Hello Pirmin,
> Johannes Schlatow wrote:
>> What about we'd be prefixing the specified label by a "tap_" e.g.
>> instead?
Since the subnodes in the pkg/runtime are just XML, there is
be no harm in adding custom attributes that can be picked up by Goa as
hints. The name of the tap device could
Hello Johannes
Thanks for your quick response.
On 6/23/23 13:44, Johannes Schlatow wrote:
Currently, the label of the required nic service determines the name of
the tap device in Goa. I understand that, to make archives deployable,
one would not want to have a "tapX" label in the runtime. Wh
Hi Pirmin,
On 23/06/2023 11:00, Duss Pirmin wrote:
Hello Johannes,
Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
On 21.06.23 14:47, Johannes Schlatow wrote:
In principle, such extensions are reasonable. In the case of
jitter_sponge, however, this would mean that we needed to make the Goa
release d
Hello Johannes,
Thank you for sharing your thoughts.
On 21.06.23 14:47, Johannes Schlatow wrote:
In principle, such extensions are reasonable. In the case of
jitter_sponge, however, this would mean that we needed to make the Goa
release dependent on the genode-world repo. I would rather avo
Hi Pirmin,
thanks for your feedback and for sharing your ideas...
On 21/06/2023 11:19, Duss Pirmin wrote:
Hello Genodians
The direction Goa is evolving is really cool! The new and upcoming
features address topics that are perfectly aligned with how we currently
use, or plan to use Goa.
In
Hello Genodians
The direction Goa is evolving is really cool! The new and upcoming
features address topics that are perfectly aligned with how we currently
use, or plan to use Goa.
In addition to what is already addressed in issue #44 [1], in order to
run or test some more complex projects w