On 04/11/14 04:10, Ambrogio De Lorenzo wrote:
LibreOffice is hanging also with the new Kernel.
Saw this mentioned somewhere elsebut can't remember where. I just tried
and verified that...
yum erase libreoffice-kde will fix the hang. Also explains why I didn't see
the hang since, even
On 04/11/14 06:09, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/11/14 04:10, Ambrogio De Lorenzo wrote:
LibreOffice is hanging also with the new Kernel.
Saw this mentioned somewhere elsebut can't remember where. I just tried
and verified that...
yum erase libreoffice-kde will fix the hang. Also
On 04/12/14 19:12, Patrick Dupre wrote:
3 months ago, I submitted a bug: 1055054
Since that time I contacted Michael Schwendt, but I cannot fix it.
So, what is next?
I cannot upgrade my other computers to fedora 20 without this bug fixed.
Is there an alternative to this package?
One thing
On 04/15/14 21:51, Joachim Backes wrote:
having the problem that lightdm is'nt able to start a gnome-session:
only seeing a screen with the (well known):
Oh no! Something has gone wrong. Please log out and try again.
Login in again shows the same phenomena, and so on...
No problem to start
On 04/16/14 09:38, Claude Jones wrote:
On 04/15/2014 05:16 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
There isn't such a thing (AFAIK) as service.service. Try this, as root:
systemctl start cups.service
And see if it starts up properly.
well, there is no output at all when I run that, but if I check the status
On 04/16/14 16:04, Someone wrote:
My sound abruptly stopped working, and the notification area widget
stopped appearing. It hasn't been working for a couple of weeks, at this
point, though it had been working fine before that. (Before it stopped
working, the notification area widget had been
On 04/20/14 10:51, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
I am having a really terrible experience with Fedora 20 KDE on Thinkpad 420i.
I installed Fedora 20 KDE on Thinkpad 420i, upgraded it to the latest and
system freezes at the login screen. System temperature goes over limit either
burning the system
On 04/20/14 11:26, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
Although I appreciate Dhaval commenting but response sounded like off-topic.
Not so sure that his suggestions where that off topic. But anyway...
If I were to see any process eating CPU would have solved the problem but as
far as I can see there are
On 04/20/14 13:49, M. Fioretti wrote:
Greetings,
a while ago, I noticed that on my Fedora box digiKam would not load
and display picture galleries anymore, and when launched from the
prompt would produce this message:
digikam(14981)/digikam (core): Reached inotify limit
which IIUC means
On 04/20/14 14:09, M. Fioretti wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 14:11:24 PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
I don't know how the system sets this value. 8192 seems rather small to me.
good point, thanks. This, in fact, is a side question that I forgot to
ask in my original email: what are the criteria
On 04/20/14 15:08, M. Fioretti wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 14:40:07 PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
One silly question.
What version of Fedora are you running. I found a message on the
mailing lists back in 2010 which, from a reliable source, indicated
this is happening on an F17
On 04/20/14 16:28, M. Fioretti wrote:
ok that's why then. So the only thing I need, if anything, is further
confirmation that increasing it on F17 would not cause problems. I'll
wait until tomorrow for further comments and then risk the increase
:-)
FWIW, I just made the change in
On 04/20/14 20:51, Ahmad Samir wrote:
The value of fs.inotify.max_user_watches was increased in F18, and later
releases, due to this bug[1] in nepomuk. It's configured by
/usr/lib/sysctl.d/97-kde-nepomuk-filewatch-inotify.conf which is installed by
nepomuk-core, so ideally you'd get that
On 04/20/14 21:38, Ahmad Samir wrote:
/usr/lib/sysctl.d/97-kde-nepomuk-filewatch-inotify.conf is included in the
initramfs by dracut when a kernel is installed/updated. Check `lsinitrd
/boot/initramfs-$(uname -r).img | grep sysctl`.
So in effect you'd have to re-create the initramfs after
On 04/21/14 00:13, Sudhir Khanger wrote:
I booted into runlevel 3 and saw system being flooded with nouveau
errors. Here is a screenshot http://i.imgur.com/qET8Zxrl.jpg
nouveau W[ PFIFO][1000 and more numbers.
I can boot fine with any kernel with nomodeset.
I can boot fine with any kernel
On 04/21/14 06:24, Ed Greshko wrote:
Of course you always have the option of switching to the nVidia drivers from
rpmfusion. I'm sure that you've thought of that already
To continue the thought before my cat hit send.
alreadyI was forced to move to nVidia when noveau produced nothing
On 04/23/14 19:40, linuxnuts...@videotron.ca wrote:
I upgraded to fedora 20 from fedora 19 using fedup. Everything went well
except for some weird issues with Thunderbird. The latter is now giving me a
pile of weird permission errors and disk space errors. There is 215GB free
space, so I
On 04/25/14 04:08, Tucker wrote:
Agreed. When you initially suggested it, I figured it was a problem with me
and something I could fix if I understood what was going on.
When you file the bugzilla, would you kindly post the link for it here?
--
Getting tired of non-Fedora discussions and
On 02/08/2011 07:06 PM, kellyremo wrote:
I need to run an application with another user then the default
(normally used).
Purpose: create a .desktop file on my desktop to run e.g.: Google
Chrome with another user (NOT ROOT! - so beesu doesn't count.)
There aren't any gksu, or kdesu packages
On 02/11/2011 03:50 PM, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Friday 11 February 2011 02:48:18 Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
One could avoid this problem to a good extend by
cherry picking updates and doing just security updates on your system
On 02/13/2011 01:00 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
The nslookup shipped with Fedora is a toy, with most of the important
parts returning not implemented status. Can someone point me to a
source for the real program, such as I used on other systems like AIX?
The lack of functionality is becoming a
On 02/25/2011 02:54 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
If you're going to
use a rapidly-changing distro like Fedora you need to keep it up to date
if you don't want to suffer the consequences of being several years
behind the curve.
Actually, in his case it wouldn't have mattered what distro he was
On 02/27/2011 07:31 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
After some checking, it appears that AIX has dropped support for nslookup
between AIX 5 and 6, the management solution was to look harder for the
fully
functional source. :-(
You're management *still* has it wrong. AIX and every Linux distro
On 02/27/2011 08:30 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
These people not only don't pay for good advice, they won't even take it for
free in many cases.
Good luck to you. No matter what direction you take, the chances are
sometime in the future the situation will become totally untenable.
I've seen
On 03/06/2011 03:14 PM, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
I didn't see anything that is. That is about files with the extension .md,
while I was asking about a file called .rnd (. r n d).
While that is true, you can always type .rnd in that site's search box
to find what it has to say.
--
When
On 03/07/2011 11:19 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 09:44 +0800, Dick Roark wrote:
I have been using backintime since Fedora 11. Since Fedora 14, it no longer
works. I have been unable to get it working. Finally, I did a F14 reinstall
which did not change the situation at
On 03/07/2011 12:27 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Yes, I can look it up as well. My point was, it's tiresome to have to
look it up just because the OP can't be bothered to add as much as a
URL. (This is a package which -- despite what the website says -- is not
in the standard repos.)
On 03/11/2011 07:23 AM, John Mellor wrote:
(Sorry for the top-post, but I've had enough of this thread.)
Can we take this offline to a bit-bucket somewhere, and maybe point the
original poster to a basic course on language and locales and character
sets? This thread has gone on far too long,
On 03/22/2011 12:14 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Doesn't work for me ... nothing happens
Just wondering Now this thread has moved on to a general discussion
on Gnome wouldn't it make some sense to start a new thread with a more
meaningful subject?
I think there were some interesting things
On 03/22/2011 09:17 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Even more OT: since we're talking about English grammar and orthography,
there are certain errors that tend to crop up on this list (and on
others of course), to wit:
1) This looks like an error?
2) How do I do this.
Sadly, they are often
On 03/22/2011 10:38 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
That may be true of English, but is it true of all languages?
The Academie Francaise tries to tell the world what is correct in French;
I don't know how many people listen to them.
I can assure you that the French Canadians don't listen to them...
On 03/22/2011 10:36 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
I was actually surprised to find out that
in some languages the statement and the question have exactly the same form,
the only difference being the question mark vs. period at the end of the
sentence.
You may also be interested to know that
On 03/24/2011 09:41 AM, JD wrote:
See these (long) URL's (sorry, my mail client broke each URL into 3 lines):
On 03/26/2011 11:37 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
Hi everyone,
I just bought a 1TB WD Passport. It came formatted as NTFS, on plugging
it in, it auto-mounted as the regular user. But after I formatted it to
use ext4 (with gparted), it keeps getting auto-mounted as root both on
F13 and F14. Any ideas
On 03/27/2011 09:24 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 03/23/2011 08:03 PM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
FC15 uses the GNOME wallpaper by default instead of the Fedora theme, does
that
tell you anything? It's not official but sure a warning sign.
Inaccurate. Fedora GNOME uses a GNOME based wallpaper
On 03/29/2011 01:08 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
In Gnome3 such a UI doesn't exist, users are being forced to dig into
keyboard short cuts == Lack of usability.
Seeing as F15 is alpha maybe it would be helpful to bring up your
observations on the t...@lists.fedoraproject.org list? And, of
On 03/29/2011 01:38 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I've done so for many years, but with Gnome3 my feel is things have
developed into a direction, they have broken my Camel's back.
Well, I'm sorry to hear about your camel. But, as I've heard it, the
folks on the test list may not be here and isn't
On 03/30/2011 08:23 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:09 PM, William Case billli...@rogers.com wrote:
Any suggestions on how I might set up a notification monitor
that shows in my system tray, or beeps or something like my email
monitor. Looked in FB apps -- nothing.
On 04/01/2011 05:11 AM, Ranjan Maitra wrote:
OK, I guess this would be unacceptable to ask in an Ubuntu mailing list
and I was trying to get help with a Fedora iso but since F15 has been
pushed back to be nice to mirrors because another distribution is
releasing just before the original date,
On 04/03/2011 01:54 PM, suvayu ali wrote:
I can confirm this too. Is their a bug report where I can follow?
Go to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/ and search on /dev/ull
--
The only person who always got his work done by Friday was Robinson
Crusoe. 葛斯克 愛德華 / 台北市八德路四段
signature.asc
Description:
On 04/03/2011 05:46 PM, Michael Liendl wrote:
Thank you. Looks like a good programm but it doesn't work for me: VNC
Server closed connection
FWIW, remmina works just fine for me with ssh tunneling.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
users mailing list
On 04/03/2011 10:25 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
However, the U2711 and the U3011 are too large to have 2 such monitors
side by side. The 2711 is about 25 inches wide and the 3011 is 27.5
inches wide. My desk isn't wide enough to have 2 such monitors,
especially when I like one monitor to be
On 04/04/2011 08:24 PM, Craig White wrote:
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 07:20 -0500, Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Sun, 2011-04-03 at 21:41 -0400, Jim wrote:
Fedora 14
I have a backup drive at sdb1 a Vfat (fat32) partition a USB hard drive
that before upgrading from Fedora 13 to Fedora 14 , the owner
On 04/04/2011 09:15 PM, Linuxguy123 wrote:
I'll post back how I like it once I've used it for a while.
Don't worry No matter what you say about how well it works for
you there will be someone that will argue that what you are doing
isn't optimal and you should do it their way'. :-)
--
On 04/04/2011 11:20 PM, JD wrote:
Which essentially was my reply to the OP.
What, you expect me to read every reply... :-)
Sorry I missed it.
--
If you don't drink it, someone else will. 葛斯克 愛德華 / 台北市八德路四段
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
users mailing list
On 04/05/2011 10:43 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
How does one verify boot.iso for the alpha version?
I've imported the key file, but I don't see a proper signature or an
sha256 checksum.
I downloaded from a mirror and it was there
e.g.
On 04/05/2011 11:12 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 04/05/2011 10:43 PM, Joel Rees wrote:
How does one verify boot.iso for the alpha version?
I've imported the key file, but I don't see a proper signature or an
sha256 checksum.
I downloaded from a mirror and it was there
e.g.
ftp
On 04/06/2011 09:38 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote:
I just pushed a fix for this to the fedora-web git repository¹. When
the website syncs next it should be on the /keys page. That is the
proper key and fingerprint (though I don't expect you to just take my
word for that ;).
The key file was
On 04/06/2011 10:22 AM, Joel Rees wrote:
Okay, Trying to verify the alpha netinst.iso, I seem to have forgotten
the way these files work, again.
Step 1 is to verify the signature on the CHECKSUM file
gpg --verify *-CHECKSUM
That gives you confidence that the data in that file comes from
On 04/06/2011 10:14 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
gpg: Signature made Thu 03 Mar 2011 11:34:51 AM CST using RSA key ID
069C8460
gpg: Good signature from Fedora (15) fed...@fedoraproject.org
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg: There is no indication
On 04/07/2011 01:19 PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 04/06/2011 10:05 PM, Unknown wrote:
It is too difficult to use Nvidia graphics with Fedora and I do not
reccomend it.
There, at least, I have to differ. If you use the guides at the Fedora
Forum or install fedoraplus (I've given pointers to both,
On 04/10/2011 03:25 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 04/09/2011 11:36 AM, AMRISH SONAWANE wrote:
I have created a Netlog profile and would like to give you
I've reported this lusing ID10T to the Netlog abuse department and I
hope that everybody else receiving his spam does the same.
Don't be so
On 04/10/2011 04:28 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 04/09/2011 12:59 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
It is most likely that when people sign up for the
service it automatically sent out notices to everyone in their address
book to invite them.
In the words of the infamous Dr. T, I, on the other hand, am
On 04/10/2011 04:55 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
Yes, I see. However, their rapid response suggests that they don't take
such things lightly.
That is what they'd like you to believe.
In many cases even those replies you get are automated. Or, their
highly trained staff gives canned responses.
On 04/14/2011 01:41 PM, JD wrote:
Because I do not see in the TB, or FF settings where to
set Firefox as the default browser.
Firefox is the only browser installed on the system.
Furthermore, this problem started after upgrade to F14.
The settings for Firefox being the default browser is not
On 04/17/2011 09:23 AM, Digimer wrote:
Fedora is more security-focused where Ubuntu is more usability focused.
Your first user in Fedora will not have sudo setup. You will need to
setup sudo yourself or use su as needed.
FYI, this is changed in the coming F15. When you create the user on
On 04/26/2011 08:40 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
The best thing for you to do is to return your network adapter and get
one that's natively supported in Linux.
Unlike MS-Windows, where hardware drivers are typically supplied by
the manufacturer, all drivers for most common hardware are
On 04/26/2011 09:08 PM, 신승원 wrote:
I tried to find it but it is all named like 'rt3070-kmod.~~~.src.fc14'
or 'rt3070-kmod-debuginfo.~~~.fc14'.
The first one is something that I've tried before(Unpack and there's
the src), but I haven't tried the latter one. Thanks.
After you enabled the
On 04/27/2011 06:17 AM, 신승원 wrote:
I know yum, but my computer can only access to internet by wireless.
I don't have any LAN cable in my room.
Well, then the question is how will you get what you need to your computer?
Are you saying your have to download to another computer, put it
On 04/27/2011 06:25 AM, 신승원 wrote:
Oh, I know, but the reason why I want to use wireless internet is
because it is the only way to connect the internet in this computer!
So, you don't have access to the internetbut you need to get the
packages to this computer...and they are only
On 05/01/2011 10:58 AM, Varuna Seneviratna wrote:
When there are only 15 days to go for the release of Fedora 15 ,Why
does the Documentation for Fedora 15 only has two sections Release
Notes and Technical notes
What about other sections?
How can anybody try out and learn Fedora 15 without
On 05/04/2011 05:54 AM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-03 at 19:31 +0300, jarmo wrote:
Suvayu Ali kirjoitti tiistai, 3. toukokuuta 2011 18:19:11:
[1]
http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/latest/
How about try Remi's package? Updates 3.6 FF. If I understood,
On 05/04/2011 09:27 AM, Mark Eackloff wrote:
Tried it but no banana. Same result. The comments in that file say that the
default is the host's DNS name, which is what I was using, against popular
advice, for my NISDOMAIN.
What you said is a bit unclear...so just want to make sure
You
On 05/20/2011 05:07 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
If you think that hiding SSID will help with security, you might as well add
that hanging a pack of onions in front of the house will also help make your
wireless more secure
There's your problem It should be garlic! :-) :-)
--
Sight is
On 05/20/2011 11:08 PM, Tim wrote:
It's generally regarded that you don't need anti-virus software for
Linux. I haven't bothered, haven't seen the need for it, and I think
it's been around a decade that I've been running Linux this way. (And I
do mean it runs, not hobbles about in a broken
On 05/25/2011 08:23 AM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
Does btrfs finally have a fully functional fsck? Or is btrfs install not
recommended for the faint of heart?
Last time I tried btrfs (~year ago), FS got corrupted after a kernel
oops. Luckily it was only a test machine.
From the release
Hi,
For all these years I've only been using 32bit Linux. Decided to install F15 as
64bit and I've run into a minor issue and looking for a simple solution.
It seems that google earth does use some 32bit libs. Probably will run into
other non-packaged apps that will need 32bit libs.
So, is
Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
So, is there a quick way to tell yum to install all (majority) of 32
bit libs?
OK Memory kicked in
yum install redhat-lsb
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
users mailing list
users
Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, it 100% reproducible, I think you should fill a bug.
Looks like a known issue:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=273002
Ah yes. I should have checked upstream.
Thanks.
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
It seems that NFS automounts on F15 are broken?
I have the usual bits set in fstab, one of them being
misty:/syntegra /syntegra nfs4rw 0 0
It doesn't get mounted, and following the advice in the boot.log I see
the following
[egreshko@meimei ~]$ sudo
On 05/28/2011 08:55 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
Anyone else seeing this? Is it related to this bugzilla?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690292
A mount after book works just fine
I think it may be this one:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692008
Anyway, you are not
On 05/28/2011 10:36 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
I haven't touched my home directory where the VM is kept, so any light
on this would be welcome.
No info on your particular error. I don't see your issue on my Win2K,
and Vista guest. However, USBs don't work in any of my guests. So, I'm
On 05/28/2011 11:37 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
OK, thanks. I haven't got as far as trying the USB stuff as I can't even
run my VM, but if USB doesn't work it's no use to me. I only run VB when
I want to update my iPhone.
FWIW I did file this to their bugtracker
Patrick Dupre patrick.du...@york.ac.uk wrote:
Hello,
Where is the CHECKSUM file ?
https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 05/28/2011 06:26 PM, Louis Lagendijk wrote:
I solaved the problem by adding a comment=systemd.automount
for the NFS mounts in fstab. See man systmd.automount
Louis
That is a very nice workaround.
Thanks,
Ed
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On 05/28/2011 09:19 PM, antonio wrote:
re-upgraded again and I confirm that I loose all networks (I get a two
screen applet wit a red cross on it on upper right part of the screen.
I am running it on an Acer laptop with Intel motherboard and wireless card
Works fine here. I've got an MSI
On 05/28/2011 10:56 PM, Steven Stern wrote:
Make sure your user account is in the vboxusers group or USB won't work.
This was a change in the 4.x series on VirtualBox.
Doh!
I hate when that happens Somehow I recall VBox giving a more
informative error message when you forgot one of the
On 05/29/2011 01:51 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Where is the comment= feature documented? It's not in the man page
given above, nor in the man pages for mount or nfs.
I fount the man page Louis wrote about by googling man systmd.automount
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 05/29/2011 06:43 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
You mean man systemd.automount (Louis misspelled it as well).
Yes... I used cp to respond.
Good that you found it nonetheless.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 05/29/2011 07:38 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
It's really all Ed's fault for changing the subject
Guilty as charged :-)
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Guidelines:
I've just installed F15 x86_64 and have been trying my best to use the
nouveau driver. However, it is falling short. I could probably live
with the failures in some of the desktop effects in KDE. But, the one
I can't seem to accept is the inability run GNOME 3 in a Vbox guest. In
F11 to
On 05/29/2011 12:19 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
rpmfusion auto kernel module rebuild is done with akmods not dkms .. so
instead of installing kmod-nvidia (or in addition if you like) install
akmod-nvidia which will build kmod-nvidia for you if its not there.
seems to be operating with
In GNOME 3 I could find no way to select which WEP key to use (1-4). I
suppose I could manually edit the file in
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts. But, am I missing something? In KDE it
is simple to select.
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On 05/29/2011 01:39 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
rpm -q --scriptspackagename should tell you such info
Doesn't the package have to be installed for this to work?
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change subscription options:
On 05/29/2011 01:52 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/29/2011 01:39 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
rpm -q --scriptspackagename should tell you such info
Doesn't the package have to be installed for this to work?
Sorryforgot to add that maybe you forgot to add the -p parameter...
--
users mailing
On 05/29/2011 01:55 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Yes. Don't see a problem there. Install it and run the query. If you
must avoid installing the package for some reason, install the srpm and
look at the spec file.
Being the cautious type, I find it better to download the packages and
run what
Hi,
I've enabled the rpmfusion repos and have just tried to do yum install
kmod-nvidia.
It offered to install the following
Installing:
kmod-nvidia
Installing for dependencies:
kmod-nvidia-2.6.38.6-26.rc1.fc15.x86_64
nvidia-settings
nvidia-xconfig
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia
Dave Ihnat dih...@dminet.com wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 01:14:28PM +0800, Ed Greshko wrote:
In GNOME 3 I could find no way to select which WEP key to use (1-4).
...
With all due respect, why bother? WEP as security is no security at
all.
I knew I should have added the caveat that anyone
Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Sun, 29 May 2011 16:35:04 +0800
Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote:
Hi,
I've enabled the rpmfusion repos and have just tried to do yum
install kmod-nvidia.
...snip...
So, I think it should have failed with a dependency error, yes?
Would
On 05/29/2011 09:47 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
What does:
rpm -q kernel
return?
That would be
2.6.38.6-27.fc15.x86_64 (as mentioned in the first post... :-) )
Do you have the 2.6.38.6-26.rc1.fc15 kernel installed?
Yes, it is still installed. I think I have it set to keep 3 kernels.
On 05/29/2011 10:52 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Then thats why. rpmfusion doesn't have one for your current kernel, but
it does for the release kernel. Since that kernel is installed (even
though it's not booted), it will meet the dep.
Seriously? It looks at what you've got installed, and not what
On 05/30/2011 12:53 AM, Joe Zeff wrote:
In a perfect world that would never happen. Of course, this is*not* a
perfect world and people sometimes either make mistakes or get behind.
Tish happens.
I don't want those designers anywhere near my nuclear power plant or
airplane. :-)
--
users
On 05/30/2011 04:11 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
To anyone trying to upgrade from Fedora 14 to Fedora 15, DON'T EVEN
TRY!!! I've just tried and have had numerous problems, finally resulting
in being unable to boot up any kernel version at all, using inittab mode
1,3, or 5. In view of this it
On 05/30/2011 04:11 PM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
To anyone trying to upgrade from Fedora 14 to Fedora 15, DON'T EVEN
TRY!!! I've just tried and have had numerous problems, finally resulting
in being unable to boot up any kernel version at all, using inittab mode
1,3, or 5. In view of this it
On 05/31/2011 02:53 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Come on. Let's assume good will. His warning might not be helpful with
more details but he is certainly just trying to warn users.
Over reaction to a personal experience is *never* a good thing not
matter how well intended.
FUD is FUD.
--
users
On 05/31/2011 03:09 AM, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 wrote:
I wish I could say the same, it's failed twice for me now, even from a
minimal Fedora 14 KDE reinstall/update. Might be FUD in your world,but I
hope for your sake you never come across a similar problem. Rest assured
if our places are ever
On 05/31/2011 03:03 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I think you are doing the same thing that you are accusing the other
person of doing IMO. You can just point out what is wrong.
The OP specifically told people DON'T EVEN TRY!!! to upgrade from F14
to F15. No details, no suggestion as to what
On 05/31/2011 03:09 AM, Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote:
No, upgrading F15 is a pain. Beware, expect danger!
That statement is not FUD. That statement is measured and reasonable.
That statement would normally be followed by Make backups before
proceeding with any upgrade.
--
users mailing
On 05/31/2011 02:08 PM, JD wrote:
Sorry for the false alarm.
I had forgotten that I had moved those 2 directories
to a different location, so when I did not see my collection
there, I thought shotwell clobbered them all.
Apologies to the shotwell developers
This was test of the emergency
On 05/31/2011 10:59 PM, Jatin K wrote:
Dear all
by mistake I've deleted a file securetty from /etc directory :-(
how do I regenerate that file again
I've tried rpm -ivh --force setup-2.*
but problem is not solved
any help is appreciated
One way to do this is to use rpm2cpio and
1101 - 1200 of 7858 matches
Mail list logo
