Re: [OMPI users] Fw: LSF's LSB_PJL_TASK_GEOMETRY + OpenMPI 1.10.2

2016-04-19 Thread Josh Hursey
Just an update for the list. Really only impacts folks running Open MPI under LSF. The LSB_PJL_TASK_GEOMETRY changes what lbs_getalloc() returns regarding the allocation. It adjusts it to the mapping/ordering specified in that environment variable. However, since it is not set by LSF when the

Re: [OMPI users] Fw: LSF's LSB_PJL_TASK_GEOMETRY + OpenMPI 1.10.2

2016-04-19 Thread Josh Hursey
Farid, I have access to the same cluster inside IBM. I can try to help you track this down and maybe work up a patch with the LSF folks. I'll contact you off-list with my IBM address and we can work on this a bit. I'll post back to the list with what we found. -- Josh On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at

Re: [OMPI users] Fw: LSF's LSB_PJL_TASK_GEOMETRY + OpenMPI 1.10.2

2016-04-19 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
On Apr 18, 2016, at 7:08 PM, Farid Parpia wrote: > > I will try to put you in touch with someone in LSF development immediately. FWIW: It would be great if IBM could contribute the fixes to this. None of us have access to LSF resources, and IBM is a core contributor to Open

[OMPI users] Fw: LSF's LSB_PJL_TASK_GEOMETRY + OpenMPI 1.10.2

2016-04-18 Thread Farid Parpia
Hi Ralph, Thank you for looking into this! The job #BSUB -J "task_geometry" #BSUB -n 9 #BSUB -R "span[ptile=3]" #BSUB -m "p10a30 p10a33 p10a35 p10a55 p10a58" #BSUB -R "affinity[core]" #BSUB -e "task_geometry.stderr.%J" #BSUB -o "task_geometry.stdout.%J" #BSUB -q "normal" #BSUB -M "800" #BSUB -R