This is the source with modified Microsoft.Scripting.Core.
http://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?action=batch_statusbatch_id=Q01IYUl1YStxRTJ4dnc9PQ
This has minimalist changes only to that dll.
I have another working version with a IronPython2 namespaces and dll across
the four core
Hi Curt,
I hope your team talk to the ASP.Net MVC/IronPython for ASP.Net guys that
are working on putting dynamic support language for ASP.Net.
If this namespace collision does not retard those projects and its users to
be able to utilize .Net 3.5 framework library, then this problem is only a
(Cross-posted from the c-extensions-for-ironpython google group -- I
thought a few people here might be interested too :))
Hi all
Our original goal for 0.5 was to import numpy, from IronPython, and do
something with it. With one monstrous caveat, we have reached that goal;
the problem is
Hello Will,
Congratulations!
It may be still too early - but a useful test for Ironclad might be to get
matplotlib to import and generate a simple chart.
That would require being able to import numpy *and* PIL (so would exercise
Ironclad fairly thoroughly) and allow you to do something
2008/8/21 Michael Foord [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It may be still too early - but a useful test for Ironclad might be to get
matplotlib to import and generate a simple chart.
That would require being able to import numpy *and* PIL (so would exercise
Ironclad fairly thoroughly) and allow you to do
Curt, believe me, we all appreciate very much what the dynamic
language teams are doing. It is just great to see such a movement
going on.
But I second Dody's remarks. He said it very well. The first solution
does not work (that's my problem scenario exactly) and the second one
may be too
We are trying parallel imports, which somtimes fail with ImportError (ipy
1.1.1). This happens when one thread attempts to import a module which is
being imported on a different thread. The number of such risky imports is
not high, and we deal with this by catching the exception and retrying.
What's the scenario under which you want to do this? Is there a fixed set of
modules being imported by your application or is the list not known until
runtime?
The behavior you describe with respect to sys.modules is identical to that
in CPython. In fact, it's required in order to resolve
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:55 PM, Seo Sanghyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/8/21 Curt Hagenlocher [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
In the long term, I think you're definitely better off rewriting against
ADO.NET, but I can certainly see the attraction in getting something to work
more quickly if you
2008/8/21 Curt Hagenlocher [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Where IronPython is worse than CPython in this regard is that it takes us
longer to import a module. This increases the chance for a collision in an
application where modules may be imported from multiple threads.
No, IronPython is worse in that
We want Resolve One to start quicker. We have found large speedups by
delaying importing of some modules.
This is implemented by moving some import statements into bodies of methods
and function, so that the modules are imported lazily when they are actually
needed. Since Resolver One runs many
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:59 AM, Seo Sanghyeon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, IronPython is worse in that its importer is not locked. CPython has
(in addition to Global Interpreter Lock, since imported module can be
a C extension)
a lock around its importer: see imp.acquire_lock and
As things stand now, I think you'll need either some kind of manual locking
or you'll need a different heuristic to tell you whether or not the module
has finished loading.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 7:20 AM, Kamil Dworakowski
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
We want Resolve One to start quicker. We have
Hi,
I've derived from CustomSymbolDictionary to add specific variables to a
scope (see seshadripv's blog). What I would expect from a method called
TryGetExtraValue is that only if the scope (where the
IAttributesCollection was added in the constructor) cannot find the
SymbolId, the
Hi,
how can I determine the Symbols or SymbolIds that are used in an
(IP2-)expression?
Obviously I need to parse the expression. Where can I find a small
sample or tutorial on parsing in IP2?
Thanks,
Christian
___
Users mailing list
Hi,
Using ironpython I'm trying to get the active window details. Refering
to voidspace (http://www.voidspace.org.uk/ironpython/winforms/
part10.shtml), I've created a user32 dll. I'm using the below code.
if User32.GetWindowText(hd, txt, WndTitleChars):
pid =
The TryGetExtraValue and TrySetExtraValue methods can return a false for
SymbolIDs that they don't maintain. Those values will be looked up in the
actual scope.
For ex, if you have a script snippet like - someVar = 1+2 the variable access
for 'someVar' will result in a call to
Thanks, we will try manual locking.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 3:42 PM, Curt Hagenlocher [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
As things stand now, I think you'll need either some kind of manual locking
or you'll need a different heuristic to tell you whether or not the module
has finished loading.
On Thu,
Dody, I am checking out if a fork of IronPython can work with the 3.5
framework inside a website. I tried your version and it seems to
eliminate almost all the warnings and errors I had. But there is one
left.
In your sample website I get this:
The predefined type
*Error 16 'ExtensionAttribute' is ambiguous in the namespace
'System.Runtime.* *CompilerServices'. InternalXmlHelper.vb*
Change your setting from treating warning as error to None.
*The predefined type
'System.Runtime.**CompilerServices.**ExtensionAttribute' is defined in
multiple
Dody, thanks for your feedback. It's encouraging to know it is
possible to make this work, at least in some circunstances.
In my case, I am getting an actual error, not a warning. It seems it
has something to do with new VB XML features. I will try and see if I
can dig the problem.
But I don't
OK. Good luck with making the decision. My project is already married to
IronPython for 16 months now. For better or worse .. :)
Dody G.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 9:15 PM, Fernando Correia
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dody, thanks for your feedback. It's encouraging to know it is
possible to make
Thanks for your support, Dody. It's really a difficult decision. I
think the error about InternalXmlHelper.vb is being caused by some
component, maybe something from Infragistics or something like that.
I really can't run the risk of solving this problem and having another
one pop up when another
Hello all,
In the latest code sync from codeplex I get a RuntimeWarning every time I
call Thread.Sleep. Is this one of the overzealous warnings that will be
fixed? (It is very annoying.)
Michael
--
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/
http://www.ironpython.info/
Hi Michael, I like your idea of publishing performance results for IronPython.
A good start would be for us to do this with PyBench on major IronPython
releases such as 2.0.0. Seems like there's enough x64 users out there to
warrant doing this for x64 Vista as well.
No, we don't run
IPy does intend to support COM well. See
http://blogs.msdn.com/shrib/archive/2008/07/30/idispatch-support-on-in-ironpython-beta-4.aspx.
If something does not work, please do report a bug.
The following worked for me. So using the natural indexing syntax is what you
need.
2008/8/21 Curt Hagenlocher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's a feature!
http://www.codeplex.com/IronPython/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=16249
There was a moderately long thread about this back in April. You can turn
the warning off either through Python's normal warning-disabling mechanism
or by
2008/8/22 Michael Foord [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/8/21 Curt Hagenlocher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's a feature!
http://www.codeplex.com/IronPython/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=16249
There was a moderately long thread about this back in April. You can turn
the warning off either through
Hi Seshadri,
thanks for your answer.
The TryGetExtraValue and TrySetExtraValue methods can return a false
for SymbolIDs that they don't maintain. Those values will be looked
up in the actual scope.
I see, makes sense.
When accessing the baseScope from your example, isn't
29 matches
Mail list logo
