Re: LUKS - lost token?

On 10/28/23 21:20, Robert Nichols wrote: Yes, as long as the device is currently unlocked Oops. I just realized that recovering the master key from the kernel works only for LUKS1. Your device is using LUKS2, and and accessing the key from userspace is not possible with LUKS2. Sorry. -- Bob

Re: LUKS - lost token?

On 10/28/23 08:49, lejeczek via users wrote: Hi guys. I know this is most likely not best suited question for this list, but I'm hoping some experts might be able to help. I have a LUKS device which had keyslot with pass-phrase removed and token for TPM keyslot removed too - I think this is

Re: Cups shared print now showing in Windows

On 10/28/23 16:09, Tom Horsley wrote: But, why can('t) Windows 10's "Add Printer" dialog find it? In the cups web page http://localhost:631/admin there is a checkbox for "share printers connected to this system", perhaps it isn't checked, or your windows system is on a different subnet? Hi

Re: Cups shared print now showing in Windows

> But, why can('t) Windows 10's "Add Printer" dialog find it? In the cups web page http://localhost:631/admin there is a checkbox for "share printers connected to this system", perhaps it isn't checked, or your windows system is on a different subnet?

Re: nvme as user?

On 10/28/23 15:14, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sat, 2023-10-28 at 14:58 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: On 10/28/23 06:51, George N. White III wrote: On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 11:40 PM ToddAndMargo via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org  wrote:

Cups shared print now showing in Windows

Hi All, Fedora 38 cups-2.4.7-1.fc38.x86_64 cups-lpd-2.4.7-1.fc38.x86_64 My old printer broke, so I had to replace it. I removed the old printer from cups and added the new printer. I set the new printer to network share (and it does over LPD). /etc/printcap: # This file was automatically

Re: nvme as user?

On Sat, 2023-10-28 at 14:58 -0700, ToddAndMargo via users wrote: > On 10/28/23 06:51, George N. White III wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 11:40 PM ToddAndMargo via users > > < > > users@lists.fedoraproject.org  > > > > > wrote: > > > >     Do not like

Re: nvme as user?

On 10/28/23 06:51, George N. White III wrote: On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 11:40 PM ToddAndMargo via users mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>> wrote: Do not like sudo, but I may have to compromise. I don't like sudo either -- it is overkill for many use cases, and the added complexity

Re: LUKS - lost token?

On 10/28/23 9:49 AM, lejeczek via users wrote: > I know this is most likely not best suited question for this list, but > I'm hoping some experts might be able to help. Hi, Try the he "cryptsetup" mailing list: https://subspace.kernel.org/lists.linux.dev.html HTH, Jorge

Re: kworker consumes 100% CPU on degraded RAID6

On Sat, 2023-10-28 at 20:11 +1100, e...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > Maybe a hint. On a whim I decided to look at interrupts on the machine. I see > an item in > /proc/interrupts > that grows by 80-90 every second. > It is listed as 'IR-PCI-MSIX-:03:00.0    0-edge  mpt2sas0-msix0' >

Re: Source code (SRPM?) for COPR package?

Ian Pilcher wrote: > Is the source code for COPR packages available anywhere? Each copr contains the srpms. If you have one installed and enabled you can pull up the baseurl and browse to the srpm. One way to do it: $ sudo dnf repolist -v copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:tmz:git | grep

Re: Source code (SRPM?) for COPR package?

On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 10:30:02 -0500 Ian Pilcher wrote: > Is the source code for COPR packages available anywhere? rpm -q -i Will print info about that package, with one of the lines it prints starting with "Source RPM" Incidentally, the source rpm name is the name you need to use in bugzilla

Source code (SRPM?) for COPR package?

Is the source code for COPR packages available anywhere? -- If your user interface is intuitive in retrospect ... it isn't intuitive

Re: nvme as user?

On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 11:40 PM ToddAndMargo via users < users@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Do not like sudo, but I may have to compromise. > I don't like sudo either -- it is overkill for many use cases, and the added complexity means more potential for security issues. Have you

LUKS - lost token?

Hi guys. I know this is most likely not best suited question for this list, but I'm hoping some experts might be able to help. I have a LUKS device which had keyslot with pass-phrase removed and token for TPM keyslot removed too - I think this is the case, for none of my passphrase works

Re: kworker consumes 100% CPU on degraded RAID6

On 28/10/2023 22.15, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: On Sat, 2023-10-28 at 08:58 +1100, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: Fully updated F28. Don't you mean F38? Thanks, yes, of course :-) poc -- Eyal at Home (fed...@eyal.emu.id.au) ___ users mailing list --

Re: kworker consumes 100% CPU on degraded RAID6

On Sat, 2023-10-28 at 08:58 +1100, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: > Fully updated F28. Don't you mean F38? poc ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: kworker consumes 100% CPU on degraded RAID6

On 28/10/2023 08.58, Eyal Lebedinsky wrote: Fully updated F28. I had to send one (of 7) member disk for RMA. I notice that the system is very non responsive. 'top' shows     PID USER  PR  NI    VIRT    RES    SHR S  %CPU  %MEM TIME+ COMMAND 1365697 root  20   0   0  0