[IronPython] IMAP4_SSL in 2.0.2 and 2.6

2009-10-20 Thread Severin
Hi, I use IronPython to send e-mails with imap4. It seems that version 2.0.2 has SSL support whereas 2.6 doesn't. Why is that? My understanding would be that SSL should or shouldn't work with both versions... Severin ___ Users mailing list

Re: [IronPython] Type analysis of expression

2009-10-20 Thread Christian Schmidt
Hi Vernon, Maybe I'm missing the point -- are you trying to load data into an existing data table, or to DEFINE a new data table? Sorry for not clarifying this. I'm able to export to _new_ tables, which will be created at runtime. For existing tables we could easily work out with the

[IronPython] IronPython 2.6 CodePlex Source Update

2009-10-20 Thread merllab
This is an automated email letting you know that sources have recently been pushed out. You can download these newer sources directly from http://ironpython.codeplex.com/SourceControl/changeset/view/60315. MODIFIED SOURCES $/IronPython/IronPython_Main/Doc/dotnet-integration.rst

Re: [IronPython] IMAP4_SSL in 2.0.2 and 2.6

2009-10-20 Thread Dino Viehland
You can give a little more information on how it is failing? It looks like we are missing the ssl module (implemented in Python but not included in IronPython because we don't implement _ssl) which is new in 2.6 but we still have all the old SSL support that previously existed in the socket

[IronPython] IronPython 2.6 for .NET 4.0 Beta 2

2009-10-20 Thread Jeff Hardy
I know, I know, it's not even publicly available yet, but I'm impatient :). Is it going to be available soon-ish, or are you guys busy enough as it is? - Jeff ___ Users mailing list Users@lists.ironpython.com

Re: [IronPython] IronPython 2.6 for .NET 4.0 Beta 2

2009-10-20 Thread Dave Fugate
It'll be released tomorrow when .NET 4.0 Beta 2 is available to all;) -Original Message- From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Hardy Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 11:33 AM To: Discussion of IronPython Subject:

Re: [IronPython] IronPython 2.6 for .NET 4.0 Beta 2

2009-10-20 Thread Dino Viehland
We're planning on releasing a CTP tomorrow when the beta is publicly available. -Original Message- From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com [mailto:users- boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Jeff Hardy Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 11:33 AM To: Discussion of IronPython

Re: [IronPython] adodbapi works correctly on RC1.

2009-10-20 Thread Josh
I Py 2.6 RC1 successfully passes all tests for adodbapi. Congratulations! You now have a fully PEP 249 compliant database engine on IronPython. Excellent. I wonder if this bodes well for Django out of the box on IPy 2.6? Is there still an issue of Django's handling of Unicode for binary

Re: [IronPython] IronPython 2.6 for .NET 4.0 Beta 2

2009-10-20 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Dave Fugate dfug...@microsoft.com wrote: It'll be released tomorrow when .NET 4.0 Beta 2 is available to all;) On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Dino Viehland di...@microsoft.com wrote: We're planning on releasing a CTP tomorrow when the beta is publicly

Re: [IronPython] adodbapi works correctly on RC1.

2009-10-20 Thread Vernon Cole
Do not hold your breath. I understand that there is a problem with unicode vs str in django. The PEP 429 specifies a BINARY constructor (which within adodbapi has different definitions for Python2.x and Python3.x) which a user can call to get a piece of raw memory. Django does not seem to have