If you're running some sort of checker (pylint, pychecker) over this,
you might get a warning about the name line not doing anything. To
avoid that, you'll sometimes see a variant like this:
try:
unused = name
except NameError:
# variable 'name' is not defined.
Except then PyLint
Dino Viehland wrote:
Thanks for the report. I've opened CodePlex bug #19350 to track this
(http://www.codeplex.com/IronPython/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=19350).
I believe the fix is actually pretty simple and we'll discuss whether we'll
take it for 2.0 final at our Friday team meeting.
Thanks Dino -- it seems that if I use ipy with -X:MTA, I can no longer
reproduce the problem. However, this bothers me a bit: I'm not competent
to follow all the consequences here, but this situation seems to imply
that Ironclad won't be usable safely from any STA thread. Is this an
intended
http://compilerlab.members.winisp.net/dlr-spec-hosting.pdf (PDF) or
http://compilerlab.members.winisp.net/dlr-spec-hosting.doc (Word)
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 5:41 AM, Slide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone point me to the latest hosting docs?
Thanks,
slide
--
slide-o-blog
When you run with -X:MTA, is the object now being finalized on a thread
other than thread #2?
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:01 AM, William Reade
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Thanks Dino -- it seems that if I use ipy with -X:MTA, I can no longer
reproduce the problem. However, this bothers me a bit: I'm
Can someone point me to the latest hosting docs?
Thanks,
slide
--
slide-o-blog
http://slide-o-blog.blogspot.com/
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.ironpython.com
http://lists.ironpython.com/listinfo.cgi/users-ironpython.com
Finalization still happens on thread 2, and I see no evidence of thread
1 any more; my main thread now appears to have id 3.
Curt Hagenlocher wrote:
When you run with -X:MTA, is the object now being finalized on a
thread other than thread #2?
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 7:01 AM, William Reade
CPy:
long('')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
ValueError: invalid literal for long() with base 10: ''
IPy:
long('')
0L
___
Users mailing list
Users@lists.ironpython.com
In MTA mode we'll create a new thread which is thread 3 - thread 1 will just be
hanging around waiting for it to exit. Unfortunately w/o a separate EXE we
can't avoid the separate thread.
I've pinged the CLR dev who owns interop these days to see if he's ever seen
anything like this.
Thanks, I've filed this as CodePlex #19363
(http://www.codeplex.com/IronPython/WorkItem/View.aspx?WorkItemId=19363)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Reade
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 8:58 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Hi,
I'm porting Testoob to IronPython and have a module function that needs to
know the filename where the code calling it is defined.
In CPython I get the current frame with sys._getframe(), then climb
the stack with frame.f_back until I find a different file:
def _first_external_frame():
The short answer is no – we realize frames is a common request and I do have a
prototype implementation of them. We’re still working on our 2.1 planning but
it might be available there w/ a command line option or it might be something
we could port to 2.0.1.
The longer answer would be
Do you know if numpy is using COM anywhere? Or does Ironclad use COM for any
of its interop?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Reade
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 6:01 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython]
By custom class you mean a class you've written? And then you want it to
light up with dynamic languages?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marty Nelson
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 7:18 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Extension
Like a Christmas tree.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dino Viehland
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 7:20 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Extension methods in python
By custom class you mean a
Ok, you don’t want extension methods, you want a dynamic object, and the good
and bad news is there are a few options ☺
Let's start with the correct options first. If you can change the base class
the easiest thing to do would be to subclass
Microsoft.Scripting.Actions.Dynamic. Then you can
16 matches
Mail list logo
