Hi All,
Well the time has come again to upgrade to a newer version of
IronPython. I'm tempted to try one of the source code drops instead of
Beta 4,is there any reason I shouldn't use this morning's drop?
I'm happy to see that the performance of IronPython has been improving
constantly.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan Eloff
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 10:07 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: [IronPython] Beta 4 or build from source?
Hi All,
Well the time has come again to upgrade to a newer version of
IronPython
Dan Eloff wrote:
Hi All,
Well the time has come again to upgrade to a newer version of
IronPython. I'm tempted to try one of the source code drops instead of
Beta 4,is there any reason I shouldn't use this morning's drop?
There have been further performance improvements from beta 4 in the
you would have to
eventually do going forward.
Thanks
sesh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Fugate
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 10:13 AM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Beta 4 or build from source
Well the time has come again to upgrade to a newer version of
IronPython. I'm tempted to try one of the source code drops instead of
Beta 4,is there any reason I shouldn't use this morning's drop?
I say go for it! =)
I'm happy to see that the performance of IronPython has been improving
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Jimmy Schementi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm happy to see that the performance of IronPython has been improving
constantly. Performance is key, I've upgraded my development PC twice,
and am running at a 20% overclock just to keep the edit, refresh,
debug cycles
I'm happy to see that the performance of IronPython has been
improving
constantly. Performance is key, I've upgraded my development PC
twice,
and am running at a 20% overclock just to keep the edit, refresh,
debug cycles down to a reasonable amount of time. A large
Silverlight
project
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 5:41 PM, Jimmy Schementi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It takes 22 seconds from cold, and 16 seconds after that. This is with
everything running on localhost.
I'm running a Core2 Duo @ 3.6 GHz with 6MB L2 cache, 1600MHz fsb, 6GB
800MHz DDR2, Raid 0 HD.
It can get close to