Re: Virtual Machine Network Connection Confusion
> Am 04.04.2023 um 17:51 schrieb Robert McBroom via users > : > > Fedora 37 with four qemu/kvm virtual machines. Trying to get internet access > from the vm's. Found some advice about using systemd-networkd instead of > NetworkManager. Following „some advice“ is usually a good chance for adventure. What was wrong with using Fedora documentation? > Lost internet connection with the host. Restored with NetworkManager. > Further research on NetworkManager gets into a tangle with ifcfg scripts and > the apparent migration to keyfiles. > > Totally confused. > > Can only start the virtual machines if the network device is removed. > > -- > > VM centos8 failed to start > > Requested operation is not valid: network 'default' is not active > - > From cockpit on the web interface tried some of the options with bond looking > like a possibility > - > 11:37 AM > [1680622647.3084] dhcp6 (bond0): state changed new lease, > address=2600:1702:4860:9dd0::34 > NetworkManager > 11:27 AM > [1680622058.5768] manager: (vnet4): new Tun device > (/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/9) > NetworkManager > 11:07 AM > [1680620850.7934] dhcp6 (bond0): state changed new lease, > address=2600:1702:4860:9dd0::34 > NetworkManager > 11:02 AM > [1680620556.1938] manager: (vnet3): new Tun device > (/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/8) > NetworkManager > 11:01 AM > [1680620475.6234] manager: (vnet2): new Tun device > (/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/7) > NetworkManager > 10:40 AM > [1680619204.0043] dhcp6 (bond0): state changed new lease, > address=2600:1702:4860:9dd0::34 > NetworkManager > > but > > VM centos8 failed to start > > Unable to add bridge bond0 port vnet5: Operation not supported > -- > > The options seem to be endless with no success. > Advice? > All these messages are nice, but meaningless for troubleshooting. The first thing is how the host was installed and how the network was configured, as a first start the output of „ip a“. The second one is, how you configured the virtual internet connection of a vm. -- Peter Boy https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy p...@fedoraproject.org Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2) Fedora Server Edition Working Group member Fedora docs team contributor Java developer and enthusiast ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Virtual Machine Network Connection Confusion
Fedora 37 with four qemu/kvm virtual machines. Trying to get internet access from the vm's. Found some advice about using systemd-networkd instead of NetworkManager. Lost internet connection with the host. Restored with NetworkManager. Further research on NetworkManager gets into a tangle with ifcfg scripts and the apparent migration to keyfiles. Totally confused. Can only start the virtual machines if the network device is removed. -- VM centos8 failed to start Requested operation is not valid: network 'default' is not active - From cockpit on the web interface tried some of the options with bond looking like a possibility - 11:37 AM [1680622647.3084] dhcp6 (bond0): state changed new lease, address=2600:1702:4860:9dd0::34 NetworkManager 11:27 AM [1680622058.5768] manager: (vnet4): new Tun device (/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/9) NetworkManager 11:07 AM [1680620850.7934] dhcp6 (bond0): state changed new lease, address=2600:1702:4860:9dd0::34 NetworkManager 11:02 AM [1680620556.1938] manager: (vnet3): new Tun device (/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/8) NetworkManager 11:01 AM [1680620475.6234] manager: (vnet2): new Tun device (/org/freedesktop/NetworkManager/Devices/7) NetworkManager 10:40 AM [1680619204.0043] dhcp6 (bond0): state changed new lease, address=2600:1702:4860:9dd0::34 NetworkManager but VM centos8 failed to start Unable to add bridge bond0 port vnet5: Operation not supported -- The options seem to be endless with no success. Advice? ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: GNOME interface is too bulky
On Mon Apr03'23 09:24:57PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > From: Tom Horsley > Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2023 21:24:57 -0400 > To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org > Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users > Subject: Re: GNOME interface is too bulky > > On Tue, 04 Apr 2023 10:39:25 +0930 > Tim via users wrote: > > > Icons, icons, icons! I can't find a damn thing by icons. > > Yes! A stop sign and an envelope are pretty much it for icons that > make some sense, after those two it is all guesswork (and I wonder how > the envelope will age with no one sending physical letters > any longer :-). > > Personally, I use the FVWM window manager and my own custom .fvwmrc > file which doesn't completely change my interface every six months. Wow, I used to use twm for a while, pre-Fedora, and then fvwm2, and then went to xfce briefly before pekwm and then settling on openbox. I make my own remix, and my wife who used to make fun of my desktop environment (shunya/zero) eventually adopted it, and does not want to go back. She went kde -> xfce -> lxde -> openbox. (She still makes fun of it though.) There is something to be said for stability and backwards compatibility, which seems to be missing from at least a few modern software -- I was long ago given to understand that achieving 1.0 in a software version meant that backwards compatibility would be maintained in the future, however this does not seem to be the case anymore. Unfortunately, I have read that openbox and other such window managers will stop working as wayland progresses without more development. I hope that is too long into the future. Ranjan ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
