Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?

2013-12-24 Thread Tom H
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: Quoting Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com: On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: a long, long time ago, i reported an apparent glitch with NFS on fedora:

Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?

2013-12-24 Thread Tom H
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: how does one configure fedora 20 to support only NFSv4? i'm used to mucking with /etc/sysconfig/nfs in earlier versions of RH, and tweaking the variables MOUNTD_NFS_V* and RPCNFSDARGS. i don't see those vars in

Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?

2013-12-24 Thread Tom H
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: Quoting Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com: In /etc/sysconfig/nfs # Optional arguments passed to rpc.nfsd. See rpc.nfsd(8) RPCNFSDARGS= man 8 rpc.nfsd -N or --no-nfs-version vers This

Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?

2013-12-24 Thread Tom H
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 12:44 AM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: Port 2049 is used by V4. I don't think V3 or V2 uses it 2049 is the nfs port for all nfs versions. grep nfs /etc/services -- users mailing list users@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe or change subscription

Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?

2013-12-24 Thread Tom H
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: On 12/24/13 09:12, Robert P. J. Day wrote: After making the suggested changes. [root@meimei ~]# mount -o ro,nfsvers=4 192.168.0.196:/home /mnt [root@meimei ~]# mount | grep mnt 192.168.0.196:/home on /mnt type

Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?

2013-12-24 Thread Ed Greshko
On 12/24/13 17:21, Tom H wrote: On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: After making the suggested changes. [root@meimei ~]# mount -o ro,nfsvers=4 192.168.0.196:/home /mnt [root@meimei ~]# mount | grep mnt 192.168.0.196:/home on /mnt type nfs4

Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?

2013-12-24 Thread Robert P. J. Day
Quoting Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com: On 12/24/13 17:21, Tom H wrote: On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: After making the suggested changes. [root@meimei ~]# mount -o ro,nfsvers=4 192.168.0.196:/home /mnt [root@meimei ~]# mount | grep mnt

Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?

2013-12-24 Thread Ed Greshko
On 12/24/13 21:24, Robert P. J. Day wrote: just to explain where this all came from, i was working off of what i was seeing on a RHEL (actually CentOS) 6.5 system, where the config file /etc/sysconfig/nfs had helpful comments which allowed me to tweak that file thusly: # Define which

Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?

2013-12-24 Thread Robert P. J. Day
Quoting Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com: On 12/24/13 21:24, Robert P. J. Day wrote: just to explain where this all came from, i was working off of what i was seeing on a RHEL (actually CentOS) 6.5 system, where the config file /etc/sysconfig/nfs had helpful comments which allowed me to

Re: Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?

2013-12-24 Thread Leonid Flaks
On 12/24/2013 05:19 AM, Ed Greshko wrote: On 12/24/13 17:21, Tom H wrote: On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:10 AM, Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com wrote: After making the suggested changes. [root@meimei ~]# mount -o ro,nfsvers=4 192.168.0.196:/home /mnt [root@meimei ~]# mount | grep mnt

Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?

2013-12-24 Thread Ed Greshko
On 12/24/13 23:07, Leonid Flaks wrote: Did you look into /etc/nfsmount.conf file? It has lots of useful hints in comments and seems to be able to control NFS versions at 3 levels - per mount point, per server and globally. It is done on the client end. That is OKbut doesn't fit the bill

Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?

2013-12-23 Thread Tom H
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: a long, long time ago, i reported an apparent glitch with NFS on fedora: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-January/097465.html in that, at the time, it *appeared* that you couldn't set up NFS

Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?

2013-12-23 Thread Robert P. J. Day
Quoting Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com: On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: a long, long time ago, i reported an apparent glitch with NFS on fedora: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-January/097465.html in that, at the time, it

Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?

2013-12-23 Thread Robert P. J. Day
Quoting Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com: On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: a long, long time ago, i reported an apparent glitch with NFS on fedora: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-January/097465.html in that, at the time, it

Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?

2013-12-23 Thread Ed Greshko
On 12/24/13 07:16, Robert P. J. Day wrote: Quoting Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com: On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: a long, long time ago, i reported an apparent glitch with NFS on fedora:

Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?

2013-12-23 Thread Robert P. J. Day
Quoting Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com: On 12/24/13 07:16, Robert P. J. Day wrote: Quoting Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com: On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: a long, long time ago, i reported an apparent glitch with NFS on fedora:

Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?

2013-12-23 Thread Ed Greshko
On 12/24/13 08:15, Robert P. J. Day wrote: Quoting Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com: On 12/24/13 07:16, Robert P. J. Day wrote: Quoting Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com: On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: a long, long time ago, i reported an apparent

Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?

2013-12-23 Thread Robert P. J. Day
Quoting Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com: On 12/24/13 08:15, Robert P. J. Day wrote: Quoting Ed Greshko ed.gres...@greshko.com: On 12/24/13 07:16, Robert P. J. Day wrote: Quoting Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com: On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:34 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: a

Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?

2013-12-23 Thread Ed Greshko
On 12/24/13 09:12, Robert P. J. Day wrote: as a quick test, i added -U but the only change was that rpcinfo -p showed me that UDP was no longer being accepted for v4 only: 133 tcp 2049 nfs 1002273 tcp 2049 nfs_acl 133 udp 2049 nfs 100227

Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?

2013-12-23 Thread Ed Greshko
On 12/24/13 09:12, Robert P. J. Day wrote: i'll test further later. I decided to test for you. :-) After making the suggested changes. [root@meimei ~]# mount -o ro,nfsvers=4 192.168.0.196:/home /mnt [root@meimei ~]# mount | grep mnt 192.168.0.196:/home on /mnt type nfs4

Re: can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?

2013-12-23 Thread Peter Skensved
On 12/24/13 09:12, Robert P. J. Day wrote: as a quick test, i added -U but the only change was that rpcinfo -p showed me that UDP was no longer being accepted for v4 only: 133 tcp 2049 nfs 1002273 tcp 2049 nfs_acl 133 udp 2049 nfs

can you (theoretically) run only NFSv4 (without earlier versions)?

2013-12-20 Thread Robert P. J. Day
a long, long time ago, i reported an apparent glitch with NFS on fedora: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-January/097465.html in that, at the time, it *appeared* that you couldn't set up NFS so that *only* version 4 was running. before i start messing with this again,