Re: F26 32-bit Live ISO stalls during boot

[Samuel Sieb]

On 11/13/2017 11:47 AM, ea...@eagerm.com wrote:

Journalctl shows sddm_greeter crashed, with stack trace of 0 (maybe stack 
overwrite corrupting return address).  The only hits I see for sddm_greeter 
involve Nvidia drivers.  My laptop has integrated Intel video.

I can run "startx" in the console and (after a while) get a KDE/Plasma desktop.  I'm able 
to open a "konsole" window and run some commands.

I'm guessing that the sddm_greater problem causes the hang.  Any idea how to 
fix this?


Do you really need to run the 32-bit version?  It looks like the live 
image respins are only done for 64-bit.  I was going to suggest using an 
F27 live image instead, but I can only find netinst images.  The spins 
don't seem to be built.  However, I did find ones for rawhide (future 
F28).  You could try that.


https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/development/rawhide/Spins/i386/iso/
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: OT: Getting lot of "TCP Retransmission" when ssh to on machine

[George N. White III]

On 12 November 2017 at 07:24, Jon Ingason  wrote:

> Den 2017-11-12 kl. 00:53, skrev George N. White III:
> > On 11 November 2017 at 11:28, Jon Ingason  > > wrote:
> >
> > Hi, know that this not a Fedora problem. I have browsed the web
> without
> > getting answer the fit the problem I have.
> >
> > I thing this has something to do with the network between to
> machines.
> > One, machine A, is in my study in my house the other, machine B, is
> in
> > my garage that i about 10 m away from house. Machine A is connected
> > directly the main Internet router.
>

Now that we know both machines are on the same subnet, you are in for basic
network troubleshooting.  Unfortunately, the internet is saturated with
obsolete and
just plain wrong information.   You need to study man pages for the "ip"
and "ss".
https://devopscube.com/list-linux-networking-troubleshooting-and-commands-
beginners/
looks current.

https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/50098/linux-
network-troubleshooting-and-debugging
is a helpful resource.

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/access_point/
1520/troubleshooting/guide/TrbleshtMesh.pdf
may be helpful

It would be a good idea to study and run the examples from the devops page
on your systems to see if any anomalies emerge.



> > By direct, do you mean using a cable or wifi?  Does A get an internet
> > address or
> > a private subnet address?
>
> I should be have more clearer in my description.
> When I say connected directly I mean connected with cable.
> Both A and B have static IP addresses on same pivate subnet (
> 192.168.1.0/24)
>
> > Between that router and machine B are
> > two extenders, C and D. Extender C is in extender mode, while D i
> meshed
> > to C. Machine B is directly connected to D.
>

Is B using wifi or cable?  Did you get your configuration from the vendors
docs?
Normally, mesh means 2 or more routers, but this is an area were vendors
use
proprietary algorithms, so you may need to ask the vendor for
recommendations.

I run a setup with two routers in "mesh" mode and a wifi to ethernet bridge
for
an office with multiple ethernet-connected systems, but I can also connect
directly with ethernet cable to either of the two wireless mesh nodes.  I
have
not seen asymmetries such as you encountered.  I wonder if C needs to use
"mesh" mode  -- the most common use case for extenders is for systems that
need internet access and don't run services like sshd for other systems.  I
have
seen reports of ssh problems using extenders with headless rPi boards.


> > The problem is that when I ssh from B to A everything is as it should
> > be. But if I ssh from A to B I get lot of "TCP Retransmission". The
> > connection from B to Internet is working excellent as well as for all
> > other devices connected to my network.
> >
> >
> > If A has an internet address and B is on a private subnet using NAT,
> > A won't be able to connect to B, but B can connect to A.
>
> Se above and below.
>
> >
> >
> > I just wonder if someone had some experience similar problems.
> >
> > Machines A and B are x86_64 Fedora 26 kernel 4.13.11-200
> > Router is ASUS RT-N66R
> > Extenders are Strong Range Extender 1600
> > -
> >
> >
> > That router supports multiple subnets with different access restrictions
> and
> > the range extender has "access point mode" which usually has NAT.  If
> > you don't need A or B to be reachable on the internet or separate subnets
> > with access restrictions, you should try to keep A and B on the same
> > (private)
> > subnet.
>
> The extender C is in extender mode.
> The extender D is in mesh mode.
>
> INTERNET  router <--WL--> C <--WL--> D
> ||
> AB
>
> <--WL--> Wireless
>  Cable
> |Cable
>

-- 
George N. White III 
Head of St. Margarets Bay, Nova Scotia
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F26 32-bit Live ISO stalls during boot

[eager]

Thanks.  I can get a console and log in.  I ran "dnf update" to update to 
current repo.  

Journalctl shows sddm_greeter crashed, with stack trace of 0 (maybe stack 
overwrite corrupting return address).  The only hits I see for sddm_greeter 
involve Nvidia drivers.  My laptop has integrated Intel video.  

I can run "startx" in the console and (after a while) get a KDE/Plasma desktop. 
 I'm able to open a "konsole" window and run some commands.  

I'm guessing that the sddm_greater problem causes the hang.  Any idea how to 
fix this?
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Login Page changed after last fedora 26 update

[Rick Stevens]

On 11/13/2017 06:56 AM, ogio spam wrote:
> Hi Ed,
> I can't remember... can photos be attached to a messages or there is a
> simply way to upload images?

Take a screen snapshot or photo, upload it to something like pastebin
and include a link to the pastebin upload in your message. Do NOT
attach the screenshot to a message here in the list.

> Il giorno lun, 13/11/2017 alle 22.49 +0800, Ed Greshko ha scritto:
>> On 11/13/17 22:09, ogio spam wrote:
>>> Hi Ed,
>>>
>>> Il giorno lun, 13/11/2017 alle 19.48 +0800, Ed Greshko ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Actually the display manager is sddm:
>>> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 36  6 lug 00.04 /etc/systemd/system/display
>>> -manager.service -> /usr/lib/systemd/system/sddm.service
>>>
>>> The date of the file is Jul 06, so I think no changes was done
>>> after
>>> the date.
>>> So the question is, why it is so different after an update?
>>
>> I have fully updated F26 systems and the login displays have not
>> changed for me.  So,
>> I can't think of what may have happened for you.
>>
>> I am not entirely clear on what you display looks like now.  Possible
>> to post a
>> screenshot or photo?
>>
>> ___
>> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> 


-- 
--
- Rick Stevens, Systems Engineer, AllDigitalri...@alldigital.com -
- AIM/Skype: therps2ICQ: 226437340   Yahoo: origrps2 -
--
- Is that a buffer overflow or are you just happy to see me? -
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Smooth upgarde to F27

[Patrick O'Callaghan]

On Mon, 2017-11-13 at 17:32 +0100, Antonio M wrote:
> I upgraded two systems from F26 to F27 (a pretty standard setup with
> RpmFusion addditional repos) this afternoon and everything went really
> smooth. Tnx to who worked on it

Since it's not been released yet, this would be helpful information for
people on the Test list.

poc
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Smooth upgarde to F27

[Antonio M]

I upgraded two systems from F26 to F27 (a pretty standard setup with
RpmFusion addditional repos) this afternoon and everything went really
smooth. Tnx to who worked on it


Antonio Montagnani

Linux Fedora 27(Workstation)
inviato da Gmail
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Login Page changed after last fedora 26 update

[ogio spam]

Hi Ed,
I can't remember... can photos be attached to a messages or there is a
simply way to upload images?

Tnx

Il giorno lun, 13/11/2017 alle 22.49 +0800, Ed Greshko ha scritto:
> On 11/13/17 22:09, ogio spam wrote:
> > Hi Ed,
> > 
> > Il giorno lun, 13/11/2017 alle 19.48 +0800, Ed Greshko ha scritto:
> > 
> > Actually the display manager is sddm:
> > lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 36  6 lug 00.04 /etc/systemd/system/display
> > -manager.service -> /usr/lib/systemd/system/sddm.service
> > 
> > The date of the file is Jul 06, so I think no changes was done
> > after
> > the date.
> > So the question is, why it is so different after an update?
> 
> I have fully updated F26 systems and the login displays have not
> changed for me.  So,
> I can't think of what may have happened for you.
> 
> I am not entirely clear on what you display looks like now.  Possible
> to post a
> screenshot or photo?
> 
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Login Page changed after last fedora 26 update

[Ed Greshko]

On 11/13/17 22:09, ogio spam wrote:
> Hi Ed,
>
> Il giorno lun, 13/11/2017 alle 19.48 +0800, Ed Greshko ha scritto:
>
> Actually the display manager is sddm:
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 36  6 lug 00.04 
> /etc/systemd/system/display-manager.service -> 
> /usr/lib/systemd/system/sddm.service
>
> The date of the file is Jul 06, so I think no changes was done after
> the date.
> So the question is, why it is so different after an update?

I have fully updated F26 systems and the login displays have not changed for 
me.  So,
I can't think of what may have happened for you.

I am not entirely clear on what you display looks like now.  Possible to post a
screenshot or photo?

-- 
Fedora Users List - The place to go to speculate endlessly



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Login Page changed after last fedora 26 update

[ogio spam]

Hi Ed,

Il giorno lun, 13/11/2017 alle 19.48 +0800, Ed Greshko ha scritto:
> On 11/13/17 18:03, ogio spam wrote:
> > I don't know what I'm using.
> > The question is that it changed after dnf update.
> > How can I check what i'm using?
> 
> 
> The output of
> 
> ll /etc/systemd/system/display-manager.service
> 
> Will point to the display manager you're using
> 

Actually the display manager is sddm:
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 36  6 lug 00.04 
/etc/systemd/system/display-manager.service -> 
/usr/lib/systemd/system/sddm.service

The date of the file is Jul 06, so I think no changes was done after
the date.
So the question is, why it is so different after an update?

Bye
 Ambrogio

> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Login Page changed after last fedora 26 update

[Ed Greshko]

On 11/13/17 18:03, ogio spam wrote:
> I don't know what I'm using.
> The question is that it changed after dnf update.
> How can I check what i'm using?


The output of

ll /etc/systemd/system/display-manager.service

Will point to the display manager you're using

-- 
Fedora Users List - The place to go to speculate endlessly



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Login Page changed after last fedora 26 update

[ogio spam]

I don't know what I'm using.
The question is that it changed after dnf update.
How can I check what i'm using?
Tnx
 Ambrogio
Il giorno lun, 13/11/2017 alle 10.41 +0100, Silvia Sánchez ha scritto:
> 
> What is your login screen? GDM? SDDM? Other?
> It never showed a list to me, but it depends on what do you use and
> how do you set up the theme.
> 
> Regards,
> Silvia
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 13 November 2017 at 10:13, ogio spam  wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > before the last updates, after power on, my fedora 26 showed a list
> > of
> > users and asked for password.
> > I use KDE.
> > 
> > After last upgrade (I can't remember what changed, but some related
> > to
> > KDE and X11) the login requires user and password, and it no more
> > lists
> > users and pictures.
> > 
> > Can someone explain me why every update change the behaviour of the
> > system? And what appened?
> > 
> > Thankyou
> >  Ambrogio
> > ___
> > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > 
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Login Page changed after last fedora 26 update

[Silvia Sánchez]

What is your login screen? GDM? SDDM? Other?
It never showed a list to me, but it depends on what do you use and how do
you set up the theme.

Regards,
Silvia




On 13 November 2017 at 10:13, ogio spam  wrote:

> Hi all,
> before the last updates, after power on, my fedora 26 showed a list of
> users and asked for password.
> I use KDE.
>
> After last upgrade (I can't remember what changed, but some related to
> KDE and X11) the login requires user and password, and it no more lists
> users and pictures.
>
> Can someone explain me why every update change the behaviour of the
> system? And what appened?
>
> Thankyou
>  Ambrogio
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-users] Re: ip address based aci

[Jan Kowalsky]

Hi William,

thanks a lot for clearing.

Am 13.11.2017 um 00:42 schrieb William Brown:
> On Sun, 2017-11-12 at 23:06 +0100, Jan Kowalsky wrote:

>> On some comments I read that it's generally discouraged to use aci's
>> with a "not" logic like:
>>
>>  ip != 10.0.0.*
>>
>> or something like this.
>>
> 
> The != is only an issue for targetattr, because if you do:
> 
> targetattr != sn
> 
> Then this includes all system attributes like nsACcountlock and
> resource limit types etc. 
> 
> IP addr != is fine :) 

>> As long as I understood, I have to define aci's for every base dn
>> separately if I running multiple databases. Is there any way to
>> define
>> this for the whole server?
> 
> If you have the databases nested IE:
> 
> dc=example,dc=com
> ou=foo,dc=example,dc=com
> 
> And in the mapping tree these are marked as "parent", then the aci of
> dc=example,dc=com should apply to ou=foo too. 

ok. So for me it doesn't work. The databases are completely separeted.

> Generally, I would look at:
> 
> https://research.google.com/pubs/pub43231.html
> 
> IP address based security is not a good control: You should be using
> other factors and information to provide access I think. You could
> limit admins to using TLS user certs for identity rather than
> passwords, using minssf rules, longer password policy, etc.

The ip based access control in my setting is only to give a additionally
control beside the firewall. The Directory should not to be accessible
from public internet at all. But for the case there is any error on
firewalling I want to protect the whole directory. Other access rights
are more granular.

Regards
Jan
___
389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Login Page changed after last fedora 26 update

[ogio spam]

Hi all,
before the last updates, after power on, my fedora 26 showed a list of
users and asked for password.
I use KDE.

After last upgrade (I can't remember what changed, but some related to
KDE and X11) the login requires user and password, and it no more lists
users and pictures.

Can someone explain me why every update change the behaviour of the
system? And what appened?

Thankyou
 Ambrogio
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org