On 01/12/2010 12:10 AM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> So I never paid attention to this since I always assumed the system
> will do The Right Thing (TM), however while going through servers today,
> I came across this discrepancy and was hoping someone here could help me
> figure out what's goin
On 01/11/2010 01:59 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> Rick Stevens wrote:
>>> While 'cat'ing /proc/cpuinfo I see this (other information removed):
>>>
>>> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
>>> cpu family : 15
>>> model : 4
>>> model name
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> It's not a bad thing to have cpuspeed installed. If you want to enjoy
> lower CPU temperatures and a quieter computer, then leave cpuspeed
> installed and enabled.
Oh, I didn't uninstall it. I just turned it off temporarily to see
if cpuinfo will change. If it
Ashley M. Kirchner on 01/11/2010 03:59 PM wrote:
> Bingo. That's what it was. The moment I turned cpuspeed off it
> went to 3400.000. I had no clue cpuspeed was even installed. Thanks!
>
It's not a bad thing to have cpuspeed installed. If you want to enjoy
lower CPU temperatures and a qu
Rick Stevens wrote:
>> While 'cat'ing /proc/cpuinfo I see this (other information removed):
>>
>> vendor_id : GenuineIntel
>> cpu family : 15
>> model : 4
>> model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.40GHz
>> stepping
On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 11:40 -0700, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> So I never paid attention to this since I always assumed the system
> will do The Right Thing (TM), however while going through servers today,
> I came across this discrepancy and was hoping someone here could help me
> figure out w
Suvayu Ali wrote:
> On Monday 11 January 2010 10:40 AM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>> model name : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.40GHz
>> cpu MHz : 2400.000
>
> That is not odd. This is a feature of most modern CPUs. Whenever the CPU
> is under minimal load, the clock
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> What does "dmidecode" say about it in its Processor Information?
Huh, it says:
Version: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.40GHz
Voltage: 3.0 V
External Clock: 200 MHz
Max Speed: 4000 MHz
Current Speed: 3400 MHz
So why's procinfo
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>
> So I never paid attention to this since I always assumed the system
> will do The Right Thing (TM), however while going through servers today,
> I came across this discrepancy and was hoping someone here could help me
> figure out
On 01/11/2010 10:40 AM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>
> So I never paid attention to this since I always assumed the system
> will do The Right Thing (TM), however while going through servers today,
> I came across this discrepancy and was hoping someone here could help me
> figure out what's go
Hi Ashley,
On Monday 11 January 2010 10:40 AM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>
> So I never paid attention to this since I always assumed the system
> will do The Right Thing (TM), however while going through servers today,
> I came across this discrepancy and was hoping someone here could help m
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:40:17 -0700
Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> Comments?
Shucks, that's not odd, you wanna see odd look at this one:
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 6
model : 2
model name : QEMU Virtual CPU version 0.11.0
stepping : 3
cpu MHz : 0.000
cache size : 512 KB
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:40:17 -0700, Ashley wrote:
>
> So I never paid attention to this since I always assumed the system
> will do The Right Thing (TM), however while going through servers today,
> I came across this discrepancy and was hoping someone here could help me
> figure out what'
So I never paid attention to this since I always assumed the system
will do The Right Thing (TM), however while going through servers today,
I came across this discrepancy and was hoping someone here could help me
figure out what's going on.
While 'cat'ing /proc/cpuinfo I see this (oth
14 matches
Mail list logo
