I would like to write some functions and classes in csharp that
interact nicely python. I would like to write a function that can
respond to keyword arguments, and a class that can dynamically resolve
__getattr__.
For the function I tried creating a function that takes a
Much appreciated, I will give that a try. In what namespace is
DynamicObject declared? (I assume the required assemblies are already
referenced if I'm pulling in IronPython).
Thanks again,
Alex
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Dino Viehland di...@microsoft.com wrote:
For kwargs you need to
In current versions of IronPython, DynamicObject is in
Microsoft.Scripting.Core as Microsoft.Scripting.DynamicObject. In .NET 4.0
System.Core, the same class will be called System.Dynamic.DynamicObject. (I
just noticed this naming discrepancy today, and I think we should probably
move it to at
Current IronPython = 2.01? I have Microsoft.Scripting.Core
referenced, and can't find DynamicObject. There is an
Microsoft.Scripting.Actions.IDynamicObject, and a
Microsoft.Scripting.Runtime.IOldDynamicObject. I'm sure I'm missing
something very basic.
We are using .net 2.0.50727 SP1
On
It should be Microsoft.Scripting.DynamicObject in 2.0.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Alex News anlee...@gmail.com wrote:
Current IronPython = 2.01? I have Microsoft.Scripting.Core
referenced, and can't find DynamicObject. There is an
Microsoft.Scripting.Actions.IDynamicObject, and a
I think it might be just Dynamic in 2.0.
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Curt Hagenlocher
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2009 11:05 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] **kwargs and __getattr__ handling in csharp
Well I am either suffering from severe user error, or it is not in the
suggested locations. The best I could find was
Microsoft.Scripting.Actions.Dynamic. It implements IDynamicObject.
It does not have the aforementioned TryGetMember function to override,
but does have a GetMember function to
No, that's the right class. Apparently, it's been changed a bit since ~late
October when we branched off the 2.0 source.
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Alex News anlee...@gmail.com wrote:
Well I am either suffering from severe user error, or it is not in the
suggested locations. The best
