Re: [IronPython] HybridMapping is full Error

2008-02-07 Thread Michael Foord
Dino Viehland wrote: > It looks like there's an internal limit that prevents us from ever having > more than 4096 PythonFile objects in existance. Is it possible that you have > that many file objects in existence that aren't getting freed? Also just > closing them won't be enough, they actual

Re: [IronPython] Decorators on classes

2008-02-07 Thread Michael Foord
Dino Viehland wrote: > This might be something fun to look at during the sprints at PyCon. > I will definitely be staying for the sprints - either as part of a Resolver sprint or under my own steam... Michael > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: [IronPython] Exporting Python code as an assembly

2008-02-07 Thread Dino Viehland
We're planning on shipping 2.0 RTM sometime in the 2nd half of this year - but we don't have a firm date quite yet. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pigneri, Rocco Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 6:56 AM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] Export

Re: [IronPython] HybridMapping is full Error

2008-02-07 Thread Dino Viehland
It looks like there's an internal limit that prevents us from ever having more than 4096 PythonFile objects in existance. Is it possible that you have that many file objects in existence that aren't getting freed? Also just closing them won't be enough, they actually have to get collected by t

Re: [IronPython] Exporting Python code as an assembly

2008-02-07 Thread Pigneri, Rocco
Michael, >Pigneri, Rocco wrote: >> Dino, >> Thanks for the insight. That helpls a lot. Too bad that we still won't >> be able to create IP types with the DLR in 2.0. I was hoping that that >> would be a feature. >> >Did you see this article on future CLR/DLR integration? > >http://blogs.msdn.com

Re: [IronPython] Exporting Python code as an assembly

2008-02-07 Thread Michael Foord
Pigneri, Rocco wrote: > Dino, > Thanks for the insight. That helpls a lot. Too bad that we still won't > be able to create IP types with the DLR in 2.0. I was hoping that that > would be a feature. > Did you see this article on future CLR/DLR integration? http://blogs.msdn.com/charlie/archive/20

Re: [IronPython] Exporting Python code as an assembly

2008-02-07 Thread Pigneri, Rocco
Dino, Thanks for the insight. That helpls a lot. Too bad that we still won't be able to create IP types with the DLR in 2.0. I was hoping that that would be a feature. By the way, do you guys have an idea of when 2.0 final will be released? Or at least an idea of what stages it has left to g

Re: [IronPython] Exporting Python code as an assembly

2008-02-07 Thread Curt Hagenlocher
I've created a project on CodePlex now. It's still in setup mode; send me email and I'll add you to the project there. The only real change I've made since the Feb 5 version are support for static and class methods. And if the class defines a static or class method named "Main", I set that as the

[IronPython] HybridMapping is full Error

2008-02-07 Thread Michael Foord
Hello, After upgrading to IronPython 1.1.1 we are seeing (sporadically) the following exception when we run our full test suite. Any idea what the cause(s) could be? Unexpected SystemException running tests: System.SystemException: HybridMapping is full at IronPython.Runtime.HybridMap