On Fri, 17 Feb 2017, r...@open-mpi.org wrote:
Mark - this is now available in master. Will look at what might be
required to bring it to 2.0
Thanks Ralph,
To be honest, since you've given me an alternative, there's no rush from
my point of view.
The logic's embedded in a script and it's
Mark - this is now available in master. Will look at what might be required to
bring it to 2.0
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 5:49 AM, r...@open-mpi.org wrote:
>
>
>> On Feb 15, 2017, at 5:45 AM, Mark Dixon wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, r...@open-mpi.org wrote:
>>
>>> Ah,
> On Feb 15, 2017, at 5:45 AM, Mark Dixon wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, r...@open-mpi.org wrote:
>
>> Ah, yes - I know what the problem is. We weren’t expecting a PE value of 1 -
>> the logic is looking expressly for values > 1 as we hadn’t anticipated this
>>
On Wed, 15 Feb 2017, r...@open-mpi.org wrote:
Ah, yes - I know what the problem is. We weren’t expecting a PE value of
1 - the logic is looking expressly for values > 1 as we hadn’t
anticipated this use-case.
Is it a sensible use-case, or am I crazy?
I can make that change. I’m off to a
Ah, yes - I know what the problem is. We weren’t expecting a PE value of 1 -
the logic is looking expressly for values > 1 as we hadn’t anticipated this
use-case.
I can make that change. I’m off to a workshop for the next day or so, but can
probably do this on the plane.
> On Feb 15, 2017,
Ah, yes - I know what the problem is. We weren’t expecting a PE value of 1 -
the logic is looking expressly for values > 1 as we hadn’t anticipated this
use-case.
I can make that change. I’m off to a workshop for the next day or so, but can
probably do this on the plane.
> On Feb 15, 2017,
Hi,
When combining OpenMPI 2.0.2 with OpenMP, I'm interested in launching a
number of ranks and allocating a number of cores to each rank. Using
"-map-by socket:PE=", switching to "-map-by node:PE=" if I want
to allocate more than a single socket to a rank, seems to do what I want.
Except