Re: How to sign a locally compiled kernel so it can be booted with UEFI.
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 00:46:20 -0400 Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 6/10/19 6:57 PM, stan via users wrote: > > Thanks. According to that, not only the kernel has to be signed, > > but all the modules that the kernel will load. Whew! That is a > > real hurdle, and a show stopper, unless there is a process to do > > that during build. I'll have to investigate. It is probably why my > > custom kernel wouldn't boot, as I didn't sign any modules, only the > > kernel vmlinuz. > > You also used mokutil to load the key in the firmware? You should > have received a prompt at boot to accept it. Yes, I did, and it accepted it. When I run pesign -S -i on the signed kernel it shows that it was signed, pesign -S -i vmlinuz-5.2.0-0.rc3.git3.1.20190609.fc31.x86_64 - certificate address is 0x7f254f09c4a8 Content was not encrypted. Content is detached; signature cannot be verified. The signer's common name is Red Hat Test Certificate No signer email address. Signing time: Sun Jun 09, 2019 There were certs or crls included. - certificate address is 0x7f254f09cfa0 Content was not encrypted. Content is detached; signature cannot be verified. The signer's common name is Organization signing key The signer's email address is e-mail address Signing time: Mon Jun 10, 2019 There were certs or crls included. Based on things I've discovered while building a new kernel, I think that the problem might be a missing ISO8859-1 module in the kernel. When I boot the custom kernel with secure boot turned off, it fails because it cannot load /boot/efi because it is missing that module. When I add it to the build, the boot succeeds. I wonder if the error message is misleading, and it is actually failing because it can't get to the information in the /boot/efi directory that it needs to check the signature. Will be checking that after I sign the new kernel that successfully boots. I'm thinking of creating new keys now that I am more familiar with the process, keys I specify rather than accepting defaults. Maybe writing a simple script for creating and signing. The other thing that is a positive, is that the kernel automatically signs all modules during build if configured to do so, which I have, so I don't have to worry about that. I'm using sha512, while the stock kernels use sha256, but that shouldn't make a difference, as long as the validation takes its cue from the kernel declaration, rather than being hard coded. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to sign a locally compiled kernel so it can be booted with UEFI.
On 6/10/19 6:57 PM, stan via users wrote: Thanks. According to that, not only the kernel has to be signed, but all the modules that the kernel will load. Whew! That is a real hurdle, and a show stopper, unless there is a process to do that during build. I'll have to investigate. It is probably why my custom kernel wouldn't boot, as I didn't sign any modules, only the kernel vmlinuz. You also used mokutil to load the key in the firmware? You should have received a prompt at boot to accept it. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Email Client
On 6/10/19 4:55 PM, Douglas G Mckendrick via users wrote: Is there still an rpm repository you can search? I'm not too keen on the new software list. It doesn't seem to want to show all searches of software, more fedora recommendations? Unless maybe it was the updates needed doing first. If you want to search everything, you need to use dnf on the command line. The Gnome Software application only shows graphical applications, not libraries or command line tools. (It will do updates of everything though.) ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to sign a locally compiled kernel so it can be booted with UEFI.
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 18:22:49 -0700 Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 6/10/19 11:39 AM, stan via users wrote: > > It still doesn't boot. Is there anyone here who has a successful > > technique for signing a locally compiled kernel so it will boot > > under UEFI? > > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/Kernel_Administration_Guide/sect-signing-kernel-modules-for-secure-boot.html > > Red Hat has a guide for this, but some details vary from motherboard > to motherboard. Thanks. According to that, not only the kernel has to be signed, but all the modules that the kernel will load. Whew! That is a real hurdle, and a show stopper, unless there is a process to do that during build. I'll have to investigate. It is probably why my custom kernel wouldn't boot, as I didn't sign any modules, only the kernel vmlinuz. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: How to sign a locally compiled kernel so it can be booted with UEFI.
On 6/10/19 11:39 AM, stan via users wrote: It still doesn't boot. Is there anyone here who has a successful technique for signing a locally compiled kernel so it will boot under UEFI? https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/Kernel_Administration_Guide/sect-signing-kernel-modules-for-secure-boot.html Red Hat has a guide for this, but some details vary from motherboard to motherboard. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Email Client
On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 00:55:42 +0100 Douglas G Mckendrick via users wrote: > Is there still an rpm repository you can search? I'm not too keen on > the new software list. It doesn't seem to want to show all searches > of software, more fedora recommendations? Unless maybe it was the > updates needed doing first. If you ran dnf update then it would only show you updates for already installed packages. Try dnf search | less to see what is available with that phrase associated. Can be a lot, thus the pipe to less. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
QtCreator on F29
Since upgrading to Fedora 29 (yes, I tend to be a bit behind), I've been having problems using QtCreator as I always have to work on LyX. Specifically, QtCreator fails to find a lot of included files, with the result that there are gazillions of 'parse errors' displayed in the editor. For example, our own generated config.h is not found, and QtCreator complains that none of the Qt headers are found. Any idea what has changed or what I might do? I've tried deleting all the *.creator files, etc. Riki ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Email Client
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 18:49:29 -0400 Ted Roche wrote: > Mozilla says they are blowing smoke: > https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1044903 I agree. I enable pop and imap so I can use fetchmail and I just ignore all the warnings google sends me every so often. I suppose I'd be willing to switch to OAUTH2 if a version of fetchmail ever showed up that officially supported it, but all I hear about are rumors and unofficial patches the last time I checked. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: mariadb vs community-mysql on F30
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 13:38:50 -0700 Paolo Galtieri wrote: > Folks I have an issue with mariadb and community-mysql. I installed > mysql-workbench. When I run it it shows a conflict between it and > the running mysql server, namely mysql-workbench is version 8.0.16 > and mariadb is 10.3.12. So I decided to remove mariadb, i.e. I did: > > yum remove mariadb-common mariadb-connector-c mariadb-embedded > mariadb-errmsg yum, not dnf? > In doing this a total of 62 packages were removed: [snip] > I then did an install of community mysql: > > yum install community-mysql-common.x86_64 > community-mysql-devel.x86_64 community-mysql-errmsg.x86_64 > community-mysql-libs.x86_64 community-mysql-server.x86_64 > community-mysql-test.x86_64 > > This failed miserably: > > Transaction Summary > > Install 20 Packages > Downgrade 4 Packages [snip] > So how do I install the community-mysql instead of the mariadb > server, and why are so many packages removed when I remove the > mariadb packages? > > Why are libreoffice-calc, libreoffice-draw, libreoffice-math removed? I think you are caught in a fork conflict. Both are a fork of mysql, and I vaguely recall there was a disagreement about the direction of mariadb that led to the creation of community-mysql. Or maybe it was with the actual mysql, at Oracle now. It's kind of like the python2 / python3 imbroglio. Eventually they will co-exist, or one will triumph, but until then, users are stuck. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Email Client
>Tuesday 11th June messages >top posting of previous messages. >not sure how to bottom post from phone Thanks Temlakos, Ted, Frank and Patrick. I've got Thunderbird up and running, I had an idea it was Google wanting some monopoly. I just wasn't too sure, I figured Google was still a friend. What would be interesting is, what exactly you lose in security? Maybe just the benefit of cross platform information and pin codes? I still received an email for log in. I managed to find emacs, woohoo! Although Vim users might be more a boohoo lol. Next question... Is there still an rpm repository you can search? I'm not too keen on the new software list. It doesn't seem to want to show all searches of software, more fedora recommendations? Unless maybe it was the updates needed doing first. On Tue, 11 Jun 2019, 00:41 Temlakos, wrote: > On 6/10/19 5:42 PM, Douglas G Mckendrick via users wrote: > > Evening all, > I'm after setting up an email client, I've tried thunderbird for my gmail > account, but I get a google complaint about the client not being secure > enough. Is there another recommended email client? Or can we make > thunderbird more secure to pass the google checks? > > Thanks in advance > > D. > > Google is going to complain no matter what e-mail client you choose. It > assumes without warrant that any desktop or laptop from which you access > Google Mail by any interface other than their browser interface, is > *shared*. > > Thunderbird is the best cross-platform e-mail client I can recommend. > > TEmlakos > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Email Client
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 19:24:48 -0400 Temlakos wrote: > > Evening all, > > I'm after setting up an email client, I've tried thunderbird for my > > gmail account, but I get a google complaint about the client not > > being secure enough. Is there another recommended email client? > > Or can we make thunderbird more secure to pass the google checks? > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > D. I use claws which is simple and fast. It's a bit idiosyncratic but there's a very active email support list. Works well for me. D -- In modern fantasy (literary or governmental), killing people is the usual solution to the so-called war between good and evil. My books are not conceived in terms of such a war, and offer no simple answers to simplistic questions. - Ursula Le Guin ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Email Client
On 6/10/19 5:42 PM, Douglas G Mckendrick via users wrote: Evening all, I'm after setting up an email client, I've tried thunderbird for my gmail account, but I get a google complaint about the client not being secure enough. Is there another recommended email client? Or can we make thunderbird more secure to pass the google checks? Thanks in advance D. Google is going to complain no matter what e-mail client you choose. It assumes without warrant that any desktop or laptop from which you access Google Mail by any interface other than their browser interface, is /shared/. Thunderbird is the best cross-platform e-mail client I can recommend. TEmlakos ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Email Client
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 6:30 PM Douglas G Mckendrick via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Evening all, > I'm after setting up an email client, I've tried thunderbird for my gmail > account, but I get a google complaint about the client not being secure > enough. Is there another recommended email client? Or can we make > thunderbird more secure to pass the google checks? > > You can't always believe what you read on the Internet, even if it's from "Do No Evil" Google.' Mozilla says they are blowing smoke: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/1044903 -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Email Client
On 6/10/19 6:42 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Mon, 2019-06-10 at 22:42 +0100, Douglas G Mckendrick via users wrote: Evening all, I'm after setting up an email client, I've tried thunderbird for my gmail account, but I get a google complaint about the client not being secure enough. Is there another recommended email client? Or can we make thunderbird more secure to pass the google checks? I use Evolution myself (with two Google accounts including this one) but Thunderbird should work perfectly well. It would be useful to see the exact error message you're getting, but note that if you have 2FA configured for the account you may need to use the Gnome Online Accounts widget to set it up. poc There are ways around the problem. I use Thunderbird all the time. This is from Googles help page: Change account access for less secure apps To help keep Google Accounts through work, school, or other groups more secure, we block some less secure apps from using them. If you have this kind of account, you’ll see a "Password incorrect" error when trying to sign in. If so, you have two options: Option 1: Install a more secure app that uses stronger security measures. All Google products, like Gmail, use the latest security measures. Option 2: Change your settings to allow less secure apps into your account. We don't recommend this option because it can make it easier for someone to break into your account. If you want to allow access anyway, follow these steps: Go to your Google Account. On the left navigation panel, click Security. On the bottom of the page, in the Less secure app access panel, click Turn on access. If you don't see this setting, your administrator might have turned off less secure app account access. If you still can't sign in to your account, learn more about the "password incorrect" error. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Email Client
On Mon, 2019-06-10 at 22:42 +0100, Douglas G Mckendrick via users wrote: > Evening all, > I'm after setting up an email client, I've tried thunderbird for my gmail > account, but I get a google complaint about the client not being secure > enough. Is there another recommended email client? Or can we make > thunderbird more secure to pass the google checks? I use Evolution myself (with two Google accounts including this one) but Thunderbird should work perfectly well. It would be useful to see the exact error message you're getting, but note that if you have 2FA configured for the account you may need to use the Gnome Online Accounts widget to set it up. poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Email Client
Evening all, I'm after setting up an email client, I've tried thunderbird for my gmail account, but I get a google complaint about the client not being secure enough. Is there another recommended email client? Or can we make thunderbird more secure to pass the google checks? Thanks in advance D. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-users] Docker official image
Hi all, Do you provide an official docker image for 389 ? I plan to deploy MMR on Kubernetes . Any advice/link ? ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
mariadb vs community-mysql on F30
Folks I have an issue with mariadb and community-mysql. I installed mysql-workbench. When I run it it shows a conflict between it and the running mysql server, namely mysql-workbench is version 8.0.16 and mariadb is 10.3.12. So I decided to remove mariadb, i.e. I did: yum remove mariadb-common mariadb-connector-c mariadb-embedded mariadb-errmsg In doing this a total of 62 packages were removed: Removing: mariadb-common x86_64 3:10.3.12-10.fc30 @fedora 179 k mariadb-connector-c x86_64 3.0.10-1.fc30 @updates 712 k mariadb-embedded x86_64 3:10.3.12-10.fc30 @fedora 22 M mariadb-errmsg x86_64 3:10.3.12-10.fc30 @fedora 2.3 M Removing dependent packages: freeradius-mysql x86_64 3.0.19-1.fc30 @fedora 78 k kf5-akonadi-server-mysql x86_64 18.12.2-2.fc30 @fedora 3.4 k libreoffice-calc x86_64 1:6.2.4.2-1.fc30 @updates 46 M libreoffice-draw x86_64 1:6.2.4.2-1.fc30 @updates 65 k libreoffice-emailmerge x86_64 1:6.2.4.2-1.fc30 @updates 26 k libreoffice-impress x86_64 1:6.2.4.2-1.fc30 @updates 2.9 M libreoffice-math x86_64 1:6.2.4.2-1.fc30 @updates 2.1 M perl-DBD-MySQL x86_64 4.050-2.fc30 @fedora 367 k Removing unused dependencies: autocorr-en noarch 1:6.2.4.2-1.fc30 @updates 467 k clucene-contribs-lib x86_64 2.3.3.4-34.20130812.e8e3d20git.fc30 @anaconda 516 k gstreamer1-plugins-good-gtk x86_64 1.16.0-1.fc30 @updates 69 k hyphen-en noarch 2.8.8-11.fc30 @anaconda 104 k libabw x86_64 0.1.2-4.fc30 @anaconda 501 k libcdr x86_64 0.1.5-4.fc30 @anaconda 983 k libcmis x86_64 0.5.2-2.fc30 @anaconda 2.2 M libe-book x86_64 0.1.3-9.fc30 @anaconda 861 k libeot x86_64 0.01-11.fc30 @anaconda 99 k libepubgen x86_64 0.1.1-3.fc30 @anaconda 613 k libetonyek x86_64 0.1.9-3.fc30 @anaconda 4.2 M libexttextcat x86_64 3.4.5-4.fc30 @anaconda 438 k libfbclient2 x86_64 3.0.4.33054-2.fc30 @fedora 2.2 M libfreehand x86_64 0.1.2-4.fc30 @anaconda 547 k liblangtag x86_64 0.6.2-7.fc30 @anaconda 268 k liblangtag-data noarch 0.6.2-7.fc30 @anaconda 1.9 M libmspub x86_64 0.1.4-7.fc30 @anaconda 536 k libmwaw x86_64 0.3.15-1.fc30 @updates 9.0 M libnumbertext x86_64 1.0.5-2.fc30 @anaconda 1.0 M libodfgen x86_64 0.1.7-4.fc30 @anaconda 1.2 M liborcus x86_64 0.14.1-3.fc30 @anaconda 1.9 M libpagemaker x86_64 0.0.4-6.fc30 @anaconda 313 k libqxp x86_64 0.0.2-3.fc30 @anaconda 525 k libreoffice-core x86_64 1:6.2.4.2-1.fc30 @updates 346 M libreoffice-data noarch 1:6.2.4.2-1.fc30 @updates 7.4 M libreoffice-graphicfilter x86_64 1:6.2.4.2-1.fc30 @updates 1.5 M libreoffice-gtk3 x86_64 1:6.2.4.2-1.fc30 @updates 2.3 M libreoffice-help-en x86_64 1:6.2.4.2-1.fc30 @updates 25 M libreoffice-langpack-en x86_64 1:6.2.4.2-1.fc30 @updates 187 k libreoffice-opensymbol-fonts noarch 1:6.2.4.2-1.fc30 @updates 623 k libreoffice-pdfimport x86_64 1:6.2.4.2-1.fc30 @updates 960 k libreoffice-pyuno x86_64 1:6.2.4.2-1.fc30 @updates 1.1 M libreoffice-ure x86_64 1:6.2.4.2-1.fc30 @updates 9.6 M libreoffice-ure-common noarch 1:6.2.4.2-1.fc30 @updates 854 k libreoffice-writer x86_64 1:6.2.4.2-1.fc30 @updates 20 M libreoffice-x11 x86_64 1:6.2.4.2-1.fc30 @updates 1.1 M librevenge x86_64 0.0.4-13.fc30 @anaconda 932 k libstaroffice x86_64 0.0.6-3.fc30 @anaconda 3.3 M libvisio x86_64 0.1.6-8.fc30 @anaconda 910 k libwpd x86_64 0.10.3-2.fc30 @anaconda 1.2 M libwpg x86_64 0.3.3-2.fc30 @anaconda 221 k libwps x86_64 0.4.10-2.fc30 @anaconda 3.0 M libzmf x86_64 0.0.2-9.fc30 @anaconda 269 k lpsolve x86_64 5.5.2.0-22.fc30 @anaconda 1.3 M mythes x86_64 1.2.4-11.fc30 @anaconda 24 k mythes-en noarch 3.0-26.fc30 @anaconda 21 M neon x86_64 0.30.2-10.fc30 @anaconda 360 k pakchois x86_64 0.4-19.fc30 @anaconda 32 k qt5-qtbase-mysql x86_64 5.12.1-7.fc30 @updates 117 k xmlsec1-nss x86_64 1.2.27-2.fc30 @anaconda 246 k Transaction Summary Remove 62 Packages I then did an install of community mysql: yum install community-mysql-common.x86_64 community-mysql-devel.x86_64 community-mysql-errmsg.x86_64
How to sign a locally compiled kernel so it can be booted with UEFI.
I compiled a fedora kernel locally. When I tried to boot it in UEFI, it failed because it wasn't signed. Which it is supposed to. I then searched and found the procedure for generating local keys using openssl, getting the public key into mok, generating the certificate, the pkcs12 structure, putting it in the pesign database, signing the kernel, and rebooting. It still doesn't boot. Is there anyone here who has a successful technique for signing a locally compiled kernel so it will boot under UEFI? I found some extreme measures like taking over all signing, but I think it is a little early for those. And, of course, I could turn off secure boot, but I'll give it a chance before doing that. Thanks. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild
Sorry, when I run
cpanspec Tk-JBrowseEntry-5.22.tar.gz
I get:
Name: perl-Tk-JBrowseEntry
Version:5.22
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Full-featured "Combo-box" (Text-entry combined with drop-down
listbox) derived from Tk::BrowseEntry with many additional features and options
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Tk-JBrowseEntry/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Tk/Tk-JBrowseEntry-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(Tk)
Requires: perl(Tk)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo
$version))
%description
Tk::JBrowseEntry is a derived widget from Tk::BrowseEntry, but adds
numerous features and options. Among them are hash lists (one set of values
is displayed for the user, but another is used as data), ability to disable
either the text entry widget or the listbox, ability to allow user to
delete items from the list, additional keyboard bindings, ability to have
the drop-down list "fixed" (always displayed, ability to use Tk::HListbox,
ie. to include thumbnail icons in the list), customized key bindings and
behaviour, and much more!
%prep
%setup -q -n Tk-JBrowseEntry-%{version}
%build
%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null \;
%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
%check
make test
%clean
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
%files
%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc Changes META.json README
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
* Mon Jun 10 2019 Patrick Dupre 5.22-1
- Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78.
---
Is there something in my .spec generation?
Anyway, addition:
Provides: perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) = %{version}-%{release}
fixes this issue
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne
9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0)380395988
===
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 at 5:22 PM
> From: "Michael Schwendt"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: rpmbuild
>
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:35:22 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
>
> > Provides: perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) = %{version}-%{release}
> >
> > seems missing in the .spec file
>
> No. These are automatically created Provides/Requires for Perl Modules.
> You need to work with a package that _really_ includes and "Provides"
> the Tk:JBrowseEntry module with a sufficient version. If such a package
> is installed in the build environment, but doesn't contain the "Provides"
> tag, you will need to take a closer look at that package.
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:35:22 +0200, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> Provides: perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) = %{version}-%{release}
>
> seems missing in the .spec file
No. These are automatically created Provides/Requires for Perl Modules.
You need to work with a package that _really_ includes and "Provides"
the Tk:JBrowseEntry module with a sufficient version. If such a package
is installed in the build environment, but doesn't contain the "Provides"
tag, you will need to take a closer look at that package.
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild
Provides: perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) = %{version}-%{release}
seems missing in the .spec file
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne
9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0)380395988
===
> > Same issue with Tk-JFileDialog.spec
> > In addition, I get:
> > rpmbuild -bb perl-Tk-JFileDialog.spec
> > error: Failed build dependencies:
> > perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) >= 4.63 is needed by
> > perl-Tk-JFileDialog-2.20-1.fc30.noarch
> >
> > while the installed version is 5.22
> >
> > Could you tell me what is wrong?
>
> It will be almost impossible to tell what is wrong without the build
> output. When you run rpmbuild add the following at the end of it.
> That will put the regular output in out.msg and the error output in
> out.ror. Then you have files of the output to analyze. Or post /
> paste (fedora has a facility called fpaste for this) for other people to
> analyze if you can't. You can view them with less out*
>
> > out.msg 2> out.ror
>
> From the information you provide, it seems unlikely that this is the
> actual issue causing the build abort. Computers don't get things like
> a simple >= wrong.
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild
On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 10:10:54 +0200 "Patrick Dupre" wrote: > Same issue with Tk-JFileDialog.spec > In addition, I get: > rpmbuild -bb perl-Tk-JFileDialog.spec > error: Failed build dependencies: > perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) >= 4.63 is needed by > perl-Tk-JFileDialog-2.20-1.fc30.noarch > > while the installed version is 5.22 > > Could you tell me what is wrong? It will be almost impossible to tell what is wrong without the build output. When you run rpmbuild add the following at the end of it. That will put the regular output in out.msg and the error output in out.ror. Then you have files of the output to analyze. Or post / paste (fedora has a facility called fpaste for this) for other people to analyze if you can't. You can view them with less out* > out.msg 2> out.ror From the information you provide, it seems unlikely that this is the actual issue causing the build abort. Computers don't get things like a simple >= wrong. ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
unlock frozen/gnome settings
Hello, Since I upgrade to fedora 30, I experience very often a frozen of the graphics login process (gnome). Actually, if I am inactive, the screen turn to lock, and I cannot unlock it. The only way to do something is to log in terminal mode and run kill -9 -1 Also, it may be linked. I lost partially the gnome setting (gnome-settings-daemon is installed) I only have Details Devices Settings is missing It should include Wi-Fi Bluetooth Background Notifications Search Privacy ... === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988 === ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Upgrade 28 to 30
Sorry, I do not have the record. However, I have 2 other machines to update. The same issue will appear when I will run the upgrade. I will send the message. === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988 === > Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 at 11:58 AM > From: "Ed Greshko" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Upgrade 28 to 30 > > On 6/10/19 5:45 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > Good idea: > > > > Here is the log > > Before I was able to upgrade, I had to remove all the packages indicated as > > removed. > > Why did I have to remove > > perl-PathTools (327 packages) > > perl-Encode (92 packages) > > perl-Data-Dumper (1276 packages!) > > I was not present when you were informed that the upgrade could not proceed > until they > were removed. > > If ou have have the output of the "failed" system-upgrade upgrade it may > provide > information that lead you to do the remove. > > Is it possible that some of the packages were installed from repos other than > fedora or > rpmfusion? > > > > > >761 | update | 2019-06-09 12:15 | Upgrade| > > 6 < > >760 | | 2019-06-09 12:12 | Install| > > 13 > > >759 | system-upgrade upgrade | 2019-06-09 11:23 | D, E, I, O, U | > > 3224 EE > >758 | remove perl-warnings-unu | 2019-06-09 10:34 | Removed| > > 1 > >757 | remove perl-the | 2019-06-09 10:34 | Removed| > > 1 > >756 | remove perl-define | 2019-06-09 10:33 | Removed| > > 1 > >755 | remove perl-Tk-LineGraph | 2019-06-09 10:32 | Removed| > > 1 > >754 | remove perl-PathTools| 2019-06-09 10:30 | Removed| > > 327 EE > >753 | remove perl-Sort-Fields | 2019-06-09 10:27 | Removed| > > 1 > >752 | remove perl-Params-Util | 2019-06-09 10:26 | Removed| > > 6 > >751 | remove perl-PGPLOT | 2019-06-09 10:25 | Removed| > > 1 > >750 | remove perl-Math-BigInt- | 2019-06-09 10:25 | Removed| > > 1 > >749 | remove perl-MIME-Base64 | 2019-06-09 10:24 | Removed| > > 3 > >748 | remove perl-Image-Sane | 2019-06-09 10:24 | Removed| > > 5 > >747 | remove perl-GD | 2019-06-09 10:23 | Removed| > > 2 > >746 | remove perl-Math-Random- | 2019-06-09 10:23 | Removed| > > 4 > >745 | remove perl-Encode | 2019-06-09 10:21 | Removed| > > 92 EE > >744 | remove perl-Email-Addres | 2019-06-09 10:20 | Removed| > > 1 > >743 | remove perl-Math-Random | 2019-06-09 10:19 | Removed| > > 1 > >742 | remove perl-Digest-MD5 | 2019-06-09 10:19 | Removed| > > 10 > >741 | remove perl-Math-Integra | 2019-06-09 10:18 | Removed| > > 1 > >740 | remove perl-Data-Dumper | 2019-06-09 10:13 | Removed| > > 451 EE > >739 | remove perl-Math-Functio | 2019-06-09 10:13 | Removed| > > 1 > >738 | remove perl-DBD-MySQL| 2019-06-09 10:12 | Removed| > > 3 > >737 | remove perl-Cpanel-JSON- | 2019-06-09 10:11 | Removed| > > 45 > >736 | remove perl-Geometry-Pri | 2019-06-09 10:11 | Removed| > > 1 > >735 | remove perl-Compress-Raw | 2019-06-09 10:09 | Removed| > > 90 > >734 | remove perl-Forest | 2019-06-09 10:09 | Removed| > > 3 > >733 | remove perl-Compress-Bzi | 2019-06-09 10:07 | Removed| > > 47 > >732 | remove perl-Clone| 2019-06-09 10:07 | Removed| > > 15 > >731 | remove perl-Class-XSAcce | 2019-06-09 10:06 | Removed| > > 13 > >730 | remove perl-Cairo| 2019-06-09 10:06 | Removed| > > 1 > >729 | remove perl-Bit-Vector | 2019-06-09 10:05 | Removed| > > 1276 > >728 | remove perl-B-Utils | 2019-06-09 10:03 | Removed| > > 25 > >727 | remove perl-Color-Scheme | 2019-06-09 10:02 | Removed| > > 1 > >726 | remove ImageMagick-perl | 2019-06-09 10:01 | Removed| > > 41 EE > >725 | remove python2-ZEO | 2019-06-09 10:00 | Removed| > > 158 > >724 | remove system-config-fir | 2019-06-09 09:57 | Removed| > > 2 > >723 | remove python2-rpkg | 2019-06-09 09:57 | Removed| > > 43 > >722 | remove python2-ecryptfs- | 2019-06-09 09:56 | Removed| > > 1 > >721 | remove perl-PDL-Graphics | 2019-06-09 09:55 | Removed| > > 1 > >720 | remove
Re: Upgrade 28 to 30
On 6/10/19 5:45 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > Good idea: > > Here is the log > Before I was able to upgrade, I had to remove all the packages indicated as > removed. > Why did I have to remove > perl-PathTools (327 packages) > perl-Encode (92 packages) > perl-Data-Dumper (1276 packages!) I was not present when you were informed that the upgrade could not proceed until they were removed. If ou have have the output of the "failed" system-upgrade upgrade it may provide information that lead you to do the remove. Is it possible that some of the packages were installed from repos other than fedora or rpmfusion? > >761 | update | 2019-06-09 12:15 | Upgrade|6 > < >760 | | 2019-06-09 12:12 | Install| 13 > > >759 | system-upgrade upgrade | 2019-06-09 11:23 | D, E, I, O, U | 3224 > EE >758 | remove perl-warnings-unu | 2019-06-09 10:34 | Removed|1 > >757 | remove perl-the | 2019-06-09 10:34 | Removed|1 > >756 | remove perl-define | 2019-06-09 10:33 | Removed|1 > >755 | remove perl-Tk-LineGraph | 2019-06-09 10:32 | Removed|1 > >754 | remove perl-PathTools| 2019-06-09 10:30 | Removed| 327 > EE >753 | remove perl-Sort-Fields | 2019-06-09 10:27 | Removed|1 > >752 | remove perl-Params-Util | 2019-06-09 10:26 | Removed|6 > >751 | remove perl-PGPLOT | 2019-06-09 10:25 | Removed|1 > >750 | remove perl-Math-BigInt- | 2019-06-09 10:25 | Removed|1 > >749 | remove perl-MIME-Base64 | 2019-06-09 10:24 | Removed|3 > >748 | remove perl-Image-Sane | 2019-06-09 10:24 | Removed|5 > >747 | remove perl-GD | 2019-06-09 10:23 | Removed|2 > >746 | remove perl-Math-Random- | 2019-06-09 10:23 | Removed|4 > >745 | remove perl-Encode | 2019-06-09 10:21 | Removed| 92 > EE >744 | remove perl-Email-Addres | 2019-06-09 10:20 | Removed|1 > >743 | remove perl-Math-Random | 2019-06-09 10:19 | Removed|1 > >742 | remove perl-Digest-MD5 | 2019-06-09 10:19 | Removed| 10 > >741 | remove perl-Math-Integra | 2019-06-09 10:18 | Removed|1 > >740 | remove perl-Data-Dumper | 2019-06-09 10:13 | Removed| 451 > EE >739 | remove perl-Math-Functio | 2019-06-09 10:13 | Removed|1 > >738 | remove perl-DBD-MySQL| 2019-06-09 10:12 | Removed|3 > >737 | remove perl-Cpanel-JSON- | 2019-06-09 10:11 | Removed| 45 > >736 | remove perl-Geometry-Pri | 2019-06-09 10:11 | Removed|1 > >735 | remove perl-Compress-Raw | 2019-06-09 10:09 | Removed| 90 > >734 | remove perl-Forest | 2019-06-09 10:09 | Removed|3 > >733 | remove perl-Compress-Bzi | 2019-06-09 10:07 | Removed| 47 > >732 | remove perl-Clone| 2019-06-09 10:07 | Removed| 15 > >731 | remove perl-Class-XSAcce | 2019-06-09 10:06 | Removed| 13 > >730 | remove perl-Cairo| 2019-06-09 10:06 | Removed|1 > >729 | remove perl-Bit-Vector | 2019-06-09 10:05 | Removed| 1276 > >728 | remove perl-B-Utils | 2019-06-09 10:03 | Removed| 25 > >727 | remove perl-Color-Scheme | 2019-06-09 10:02 | Removed|1 > >726 | remove ImageMagick-perl | 2019-06-09 10:01 | Removed| 41 > EE >725 | remove python2-ZEO | 2019-06-09 10:00 | Removed| 158 > >724 | remove system-config-fir | 2019-06-09 09:57 | Removed|2 > >723 | remove python2-rpkg | 2019-06-09 09:57 | Removed| 43 > >722 | remove python2-ecryptfs- | 2019-06-09 09:56 | Removed|1 > >721 | remove perl-PDL-Graphics | 2019-06-09 09:55 | Removed|1 > >720 | remove perl-Chart-GRACE | 2019-06-09 09:55 | Removed|1 > >719 | remove AdobeReader_enu | 2019-06-09 09:53 | Removed|4 > >718 | remove LabPlot | 2019-06-08 23:48 | Removed|8 > > > -- Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default color scheme ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Upgrade 28 to 30
Good idea: Here is the log Before I was able to upgrade, I had to remove all the packages indicated as removed. Why did I have to remove perl-PathTools (327 packages) perl-Encode (92 packages) perl-Data-Dumper (1276 packages!) 761 | update | 2019-06-09 12:15 | Upgrade|6 < 760 | | 2019-06-09 12:12 | Install| 13 > 759 | system-upgrade upgrade | 2019-06-09 11:23 | D, E, I, O, U | 3224 EE 758 | remove perl-warnings-unu | 2019-06-09 10:34 | Removed|1 757 | remove perl-the | 2019-06-09 10:34 | Removed|1 756 | remove perl-define | 2019-06-09 10:33 | Removed|1 755 | remove perl-Tk-LineGraph | 2019-06-09 10:32 | Removed|1 754 | remove perl-PathTools| 2019-06-09 10:30 | Removed| 327 EE 753 | remove perl-Sort-Fields | 2019-06-09 10:27 | Removed|1 752 | remove perl-Params-Util | 2019-06-09 10:26 | Removed|6 751 | remove perl-PGPLOT | 2019-06-09 10:25 | Removed|1 750 | remove perl-Math-BigInt- | 2019-06-09 10:25 | Removed|1 749 | remove perl-MIME-Base64 | 2019-06-09 10:24 | Removed|3 748 | remove perl-Image-Sane | 2019-06-09 10:24 | Removed|5 747 | remove perl-GD | 2019-06-09 10:23 | Removed|2 746 | remove perl-Math-Random- | 2019-06-09 10:23 | Removed|4 745 | remove perl-Encode | 2019-06-09 10:21 | Removed| 92 EE 744 | remove perl-Email-Addres | 2019-06-09 10:20 | Removed|1 743 | remove perl-Math-Random | 2019-06-09 10:19 | Removed|1 742 | remove perl-Digest-MD5 | 2019-06-09 10:19 | Removed| 10 741 | remove perl-Math-Integra | 2019-06-09 10:18 | Removed|1 740 | remove perl-Data-Dumper | 2019-06-09 10:13 | Removed| 451 EE 739 | remove perl-Math-Functio | 2019-06-09 10:13 | Removed|1 738 | remove perl-DBD-MySQL| 2019-06-09 10:12 | Removed|3 737 | remove perl-Cpanel-JSON- | 2019-06-09 10:11 | Removed| 45 736 | remove perl-Geometry-Pri | 2019-06-09 10:11 | Removed|1 735 | remove perl-Compress-Raw | 2019-06-09 10:09 | Removed| 90 734 | remove perl-Forest | 2019-06-09 10:09 | Removed|3 733 | remove perl-Compress-Bzi | 2019-06-09 10:07 | Removed| 47 732 | remove perl-Clone| 2019-06-09 10:07 | Removed| 15 731 | remove perl-Class-XSAcce | 2019-06-09 10:06 | Removed| 13 730 | remove perl-Cairo| 2019-06-09 10:06 | Removed|1 729 | remove perl-Bit-Vector | 2019-06-09 10:05 | Removed| 1276 728 | remove perl-B-Utils | 2019-06-09 10:03 | Removed| 25 727 | remove perl-Color-Scheme | 2019-06-09 10:02 | Removed|1 726 | remove ImageMagick-perl | 2019-06-09 10:01 | Removed| 41 EE 725 | remove python2-ZEO | 2019-06-09 10:00 | Removed| 158 724 | remove system-config-fir | 2019-06-09 09:57 | Removed|2 723 | remove python2-rpkg | 2019-06-09 09:57 | Removed| 43 722 | remove python2-ecryptfs- | 2019-06-09 09:56 | Removed|1 721 | remove perl-PDL-Graphics | 2019-06-09 09:55 | Removed|1 720 | remove perl-Chart-GRACE | 2019-06-09 09:55 | Removed|1 719 | remove AdobeReader_enu | 2019-06-09 09:53 | Removed|4 718 | remove LabPlot | 2019-06-08 23:48 | Removed|8 === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988 === > Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 at 11:27 AM > From: "Ed Greshko" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Upgrade 28 to 30 > > On 6/10/19 4:24 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > > dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=30 > > Fine But what you should now do is > > dnf history and find the entry which did the upgrade. > > For example, on my system it is > > 739 | system-upgrade upgrade | 2019-05-01 12:08 | D, E, I, O, U | 2992 > EE > > And then > > dnf history info #yours > > Chances are that output is rather long. So you really should post it > elsewhere and not to > this list. > > > -- > Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the > default color scheme > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to
Re: Upgrade 28 to 30
On 6/10/19 4:24 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote: > dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=30 Fine But what you should now do is dnf history and find the entry which did the upgrade. For example, on my system it is 739 | system-upgrade upgrade | 2019-05-01 12:08 | D, E, I, O, U | 2992 EE And then dnf history info #yours Chances are that output is rather long. So you really should post it elsewhere and not to this list. -- Right: I dislike the default color scheme Wrong: What idiot picked the default color scheme ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Upgrade 28 to 30
dnf system-upgrade download --refresh --releasever=30 === Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988 === > Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2019 at 1:07 PM > From: "José Abílio Matos" > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Upgrade 28 to 30 > > On Sunday, 9 June 2019 10.18.45 WEST Patrick Dupre wrote: > > Here is the list > > AdobeReader_enu, perl-Chart-GRACE, perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot, > > python2-ecryptfs-utils, python2-rpkg, system-config-firewall, python2-ZEO, > > sagemath, ImageMagick-perl, perl-Color-Scheme, perl-B-Utils > > perl-Bit-Vector, texlive, perl-Cairo, perl-Class-XSAccessor, perl-Clone, > > perl-Compress-Bzip2, perl-Forest, perl-Graphics-Primitive, > > perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2, perl-Geometry-Primitive perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS, > > perl-DBD-MySQL, perl-Math-Function-Roots, perl-Data-Dumper, webmin, > > TeXmacs, fig2ps, gnuplot-latex, gv, lyx, maxima, maxima-gui, octave, > > qtoctave, perl-Math-Integral-Romberg perl-Digest-MD5, perl-Math-Random, > > perl-Email-Address-XS, perl-Encode, chemtool, perl-Tk, perl-tk-zinc, xfig, > > transfig, perl-Math-Random-Brownian, perl-GD, perl-Image-Sane, > > perl-MIME-Base64, perl-Unicode-String, perl-Math-BigInt-FastCalc, > > perl-PGPLOT, perl-Params-Util, perl-Sort-Fields, perl-PathTools, lzop, > > wine, usermin, valgrind, root, kernel-devel, kbibtex, kalzium, enscript > > digikam, perl-String-Scanf, perl-Tk-LineGraphDataset, perl-define, > > perl-the, perl-warnings-unused > > What command are you using to upgrade? > > Some of those above are related. The issue is to find what packages are the > culprit for those removals. > > As an example above why do you need qtoctave? Since octave 3.8, that octave > has a GUI interface and qtoctave has been abandoned for a long time. > > Most of the packages that you list above are available in Fedora 30. > -- > José Matos > > ___ > users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: rpmbuild
Thank.
Same issue with Tk-JFileDialog.spec
In addition, I get:
rpmbuild -bb perl-Tk-JFileDialog.spec
error: Failed build dependencies:
perl(Tk::JBrowseEntry) >= 4.63 is needed by
perl-Tk-JFileDialog-2.20-1.fc30.noarch
while the installed version is 5.22
Could you tell me what is wrong?
Thank
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne
9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0)380395988
===
> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2019 at 2:11 AM
> From: "Gordon Messmer"
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: rpmbuild
>
> On 6/9/19 2:27 PM, Patrick Dupre wrote:
> > RPM build errors:
> > Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
> > /usr/bin/JBrowseTest.pl
>
>
> Add that path to the %files section of the spec. If you're maintaining
> this for redistribution, you might want to list the path as
> "%{_bindir}/JBrowseTest.pl"
> ___
> users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
[389-users] Re: What Do I Need?
> On 7 Jun 2019, at 23:53, Eugene Poole wrote: > > I'm trying to upgrade my environment and I've reinstalled my CentOS machines > to CentOS 7 except for one. I've got my DNS for my LAN working just fine. > So now it's time for Directory Server. > > What is a GOOD tutorial to follow? My environment includes 26 physical and > KVM virtual machines; 4 Windows 7 machines and 1 ArcaOS (OS/2) machine. What > is a DS configuration to go for? I think the better thing to ask is what do you want to achieve here? What's your ideal setup for integrating each of these clients, and what information do you want to make available to them? I think that would help me to advise on "what next" for you :) > > TIA > > -- > Eugene Poole > Woodstock, Georgia > ___ > 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org — Sincerely, William Brown Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server SUSE Labs ___ 389-users mailing list -- 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Upgrade 28 to 30
On Sunday, 9 June 2019 10.18.45 WEST Patrick Dupre wrote: > Here is the list > AdobeReader_enu, perl-Chart-GRACE, perl-PDL-Graphics-PLplot, > python2-ecryptfs-utils, python2-rpkg, system-config-firewall, python2-ZEO, > sagemath, ImageMagick-perl, perl-Color-Scheme, perl-B-Utils > perl-Bit-Vector, texlive, perl-Cairo, perl-Class-XSAccessor, perl-Clone, > perl-Compress-Bzip2, perl-Forest, perl-Graphics-Primitive, > perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2, perl-Geometry-Primitive perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS, > perl-DBD-MySQL, perl-Math-Function-Roots, perl-Data-Dumper, webmin, > TeXmacs, fig2ps, gnuplot-latex, gv, lyx, maxima, maxima-gui, octave, > qtoctave, perl-Math-Integral-Romberg perl-Digest-MD5, perl-Math-Random, > perl-Email-Address-XS, perl-Encode, chemtool, perl-Tk, perl-tk-zinc, xfig, > transfig, perl-Math-Random-Brownian, perl-GD, perl-Image-Sane, > perl-MIME-Base64, perl-Unicode-String, perl-Math-BigInt-FastCalc, > perl-PGPLOT, perl-Params-Util, perl-Sort-Fields, perl-PathTools, lzop, > wine, usermin, valgrind, root, kernel-devel, kbibtex, kalzium, enscript > digikam, perl-String-Scanf, perl-Tk-LineGraphDataset, perl-define, > perl-the, perl-warnings-unused What command are you using to upgrade? Some of those above are related. The issue is to find what packages are the culprit for those removals. As an example above why do you need qtoctave? Since octave 3.8, that octave has a GUI interface and qtoctave has been abandoned for a long time. Most of the packages that you list above are available in Fedora 30. -- José Matos ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
