Re: libvirtd.service start
On 3/21/24 20:49, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 3/21/24 4:51 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 3/21/24 12:20, Robert McBroom via users wrote: Status then shows systemctl status libvirtd ●libvirtd.service - libvirt legacy monolithic daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/libvirtd.service; enabled; preset: disabled) Thought systemctl enable libvirtd would change the preset notation but it didn't It doesn't. That's the system preset. "enable" only changes the first enabled/disable option, but that overrides the preset, so it should be starting at boot if you've rebooted since changing that setting. You can use "journalctl -b -u libvirtd" to find out what has happened. -- Saw no indication that any setting had changed. The status shows that it's enabled. Nothing from the journal tells anything that I understand # journalctl -b -u libvirtd Mar 21 09:31:17 HPZ440.attlocal.net systemd[1]: Starting libvirtd.service - libvirt legacy monolithic daemon... Mar 21 09:31:18 HPZ440.attlocal.net systemd[1]: Started libvirtd.service - libvirt legacy monolithic daemon. Mar 21 09:33:18 HPZ440.attlocal.net systemd[1]: libvirtd.service: Deactivated successfully. I'm not sure what's going on here. systemd kind of starts it, but then apparently either systemd shuts it down or the service decides it has nothing to do and quits. Try running just "journalctl -b" and see if there are any other relevant messages around that time. Mar 21 09:56:36 HPZ440.attlocal.net systemd[1]: Starting libvirtd.service - libvirt legacy monolithic daemon... Mar 21 09:56:36 HPZ440.attlocal.net systemd[1]: Started libvirtd.service - libvirt legacy monolithic daemon. Mar 21 09:56:37 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: libvirt version: 10.1.0, package: 1.fc40 (Fedora Project, 2024-03-01-18:35:13, ) This must be from you starting it. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: libvirtd.service start
On 3/21/24 4:51 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 3/21/24 12:20, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 3/20/24 10:32 AM, Jerry James wrote: On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 7:49 AM Robert McBroom via users wrote: Recently libvirtd.service is not starting on boot. I have to manually start it with systemctl start libvirtd. Do I need to put that command in a startup script? libvirtd.service is socket activated, so it should run automatically when needed. Does something not work if you don't start it manually? virt- manager starts but says it cannot connect to anything. I have six virtual machines I use for various purposes. systemctl status libvirtd shows disabled and dead. After starting it manually all machines are present. Status then shows systemctl status libvirtd ●libvirtd.service - libvirt legacy monolithic daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/libvirtd.service; enabled; preset: disabled) Thought systemctl enable libvirtd would change the preset notation but it didn't It doesn't. That's the system preset. "enable" only changes the first enabled/disable option, but that overrides the preset, so it should be starting at boot if you've rebooted since changing that setting. You can use "journalctl -b -u libvirtd" to find out what has happened. -- Saw no indication that any setting had changed. Nothing from the journal tells anything that I understand # journalctl -b -u libvirtd Mar 21 09:31:17 HPZ440.attlocal.net systemd[1]: Starting libvirtd.service - libvirt legacy monolithic daemon... Mar 21 09:31:18 HPZ440.attlocal.net systemd[1]: Started libvirtd.service - libvirt legacy monolithic daemon. Mar 21 09:33:18 HPZ440.attlocal.net systemd[1]: libvirtd.service: Deactivated successfully. Mar 21 09:56:36 HPZ440.attlocal.net systemd[1]: Starting libvirtd.service - libvirt legacy monolithic daemon... Mar 21 09:56:36 HPZ440.attlocal.net systemd[1]: Started libvirtd.service - libvirt legacy monolithic daemon. Mar 21 09:56:37 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: libvirt version: 10.1.0, package: 1.fc40 (Fedora Project, 2024-03-01-18:35:13, ) Mar 21 09:56:37 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: hostname: HPZ440.attlocal.net Mar 21 09:56:37 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: internal error: Failed to start QEMU binary /usr/bin/qemu-system-alpha for probing: /usr/bin/qemu-system-alpha: error while l> Mar 21 09:56:37 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: Failed to probe capabilities for /usr/bin/qemu-system-alpha: internal error: Failed to start QEMU binary /usr/bin/qemu-system> Mar 21 09:56:37 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: internal error: Failed to start QEMU binary /usr/bin/qemu-system-arm for probing: /usr/bin/qemu-system-arm: error while loadi> Mar 21 09:56:37 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: Failed to probe capabilities for /usr/bin/qemu-system-arm: internal error: Failed to start QEMU binary /usr/bin/qemu-system-a> Mar 21 09:56:37 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: internal error: Failed to start QEMU binary /usr/bin/qemu-system-arm for probing: /usr/bin/qemu-system-arm: error while loadi> Mar 21 09:56:37 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: Failed to probe capabilities for /usr/bin/qemu-system-arm: internal error: Failed to start QEMU binary /usr/bin/qemu-system-a> Mar 21 09:56:37 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: internal error: Failed to start QEMU binary /usr/bin/qemu-system-aarch64 for probing: /usr/bin/qemu-system-aarch64: error whi> Mar 21 09:56:37 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: Failed to probe capabilities for /usr/bin/qemu-system-aarch64: internal error: Failed to start QEMU binary /usr/bin/qemu-syst> Mar 21 09:56:37 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: internal error: Failed to start QEMU binary /usr/bin/qemu-system-cris for probing: /usr/bin/qemu-system-cris: error while loa> Mar 21 09:56:37 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: Failed to probe capabilities for /usr/bin/qemu-system-cris: internal error: Failed to start QEMU binary /usr/bin/qemu-system-> Mar 21 09:56:37 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: internal error: Failed to start QEMU binary /usr/bin/qemu-system-lm32 for probing: /usr/bin/qemu-system-lm32: error while loa> Mar 21 09:56:37 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: Failed to probe capabilities for /usr/bin/qemu-system-lm32: internal error: Failed to start QEMU binary /usr/bin/qemu-system-> Mar 21 09:56:37 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: internal error: Failed to start QEMU binary /usr/bin/qemu-system-m68k for probing: /usr/bin/qemu-system-m68k: error while loa> Mar 21 09:56:37 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: Failed to probe capabilities for /usr/bin/qemu-system-m68k: internal error: Failed to start QEMU binary /usr/bin/qemu-system-> Mar 21 09:56:37 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: internal error: Failed to start QEMU binary /usr/bin/qemu-system-microblaze for probing: /usr/bin/qemu-system-microblaze: err> Mar 21 09:56:37 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: Failed to probe
Re: libvirtd.service start
On 3/21/24 4:29 PM, Jerry James wrote: On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 1:20 PM Robert McBroom via users wrote: virt- manager starts but says it cannot connect to anything. I have six virtual machines I use for various purposes. In virt-manager, if you select the Edit menu and then "Connection Details", is the "Autoconnect" item selected? It is -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: libvirtd.service start
On 3/21/24 17:54, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 3/21/24 4:15 PM, Barry wrote: On 21 Mar 2024, at 19:21, Robert McBroom via users wrote: systemctl enable libvirtd would change the preset notation but it didn't Did this add libvirtd to the multi user target? If so it will start when you boot fedora. Is that what you mean by preset? Barry looking at the status it shows preset:disabled Maybe have to stop libvirtd and then enable it You can't change the preset, other than editing some files that you shouldn't modify. That setting is merely informational at this point. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Which scanner/copier do you use with Fedora?
On 3/21/24 17:36, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I keep reading good things said about Brother scanners/all-in-ones. Reading into details, it's always one of two things. It also involves a driver download, like hplip's modus operandi, and it's not really an out of the box solution. Alternatively, the alleged printer model is nowhere to be found in xsane's hardware database. So, it's basically pot luck: buy it, and hope that it works. I've been following this discussion because I currently have an HP-4650 3 in 1 inkjet and I'd like to replace it with a laser 3 in 1. I've been looking at the Brother DCP-L2640DW. Right now it goes for $200. I've been looking to see if it works with Fedora but have not been having much luck other than reviews on Amazon. Some say it works out of the box on Linux and other say they had to download the driver. I believe it's rather new, being released last summer so I imagine it should work as both a printer with cups and scanner with xsane. Does anyone have any experience with this printer/scanner/copier? Thanks Charles Dennett -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: libvirtd.service start
On 3/21/24 4:15 PM, Barry wrote: On 21 Mar 2024, at 19:21, Robert McBroom via users wrote: systemctl enable libvirtd would change the preset notation but it didn't Did this add libvirtd to the multi user target? If so it will start when you boot fedora. Is that what you mean by preset? Barry looking at the status it shows preset:disabled Maybe have to stop libvirtd and then enable it -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: libvirtd.service start
> Am 21.03.2024 um 21:51 schrieb Samuel Sieb : > > On 3/21/24 12:20, Robert McBroom via users wrote: >> On 3/20/24 10:32 AM, Jerry James wrote: >>> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 7:49 AM Robert McBroom via users >>> wrote: Recently libvirtd.service is not starting on boot. I have to manually start it with systemctl start libvirtd. Do I need to put that command in a startup script? >>> libvirtd.service is socket activated, so it should run automatically >>> when needed. Does something not work if you don't start it manually? >> virt- manager starts but says it cannot connect to anything. I have six >> virtual machines I use for various purposes. >> systemctl status libvirtd >> shows disabled and dead. After starting it manually all machines are present. >> Status then shows >> systemctl status libvirtd >> ●libvirtd.service - libvirt legacy monolithic daemon >> Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/libvirtd.service; enabled; >> preset: disabled) >> Thought >> systemctl enable libvirtd >> would change the preset notation but it didn't > > It doesn't. That's the system preset. "enable" only changes the first > enabled/disable option, but that overrides the preset, so it should be > starting at boot if you've rebooted since changing that setting. > > You can use "journalctl -b -u libvirtd" to find out what has happened. As you noticed: > systemctl status libvirtd > ● libvirtd.service - libvirt legacy monolithic daemon ^ Fedora uses the current modularized version See: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibvirtModularDaemons - https://libvirt.org/daemons.html#switching-to-modular-daemons -- Peter Boy https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy p...@fedoraproject.org Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2) Fedora Server Edition Working Group member Fedora Docs team contributor and board member Java developer and enthusiast -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 python3-pygame Module Issue
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 6:07 PM Samuel Sieb wrote: > > On 3/21/24 14:45, Stephen Morris wrote: > > On 22/3/24 00:18, Barry wrote: > >>> On 20 Mar 2024, at 22:19, Stephen Morris > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Just a couple of silly questions: > >>> AVX cpu's, both Intel and AMD, have been around since 2008, and > >>> this is 2024, why does Fedora not have support for the AVXx > >>> instruction sets? > >> Not all recent CPUs have AVX, only some CPUs I believe. > >> Therefore the preference for detect at runtime. > > I can understand the runtime detection, but why is pygame, presumably > > with its support for vectors, not compiled to use AVX if available. The > > math module doesn't produce the message, even though AVX can be used > > with integer manipulations, does that mean it has been compiled with AVX > > support or is it not checking for support? > > With, in this case, the pygame module having been installed from the > > Fedora repositories and producing this issue, does that mean I shouldn't > > install the modules from the Fedora repositories, I should use pip3 to > > install the modules as they may be compiled with AVX support? > > The message I got indicated that my cpu supports AVX2, how do I > > determine if it supports AVX512? > > The message is about AVX2, not AVX. The computer I'm currently using is > an Intel Xeon from 2019 or maybe a bit earlier. It has AVX, but not any > of the higher ones. It is common to see manufacturers of low-end tablets and pc's buying cpu's from Intel that only have SSE2-SSE4.1+AES+RDRAND enabled. I encounter them regularly in low-end netbooks. The cpu's probably have higher ISAs, they just are not enabled. Intel will also de-clock or slow down the cpu for the price point. I was talking to David Johnson, who designed Intel's RDRAND circuit. He told me intel can tune about 100 different parameters to vary cpu features and speeds for a particular price point. > You can look in /proc/cpuinfo to see the flags, or install "cpuid" to > get very detailed information. Jeff -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Which scanner/copier do you use with Fedora?
On Thu, 2024-03-21 at 18:18 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 5:36 PM Sam Varshavchik
> wrote:
> > [...]
> > I keep reading good things said about Brother scanners/all-in-ones.
> > Reading
> > into details, it's always one of two things. It also involves a
> > driver
> > download, like hplip's modus operandi, and it's not really an out
> > of the box
> > solution. Alternatively, the alleged printer model is nowhere to be
> > found in
> > xsane's hardware database. So, it's basically pot luck: buy it, and
> > hope
> > that it works.
>
> One comment about Brother... My mother uses Linux Mint and has a
> Brother MFC-J870DW All-in-One over USB. My complaint about the
> MFC-J870DW is, it only supplies a 32-bit driver. So we have to run
> the
> i386 multiarch gear on her 64-bit machine.
>
> The MFC-J870DW is the only thing stopping me from:
>
> sudo apt-get purge $(dpkg --get-selections | grep ":i386" | awk
> '{print $1}')
> sudo dpkg --remove-architecture i386
>
> In the past we tried to set up the MFC-J870DW without the Brother
> driver. It never worked that way, so we had to install the driver. I
> suspect the problems had to do with the All-in-One connected directly
> to the machine via USB.
This might be useful:
https://wiki.debian.org/CUPSDriverlessPrinting#ippoverusb
It's for Debian but that doesn't seem to matter.
poc
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Which scanner/copier do you use with Fedora?
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 5:36 PM Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> [...]
> I keep reading good things said about Brother scanners/all-in-ones. Reading
> into details, it's always one of two things. It also involves a driver
> download, like hplip's modus operandi, and it's not really an out of the box
> solution. Alternatively, the alleged printer model is nowhere to be found in
> xsane's hardware database. So, it's basically pot luck: buy it, and hope
> that it works.
One comment about Brother... My mother uses Linux Mint and has a
Brother MFC-J870DW All-in-One over USB. My complaint about the
MFC-J870DW is, it only supplies a 32-bit driver. So we have to run the
i386 multiarch gear on her 64-bit machine.
The MFC-J870DW is the only thing stopping me from:
sudo apt-get purge $(dpkg --get-selections | grep ":i386" | awk
'{print $1}')
sudo dpkg --remove-architecture i386
In the past we tried to set up the MFC-J870DW without the Brother
driver. It never worked that way, so we had to install the driver. I
suspect the problems had to do with the All-in-One connected directly
to the machine via USB.
Jeff
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: How to turn grub2-install from sad to happy.
On 22/3/24 09:10, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 3/21/24 15:06, Stephen Morris wrote: On 21/3/24 09:38, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 3/20/24 15:30, Stephen Morris wrote: Given that you are indicating that you are booting off a raid environment and hence have Fedora installed on raid, I'm assuming you are using Fedora server, is that correct? I'm just curious because I played around with using Raid 10 a couple of years ago and ran into issues where Fedora workstation would not install on raid only Fedora server had support for doing that. I don't know why there would be a difference. The installer and drivers are the same in both cases. I've never used the server install and I've been using software raid for a long time. Sorry, I was referring to physical raid from a motherboard that provided built in Raid 10 support. At the time I was doing this it was documented that Fedora workstation did support installing on Raid but Fedora Server did. I was just playing around with the environment and one issue I had was you had to install drivers into the installer for it to see the raid partition, and the motherboard only built drivers for windows, so I finished up installing the boot partition for Fedora on a non-raid devices and the rest of the partitions on raid. That's why I mentioned that the drivers are the same in both cases. I don't know why Workstation wouldn't be able to do it. But also, the OP specifically mentioned that he was using software raid anyway. Sorry, I missed that bit. regards, Steve -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue OpenPGP_0x594338B1DE179AB2.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 python3-pygame Module Issue
On 22/3/24 09:07, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 3/21/24 14:45, Stephen Morris wrote: On 22/3/24 00:18, Barry wrote: On 20 Mar 2024, at 22:19, Stephen Morris wrote: Just a couple of silly questions: AVX cpu's, both Intel and AMD, have been around since 2008, and this is 2024, why does Fedora not have support for the AVXx instruction sets? Not all recent CPUs have AVX, only some CPUs I believe. Therefore the preference for detect at runtime. I can understand the runtime detection, but why is pygame, presumably with its support for vectors, not compiled to use AVX if available. The math module doesn't produce the message, even though AVX can be used with integer manipulations, does that mean it has been compiled with AVX support or is it not checking for support? With, in this case, the pygame module having been installed from the Fedora repositories and producing this issue, does that mean I shouldn't install the modules from the Fedora repositories, I should use pip3 to install the modules as they may be compiled with AVX support? The message I got indicated that my cpu supports AVX2, how do I determine if it supports AVX512? The message is about AVX2, not AVX. The computer I'm currently using is an Intel Xeon from 2019 or maybe a bit earlier. It has AVX, but not any of the higher ones. You can look in /proc/cpuinfo to see the flags, or install "cpuid" to get very detailed information. Thanks Samuel. I don't actually need that level of support, I was just curious. Until I got the message I hadn't thought about anything related to AVX. The only reason I got the message was I'm following lessons in a Python book to refresh my python knowledge for future use at work, and the book was using pygame as an example of how to import modules. I'm running an AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core which I installed 18 months or so ago. regards, Steve -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue OpenPGP_0x594338B1DE179AB2.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: How to turn grub2-install from sad to happy.
On 3/21/24 15:06, Stephen Morris wrote: On 21/3/24 09:38, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 3/20/24 15:30, Stephen Morris wrote: Given that you are indicating that you are booting off a raid environment and hence have Fedora installed on raid, I'm assuming you are using Fedora server, is that correct? I'm just curious because I played around with using Raid 10 a couple of years ago and ran into issues where Fedora workstation would not install on raid only Fedora server had support for doing that. I don't know why there would be a difference. The installer and drivers are the same in both cases. I've never used the server install and I've been using software raid for a long time. Sorry, I was referring to physical raid from a motherboard that provided built in Raid 10 support. At the time I was doing this it was documented that Fedora workstation did support installing on Raid but Fedora Server did. I was just playing around with the environment and one issue I had was you had to install drivers into the installer for it to see the raid partition, and the motherboard only built drivers for windows, so I finished up installing the boot partition for Fedora on a non-raid devices and the rest of the partitions on raid. That's why I mentioned that the drivers are the same in both cases. I don't know why Workstation wouldn't be able to do it. But also, the OP specifically mentioned that he was using software raid anyway. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 python3-pygame Module Issue
On 3/21/24 14:45, Stephen Morris wrote: On 22/3/24 00:18, Barry wrote: On 20 Mar 2024, at 22:19, Stephen Morris wrote: Just a couple of silly questions: AVX cpu's, both Intel and AMD, have been around since 2008, and this is 2024, why does Fedora not have support for the AVXx instruction sets? Not all recent CPUs have AVX, only some CPUs I believe. Therefore the preference for detect at runtime. I can understand the runtime detection, but why is pygame, presumably with its support for vectors, not compiled to use AVX if available. The math module doesn't produce the message, even though AVX can be used with integer manipulations, does that mean it has been compiled with AVX support or is it not checking for support? With, in this case, the pygame module having been installed from the Fedora repositories and producing this issue, does that mean I shouldn't install the modules from the Fedora repositories, I should use pip3 to install the modules as they may be compiled with AVX support? The message I got indicated that my cpu supports AVX2, how do I determine if it supports AVX512? The message is about AVX2, not AVX. The computer I'm currently using is an Intel Xeon from 2019 or maybe a bit earlier. It has AVX, but not any of the higher ones. You can look in /proc/cpuinfo to see the flags, or install "cpuid" to get very detailed information. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: How to turn grub2-install from sad to happy.
On 21/3/24 09:38, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 3/20/24 15:30, Stephen Morris wrote: Given that you are indicating that you are booting off a raid environment and hence have Fedora installed on raid, I'm assuming you are using Fedora server, is that correct? I'm just curious because I played around with using Raid 10 a couple of years ago and ran into issues where Fedora workstation would not install on raid only Fedora server had support for doing that. I don't know why there would be a difference. The installer and drivers are the same in both cases. I've never used the server install and I've been using software raid for a long time. Sorry, I was referring to physical raid from a motherboard that provided built in Raid 10 support. At the time I was doing this it was documented that Fedora workstation did support installing on Raid but Fedora Server did. I was just playing around with the environment and one issue I had was you had to install drivers into the installer for it to see the raid partition, and the motherboard only built drivers for windows, so I finished up installing the boot partition for Fedora on a non-raid devices and the rest of the partitions on raid. regards, Steve -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue OpenPGP_0x594338B1DE179AB2.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Which scanner/copier do you use with Fedora?
On 22/3/24 08:36, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Dave Ihnat writes: But with the talk of using HP AiOs, I had to pipe up. I have advised all my clients to no longer buy HP printers of any type, including the AiOs, and will personally never buy another HP printer until and unless they back off their current policies and practices. I believe that the policies and practices described here are for HP's inkjets. Their reputation definitely precedes them. HP's laser printers had a little bit bit rep. I've had much better luck, historically, with HP's laser printers than with other brands. The one I'm currently wrangling with is a laser. I keep reading good things said about Brother scanners/all-in-ones. Reading into details, it's always one of two things. It also involves a driver download, like hplip's modus operandi, and it's not really an out of the box solution. Alternatively, the alleged printer model is nowhere to be found in xsane's hardware database. So, it's basically pot luck: buy it, and hope that it works. Anyway, I think I managed to get this HP to work over Ethernet. With a direct USB connection xsane is still erroring out. But Ethernet seems to be working. But now they have. Take a look at: https://www.wired.com/story/hp-all-in-plan-printer-subscription-service/ Yes, and looks like they're starting to push this onto the laser printers too, as I see from the packaging and the marketing material on this laser. I have an Epson ET3700 All_in_one printer/scanner connected as a network device on my router via ethernet (it supports wifi but where it is situated it can see a wifi signal. I'm also using the 80211AX protocol on my router). Epson have a driver for the printer but I don't use it, I use the headerless driver from cups. I use simple document scanner for scanning and looking at the KDE Throbber I don't appear to have either Sane or Xsane installed on F39. The one issue I do have with Simple Scanner is on start up it doesn't see the scanner, I have to refresh its detection for it to see the device. regards, Steve -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue OpenPGP_0x594338B1DE179AB2.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Which scanner/copier do you use with Fedora?
On Thu, 2024-03-21 at 17:36 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > I keep reading good things said about Brother scanners/all-in-ones. > Reading > into details, it's always one of two things. It also involves a > driver > download, like hplip's modus operandi, and it's not really an out of > the box > solution. As I already pointed out, my Brother unit did not require a driver download. One is available, but I don't use it. > Alternatively, the alleged printer model is nowhere to be found in > xsane's hardware database. So, it's basically pot luck: buy it, and > hope that it works. As I haven't tested every model of Brother all-in-one I can't guarantee that they all work, but I'd be surprised is they didn't. This is the way all such devices will be expected to work in the near future. poc -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 python3-pygame Module Issue
On 22/3/24 00:18, Barry wrote: On 20 Mar 2024, at 22:19, Stephen Morris wrote: Just a couple of silly questions: AVX cpu's, both Intel and AMD, have been around since 2008, and this is 2024, why does Fedora not have support for the AVXx instruction sets? Not all recent CPUs have AVX, only some CPUs I believe. Therefore the preference for detect at runtime. I can understand the runtime detection, but why is pygame, presumably with its support for vectors, not compiled to use AVX if available. The math module doesn't produce the message, even though AVX can be used with integer manipulations, does that mean it has been compiled with AVX support or is it not checking for support? With, in this case, the pygame module having been installed from the Fedora repositories and producing this issue, does that mean I shouldn't install the modules from the Fedora repositories, I should use pip3 to install the modules as they may be compiled with AVX support? The message I got indicated that my cpu supports AVX2, how do I determine if it supports AVX512? regards, Steve Barry -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue OpenPGP_0x594338B1DE179AB2.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Which scanner/copier do you use with Fedora?
Dave Ihnat writes: But with the talk of using HP AiOs, I had to pipe up. I have advised all my clients to no longer buy HP printers of any type, including the AiOs, and will personally never buy another HP printer until and unless they back off their current policies and practices. I believe that the policies and practices described here are for HP's inkjets. Their reputation definitely precedes them. HP's laser printers had a little bit bit rep. I've had much better luck, historically, with HP's laser printers than with other brands. The one I'm currently wrangling with is a laser. I keep reading good things said about Brother scanners/all-in-ones. Reading into details, it's always one of two things. It also involves a driver download, like hplip's modus operandi, and it's not really an out of the box solution. Alternatively, the alleged printer model is nowhere to be found in xsane's hardware database. So, it's basically pot luck: buy it, and hope that it works. Anyway, I think I managed to get this HP to work over Ethernet. With a direct USB connection xsane is still erroring out. But Ethernet seems to be working. But now they have. Take a look at: https://www.wired.com/story/hp-all-in-plan-printer-subscription-service/ Yes, and looks like they're starting to push this onto the laser printers too, as I see from the packaging and the marketing material on this laser. pgpuqmZG8Eku7.pgp Description: PGP signature -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: libvirtd.service start
On 3/21/24 12:20, Robert McBroom via users wrote: On 3/20/24 10:32 AM, Jerry James wrote: On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 7:49 AM Robert McBroom via users wrote: Recently libvirtd.service is not starting on boot. I have to manually start it with systemctl start libvirtd. Do I need to put that command in a startup script? libvirtd.service is socket activated, so it should run automatically when needed. Does something not work if you don't start it manually? virt- manager starts but says it cannot connect to anything. I have six virtual machines I use for various purposes. systemctl status libvirtd shows disabled and dead. After starting it manually all machines are present. Status then shows systemctl status libvirtd ●libvirtd.service - libvirt legacy monolithic daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/libvirtd.service; enabled; preset: disabled) Thought systemctl enable libvirtd would change the preset notation but it didn't It doesn't. That's the system preset. "enable" only changes the first enabled/disable option, but that overrides the preset, so it should be starting at boot if you've rebooted since changing that setting. You can use "journalctl -b -u libvirtd" to find out what has happened. -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: libvirtd.service start
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 1:20 PM Robert McBroom via users wrote: > virt- manager starts but says it cannot connect to anything. I have six > virtual machines I use for various purposes. In virt-manager, if you select the Edit menu and then "Connection Details", is the "Autoconnect" item selected? -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: libvirtd.service start
> On 21 Mar 2024, at 19:21, Robert McBroom via users > wrote: > > systemctl enable libvirtd > > would change the preset notation but it didn't > Did this add libvirtd to the multi user target? If so it will start when you boot fedora. Is that what you mean by preset? Barry -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Which scanner/copier do you use with Fedora?
OS: Fedora 39 MFP: HP M477 - Got Simple-scan working over network Web Interface is clunky, Printer console interface is too. Software is mostly the typical Windows-Centric, though the HPLIP package seems pretty tidy: https://developers.hp.com/hp-linux-imaging-and-printing/gethplip Firmware updates -may- interfere with third party inks. Time setting at one point required a full system reset - needed for Fax Date time -due to lack of Time service. Paper transport for Automatic Doc Feeder has been very solid. Ink has been reliable after long offlne periods. John Westerdale -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: libvirtd.service start
On 3/20/24 10:32 AM, Jerry James wrote: On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 7:49 AM Robert McBroom via users wrote: Recently libvirtd.service is not starting on boot. I have to manually start it with systemctl start libvirtd. Do I need to put that command in a startup script? libvirtd.service is socket activated, so it should run automatically when needed. Does something not work if you don't start it manually? virt- manager starts but says it cannot connect to anything. I have six virtual machines I use for various purposes. systemctl status libvirtd shows disabled and dead. After starting it manually all machines are present. Status then shows systemctl status libvirtd ●libvirtd.service - libvirt legacy monolithic daemon Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/libvirtd.service; enabled; preset: disabled) Drop-In: /usr/lib/systemd/system/service.d └─10-timeout-abort.conf Active: active (running)since Thu 2024-03-21 09:56:36 EDT; 5h 13min ago TriggeredBy: ●libvirtd-ro.socket ●libvirtd-admin.socket ●libvirtd.socket Docs: man:libvirtd(8) https://libvirt.org/ Main PID: 10039 (libvirtd) Tasks: 21 (limit: 32768) Memory: 40.6M (peak: 92.4M) CPU: 25.975s CGroup: /system.slice/libvirtd.service └─10039 /usr/sbin/libvirtd --timeout 120 Mar 21 09:56:38 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: internal error: Failed to start QEMU binary /usr/bin/qemu-> Mar 21 09:56:38 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: Failed to probe capabilities for /usr/bin/qemu-system-xten> Mar 21 09:56:50 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: operation failed: Multiple USB devices for 781:5581, use <> Mar 21 09:56:50 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10039]: Unable to find device 000.000 in list of active USB devices Mar 21 09:57:54 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10306]: 2024-03-21 13:57:54.273+: 10306: info : libvirt versio> Mar 21 09:57:54 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10306]: 2024-03-21 13:57:54.273+: 10306: info : hostname: HPZ4> Mar 21 09:57:54 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10306]: 2024-03-21 13:57:54.273+: 10306: warning : virSecurity> Mar 21 09:57:54 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10307]: 2024-03-21 13:57:54.275+: 10307: info : libvirt versio> Mar 21 09:57:54 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10307]: 2024-03-21 13:57:54.275+: 10307: info : hostname: HPZ4> Mar 21 09:57:54 HPZ440.attlocal.net libvirtd[10307]: 2024-03-21 13:57:54.275+: 10307: warning : virSecurity> Thought systemctl enable libvirtd would change the preset notation but it didn't -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Which scanner/copier do you use with Fedora?
I've been following this, but as I'm not currently using my scanner with Fedora, I didn't pipe up. I, personally, am thoroughly satisfied with Fujitsu scanners. My current one is a venerable SP-1425. Not cheap, but "do one thing and do it well" certainly applies. But with the talk of using HP AiOs, I had to pipe up. I have advised all my clients to no longer buy HP printers of any type, including the AiOs, and will personally never buy another HP printer until and unless they back off their current policies and practices. This first bit me at a client who purchased an HP AiO last year. It insisted on tying itself to an HP account. I managed to get it to work without doing so--and in a week, it stopped printing. Support insisted it had to be connected to HP, and the client told me to do so. After it connected, it updated the firmware without warning or requesting permission--and immediately stopped printing because the toner in use was a from a third-party vendor. They scrapped the printer and got a Brother. (Note this was before HP actually admitted to what they were doing.) But now they have. Take a look at: https://www.wired.com/story/hp-all-in-plan-printer-subscription-service/ Sincerely, -- Dave Ihnat dih...@dminet.com -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Which scanner/copier do you use with Fedora?
On Thu, 2024-03-21 at 08:58 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > [root@monster ~]# airscan-discover > [devices] > HP LaserJet MFP M234dw (CB1249) = http://192.168.0.19:8080/eSCL/, > eSCL > HP LaserJet MFP M234dw (CB1249) = https://192.168.0.19:443/eSCL/, > eSCL > HP LaserJet MFP M234dw (CB1249) = http://192.168.0.19:53048/, WSD > HP LaserJet MFP M234dw (CB1249) = > http://[fe80::d2ad:8ff:fecb:1249%254]:53048/, WSD > > It's not showing up in airscan-discover. > Try 'sudo avahi-browse -a -t' poc -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Which scanner/copier do you use with Fedora?
On Thu, 2024-03-21 at 08:58 -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Patrick O'Callaghan writes: > > > My Brother all-in-one units (I've had two) have never done that. > > Also, > > I can get third-party toner cartridges for very reasonable prices. > > Did you get that unit after crossing your fingers, and hoping that it > works, > or did you verify compatibility somehow. I tried reconciling what's > on the > market now versus xsane's hardware compatibility list without much > luck. No, I didn't check. I had an earlier Brother unit for years before it finally gave up the ghost and I got an updated one (didn't even notice it does double-sided printing until it worked :-). Any modern scanner should support DNS-SD via Avahi on Linux. Even more so because Microsoft has announced that they will no longer ship manufacturer device drivers for printers and scanners, so the market is being pushed into standardising. I don't know if some special use-cases might require a device-specific driver, but I don't personally care. As regards toner compatibility, Amazon has a number of brands that work. I tend to get special offers of 2 at a time. poc -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Fedora 39 python3-pygame Module Issue
> On 20 Mar 2024, at 22:19, Stephen Morris wrote: > > Just a couple of silly questions: > AVX cpu's, both Intel and AMD, have been around since 2008, and this is > 2024, why does Fedora not have support for the AVXx instruction sets? Not all recent CPUs have AVX, only some CPUs I believe. Therefore the preference for detect at runtime. Barry -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Which scanner/copier do you use with Fedora?
Patrick O'Callaghan writes: My Brother all-in-one units (I've had two) have never done that. Also, I can get third-party toner cartridges for very reasonable prices. Did you get that unit after crossing your fingers, and hoping that it works, or did you verify compatibility somehow. I tried reconciling what's on the market now versus xsane's hardware compatibility list without much luck. I ended up ordering an HP all in one, MFP 232, because hplip's hardware compatibility list claimed that model is fully supported, including scanning. So it arrived. I used hplip to set it up, printing works fine. Pushing the "scan" button in hplip guided me through downloading the driver, then it launched xsane. xsane sees the scanner. But the preview button hangs, then eventually comes back with a "Faied to star scanner: error during device I/O". Based on my Google searches: # scanimage -L device `airscan:e1:HP LaserJet MFP M234dw (CB1249)' is a eSCL HP LaserJet MFP M234dw (CB1249) ip=192.168.0.19 device `hpaio:/net/HP_LaserJet_MFP_M232-M237?ip=192.168.0.19' is a Hewlett- Packard HP_LaserJet_MFP_M232-M237 all-in-one device `hpaio:/net/laserjet_mfp_m232-m237?ip=192.168.0.19=false' is a Hewlett-Packard laserjet_mfp_m232-m237 all-in-one [root@monster ~]# airscan-discover [devices] HP LaserJet MFP M234dw (CB1249) = http://192.168.0.19:8080/eSCL/, eSCL HP LaserJet MFP M234dw (CB1249) = https://192.168.0.19:443/eSCL/, eSCL HP LaserJet MFP M234dw (CB1249) = http://192.168.0.19:53048/, WSD HP LaserJet MFP M234dw (CB1249) = http://[fe80::d2ad:8ff:fecb:1249%254]:53048/, WSD It's not showing up in airscan-discover. I have it connected via ethernet, I'm suspecting that scanning only works via a direct connection. Digging further… pgp6fZ617GQEr.pgp Description: PGP signature -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: File Locking to prevent "race condition" question
Hi On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 12:56:33 -0700 Samuel Sieb wrote: > On 3/20/24 12:36, Sbob wrote: >> Question: will flock() properly lock a file in a way that incoming >> commands over ssh from multiple other servers will respect the lock? > Yes, the command is still running on the same system. It doesn't matter > where the connection comes from. Right, but you can also define the failover as a systemd service. systemd will do the locking itself since "systemctl start X" is a noop if X is started. In addition, you get the control with systemctl and the log in the journal. For example: -- X.service -- [Unit] Description=%n [Service] Type=oneshot SyslogIdentifier=%N RemainAfterExit=yes ExecStart=command doing the failover -- X.service -- -- francis -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Contribute to Podman 5 Test Week 2024-03-21 through 2024-03-27
Hey Folks! Fedora 40 is going to ship with Podman 5[0] and as part of this changeset, there will be a lot of breaking changes which can affect your container workflow. To ensure a smooth transition, the Podman team and the Quality team of Fedora have decided to host a test week[1]. The idea is for users to test Podman 5 on a Fedora 40 Pre-release machine and submit results in the Test Day App[2]. If you have spare cycles or use Podman as a daily driver, it will be great to have some folks try out and report bugs right away. [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Podman5 [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2024-03-21_Podman_5 [2] https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/183 -- //sumantro Fedora QE TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED -- ___ users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
