. This doesn't appear to be a video driver problem because I have a perfectly wonderful mouse pointer on the login screen, it only disappears after I login :-). I did some google searches and found this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969649 then later found a solution I added in comment 30 in that bug: Use dconf to turn off the cursor plugin in gnome-settings-demon. Why the exact same setup doesn't have the problem in f19, I don't know, but f19 still works fine if I turn off that plugin, so I have it disabled now :-). -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: FYI: Centos joins RedHat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/08/2014 03:23 AM, Frank Murphy wrote: On Tue, 07 Jan 2014 15:26:03 -0600 Steven Stern subscribed-li...@sterndata.com wrote: From the CENTOS user mailing list snipped Would this be a ready made base, for fedora.next server? I can only speak for my own intentions here, but I have been treating Fedora Server as the reverse. What I want to see is Fedora Server being the development line for what will eventually become the RHEL Server and CentOS Server platforms. Ideally, I'd like to do it without the historic wink wink, RHEL might be coming soon garbage that makes it difficult to plan. I'd like for there to be transparency about exactly we expect RHEL N+1 to be providing and make a clear and publicized branch point from Fedora Server. So, in effect, CentOS basically does then become the Fedora LTS that people have been asking for over the years. Note: This statement is made by Stephen Gallagher the Fedora contributor. Stephen Gallagher the Red Hat employee is campaigning for this internally as well, but no commitments (or contradictions) have as yet been made by Red Hat towards this statement. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlLNREIACgkQeiVVYja6o6PvXACfQGPj7EWJzr5UEt9g8KR+lbRs 23UAn1LpiBOWFhua71YU19ts6emPTxnO =UrLH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Stale /var/run/nologin
Steven P. Ulrick writes: On Sat, 4 Jan 2014 19:42:16 -0600 Steven Ulrick meow8...@gmail.com wrote: On Saturday, January 4, 2014, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote: About ten hours after a reboot, a chance attempt to log in back to the server was rather rudely rejected with a: System is booting up. See pam_nologin(8) Connection closed by 192.168.0.2 A quick run back to the console revealed the existence of a ten hour old /var/run/nologin file as the culprit. Removing it put everything back in working order. Two things: 1. You are not alone! 2. Thanks for the workaround... OK... I guess #2 was a bit premature. I just had reason to log out of my KDE session. When I logged back in (or tried to), I was greeted with the dreaded System is booting up. See pam_nologin(8) When my system is in this state, I can get to a console, but it will not let me log in. I even tried to ssh from another system. The other system informs me of the following: System is booting up. See pam_nologin(8) For clarification, the remote system that I am attempting to ssh FROM is telling me that the system that I am trying to ssh INTO is in the following state: System is booting up. See pam_nologin(8) So, it appears that I have no workaround to this issue other than rebooting... No. According to the documentation, root is allowed to log in. You should be able to ssh as root. My original working theory was that /run/nologin was not getting cleared by whatever godforsaken systemd service is responsible for removing it, when the boot mostly completes. This was based on my /run/nologin's timestamp, which dated back to my system's boot. But if that's getting spuriously created, during a normal system state, then something indeed must be creating it, in the wild. Not going to be easy tracking it down. Perusing journalctl's man page, there doesn't seem to be a way to specify a time interval. Given /run/nologin's timestamp, it should be possible to track down what was started in that timeframe, but I do not see a way to specify a timeframe. Furthermore, journalctl's output seems to consist of merely log messages from systemd- started processes, rather than the actual log of what was started, and when. So, tell me again how logs kept as binary blobs are superior to plain text files. I'd start to hit Google, looking for way to find systemd's actual logs, and filtering them by a time interval. Seems silly to have to do that, but systemd is such a winner… pgpm61ZMZs65K.pgp Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
from 19 to 20
Hello, After I updated my distribution, the gnome-terminal open in a user session starts in / and not in $HOME while $HOME has the right value. It is OK in a text session. Do I need to modifiy my gnome-terminal profile session preferences? Thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: OT: procmailrc question
Hi, Thanks very much for your help! sylfilter ~/Mail/inbox/1234 as the example to classify a message. Yes, and the response is something like this: sylfilter /home/maitra/Mail/inbox/1234 /home/maitra/Mail/inbox/1234: This is a clean mail (prob: 0.00) So I believe you want: :0 Wc | /usr/local/bin/sylfilter /dev/stdin :0 a $HOME/Mail/Junk/. because the message will be in the standard input and sylfilter wants a filename. Shouldn't this simpler invocation work? :0 Wc | /usr/local/bin/sylfilter - :0 a $HOME/Mail/Junk However, neither of these work, in the sense that both yield the same result as before: No input file. Unless the specification above is incomplete, something appears to be wrong with sylfilter itself. It does work (manually) within sylpheed itself. Many thanks again! Ranjan -- Cameron Simpson c...@zip.com.au I had a wierd dream with Ken Thompson in it once. - George Politis geo...@research.canon.com.au -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be deleted on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate. For those needing to send personal or professional e-mail, please use appropriate addresses. FREE 3D MARINE AQUARIUM SCREENSAVER - Watch dolphins, sharks orcas on your desktop! Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/marineaquarium -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: kde-plasma-nm disabled
Ed Greshko wrote: On 01/07/14 23:45, Neal Becker wrote: Network is working fine, with a wired enet. I probably disabled nm a long time ago. Now I want to enable it (so I can try bridge). I have kde-plasma-nm-0.9.3.2-1.fc20.x86_64, but on my desktop, the net icon has a red X. If I try to edit connections/add connection, I don't see any wired interface names under 'restrict connection'. This suggests something's wrong - it's not learning the names of the interfaces. In /var/log/messages I see: Jan 7 10:27:34 nbecker7 dbus[624]: [system] Rejected send message, 3 matched rules; type=method_call, sender=:1.4740 (uid=1000 pid=8349 comm=/usr/bin/kde-nm-connection-editor ) interface=org.freedesktop.DBus.Properties member=Get error name=(unset) requested_reply=0 destination=org.freedesktop.NetworkManager (uid=0 pid=602 comm=/usr/sbin/NetworkManager --no-daemon ) Any idea how to proceed? On my laptop with working NM, if I go to the edit connections I see a list of several interfaces Since you don't recall how you disabled network manager What does ... systemctl status NetworkManager.service return? and ... In your /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts Whatever interface file... Do you have a NM_CONTROLLED= line? sudo systemctl status NetworkManager NetworkManager.service - Network Manager Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/NetworkManager.service; enabled) Active: active (running) since Mon 2013-12-23 10:15:30 EST; 2 weeks 1 days ago Main PID: 602 (NetworkManager) CGroup: /system.slice/NetworkManager.service 602 /usr/sbin/NetworkManager --no-daemon 686 /sbin/dhclient -d -sf /usr/libexec/nm-dhcp-helper -pf /var/r... Jan 08 07:27:38 nbecker7 NetworkManager[602]: info hostname 'nbecker7' Jan 08 07:27:38 nbecker7 NetworkManager[602]: info nameserver '10.33.41.30' Jan 08 07:27:38 nbecker7 NetworkManager[602]: info domain name 'hughes.com' Jan 08 07:27:38 nbecker7 NetworkManager[602]: info domain search 'hughes...' Jan 08 07:27:38 nbecker7 NetworkManager[602]: info domain search 'hns.com.' Jan 08 07:27:38 nbecker7 NetworkManager[602]: info domain search 'md.hns...' Jan 08 07:27:38 nbecker7 NetworkManager[602]: info domain search 'md.hns...' Jan 08 07:27:38 nbecker7 NetworkManager[602]: info domain search 'ca.hns...' Jan 08 07:27:38 nbecker7 NetworkManager[602]: info domain search 'backup...' Jan 08 07:27:38 nbecker7 NetworkManager[602]: bound to 10.32.112.225 -- rene Hint: Some lines were ellipsized, use -l to show in full. --- But why does NM not show any interfaces, if I try to add? That tells me something isn't working. ifcfg-em1 does NOT have NM_CONTROLLED line -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: from 19 to 20
Patrick Dupre writes: Hello, After I updated my distribution, the gnome-terminal open in a user session starts in / and not in $HOME while $HOME has the right value. It is OK in a text session. Do I need to modifiy my gnome-terminal profile session preferences? No, it's an undetermined bug. There's a bugzilla entry for it. The workaround is to copy gnome-terminal.desktop to your $HOME/Desktop, and edit it so that its command is sh -c gnome-terminal --working-directory=$HOME pgp2NdIll9w5K.pgp Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: from 19 to 20
- Original Message - From: Sam Varshavchik Sent: 01/08/14 01:48 PM To: Community support for Fedora users Subject: Re: from 19 to 20 Patrick Dupre writes: Hello, After I updated my distribution, the gnome-terminal open in a user session starts in / and not in $HOME while $HOME has the right value. It is OK in a text session. Do I need to modifiy my gnome-terminal profile session preferences? No, it's an undetermined bug. There's a bugzilla entry for it. The workaround is to copy gnome-terminal.desktop to your $HOME/Desktop, and edit it so that its command is sh -c gnome-terminal --working-directory=$HOME Thank. Should I put it in the .bashrc or .bash_profile file? === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Stale /var/run/nologin
On 01/08/14 20:29, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Steven P. Ulrick writes: On Sat, 4 Jan 2014 19:42:16 -0600 Steven Ulrick meow8...@gmail.com wrote: On Saturday, January 4, 2014, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote: About ten hours after a reboot, a chance attempt to log in back to the server was rather rudely rejected with a: System is booting up. See pam_nologin(8) Connection closed by 192.168.0.2 A quick run back to the console revealed the existence of a ten hour old /var/run/nologin file as the culprit. Removing it put everything back in working order. Two things: 1. You are not alone! 2. Thanks for the workaround... OK... I guess #2 was a bit premature. I just had reason to log out of my KDE session. When I logged back in (or tried to), I was greeted with the dreaded System is booting up. See pam_nologin(8) When my system is in this state, I can get to a console, but it will not let me log in. I even tried to ssh from another system. The other system informs me of the following: System is booting up. See pam_nologin(8) For clarification, the remote system that I am attempting to ssh FROM is telling me that the system that I am trying to ssh INTO is in the following state: System is booting up. See pam_nologin(8) So, it appears that I have no workaround to this issue other than rebooting... No. According to the documentation, root is allowed to log in. You should be able to ssh as root. My original working theory was that /run/nologin was not getting cleared by whatever godforsaken systemd service is responsible for removing it, when the boot mostly completes. This was based on my /run/nologin's timestamp, which dated back to my system's boot. But if that's getting spuriously created, during a normal system state, then something indeed must be creating it, in the wild. Not going to be easy tracking it down. Perusing journalctl's man page, there doesn't seem to be a way to specify a time interval. Given /run/nologin's timestamp, it should be possible to track down what was started in that timeframe, but I do not see a way to specify a timeframe. Furthermore, journalctl's output seems to consist of merely log messages from systemd-started processes, rather than the actual log of what was started, and when. So, tell me again how logs kept as binary blobs are superior to plain text files. I'd start to hit Google, looking for way to find systemd's actual logs, and filtering them by a time interval. Seems silly to have to do that, but systemd is such a winner… Have a look here to see if their fix may apply to your situation https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811793 -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Looking for a Nautilus alternative - under Gnome
I am not looking at switching from Gnome to another desktop environment, but the removal of the tree view from Nautilus has hamstrung it for drag-n-drop. I have worked with it for a couple weeks now, and there are a number of DnD operations I do that just don't work. In some cases, between two Nautilus windows I can kind of live with how DnD functions without tree view, but even that is hit and miss (constant changing of focus to where you are dropping, for example of bad behaviour). On the Gnome list i was told tree view was deprecated. No plugins, and I don't know how to even begin writing one. BTW, I DO turn on 'Navigate folders in a tree' view, but that is only half of tree view. So what alternative is there to Nautilus. I went searching via yumex, I did not see any obvious other file browser. Seems there use to be a number of them? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: lyx in fedora 20
- Original Message - From: Richard Vickery Sent: 01/08/14 04:36 AM To: Community support for Fedora users Subject: Re: lyx in fedora 20 On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote: Hello, when I lauch lyx, I just get: lyx: error while loading shared libraries: libboost_regex-mt.so.1.53.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I need it urgently!! Thank. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === -- I might attempt yum installing libboost_regex-mt.so.1.53.0 first, since it's asking for this file, but it might be more wise answering the question about your TeX distribution; Aradenatorix likely has more knowledge than I do, and you might end up answering those questions regardless of my haphazard attempt at helping. The Tex distrinution is that provided by fedora 20: texlive-2013-432013226-r32488 I installed boost, but it does not help. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Looking for a Nautilus alternative - under Gnome
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/08/2014 08:05 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I am not looking at switching from Gnome to another desktop environment, but the removal of the tree view from Nautilus has hamstrung it for drag-n-drop. I have worked with it for a couple weeks now, and there are a number of DnD operations I do that just don't work. In some cases, between two Nautilus windows I can kind of live with how DnD functions without tree view, but even that is hit and miss (constant changing of focus to where you are dropping, for example of bad behaviour). On the Gnome list i was told tree view was deprecated. No plugins, and I don't know how to even begin writing one. BTW, I DO turn on 'Navigate folders in a tree' view, but that is only half of tree view. So what alternative is there to Nautilus. I went searching via yumex, I did not see any obvious other file browser. Seems there use to be a number of them? Try 'nemo', it's a fork of Nautilus used in the Cinnamon desktop. IIRC it still has the tree view. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlLNULcACgkQeiVVYja6o6MABACfVtG16IU9R6DtFLQ8cglmmhb3 ThUAoIjwUZ8UYvL7HayQhqa7FCDRjlsK =u5ow -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: lyx in fedora 20
OK, I guess that I understand. The lyx with fedora 20 is 2.0.6 while the version with fedora 19 was 2.0.7. Hence, the update has not been done! Thank. - Original Message - From: Ed Greshko Sent: 01/08/14 02:23 PM To: Community support for Fedora users Subject: Re: lyx in fedora 20 On 01/08/14 21:09, Patrick Dupre wrote: The Tex distrinution is that provided by fedora 20: texlive-2013-432013226-r32488 I installed boost, but it does not help. FWIW, I just did a yum install lyx on a F20 test system of mine. 236 packages were installed and it started up just fine. For the record Jan 08 21:15:49 Installed: 3:texlive-base-2013-4.20131226_r32488.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:49 Installed: 3:texlive-kpathsea-lib-2013-4.20131226_r32488.fc20.x86_64 Jan 08 21:15:49 Installed: 3:texlive-kpathsea-svn32266.0-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:50 Installed: 3:texlive-kpathsea-bin-svn30088.0-4.20131226_r32488.fc20.x86_64 Jan 08 21:15:50 Installed: 3:texlive-graphics-svn25405.1.0o-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:50 Installed: 3:texlive-hyphen-base-svn31131.0-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:50 Installed: 3:texlive-tools-svn29849.0-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:50 Installed: 3:texlive-amsmath-svn30645.2.14-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:50 Installed: 3:texlive-xkeyval-svn27995.2.6a-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:50 Installed: 3:texlive-ifxetex-svn19685.0.5-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:50 Installed: 3:texlive-etex-pkg-svn15878.2.0-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:51 Installed: 3:texlive-ifluatex-svn26725.1.3-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:51 Installed: 3:texlive-url-svn16864.3.2-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:51 Installed: 3:texlive-booktabs-svn15878.1.61803-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:51 Installed: 3:texlive-thumbpdf-bin-svn6898.0-4.20131226_r32488.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:51 Installed: 3:texlive-thumbpdf-svn29725.3.15-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:51 Installed: 3:texlive-etoolbox-svn20922.2.1-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:51 Installed: 3:texlive-colortbl-svn29803.v1.0a-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:51 Installed: 3:texlive-caption-svn30449.2013_05_12-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:51 Installed: 3:texlive-latex-fonts-svn2.0-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:51 Installed: 3:texlive-dvips-bin-svn30088.0-4.20131226_r32488.fc20.x86_64 Jan 08 21:15:52 Installed: 3:texlive-dvips-svn32380.0-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:52 Installed: 3:texlive-babel-svn32311.3.9h-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:52 Installed: 3:texlive-multido-svn18302.1.42-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:52 Installed: 3:texlive-fp-svn15878.0-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:52 Installed: 3:texlive-babelbib-svn25245.1.31-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:52 Installed: 3:texlive-subfig-svn15878.1.3-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:52 Installed: 3:texlive-carlisle-svn18258.0-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:52 Installed: 3:texlive-plain-svn26647.0-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:52 Installed: 3:texlive-mfware-svn29764.0-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:52 Installed: 3:texlive-mfware-bin-svn30088.0-4.20131226_r32488.fc20.x86_64 Jan 08 21:15:53 Installed: 3:texlive-makeindex-svn29764.2.12-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:53 Installed: 3:texlive-makeindex-bin-svn30088.0-4.20131226_r32488.fc20.x86_64 Jan 08 21:15:53 Installed: 3:texlive-natbib-svn20668.8.31b-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:53 Installed: 3:texlive-texconfig-bin-svn29741.0-4.20131226_r32488.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:53 Installed: 3:texlive-texconfig-svn29764.0-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:53 Installed: 3:texlive-enumitem-svn24146.3.5.2-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:53 Installed: 3:texlive-float-svn15878.1.3d-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:53 Installed: 3:texlive-euler-svn17261.2.5-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:53 Installed: 3:texlive-underscore-svn18261.0-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:53 Installed: 3:texlive-latexconfig-svn28991.0-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:53 Installed: 3:texlive-index-svn24099.4.1beta-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:53 Installed: 3:texlive-dvipdfmx-def-svn31722.0-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:54 Installed: 3:texlive-xdvi-svn30339.22.86-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:54 Installed: 3:texlive-xdvi-bin-svn30088.0-4.20131226_r32488.fc20.x86_64 Jan 08 21:15:54 Installed: 3:texlive-gsftopk-svn29764.1.19.2-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:54 Installed: 3:texlive-gsftopk-bin-svn30088.0-4.20131226_r32488.fc20.x86_64 Jan 08 21:15:54 Installed: 3:texlive-glyphlist-svn28576.0-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:54 Installed: 3:texlive-footmisc-svn23330.5.5b-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:54 Installed: 3:texlive-setspace-svn24881.6.7a-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:54 Installed: 3:texlive-bibtex-svn29764.0.99d-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:54 Installed: 3:texlive-bibtex-bin-svn30088.0-4.20131226_r32488.fc20.x86_64 Jan 08 21:15:55 Installed: perl-XML-Parser-2.41-11.fc20.x86_64 Jan 08 21:15:55 Installed: perl-XML-XPath-1.13-24.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:55 Installed: 3:texlive-euro-svn22191.1.1-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:55 Installed: 3:texlive-csquotes-svn24393.5.1d-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08 21:15:55 Installed: 3:texlive-fancyref-svn15878.0.9c-4.fc20.noarch Jan 08
Re: lyx in fedora 20
On 01/08/14 21:34, Patrick Dupre wrote: OK, I guess that I understand. The lyx with fedora 20 is 2.0.6 while the version with fedora 19 was 2.0.7. Hence, the update has not been done! Are you sure about that? I just did a yum info lyx on an F19 system and I get Available Packages Name: lyx Arch: x86_64 Version : 2.0.6 Release : 1.fc19 Size: 3.6 M Repo: fedora/19/x86_64 -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Looking for a Nautilus alternative - under Gnome
On 01/08/2014 08:20 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/08/2014 08:05 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I am not looking at switching from Gnome to another desktop environment, but the removal of the tree view from Nautilus has hamstrung it for drag-n-drop. I have worked with it for a couple weeks now, and there are a number of DnD operations I do that just don't work. In some cases, between two Nautilus windows I can kind of live with how DnD functions without tree view, but even that is hit and miss (constant changing of focus to where you are dropping, for example of bad behaviour). On the Gnome list i was told tree view was deprecated. No plugins, and I don't know how to even begin writing one. BTW, I DO turn on 'Navigate folders in a tree' view, but that is only half of tree view. So what alternative is there to Nautilus. I went searching via yumex, I did not see any obvious other file browser. Seems there use to be a number of them? Try 'nemo', it's a fork of Nautilus used in the Cinnamon desktop. IIRC it still has the tree view. Yes it does! Thanks for the pointer. Will work with it now, and see how it goes. Will have to see if I can tweak Gnome so that when I insert a USB drive, it starts Nemo rather than Nautilus. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: installing chrome on fedora 20 (64 bit) failed
Hi, Thanks for your answer. Is it ok to download it from here: http://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=google-chrome-stable(x86-64) DavidS On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:47 AM, Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 8 Jan 2014 11:28:43 +0200 David Shwatrz dshwa...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, When trying to install chrome I get the following error: yum install google-chrome-stable Problem with chrome mirrors, give it some time try again. If problem persists contact google. ___ Regards, Frank www.frankly3d.com -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: lyx in fedora 20
On 8 January 2014 15:42, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: On 01/08/14 21:34, Patrick Dupre wrote: OK, I guess that I understand. The lyx with fedora 20 is 2.0.6 while the version with fedora 19 was 2.0.7. Hence, the update has not been done! Are you sure about that? I just did a yum info lyx on an F19 system and I get Available Packages Name: lyx Arch: x86_64 Version : 2.0.6 Release : 1.fc19 Size: 3.6 M Repo: fedora/19/x86_64 2.0.7 is in updates-testing in fc19 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=486384 -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- Ahmad Samir -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
frippery extension in fedora 20
Hello, I cannot update frippery extensions (application menu, etc..) in fedora 20 I cannot remove them either. Any idea? === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | | Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale | | Tel. (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12 | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France === -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: lyx in fedora 20
On 01/08/14 22:08, Ahmad Samir wrote: On 8 January 2014 15:42, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: On 01/08/14 21:34, Patrick Dupre wrote: OK, I guess that I understand. The lyx with fedora 20 is 2.0.6 while the version with fedora 19 was 2.0.7. Hence, the update has not been done! Are you sure about that? I just did a yum info lyx on an F19 system and I get Available Packages Name: lyx Arch: x86_64 Version : 2.0.6 Release : 1.fc19 Size: 3.6 M Repo: fedora/19/x86_64 2.0.7 is in updates-testing in fc19 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=486384 Yepalso is available in updates-testing for F20. This is kind of my point, if one installs stuff from testing and then updates their system they need to understand the potential issues. -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
gnome-classic-session
I am looking through what extensions are available for gnome via yumex, and I find gnome-classic-session. This sounds interesting. I really miss gnome2, and Centos and ClearOS are gnome2. So is anyone running it on f20? What experiences are they having? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: FYI: Centos joins RedHat
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 05:47:08PM -0800, Richard Vickery wrote: Our own Fedora Project Leader Robyn Bergeron has a blog post on this, with some commentary on how Fedora fits in: http://wordshack.wordpress.com/2014/01/07/centos-welcome/ I wonder how / if this is going to affect us. Well, Robyn touches on some of that. I think overall the answer is as much as we want it to. -- Matthew Miller-- Fedora Project--mat...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
[389-users] Upgraded to RHDS 9.1 but Console is Still Looking for 9.0 JAR
Hi,I recently updated RHDS 9.0 servers to 9.1. I am getting mixed results with the update. Steps taken:1. Stop all dirsrv and dirsrv-admin services2. Executed yum localupdate *.rpm3. After the yum completes. Execute setup-ds.pl --debug --update (no errors generated, status is databases updated successfully.4. Reinstall openldap (based on RHBA-2013-0778).5. Reboot system. (I do this because restarting the dirsrv-admin service still generates the NSS error in the error log, but with a reboot it does not.)6. connect to system and see jars have not loaded. I select Admin and an error states I do not have 9.0jar and cannot install.I checked the master and it no longer has the 9.0 jar, but rather the 9.1 But for some reason the admin server is still looking for 9.0 jars.I tried to change the /etc/dirsv/admin-serv/local.conf file to look like a working 9.1 local.conf file, but it seems that file is ignored. Looking for ideas on what else I can do "upgrade" the directory server.Paul M. Whitney E-mail: paul.whit...@mac.com -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: gnome-classic-session
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/08/2014 11:57 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I am looking through what extensions are available for gnome via yumex, and I find gnome-classic-session. This sounds interesting. I really miss gnome2, and Centos and ClearOS are gnome2. So is anyone running it on f20? What experiences are they having? I did an extensive series of blog posts on Gnome Classic. The final one describes my ultimate (and current) environment on Fedora 20. I suggest you have a look: http://sgallagh.wordpress.com/2013/06/27/one-week-with-gnome-3-classic-twenty-eight-days-later/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlLNj/IACgkQeiVVYja6o6PHdACffp5QRV6c8et6BcFhawBvdKdI PBAAn3lcKuu6lPraXCWe5pFkrFmbYDgs =lNFY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: [389-users] Upgraded to RHDS 9.1 but Console is Still Looking for 9.0 JAR
On 01/08/2014 10:52 AM, Paul Whitney wrote: Hi Rich, thank you for the quick response. I ran the script as you suggested and after the interview process (server, credentials, etc) the update stops on error: Error adding entry 'cn=PAM Pass Through Auth,cn=plugins,cn=config'. Error: Already exists. Can you provide the output of running setup-ds-admin.pl -u -ddd I did not run this setup-ds-admin script on the other servers in my development environment, but they were able to update successfully with just the setup-ds.pl -u script. Note that rpm/yum runs setup-ds.pl -u during the post-install phase. You should never have to run setup-ds.pl -u manually. setup-ds-admin.pl -u cannot be run automatically because it has to contact the (possibly) remote machine with o=NetscapeRoot, and you have to provide the admin password. Also, as a test, I created a new instance on the server and the new instances does show that it is using version 9.1. Right. New instances will work fine. The problem is in upgrading existing instances. Paul M. Whitney E-mail: paul.whit...@mac.com On Jan 08, 2014, at 12:31 PM, Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com wrote: On 01/08/2014 10:31 AM, Paul Whitney wrote: Hi, I recently updated RHDS 9.0 servers to 9.1. I am getting mixed results with the update. Steps taken: 1. Stop all dirsrv and dirsrv-admin services 2. Executed yum localupdate *.rpm 3. After the yum completes. Execute setup-ds.pl --debug --update (no errors generated, status is databases updated successfully. 4. Reinstall openldap (based on RHBA-2013-0778). 5. Reboot system. (I do this because restarting the dirsrv-admin service still generates the NSS error in the error log, but with a reboot it does not.) 6. connect to system and see jars have not loaded. I select Admin and an error states I do not have 9.0jar and cannot install. You have to run setup-ds-admin.pl -u to update the version information used by the .jar file locator. I checked the master and it no longer has the 9.0 jar, but rather the 9.1 But for some reason the admin server is still looking for 9.0 jars. I tried to change the /etc/dirsv/admin-serv/local.conf file to look like a working 9.1 local.conf file, but it seems that file is ignored. That is a read-only file. It is basically just a cache of the information stored under o=NetscapeRoot, used for bootstrap purposes, or if the directory server is down. Looking for ideas on what else I can do upgrade the directory server. Paul M. Whitney E-mail:paul.whit...@mac.com -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org mailto:389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users -- 389 users mailing list 389-us...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Re: Stale /var/run/nologin
On 01/08/2014 04:29 AM, Sam Varshavchik issued this missive: Steven P. Ulrick writes: On Sat, 4 Jan 2014 19:42:16 -0600 Steven Ulrick meow8...@gmail.com wrote: On Saturday, January 4, 2014, Sam Varshavchik mr...@courier-mta.com wrote: About ten hours after a reboot, a chance attempt to log in back to the server was rather rudely rejected with a: System is booting up. See pam_nologin(8) Connection closed by 192.168.0.2 A quick run back to the console revealed the existence of a ten hour old /var/run/nologin file as the culprit. Removing it put everything back in working order. Two things: 1. You are not alone! 2. Thanks for the workaround... OK... I guess #2 was a bit premature. I just had reason to log out of my KDE session. When I logged back in (or tried to), I was greeted with the dreaded System is booting up. See pam_nologin(8) When my system is in this state, I can get to a console, but it will not let me log in. I even tried to ssh from another system. The other system informs me of the following: System is booting up. See pam_nologin(8) For clarification, the remote system that I am attempting to ssh FROM is telling me that the system that I am trying to ssh INTO is in the following state: System is booting up. See pam_nologin(8) So, it appears that I have no workaround to this issue other than rebooting... No. According to the documentation, root is allowed to log in. You should be able to ssh as root. My original working theory was that /run/nologin was not getting cleared by whatever godforsaken systemd service is responsible for removing it, when the boot mostly completes. This was based on my /run/nologin's timestamp, which dated back to my system's boot. But if that's getting spuriously created, during a normal system state, then something indeed must be creating it, in the wild. Not going to be easy tracking it down. Perusing journalctl's man page, there doesn't seem to be a way to specify a time interval. Given /run/nologin's timestamp, it should be possible to track down what was started in that timeframe, but I do not see a way to specify a timeframe. Furthermore, journalctl's output seems to consist of merely log messages from systemd-started processes, rather than the actual log of what was started, and when. 'journalctl --since=-600' will show all log messages for the last 600 seconds (10 minutes). Or you can use 'journalctl --since=2014-01-08 00:00:00' for everything since midnight today. You get the idea. man journalctl and look at the --since and --until bits. You can even combine the two: journalctl --since=2014-01-08 00:00:00 --until=2014-01-08 08:00:00 to get stuff between midnight and 8 a.m. -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 - -- - Let us think the unthinkable. Let us do the undoable. Let us - - prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may - - not eff it up after all. - - -- Douglas Adams - -- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Scroll history on f20 gnome-terminal
Hi, I've just installed f20 and can't figure out why the gnome-terminal scroll history doesn't work. I've enabled both scroll on output and scroll on keystroke in the Scrolling tab, but there is still no scroll history. What am I missing? Thanks, Alex -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Audio problems
Lenovo x120e Builtin speakers work for a couple minutes after a boot, then typically stop working. Sometimes may work for a bit longer, but always stop. Headphones (you have to use a combo headphone/mic, like the one from your smartphone) works no problem. The schematic from the manual shows the wires going into the jack component and from there to the speaker component. The bios speaker mute button Fn-esc can tell the difference if a headset is plugged in or not (mute headset/speaker); perhaps this is an impedence test. Can this in anyway be a software issue? I suppose I could tear into the unit. I have a busted older unit; I cooked the processor board with a coke (tm) spill. I doubt it got the sound subsystem. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Evolution freezes on calendar page
Suddenly, whenever I switch evolution to the calendar page (or whenever it starts on the calendar page) it locks up. The status bar shows several occurrences of attempts to sync a couple of calendars that I subscribe to in gmail. The last act I completed successfully was to create a recurring appointment in my Exchange calendar. The first lockup occurred when I tried to copy and past that item (though I'm not sure there's a causal relationship). (Probably should have just created the next appointment from scratch, rather than trying to modify a copy.) Also, the Google calendars that are shown syncing are not my own, but ones I subscribed to. They don't have passwords associated with them, but I keep getting popups in GNOME Shell asking for those passwords. Any idea how I can at least get around the freeze in order to retry things? I can't use Evo to unsubscribe from any calendars because one does that from the calendar screen and the calendar screen freezes. Is there a config file that I can edit? Also, how can I get GNOME to stop pestering me for the nonexistent password? TIA. -- Matthew Saltzman Clemson University Math Sciences mjs AT clemson DOT edu -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Evolution freezes on calendar page
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:44 PM, Matthew Saltzman m...@clemson.edu wrote: Suddenly, whenever I switch evolution to the calendar page (or whenever it starts on the calendar page) it locks up. The status bar shows several occurrences of attempts to sync a couple of calendars that I subscribe to in gmail. The last act I completed successfully was to create a recurring appointment in my Exchange calendar. The first lockup occurred when I tried to copy and past that item (though I'm not sure there's a causal relationship). (Probably should have just created the next appointment from scratch, rather than trying to modify a copy.) You might try asking on the Evo list ( https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list) but when doing so please state which version of Evo you have (see Help-About). poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Setting Maps location
Maps is showing me in Lansing, MI. Not Oak Park. Don't know why, I ISP is just down road. Anyway, I don't see any setting for location. The icon that kind of looks like GPS on my phone, just moves the focus over to Lansing. It might be due to the partial install I am working with as well... -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Setting Maps location
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.comwrote: Maps is showing me in Lansing, MI. Not Oak Park. Don't know why, I ISP is just down road. Anyway, I don't see any setting for location. The icon that kind of looks like GPS on my phone, just moves the focus over to Lansing. It might be due to the partial install I am working with as well... What icon? I don't get any of this. Is it a Gnome thing (don't use it myself). Please give more context when asking for help. poc -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Setting Maps location
On 01/08/2014 05:28 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:33 PM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com mailto:r...@htt-consult.com wrote: Maps is showing me in Lansing, MI. Not Oak Park. Don't know why, I ISP is just down road. Anyway, I don't see any setting for location. The icon that kind of looks like GPS on my phone, just moves the focus over to Lansing. It might be due to the partial install I am working with as well... What icon? I don't get any of this. Is it a Gnome thing (don't use it myself). Please give more context when asking for help. Oops you are right. Maps is a new feature in f20/Gnome. It is in the f20 announce page. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Stale /var/run/nologin
Rick Stevens writes: On 01/08/2014 04:29 AM, Sam Varshavchik issued this missive: But if that's getting spuriously created, during a normal system state, then something indeed must be creating it, in the wild. Not going to be easy tracking it down. Perusing journalctl's man page, there doesn't seem to be a way to specify a time interval. Given /run/nologin's timestamp, it should be possible to track down what was started in that timeframe, but I do not see a way to specify a timeframe. Furthermore, journalctl's output seems to consist of merely log messages from systemd-started processes, rather than the actual log of what was started, and when. 'journalctl --since=-600' will show all log messages for the last 600 seconds (10 minutes). Or you can use Except, as I explained, I am not looking for messages that were logged by systemd-started processes, in some time interval. I am looking at what exactly systemd started, during some time interval. Which is completely different from whatever got logged by a systemd-started process. At system boot, systemd fills the system console Starting foo… followed by, at some time later Started foo…. Several pages of that. Most of that seems to be completely absent from the output of journalctl --since. Perusal of the time intervals spanning the last couple of reboot cycles shows that each reboot results in a grand total of one message: Starting Default, and even that is not reliable, and is missing from several boot cycles. systemd's logging appears to be incomplete. pgpo3HW1xuPog.pgp Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Policies
Is there a policy in these groups regarding including outsiders in a conversation by merely adding the person's address to the email? We - he and I -installed Fedora on his machine, and he is eager to come aboard, but he has yet to join an email group. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: lyx in fedora 20
On 01/08/14 22:13, Ed Greshko wrote: On 01/08/14 22:08, Ahmad Samir wrote: On 8 January 2014 15:42, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: On 01/08/14 21:34, Patrick Dupre wrote: OK, I guess that I understand. The lyx with fedora 20 is 2.0.6 while the version with fedora 19 was 2.0.7. Hence, the update has not been done! Are you sure about that? I just did a yum info lyx on an F19 system and I get Available Packages Name: lyx Arch: x86_64 Version : 2.0.6 Release : 1.fc19 Size: 3.6 M Repo: fedora/19/x86_64 2.0.7 is in updates-testing in fc19 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=486384 Yepalso is available in updates-testing for F20. This is kind of my point, if one installs stuff from testing and then updates their system they need to understand the potential issues. Also, I just got around to updating from updates-testing and 2.0.7 has no problems at all. Also note [root@f20f log]# locate libboost_regex /usr/lib64/libboost_regex.so.1.54.0 [root@f20f log]# locate libboost_regex-mt [root@f20f log]# So, I'm at a loss to explain why libboost_regex-mt.so.1.53.0 is being accessed by lyx on the OP's system. -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Policies
On 01/09/14 09:05, Richard Vickery wrote: Is there a policy in these groups regarding including outsiders in a conversation by merely adding the person's address to the email? We - he and I -installed Fedora on his machine, and he is eager to come aboard, but he has yet to join an email group. If it isn't covered in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines then I don't think so. -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Policies
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:05:34PM -0800, Richard Vickery wrote: Is there a policy in these groups regarding including outsiders in a conversation by merely adding the person's address to the email? We - he and I -installed Fedora on his machine, and he is eager to come aboard, but he has yet to join an email group. It's not forbidden, but it's a bad idea for two reasons: 1. The mailing list software won't forward the other address through, so only _your_ messages will go to them. 2. If they do reply to your message, it won't go to the list anyway. I'd suggest helping your friend subscribe to the group. -- Matthew Miller-- Fedora Project--mat...@fedoraproject.org -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Stale /var/run/nologin
On 01/08/2014 04:34 PM, Sam Varshavchik issued this missive: Rick Stevens writes: On 01/08/2014 04:29 AM, Sam Varshavchik issued this missive: But if that's getting spuriously created, during a normal system state, then something indeed must be creating it, in the wild. Not going to be easy tracking it down. Perusing journalctl's man page, there doesn't seem to be a way to specify a time interval. Given /run/nologin's timestamp, it should be possible to track down what was started in that timeframe, but I do not see a way to specify a timeframe. Furthermore, journalctl's output seems to consist of merely log messages from systemd-started processes, rather than the actual log of what was started, and when. 'journalctl --since=-600' will show all log messages for the last 600 seconds (10 minutes). Or you can use Except, as I explained, I am not looking for messages that were logged by systemd-started processes, in some time interval. I am looking at what exactly systemd started, during some time interval. Which is completely different from whatever got logged by a systemd-started process. At system boot, systemd fills the system console Starting foo… followed by, at some time later Started foo…. Several pages of that. Most of that seems to be completely absent from the output of journalctl --since. Perusal of the time intervals spanning the last couple of reboot cycles shows that each reboot results in a grand total of one message: Starting Default, and even that is not reliable, and is missing from several boot cycles. systemd's logging appears to be incomplete. The stuff you're seeing is sent to the console--not the system log--so you wouldn't see them in the standard log or journalctl anyway. It does appear in /var/log/boot.log. Note that by default, systemd logs at level info and sends the logs to the journal or kmesg. If you want to kick it into being VERY verbose, try changing the line: #LogLevel=info in /etc/systemd/system.conf to: LogLevel=debug (note the uncomment and change of level) and rebooting. Perhaps you'll capture what it's doing. Don't forget to change it back after you finish debugging. I did some digging around and found the /run/nologin file is managed by the program /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-user-sessions (invoked by systemd-user-sessions.service). -- - Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com - - AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 22643734Yahoo: origrps2 - -- -Working with Linux is like wrestling with a worthy opponent.- - Working with Windows is like picking on an annoyed child with a - -loaded handgun. - -- -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Stale /var/run/nologin
On 01/09/14 10:09, Rick Stevens wrote: I did some digging around and found the /run/nologin file is managed by the program /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-user-sessions (invoked by systemd-user-sessions.service). FWIW, this issue has been reported as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043212 in December. -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Stale /var/run/nologin
Ed Greshko writes: On 01/09/14 10:09, Rick Stevens wrote: I did some digging around and found the /run/nologin file is managed by the program /usr/lib/systemd/systemd-user-sessions (invoked by systemd-user-sessions.service). FWIW, this issue has been reported as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043212 in December. Well, as I noted there, systemd-user-session doesn't exactly manage the /run/nologin file, but it should simply remove it. Whenever my current bout of laziness passes, I'm going to stare at the source, to see if there are any conditions under which systemd-user-session fails or refuses to remove the file. pgpJCme6I9Z3O.pgp Description: PGP signature -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
OT: Kernel USB message
I have a project that I build using Fedora, but have just gotten some new machine with USB keyboards and mice, and am getting a message that pops up often. With Fedora it isn't a real issue, since it goes to the log, but with the project it displays on the text screen, and corrupts the dialog display. The message seems to be linked to the Lenova Mouse, but not sure how to solve or supress the messages. Message is: usb 3-x: ep 0x81 - rounding interval to 64 microframes, ep desc says 80 microframes The message appears at random times, with no use of the mouse. Nothing for time, then sometimes 1 or a few will pop up. The 3-x has the x value change depending on what USB port it is plugged into. For my project the kernels are build from kernel.org source, but the support is currently built from Fedora machines. Any ideals on ways to resolve the issue? Searches find lots of results, but they are mainly long log listings that have the line somewhere in the listing. Thanks. +--+ Michael D. Setzer II - Computer Science Instructor Guam Community College Computer Center mailto:mi...@kuentos.guam.net mailto:msetze...@gmail.com http://www.guam.net/home/mikes Guam - Where America's Day Begins G4L Disk Imaging Project maintainer http://sourceforge.net/projects/g4l/ +--+ http://setiathome.berkeley.edu (Original) Number of Seti Units Returned: 19,471 Processing time: 32 years, 290 days, 12 hours, 58 minutes (Total Hours: 287,489) BOINC@HOME CREDITS ROSETTA 9837209.884483 | SETI17208320.847877 ABC 16611686.340441 | EINSTEIN14962286.139852 -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Policies
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 17:05:34 -0800, Richard Vickery richard.vicker...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a policy in these groups regarding including outsiders in a conversation by merely adding the person's address to the email? We - he and I -installed Fedora on his machine, and he is eager to come aboard, but he has yet to join an email group. Adding him as a CC won't automatically have other people's replies copied to him. Most people here do reply to list. (Or for the lists that mung the reply-to header, just reply. I forget whether this particular list does reply-to munging, as I strip those headers.) So likely further replies in a thread wouldn't copy him. Also when he replies his messages would either be held for moderation or rejected. (Again depending on the particular list.) So to participate effectively he would want to subscribe. He can always unsubscribe later. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: lyx in fedora 20
On 9 January 2014 03:08, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: On 01/08/14 22:13, Ed Greshko wrote: On 01/08/14 22:08, Ahmad Samir wrote: On 8 January 2014 15:42, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: On 01/08/14 21:34, Patrick Dupre wrote: OK, I guess that I understand. The lyx with fedora 20 is 2.0.6 while the version with fedora 19 was 2.0.7. Hence, the update has not been done! Are you sure about that? I just did a yum info lyx on an F19 system and I get Available Packages Name: lyx Arch: x86_64 Version : 2.0.6 Release : 1.fc19 Size: 3.6 M Repo: fedora/19/x86_64 2.0.7 is in updates-testing in fc19 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=486384 Yepalso is available in updates-testing for F20. This is kind of my point, if one installs stuff from testing and then updates their system they need to understand the potential issues. Also, I just got around to updating from updates-testing and 2.0.7 has no problems at all. Also note [root@f20f log]# locate libboost_regex /usr/lib64/libboost_regex.so.1.54.0 [root@f20f log]# locate libboost_regex-mt [root@f20f log]# So, I'm at a loss to explain why libboost_regex-mt.so.1.53.0 is being accessed by lyx on the OP's system. The OP has lyx from fc19 repos, which is built against boost-1.53.0; in fc20 it's boost-1.54.0. The OP should run 'yum distro-sync' to take care of all those packages that weren't upgraded to fc20 when he upgraded the system. -- Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and self-serving posts -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org -- Ahmad Samir -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Cinnamon desktop
My brother told me about Cinnamon desktop . I tryed it I like it but I do not want to install it along with gnome . Witch fedora spin has it as default desktop ? -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Re: Cinnamon desktop
On 1/8/2014 10:35 PM, William Biggs wrote: My brother told me about Cinnamon desktop . I tryed it I like it but I do not want to install it along with gnome . Witch fedora spin has it as default desktop ? Unfortunately, according to the spins directory, it does not seem a cinnamon spin exists May want to check the MATE-compiz spin. https://spins.fedoraproject.org/ -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
Problems with hybrid graphics in Fedora 20
Hi, after updating my system to fedora 20 I encountered multiple problems 1- Kernel package 3.12 crashes every time I try to use acpi_call or vgaswitcheroo to turn off my discrete graphics card (ATI Radeon HD 5650), every time I try acpi_call or vgaswitcheroo a abrt notification about kernel package appears and vga switcheroo folder disapears from /sys/kernel/debug folder 2- While xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.21.15-4 seemed to works fine for me, but after new update to that package (2.21.15-5) I encountered complete black screen after boot up on tty1. I stuck with previous version for now. 3- I don't know is it really relevant or not, but every time I shutdown my system it somehow do something to my wireless router (!?) If I want any other client connect to my wireless network I actually have to restart my wireless router after shutting down my laptop. I recon I had same problem with fedora 19 in early days of release, but I don't know how can it be related to OS. -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription options: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct Guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines Have a question? Ask away: http://ask.fedoraproject.org
