Hello Aymeric,
I was forwarding some registrations to your domain and didn't get the
deadlock. I did get tcp_send failed many times and then used second dns
record. I have two udp workers.
How fast did you get to lock?
I am using latest 1.5.3 here, what is your output of kamailio -V?
Thank
On 1/28/10 9:17 PM, Aymeric Moizard wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 1/28/10 8:40 PM, Aymeric Moizard wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Jan 28, 2010 at 14:56, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
I am cc-ing sr-dev, since tcp code i
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 1/28/10 8:40 PM, Aymeric Moizard wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Jan 28, 2010 at 14:56, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
I am cc-ing sr-dev, since tcp code is from ser and Andrei may have more
insights.
On 1/28/10 8:40 PM, Aymeric Moizard wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Jan 28, 2010 at 14:56, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
I am cc-ing sr-dev, since tcp code is from ser and Andrei may have more
insights...
Is this kamailio 1.5 or kamailio 3.0 (looks like <
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote:
On Jan 28, 2010 at 14:56, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
I am cc-ing sr-dev, since tcp code is from ser and Andrei may have more
insights...
Is this kamailio 1.5 or kamailio 3.0 (looks like <3.0 to me)?
This is branches/1.5
With svn ve
On Jan 28, 2010 at 14:56, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
> I am cc-ing sr-dev, since tcp code is from ser and Andrei may have more
> insights...
Is this kamailio 1.5 or kamailio 3.0 (looks like <3.0 to me)?
>
> On 1/28/10 2:41 PM, Aymeric Moizard wrote:
> >
> >
> >On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Henning