Re: [OMPI users] Tight integration and interactive sessions with SGE

2008-11-12 Thread Scott Beardsley
Reuti wrote: qlogin will create a completely fresh bash, which is not aware of running under SGE. Although you could set the SGE_* variables by hand, it's easier to use an interactive session with: In the past we'd source some sge script and SLOTS, TMPDIR, etc were populated. $ qrsh -pe or

Re: [OMPI users] Tight integration and interactive sessions with SGE

2008-11-12 Thread Reuti
Scott, Am 13.11.2008 um 01:34 schrieb Scott Beardsley: I've been using OMPI 1.2.6 tightly integrated with Grid Engine for a bit now and it works great. However, I'm running into a problem running jobs from an interactive session (qlogin). I tried just doing "mpirun -np N /path/to/binary" w

[OMPI users] Tight integration and interactive sessions with SGE

2008-11-12 Thread Scott Beardsley
I've been using OMPI 1.2.6 tightly integrated with Grid Engine for a bit now and it works great. However, I'm running into a problem running jobs from an interactive session (qlogin). I tried just doing "mpirun -np N /path/to/binary" where N > # of cpus per node but OMPI will just oversubscribe

Re: [OMPI users] Fwd: Problems installing in Cygwin

2008-11-12 Thread Neville Clark
Hi all, Update to build attempt. I have a successful build using Cygwin with the following command $ ./configure --prefix=/opt/openmpi-1.3b2 \ --enable-mca-no-build=memory_mallopt,paffinity But I also had problem with "max" being defined somewhere. I was able to locate it to the following line

Re: [OMPI users] MPI_Type_create_darray causes MPI_File_set_view to crash when ndims=2, array_of_gsizes[0]>array_of_gsizes[1]

2008-11-12 Thread Antonio Molins
Hi Rob, I think I could trim it down to a small test case, but this should be reproducible with the conditions given. I find it unlikely that it is a ROMIO bug, because when I construct the datatype by myself, it goes smooth as silk. Thanks for the reply, A On Nov 12, 2008, at 5:51 PM, R

Re: [OMPI users] MPI_Type_create_darray causes MPI_File_set_view to crash when ndims=2, array_of_gsizes[0]>array_of_gsizes[1]

2008-11-12 Thread Robert Latham
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:19:39AM -0400, Antonio Molins wrote: > Hi again, > > The problem in a nutshell: it looks like, when I use > MPI_Type_create_darray with an argument array_of_gsizes where > array_of_gsizes[0]>array_of_gsizes[1], the datatype returned goes > through MPI_Type_commit()

Re: [OMPI users] ADIOI_GEN_DELETE

2008-11-12 Thread Robert Latham
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:41:45AM -0200, Davi Vercillo C. Garcia (ダヴィ) wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to run a code using OpenMPI and I'm getting this error: > > ADIOI_GEN_DELETE (line 22): **io No such file or directory > > I don't know why this occurs, I only know this happens when I use more >

Re: [OMPI users] timing + /usr/bin/time

2008-11-12 Thread Reuti
Hi Ray, with the Tight Integration of Open MPI into SGE (http:// gridengine.sunsource.net/) you will get a correct accouting. Every process created with qrsh (a replacement for ssh) will have an additional group id attached and SGE will accumulate them all. Depending on the size of the clu

Re: [OMPI users] timing + /usr/bin/time

2008-11-12 Thread Fabian Hänsel
Hi Ray, > So, to make sure I understand what happens... This command: > > mpirun -np 2 myprog > > starts the program "mpirun" and two processes of "myprog". So, what > the "real time" of /usr/bin/time reports is the wall clock for mpirun. Exactly. > Does the user time have any meaning here?

Re: [OMPI users] Fwd: Problems installing in Cygwin

2008-11-12 Thread Neville Clark
George (or anyone else that can help), I have been trying to build OpenMPI for windows (XP). But so far have not been successful. I am trying to build version 1.3b2, because of these emails, I have setup two virtual machine to do the windows builds, one with cygwin installed and one with Microsoft

Re: [OMPI users] timing + /usr/bin/time

2008-11-12 Thread Raymond Wan
Hi Fabian, Fabian Hänsel wrote: On a separate topic, but related to your post here, how did you do the timing? [Especially to so many digits of accuracy. :-) ] two things to consider: i) What do I actually (want to) measure? ii) How accurate can I do that? i) Option iA) execution ti