Re: [IronPython] Road to IronPython 2.7 (update)

2011-02-22 Thread Tristan Zajonc
1128 340282366920938463463374607431768211456L Thomas: Hadn't tried that and it works. (At some point it might be nice to try to get it working with MonoDevelop GUI. When I load it it's targeting .NET 2.0 and has a bunch of issues.) Tristan On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 12:34 PM, Jeff Hardy

Re: [IronPython] Road to IronPython 2.7 (update)

2011-02-22 Thread Tristan Zajonc
It appears to be because int is a very large long. This is probably the core issue: In IronPython: a=143098242404177361603877621312831893704 Traceback (most recent call last): OverflowError: Number overflow. a=143098242404177361603877621312831893704L a

Re: [IronPython] Road to IronPython 2.7 (update)

2011-02-22 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Tristan Zajonc trist...@gmail.com wrote: It appears to be because int is a very large long.  This is probably the core issue: In IronPython: a=143098242404177361603877621312831893704 Traceback (most recent call last): OverflowError: Number overflow.

Re: [IronPython] Road to IronPython 2.7 (update)

2011-02-22 Thread Tristan Zajonc
Looks like a Mono Bug. The following code prints both small enough and big enough, which not true. var a = System.Numerics.BigInteger.Parse(143098242404177361603877621312831893704); Console.WriteLine(a); if (a System.Int32.MaxValue) { Console.WriteLine(Small enough); } if (a

Re: [IronPython] Road to IronPython 2.7 (update)

2011-02-22 Thread Jeff Hardy
Opened http://ironpython.codeplex.com/workitem/30240 as high priority. Thanks! - Jeff On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Steve Dower s.j.do...@gmail.com wrote: The tools problem seems to be to do with the installer. IPyTools (PythonRuntimeHost.cs:89-100) tries to load the installed path from

[IronPython] Road to IronPython 2.7 (update)

2011-02-21 Thread Jeff Hardy
Hi all, The following issues are blockers for IronPython 2.7: * #29841 - sysconfig traceback when starting 2.7B1 - http://ironpython.codeplex.com/workitem/29841 I don't know enough about Mono/MacOS/POSIX to fix this one properly. I haven't yet chercked what the Mono guys did to get it working on

Re: [IronPython] Road to IronPython 2.7 (update)

2011-02-21 Thread Steve Dower
The tools problem seems to be to do with the installer. IPyTools (PythonRuntimeHost.cs:89-100) tries to load the installed path from HKLM\SOFTWARE\IronPython\2.7\(default). On my machine (Win7 x64, IPy 2.7 RC1 installed without IPyTools, which were built from source) this is actually in

Re: [IronPython] Road to IronPython 2.7 (update)

2011-02-21 Thread Jimmy Schementi
I can do a quick test pass of the silverlight support. ~Jimmy On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Steve Dower s.j.do...@gmail.com wrote: The tools problem seems to be to do with the installer. IPyTools (PythonRuntimeHost.cs:89-100) tries to load the installed path from

Re: [IronPython] Road to IronPython 2.7 (update)

2011-02-21 Thread Dino Viehland
(and uuid goes through this path). From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Tristan Zajonc Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 6:11 PM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] Road to IronPython 2.7 (update) There seems to be some

Re: [IronPython] Road to IronPython 2.7 (update)

2011-02-21 Thread Tomas Matousek
IronPython.Mono.sln should build fine on Mono 2.10 RC2. Tomas From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Tristan Zajonc Sent: Monday, February 21, 2011 6:11 PM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject: Re: [IronPython] Road to IronPython 2.7

Re: [IronPython] Road to IronPython 2.7 (update)

2011-02-21 Thread Tristan Zajonc
: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] *On Behalf Of *Tristan Zajonc *Sent:* Monday, February 21, 2011 6:11 PM *To:* Discussion of IronPython *Subject:* Re: [IronPython] Road to IronPython 2.7 (update) There seems to be some regressions between 2.6 and 2.7 for OSX/Mono. In particular