Re: [OMPI users] Extent of Distributed Array Type?

Thanks Ralph! In future, I'll try and remember to follow up on these things :) Cheers, Richard On 10 April 2014 11:16, Ralph Castain wrote: > Not really - it's the responsibility of the developer to file the CMR. > Some folks are good about it, and some aren't. In this

Re: [OMPI users] Extent of Distributed Array Type?

Okay. Thanks for having a look Ralph! For future reference, is there a better process I can go through if I find bugs like this that makes sure they don't get forgotten? Thanks, Richard On 10 April 2014 00:39, Ralph Castain wrote: > Wow - that's an ancient one. I'll see if

Re: [OMPI users] Extent of Distributed Array Type?

Wow - that's an ancient one. I'll see if it can be applied to 1.8.1. These things don't automatically go across - it requires that someone file a request to move it - and I think this commit came into the trunk after we branched for the 1.7 series. On Apr 9, 2014, at 12:05 PM, Richard Shaw

Re: [OMPI users] Extent of Distributed Array Type?

I'm not sure I ever replied to this to say that the patch works perfectly (very belatedly)! However I just wanted to ask what the progress of getting this into a released version is? I'm not particularly sure on the details on the OpenMPI development process - I've noticed that it's still in the

Re: [OMPI users] Extent of Distributed Array Type?

Thanks George, I'm glad it wasn't just me being crazy. I'll try and test that one soon. Cheers, Richard On Tuesday, 24 July, 2012 at 6:28 PM, George Bosilca wrote: > Richard, > > Thanks for identifying this issue and for the short example. I can confirm > your original understanding was

Re: [OMPI users] Extent of Distributed Array Type?

On Jul 24, 2012, at 6:28 PM, George Bosilca wrote: > Thanks for identifying this issue and for the short example. I can confirm > your original understanding was right, the upper bound should be identical on > all ranks. I just pushed a patch (r26862), let me know if this fixes your > issue.

Re: [OMPI users] Extent of Distributed Array Type?

Richard, Thanks for identifying this issue and for the short example. I can confirm your original understanding was right, the upper bound should be identical on all ranks. I just pushed a patch (r26862), let me know if this fixes your issue. Thanks, george. On Jul 24, 2012, at 17:27 ,

Re: [OMPI users] Extent of Distributed Array Type?

I've been speaking off line to Jonathan Dursi about this problem. And it does seems to be a bug. The same problem crops up in a simplified 1d only case (test case attached). In this instance the specification seems to be comprehensible - looking at the pdf copy of MPI-2.2 spec, p92-93, the

[OMPI users] Extent of Distributed Array Type?

Hello, I'm getting thoroughly confused trying to work out what is the correct extent of a block-cyclic distributed array type (created with MPI_Type_create_darray), and I'm hoping someone can clarify it for me. My expectation is that calling MPI_Get_extent on this type should return the size