[389-users] Re: Passwords migration from openldap to 389DS

On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 01:33 +0100, wodel youchi wrote: > Hi, > > We're planning the migration from openldap to 389DS, > we did some tests, and we have some problems with users passwords migration. > > We found this article in 389DS's website >

[389-users] Re: Installation of 389 DS

On Thu, 2016-03-03 at 01:26 +0100, wodel youchi wrote: > Hi and thanks for your help, > > This is the link of the documentation : > > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/10/html/ > Installation_Guide/Preparing_for_a_Directory_Server_Installation- >

[389-users] Passwords migration from openldap to 389DS

Hi, We're planning the migration from openldap to 389DS, we did some tests, and we have some problems with users passwords migration. We found this article in 389DS's website http://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/design/password-migration-design.html Is this implemented or not yet or

[389-users] Re: Installation of 389 DS

Hi and thanks for your help, This is the link of the documentation : https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Directory_Server/10/html/Installation_Guide/Preparing_for_a_Directory_Server_Installation-Considerations.html and it is the actual documentation of the RDS v10 Regards.

[389-users] Re: Installation of 389 DS

On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 19:28 +0100, wodel youchi wrote: > Hi, > > I am a newbie on 389 DS, I was following the RDS install document from > RedHat Documentation. > > OS: Centos 7.2 x64 latest updates > 389 DS : > 389-admin-console-1.1.10-1.el7.noarch > 389-ds-base-libs-1.3.4.0-26.el7_2.x86_64 >

[389-users] Re: ns-slapd memory usage

On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 15:19 +, Radu Pantiru wrote: > Hi, > > I am using 1.3.3 and the reserved memory usage it is going up on average  > ~ 800MB per week and I have a cache hit rate of ~98% on both ldap  > userRoot and db_stat > Is this normal behavior or possibly I have a memory leak? > I

[389-users] Re: Unable to connect to Admin server via 389 windows console

Could you please double check your Directory Server is configured with SSLv3 disabled? http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/howto/howto-disable-sslv3.html On 03/02/2016 01:35 PM, Daniel Franciscus wrote: OK, new error now after upgrading: Unable to create ssl socket

[389-users] Re: Unable to connect to Admin server via 389 windows console

OK, new error now after upgrading: Unable to create ssl socket org.mozilla.jss.ssl.SSLSocketException: SSL_ForceHandshake failed: (-12279) Peer using unsupported version of security protocol. at org.mozilla.jss.ssl.SSLSocket.forceHandshake(Native Method) at

Re: Unexpected system error Notifications

George N. White III On 2016-03-01 6:24 PM, "Rick Stevens" wrote: > > On 03/01/2016 02:14 PM, CS DBA wrote: >> >> >> >> On 03/01/2016 03:12 PM, Rick Stevens wrote: >>> >>> On 03/01/2016 02:06 PM, CS DBA wrote: All; I'm seeing this notification multiple

[389-users] Installation of 389 DS

Hi, I am a newbie on 389 DS, I was following the RDS install document from RedHat Documentation. OS: Centos 7.2 x64 latest updates 389 DS : 389-admin-console-1.1.10-1.el7.noarch 389-ds-base-libs-1.3.4.0-26.el7_2.x86_64 389-ds-base-1.3.4.0-26.el7_2.x86_64 389-console-1.1.9-1.el7.noarch

[HEADS UP]: OpenSSH 7.2 to Fedora 23

Hi there, I just pushed openssh-7.2 update [1] into Fedora 23 testing. There are no incompatible changes except these: * the minimum modulus size supported for diffie-hellman-group-exchange was increased to 2048 bits, * several legacy cryptographic algorithms and MD5-based and truncated

Re: Fedora on a Dell XPS 15

I have tried on $SUBJECT = $MACH. That is, Dell Precision M3800. System does not come back from hibernate reliably. On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 08:51:03 -0600 Ian Pilcher wrote: > Has anyone tried $SUBJECT? Any issues? > > -- >

Re: Where is my qemu ? Can i install it without breaking everythin

Help a lot, thanks for clarifying things 2016-03-02 16:49 GMT+01:00 Todd Zullinger : > Tim wrote: > >> On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 05:40 +0100, thibaut noah wrote: >> >>> I think i misunderstand things on version numbers, thought 2:2.5.0-6 >>> means version 2.2... From what you say i

[389-users] Re: Unable to connect to Admin server via 389 windows console

On 03/02/2016 08:29 AM, Daniel Franciscus wrote: C:\Program Files\389 Management Console>"java" "-Djava.library.path=." -cp "./jss4.jar;./ldapjdk.jar;./idm-console-base.jar;./idm-console-mcc.jar;./idm-console-mcc_en.jar;./idm-console-nmclf.jar;./idm-console-nmclf_en.jar;./389-console_en.jar"

Re: Where is my qemu ? Can i install it without breaking everythin

Tim wrote: On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 05:40 +0100, thibaut noah wrote: I think i misunderstand things on version numbers, thought 2:2.5.0-6 means version 2.2... From what you say i have the feeling that i might be wrong about this. epoch:version epoch 2 version 2.5.0-6 Go by the decimals, file

[389-users] ns-slapd memory usage

Hi, I am using 1.3.3 and the reserved memory usage it is going up on average ~ 800MB per week and I have a cache hit rate of ~98% on both ldap userRoot and db_stat Is this normal behavior or possibly I have a memory leak? Regards, Radu -- 389 users mailing list 389-users@%(host_name)s

yum install nodejs installs 200+ rpms but still won't run.

I folks. I've tried installing node.js and socket.io as I want to see if they will provide a solution to a problem I have. However, the first problem I've got is that it won't run. Below are the yum installs that I've tried. They look a bit iratic as I did them while trying things, and

Fedora on a Dell XPS 15

Has anyone tried $SUBJECT? Any issues? -- Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com "I grew up before Mark Zuckerberg invented friendship"

[389-users] Re: Unable to connect to Admin server via 389 windows console

C:\Program Files\389 Management Console>"java" "-Djava.library.path=." -cp "./jss4.jar;./ldapjdk.jar;./idm-console-base.jar;./idm-console-mcc.jar;./idm-console-mcc_en.jar;./idm-console-nmclf.jar;./idm-console-nmclf_en.jar;./389-console_en.jar" -Djava.util.prefs.systemRo ot=I:\/.389-console

Re: Where is my qemu ? Can i install it without breaking everythin

On Wed, 2016-03-02 at 05:40 +0100, thibaut noah wrote: > I think i misunderstand things on version numbers, thought 2:2.5.0-6 > means version 2.2... From what you say i have the feeling that i might > be wrong about this. epoch:version epoch 2 version 2.5.0-6 Go by the decimals, file version