On 03/24/2010 01:26 AM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Tuesday 23 March 2010 19:21:59 Robin Laing wrote:
On 03/13/2010 08:34 AM, Mail Lists wrote:
It will be interesting if
Mono is pushed into Gnome to the point that RedHad cannot work around
it. Could KDE become the default Fedora desktop?
On 03/24/2010 01:54 PM, Konstantin Svist wrote:
KDE 3.5 - 4 upgrade annoyed me to no end because KDE4 wasn't ready for
prime time. The current version is pretty nice, but I've switched to XFCE.
But that doesn't mean that all change is bad. For instance, upstart
integration has been way
On 03/27/2010 04:05 AM, Rick Stevens wrote:
Not to pick nits, Aaron, but there are some things that NM simply
cannot or will not do correctly (e.g. it won't even bloody start unless
you have a user logged in so it's useless for a large number of
applications). I'd hardly call the people that
On 03/28/2010 01:59 PM, Rajanish Kumar wrote:
Hi!
I have already installed Fedora 12 .I have given root password...and
finally added a user name rajanish
.I am log in through rajanishbut i have not accessing throgh
root...I want to log in through root because i want to learn
administrative
On 03/29/2010 03:26 AM, Tim wrote:
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 15:35 -0700, Rick Stevens wrote:
Yes, NM is quite good, but a complete and utter lack of docs for it is
a major problem, and it appears the people working on it aren't
willing to farm the creation of docs out. I know. I offered to
On 03/27/2010 10:24 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
I believe the original message said it was Fedora 11, which I believe didn't
use ext4 or have it as an option.
Actually, Fedora 11 had Ext4 as the default and it was introduced first
as a option in Fedora 9
On 03/29/2010 03:45 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
When specifying names of groups with spaces in them you need to quote.
e.g. yum groupremove Tibetan Support
It might be easier to do
# yum -v grouplist
# yum install @tibetan-support
For a lot of groups, the shorter names are far less
On 03/31/2010 01:50 PM, mike cloaked wrote:
I second that - chromium has some rather difficult java problems as
far as I remember - google-chrome-beta (installed easiest via google
repo setup) works well enough most of the time to be a mainstream
browser now.
Note that Google Chrome is a
On 04/02/2010 04:36 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Sam Sharpe lists.red...@samsharpe.net said:
I believe that diverting resources into maintaining older releases
does not further any of the Foundations. It takes resources away from
further the last two principles.
I would
On 04/02/2010 05:27 AM, charles zeitler wrote:
--
Do what thou wilt
shall be the whole of the Law.
1) free and open source software is redundant ( if it's free software )
Not quite. FOSS is a umbrella term and using it is one way of avoiding
the free beer vs freedom confusion
2)
On 04/01/2010 11:12 PM, psmith wrote:
then why don't you both get off your a**es and help the packagers
package and test the newer releases instead of just blowing off at
volunteers who are giving you something for free?
This type of language is completely unnecessary. The maintainers
On 04/02/2010 11:05 PM, Michael Miles wrote
then why don't you both get off your a**es and help the packagers
package and test the newer releases instead of just blowing off at
volunteers who are giving you something for free?
Maybe they are asking because they do not know how.
This kind of
On 04/02/2010 11:19 PM, Craig White wrote:
Rahul is a Fedora director, one of the kindest, gentlest and most
patient people on this list.
Thanks for the compliment but I am not really any kind of director.
Just a Fedora contributor among many others. No special titles.
Rahul
--
users
On 04/03/2010 05:19 AM, David Bartmess wrote:
I don't find kvm anywhere. Is there a specific repository I need to add
to my list?
KVM is a kernel module. There is no separate package or binary called
KVM. The user space tool is qemu-kvm.
On 04/03/2010 07:22 PM, R. G. Newbury wrote:
Hmm. That I did not know. I'll try rmmod'ing the kvm modules and
checking what happens. Virtualbox does not load any modules AFAICT. It
just runs as a service against internal kernel structures...which I had
always assumed were accessed through
On 04/06/2010 02:39 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
Meanwhile, back on the farm, Mark Shuttleworth pays his developers and
doesn't get a cent back... for now.
Far from true. You need to check your facts.
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On 04/06/2010 02:59 AM, psmith wrote:
i think his reply was meant for me rahul, notice that the first
paragraph of him mail is my reply to the two complainants verbatim, and
mea culpa for the language/post, it was a result of a long day dealing
with extremely ungratefull people and i let
On 04/08/2010 02:29 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 04/06/2010 02:39 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
Meanwhile, back on the farm, Mark Shuttleworth pays his
developers and
doesn't get a cent back... for now.
Far from true
On 04/09/2010 05:17 AM, Marcel Rieux wrote:
[ You mailed me offlist and then quoted me on a public list. You need
to stop doing that]
You are right in observing that the cost of living is not the same in
America and India. But, if RHF is satisfied with your work, you should
be able to
On 04/11/2010 02:13 AM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
Dear fellow Fedora users,
\begin{rant}
I have tried to use firefox on/off for a while, and I know since it is
opensource, Fedora will stick with it even though it has become a big and
ugly resource taker :(.
The other day I was giving it a
On 04/11/2010 02:15 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
I see all the reports of crash on shutdown have been marked as duplicates of
572868, but the latest kernel didn't help (I misunderstood there's a patch
to
mean which fixes the problem) so if you test 64 bit fc13 you may want to
manually unmount
On 04/11/2010 02:34 AM, Antonio Olivares wrote:
Do you package firefox? if you do, I am sorry, but I still don't like the
way it has been behaving.
Nope and while I understand you don't like Firefox, kernel oopses are
usually a kernel issue regardless of the program triggering it. You
On 04/12/2010 05:42 AM, Paolo Galtieri wrote:
The safaribooksonline.com website uses flash heavily. In the past I
have had firefox crash repeatedly on this site.
Quick note: Firefox 3.6.x will be pushed out as an update in sometime,
features out of progress plugins. Essentially, if
On 04/12/2010 06:02 AM, Mail Lists wrote:
On 04/11/2010 08:26 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Quick note: Firefox 3.6.x will be pushed out as an update in sometime,
features out of progress plugins. Essentially, if Flash or any other
plugin crashes on that version onwards, it will not take
On 04/12/2010 06:20 AM, Mail Lists wrote:
On 04/11/2010 08:46 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I don't have any memory problems with Firefox. I am also uninterested
in switching to a proprietary browser. I have Chromium running on my
system to evaluate progress.
Whatever works for you
On 04/12/2010 10:55 AM, Andre Goree wrote:
Which parts, exactly, are unacceptable? I'd hope you aren't referring
to the mess that happened when Chrome first came out, since that was
ratified 2 days later and Google admitted their mistake in having that
part in the EULA.
Have you read
On 04/15/2010 03:34 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
FC13 has branched from rawhide and has infofeed RSS streams and its own
channel
on bugzilla. Therefore questions here are probably valid and certainly
deserve a
polite answer, one without complaining and the wrong list doesn't seem
very
On 04/16/2010 07:05 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Fri, 16 Apr 2010 08:25:27 -0500
Aaron Konstam wrote:
Why would anyone change the name of gnome-key-manager (a name with some
meaning) to seahorse (seemingly meaningless)?
I think this falls under my theory:
On 04/18/2010 07:06 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
As I sometimes am, I am confused by what you say Rahul. The question is
not whether Red Hat has a right to replace programs by new ones created
by another different team of volunteers. They do.
I wasn't answering you. It was a reply to Tom
On 04/19/2010 12:52 AM, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
On the other hand, we do have control over the descriptions in the RPM
packages. When this issue came up last fall, I filed a bug to make sure
that the word keyring appeared in the description field for seahorse,
so that it would at least show
On 04/20/2010 01:32 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
dexter wrote:
Add live_ram to the editable boot prompt at runtime or in your kickstart
use:
bootloader --append=live_ram
These are hidden poweruser options use with care ;-)
Thank you, it worked.
Why is this option not added as an
On 04/20/2010 10:14 AM, Germán A. Racca wrote:
Dear list:
When Fedora 12 Beta was released, I updated to it with
# yum --enablerepo=rawhide upate
and nearly every package was changed from package.fc11 to package.fc12.
But now, when I run the same command to update to Fedora 13 Beta with
On 04/20/2010 01:00 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
It was in the menu before and caused a lot of confusion and bug reports
from users who misunderstood what it meant.
Hmmm, so this is another case where inexperienced users damage long time
users.
Wouldn't
On 04/20/2010 03:32 PM, Alan Holt wrote:
All this methods they are don't working. If you want I can explain.
*Ubuntu Live USB creater* - is an official tool to create Live USBs
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_USB of Ubuntu
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ubuntu_%28operating_system%29 from the
On 04/24/2010 08:08 PM, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Hi,
how to make Fedora 12 and Fedora 13 LiveCD/DVD that is btrfs formated
and not ext4?
What options need to be enables in kicstart file so that
livecd-creator makes btrfs iso images?
I would like to also have compression enabled after btrfs
On 05/10/2010 07:04 PM, Jesse Palser wrote:
Where do I download Release Candidate?
The latest RC is at
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/13.RC2/
I recommend subscribing to test list and following the discussions there.
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 05/10/2010 09:06 PM, Len J wrote:
File not found:
Error Type: class 'yum.Errors.RepoError'
Error Value: Error getting repository data for installed, repository
not found
File : /usr/share/PackageKit/helpers/yum/yumBackend.py, line 3125,
in module
Try a yum update instead.
Rahul
--
On 05/10/2010 07:57 PM, Aaron Konstam wrote:
Today I saw the standard octagon symbol on my top panel indicating
updates being available. I clicked on the icon and saw a display saying
no updates were available. But the octagon symbol did not disappear. Out
of curiosity I ran yum upgrade and
On 05/19/2010 02:20 AM, Jeff Sadino wrote:
Hello everyone,
I was wondering what everyone's opinion is as to the best
command/program to use for backups? I don't need to preserve the
partition table, basically just copy files to a backup hard drive.
There are several options and I recommend
On 05/19/2010 02:28 AM, Sam Sharpe wrote:
On 18 May 2010 21:46, Jesse Palser slnth...@aol.com wrote:
That makes me sad, OpenOffice should be on LiveCD...
The openoffice-core RPM is 238 MB (which is compressed... and not the
only necessary component...)
The LiveCD is 700MB
I'm
On 05/19/2010 03:04 AM, birger wrote:
On Wed, 2010-05-19 at 02:11 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
The Live CD has already been finalized. There will no such changes at
this point. Fedora includes very comprehensive locale support and we
opted to not include Openoffice.org because
On 05/19/2010 09:52 PM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
On Wednesday 19 May 2010 08:33 AM, Chris Tyler wrote:
Use the command: yum history info
I can't find that on F11, is this a new feature?
Yes.
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On 05/21/2010 10:42 PM, Adel ESSAFI wrote:
hi list
I have tried empathy with F10 sucessufully.
However, in F12 I could not communicate with voice with my google
contacts. There is a short ring and then it stops.
do you have any experience with this?
regards
Adel
ps: the version is
On 05/22/2010 10:13 PM, Vitaly Dolgov wrote:
I've seen strange in my system:
$ yum list installed | grep rawhide | wc -l
520
But they marked as @rawhide/$releasever, not rawhide
Ok. I've downloaded full file list from fedora repo mirror and checked
packages:
$ yum list installed | grep
On 05/22/2010 10:41 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sat, 22 May 2010 10:03:27 -0700
Paolo Galtieri wrote:
When I tried running the virtual machine manager as a regular user I
was prompted for the root password.
Ah, but the root password prompt comes from the
On 05/23/2010 05:18 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
Are we playing the wrong games? (So far we have played bzflag, wesnoth and
armacycles and will be playing hedgewars next Saturday. Suggestions are
welcome, but for now we are avoiding games that are essentially unplayable
with the Fedora graphics
On 05/23/2010 08:38 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Right now, Gnome shows an alert bubble when I have somewhere between
15 and 20 minutes remaining on battery power (varies). When there's a
couple of minutes left, an automatic shutdown gets initiated.
I would like to adjust the thresholds. I want
On 05/24/2010 08:15 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Several times I had ABRT claim that my kernel oops report was
succesfully uploaded, yet I cannot find the bug reports in Bugzilla. I
have my Bugzilla login ID and password set in the bugzilla ABRT
plugin. I don't think my oops reports are going
On 05/25/2010 04:12 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Ok. Oh, and I did poke around the plugin -- it is indeed sending the
oopses to kerneloops. It's a bit misleading, since the fields I get to
fill in, before submitting the report, are Bugzilla fields, leading me
to believe that's where the oops is
On 05/25/2010 03:22 PM, George R Goffe wrote:
Howdy,
I have had my FC12 system installed since February this year and have
experienced this particular problem twice so far. The problem does NOT
happen frequently... Just long enough for me to become complacent that
it was a fluke.
Files in
On 05/26/2010 09:51 PM, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 17:24 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Voice your opinion on the websites[1] list.
[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites
I'm not joining that list to say one thing:
The new Get
On 05/27/2010 12:34 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Are the sha256sum checksums of the various downloadable images (both
install and live) available anywhere other than within the downloads
themselves? If not, why not?
https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify
Rahul
--
users mailing list
On 05/27/2010 09:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
A...you poor thing.
Ed, stop being so patronizing. It doesn't help the conversation.
As someone else pointed outthe View full list of options for
getting Fedora ... http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-options is
incomplete. One
On 05/27/2010 10:37 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Climb down from your high horse for a moment and stop being so much a
word police and the defender of anyone with a fedoraproject.org email
address. If I (or anyone else) can't use a simple BS without the fear
that someone is going to go on a pity
On 05/27/2010 10:58 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
So, you are the list moderator? And who trashed anything?
I don't see the need for being a list moderator to point this out but if
you want me to play that role, I can take that up.
For someone who is on guard for the tone of the conversation to not
On 05/27/2010 11:57 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
I don't want this to be a best effort affair either. Either he
undertakes the job full time or not at all. As part of the project I
would also hope that he updates the list guidelines to indicate what
words or phrases that we are not to use. I can
On 05/27/2010 12:17 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
I was just there 3 minutes ago Rahul, and there is still as yet, no way to
follow that site to a get torrents page, and the site
Patience. The patch was just submitted sometime back and it takes time
to get it synced, translations updated etc.
On 05/27/2010 11:47 AM, Mike McCarty wrote:
Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
IOW it remembers it by logging it. How else would it do it except by
recording it in a file?
I'm not interested in argumentation. It does not remember passwords,
period.
I am not sure how you can declare
On 05/27/2010 12:32 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
Then I guess I am a rude person Bruno. I am not a developer, I'm 50 years
too late for that, I wrote my ground breaking SW 15 to 30+ years ago.
You don't have to be a developer to provide constructive feedback or
even contribute to improving a
On 05/27/2010 12:09 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
I have seen claims on this list that the root password is
remembered for a small amount of time so you don't keep
getting asked. That has never worked for me, but I assumed
it was just because I was running a non-standard session
and was missing
On 05/27/2010 01:04 PM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Then what precisely are you offering to do when you said I don't see
the need for being a list moderator to point this out but if you want me
to play that role, I can take that up.?
It was a potential consideration on a best effort basis. Noone
On 05/27/2010 02:42 PM, Mike McCarty wrote:
I'm aware of that information.
Well, it seems that I was not clear enough in my statement.
There is no lack of clarity. When people refer to sudo remembering
passwords, they are certainly referring to the functionality and not the
On 05/27/2010 02:45 PM, Chris Kloiber wrote:
nouveau does work fine... If you have one screen, or two screens and
like spanning desktops (with the second to the right of the first). If
you (like I) prefer separate desktops (so I can put a virtual machine
on the second monitor) and the second
On 05/27/2010 03:30 PM, Andrew Parker wrote:
I disagree. Nit picking details in this industry is essential for
progress and understanding. Defending flawed terminology that imply
security holes when they don't exist is foolish. I would like to
thank Mike for his explanations, I for one have
On 05/27/2010 07:10 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
As a matter of interest, is there any way
of running the Fedora-13 KDE Live CD
from the ISO file, on a machine without a CD reader?
You can use a USB key.
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On 05/28/2010 04:53 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
So, you are suggesting that existing users that are aware of
http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/
bookmark those pages, yes?
What about newcomers to Linux and Fedora? How would they determine they
should bookmark these pages?
On 05/28/2010 05:12 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
Activities doesn't mean much to me either.
The design isn't based on a single user, especially not skewed towards
technical users. It is based on a survey that suggests that activities
are better leading term than spins for new users.
Rahul
--
On 05/28/2010 05:16 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
On 05/28/2010 07:34 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora - click on all download methods
Oh, FWIW, I just saw that link. It was hidden from view on my desktop.
Yeah. I think there is a slight mis
On 05/28/2010 05:22 AM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
Am I the only one who completely missed this link?
I spent at least five minutes flipping through the pages, going back
and forth in circles, looking for the torrent link, before throwing up
my hands in disgust and jumping to Google.
Depends on
On 05/28/2010 05:33 AM, Ed Greshko wrote:
So, I think you are saying that non-technical users are more likely to
go to Activities to see what that is all about than go to Spins. In
other words, since they wouldn't know what spin means...they wouldn't
have any curiosity and click on the tab.
On 05/28/2010 05:31 AM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Fri, 28 May 2010 07:23:50 +0800
Ed Greshko wrote:
Activity and a Spin? If so, what is the difference? If not, why
not just have a Spin tab? Seems to me it would be more consistent.
And beside which, newbie users probably don't know
On 05/28/2010 06:25 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
No luck. I reinstalled and get the same error. yum check gives:
$ sudo yum check
Loaded plugins: changelog, fastestmirror, merge-conf, presto, protectbase,
refresh-packagekit
rb_libtorrent-0.14.10-1.fc12.x86_64 has missing requires of
On 05/28/2010 07:09 AM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
We could call it what it really is -- Live CDs or Task Live CDs or
even Live Media.
Except that spins can be non-live media as well. There is also the
differentiation that spins are generally available as torrent only.
Anyway this
On 05/28/2010 06:30 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
That did it. I see the downgrade installs the F13 version of
rb_libtorrent.
Long story but I am trying to get this fixed now
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2214538
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/3767#preview
On 05/29/2010 07:40 AM, Mike Fedyk wrote:
My recommendation is after the designer SIG has hashed it over,
attempt getting feedback from the intended audience, and that audience
is the users list and then the general public.
Users list is just one among several possible places. As you
On 05/29/2010 05:11 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
What's the appropriate contact to request new feeds at:
http://planet.fedoraproject.org/infofeed/
Should I file an RFE in bugzilla?
webmaster AT fedoraproject.org
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or
On 05/29/2010 12:09 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
Is there an Omega Live version of F-13 [for USB flash drive] to be
available and if so when?
I am hoping to do a initial release before next week.
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe or change
On 05/29/2010 04:52 AM, David Boles wrote:
SHUT UP!
None of you was here when this was talked about? Since October? And now
you want to bitch becasue the site does NOT fit YOUR needs. REALLY!
[Snipped]
Calm down. The thread has moved towards more constructive feedback and
we do want to
On 05/29/2010 08:15 AM, Dale J. Chatham wrote:
OK, I was an idiot. I took about 20 minutes yesterday looking for a way
to disable the floppy. Today, it jumped out at me.
Doh!
I might suggest that timing out the attempt to query a floppy and moving
on might be a wise for the developers
On 05/29/2010 08:52 PM, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
For the first time ever, I have eye candy, thanks to
mesa-dri-drivers-experimental, on my laptop with an NV40 chip.
Kudos all around. This is quite an accomplishment.
I assume you are referring to Compiz here. Have you tried GNOME Shell?
# yum
On 05/29/2010 09:02 PM, Marvin Kosmal wrote:
HI
Is there a shot of what this would look like before I try this..
#yum install gnome-shell
I am running FC 12 yet.. Waiting for the downloads to quiet down
before I upgrade.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:Gnome-shell-f13.png
Rahul
--
On 05/29/2010 10:34 PM, g wrote:
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
snip
Depends on when you did it. As I indicated before, there was some
recent changes done in response to feedback here.
which would have been unnecessary if web page designers had posted
a link to this list notifying
On 05/30/2010 10:38 AM, g wrote:
posting notification and a link to new page design to all list can help in
prevention because if someone does complain, it is a simple matter to point
out that notice was given and comments were requested.
As already pointed out, feedback was requested as
On 05/31/2010 09:39 PM, BeartoothBBB wrote:
On Sun, 30 May 2010 08:34:34 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
[]
I look forward to it.
Ditto! And will preupgrade work on it??
Yep. As much as in Fedora.
Rahul
--
users mailing list
users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On 05/30/2010 12:10 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Definitely. Best back up /home and create a new partition once and for
all. While you're at it, make sure /boot is at least 500MB in case you
want to use preupgrade in the future.
FYI, /boot is 500 MB by default in Fedora 13, precisely to
On 05/30/2010 01:03 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Supposedly /boot cannot be ext4 as it's not yet supported by Grub, so I
don't know how you got that to work.
Till Fedora 11, this was the case. Fedora 12 onwards can support Ext4
in a boot partition because GRUB has been patched to
On 05/26/2010 03:24 AM, Bill Davidsen wrote:
I normally follow updates to official releases on the infofeed RSS, since it
tells me not only what was changed but for new apps, what the app does.
Hopefully now there will be one for FC13 as well.
Websites team have added one now.
Rahul
On 06/01/2010 01:54 PM, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Chrome/Chromium browser has more than 70 million users[3], much more
than Fedora itself, for me that proves it is a good and stable
browser.
I think that assertion is wrong. Firefox has more users but more
importantly, the large majority of
On 06/03/2010 09:01 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
Well sure enough, I tried several different options in anaconda under
virtualbox and it asked me to init my nic every time. At this point I
don't know if it's a problem of using the livecd tools, which is
unlikely, or that it doesn't see the nic on
On 06/03/2010 09:35 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
However, that is google-chrome - I have not tried spots repo for a
while but when I first tried it it was far less functional than
google-chrome - cannot tell you why (java flash problems primarily if I
recall).
You are just making my point
On 06/03/2010 09:52 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
I dont understand your point. I am encouraging us and to advance chrome
and/or chromium - either or both of working with google to allow fedora
to distribute it - or/and advancing spots repo so it can be in regular
f14 or sooner.
If that is
On 06/03/2010 10:03 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
Good issues - so how do you propose fedora devs et al can engage to
help advance chrome in linux - it is in googles interest and ours.
The list of issues in that tracker comes from Spot's work with Google.
If anyone is interested to help,
On 06/03/2010 10:28 AM, Darr wrote:
I think few people are aware of the fedora-easy-karma package, let alone the
workings of bodhi.
If a package does not get negative karma, I think the 2-week-wait /
push-to-stable treatment is reasonable. YMMV.
With the exception of critical security
On 06/05/2010 06:10 AM, Suvayu Ali wrote:
I would like to keep this auto update feature of debuginfo packages, but
is there someway I could tell the plugin not to enable the debuginfo
repos for all repositories, just the ones with installed debuginfo packages?
You might have to just file
On 06/05/2010 07:34 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Sat, 2010-06-05 at 15:47 +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
As the title suggest, I've preupgraded a fully updated F11 to F13.
AFAIK this is not supported:
preupgrade prepares your Fedora system for an upgrade to the next
version ...
On 06/05/2010 08:43 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
Thanks Rahul, but which Wiki page? https://fedorahosted.org/preupgrade/
doesn't say this, and neither do the rpm info and the README in the
package, so they would also need to be changed. And how many people are
going to look at the Rawhide
On 06/06/2010 11:19 PM, Beartooth wrote:
Actually even better. I clicked the gpk-viewer icon; it did its
normal thing *and* also popped a box up telling me the preupgrade was
available, and asking if I wanted it. Very nice!
Many, many thanks!
That happens with standard
On 06/07/2010 12:43 AM, Bob Goodwin wrote:
Is Omega 13 available? If it is Google doesn't know it is. Where do
I for my copy?
I have yet to build a ISO image. If you have already have Fedora 12
installed, a preupgrade prompt will guide you through a upgrade to
Fedora 13 + all the
On 06/07/2010 01:22 PM, Joachim Backes wrote:
Coincidentally seeing this thread, and wondering too about this pause
effect, I removed PackageKit-command-not-found. But I get some error if
entering a command which bash does not find:
bac...@x [~]: Bush
bash:
On 06/08/2010 08:35 PM, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Have you heard that it is now possible to compile additional ZFS
module? That way Fedora can get native ZFS support. Has anybody done
this? If you have please post step by step instructions, much
appreciated.
Additional links:
1 - 100 of 996 matches
Mail list logo
