: 'Discussion of IronPython'
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Debugging support PythonEngine
Leaking memory with
IronPython.Compiler.Options.GenerateDynamicMethods = false isn’t really a big
issue: ClrDebuggingEnabled = true already starts to leak memory (at least
that’s what the comment say
: Thursday, August 17, 2006 9:44 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Debugging support PythonEngine
Without looking at the IP source, can we be confident that the same IL is
produced when a DynamicMethod is created as when AssemblyBuilder is used? Do
the test cases get run
August 2006
23:49
To: Discussion
of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython]
Debugging support PythonEngine
The first issue is
probably the same that IL offset 0 does not have any debug information.
Calling the delegate
“add” steps into a DynamicMethod which confuses VS. A workaround
for now is
Without looking at the IP source, can we be confident that the same IL is
produced when a DynamicMethod is created as when AssemblyBuilder is used? Do
the test cases get run with both settings of Options.GenerateDynamicMethods?
One of the most frustrating debugging problems is when code fails w
, 2006 1:54 PM
To: 'Discussion of IronPython'
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Debugging support PythonEngine
It’s good to hear that it’s fixable. But, off course,
here’s the next one J.
With the same little script:
x = 1
y = 2
def Add(a, b):
x = a + b
return x
om:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shri Borde
Sent: Thursday 17 August 2006
20:25
To: Discussion
of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython]
Debugging support PythonEngine
I have opened this
bug - http://www.codeplex.com/WorkItem/View.aspx?ProjectName=IronPython&WorkIt
Shri Borde
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 12:29 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Debugging support PythonEngine
We have started doing some work for improving debugging as shown
by the VSIP sample (http://blogs.msdn.com/aaronmar/archive/2006/02/16/533273.aspx).
However
Behalf Of Kristof Wagemans
Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2006 1:38 AM
To: 'Discussion of IronPython'
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Debugging support PythonEngine
Thanks for the info. It’s good to hear that there will be
improvement possible in this area in the future. Although, the way I
functions will step you through methods in
IronPython.dll .
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kristof Wagemans
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006
12:36 AM
To: 'Discussion
of IronPython'
Subject: Re: [IronPython]
Debugging support PythonEngine
Are
ther
you through methods in IronPython.dll .
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kristof
Wagemans
Sent: Friday, August 11, 2006 12:36 AM
To: 'Discussion of IronPython'
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Debugging support PythonEngine
Are there plans to i
: Discussion
of IronPython
Cc: Glenn Hackney
Subject: Re: [IronPython]
Debugging support PythonEngine
If EngineOptions.ClrDebuggingEnabled
is set, we use AssemblyBuilder, TypeBuilder, etc for PythonEngine.Executed. The
code generated by AssemblyBuilder, TypeBuilder, etc supports PDB debug
/details.aspx?JobID=6D4754DE-11F0-45DF-8B78-DC1B43134038)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kristof Wagemans
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2006 2:10 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: [IronPython] Debugging support PythonEngine
I
have been experimenting with
I have been experimenting with the debugging support for the
PythonEngine. When I use the following code I have several problems.
PythonEngine _pe;
EngineOptions options = new EngineOptions();
options.ClrDebuggingEnabled = true;
_pe = new PythonEngine(options);
_pe.ExecuteFile(@"
I have been experimenting with the debugging support for the
PythonEngine. When I use the following code I have several problems.
PythonEngine _pe;
EngineOptions options = new EngineOptions();
options.ClrDebuggingEnabled = true;
_pe = new PythonEngine(options);
_pe.ExecuteFile(@"
14 matches
Mail list logo
