D] On Behalf Of Jeff Hardy
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2008 4:50 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] SCons on IronPython 2.0B2
Hi Dino,
Thanks for all the information! I find it helpful when filing bugs to
know how the team prioritizes bugs, what they look for, etc. It makes
it eas
Future. Those are bugs we don't think we can get to anytime
> soon due to deep architectural issues. If something's been moved to 2.1 then
> it's more the case that we think this can wait and that's an easy decision to
> reverse.
>
>
> -Original Message-
>
think this can wait and that's an easy decision to
reverse.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Hardy
Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2008 12:40 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] SCons on IronPython 2.0B2
Hi Dino,
Yea
Hi Dino,
Yeah, _winreg is what's missing. Good to hear that it will be coming soon!
Not every bug I've filed is related to SCons (some are Trac-related,
and maybe even a couple from elsewhere). I've just been testing random
apps (primarily WSGI-enabled webapps), seeing what breaks, and filing
bugs
Is "no registry module" _winreg or is it something else? The good news here
might be that Srivatsn has implemented this for Beta 3 (along w/ cmath) but it
didn't quite make it into b2.
Let us know if we end up pushing any bugs to statuses you don't like. BTW are
all the bugs you've opened rel
