One 1.4 beta - with IronPython 2.0
Hi all,
Version 1.4 of Resolver One, our Pythonic spreadsheet, is based on
IronPython 2.0, and includes (alpha-level) support for numpy using our
Ironclad project.
We're releasing the beta tomorrow: this has a few performance problems
(which are being
I should point out ahead of time that there's no mmap module in
IronPython at the moment, and so memory-mapped ndarrays don't work yet
-- although most of the usual numpy save/load bits do work, so you'll
probably be fine (unless they're too big to fit in memory).
Dan Shechter wrote:
Here!
I know :)
I have my own C# Assembly that does mmap() on Windows/Linux with PInvoke.
I did notice though that .NET 4.0 WIll have native support for mmap()
through System.IO.MemoryMappedFiles...
So perhaps IP 2.X will add that as well...
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 12:15 PM, William Reade
if at possible).
From: users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Dan Shechter
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 1:04 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Resolver One 1.4 beta - with IronPython 2.0
I know :)
I have my own C
: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 1:04 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Resolver One 1.4 beta - with IronPython 2.0
I know :)
I have my own C# Assembly that does mmap() on Windows/Linux with PInvoke.
I did notice though that .NET 4.0 WIll have native support for mmap
...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Dan Shechter
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 1:04 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Resolver One 1.4 beta - with IronPython 2.0
I know :)
I have my own C# Assembly that does mmap() on Windows/Linux with
PInvoke.
I did notice though
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Dan Shechter
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 1:04 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Resolver One 1.4 beta - with IronPython 2.0
I know :)
I have my own C# Assembly that does mmap() on Windows/Linux with PInvoke.
I did
...@lists.ironpython.com
[mailto:users-boun...@lists.ironpython.com] On Behalf Of Slide
Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2009 2:13 PM
To: Discussion of IronPython
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Resolver One 1.4 beta - with IronPython 2.0
That's true, but if the low-level bindings are in the framework
itself
Subject: Re: [IronPython] Resolver One 1.4 beta - with IronPython 2.0
That's true, but if the low-level bindings are in the framework
itself, rather than a consumer of the framework, it does make it
easier to port to other platforms which have the same API that wrap
the low-level bindings
Here!
I can't wait to use it with NumPy.
I actually have a .NET C# assembly that does some really nasty low-level
stuff like loading data from memory mapped
files and wrapping them with IListT :)
I can't wait to make Ironclad/Numpy blow up :)
On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Giles Thomas
Hi all,
Version 1.4 of Resolver One, our Pythonic spreadsheet, is based on
IronPython 2.0, and includes (alpha-level) support for numpy using our
Ironclad project.
We're releasing the beta tomorrow: this has a few performance problems
(which are being addressed - many thanks to Dino
11 matches
Mail list logo