On Aug 31, 2006, at 4:00 PM, Dino Viehland wrote:
> The Item property is the default indexer, so you should be able to
> access it using foo[index].
>
> As for your other question - Martin looked into this but I didn't
> see a response from him... The problem seems to be that we don't
> de
1:14 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] custom ConfigurationSection in IronPython
On Aug 31, 2006, at 4:00 PM, Dino Viehland wrote:
> The Item property is the default indexer, so you should be able to
> access it using foo[index].
Thats what I thought, but it doe
Ferrara
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 12:56 PM
> To: Discussion of IronPython
> Subject: Re: [IronPython] custom ConfigurationSection in IronPython
>
> I have another related question. The "Item" property of
> System.Configuration.ConfigurationElement (base class f
ussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] custom ConfigurationSection in IronPython
I have another related question. The "Item" property of
System.Configuration.ConfigurationElement (base class for
ConfigurationSection) doesn't seem to be accessible from IronPython.
Is this becau
I have another related question. The "Item" property of
System.Configuration.ConfigurationElement (base class for
ConfigurationSection) doesn't seem to be accessible from IronPython.
Is this because its overloaded by parameter type? Is there a way to
access it from IronPython?
Thanks
-
