Re: [OMPI users] More NetBSD fixes

On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:55:06 -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote: > That being said, you could sign up on it and then set your membership to > receive no mail...? This is especially dangerous because the Open MPI lists munge the Reply-To header, which is a bad thing

Re: [OMPI users] More NetBSD fixes

On Jan 14, 2010, at 7:38 PM, Aleksej Saushev wrote: > The first one, "#! /usr/bin/env bash " should be "#! /usr/bin/env bash" > at the very least. Ah, in autogen.sh -- I thought you were referring to configure. Strange that NetBSD doesn't like it; I wonder why... Regardless, the extra space

Re: [OMPI users] More NetBSD fixes

Jeff Squyres writes: > On Jan 14, 2010, at 7:00 PM, Aleksej Saushev wrote: > >> > Thanks! I have this queued up to commit in a few hours (we try not to >> > commit autogen/configure-worthy changes during the US workday). >> >> While we're at autogen stuff, could you drop

Re: [OMPI users] More NetBSD fixes

Jeff Squyres writes: > Thanks! I have this queued up to commit in a few hours (we try not to > commit autogen/configure-worthy changes during the US workday). While we're at autogen stuff, could you drop trailing space on interpreter line? NetBSD doesn't like it. While I'm

Re: [OMPI users] More NetBSD fixes

Thanks! I have this queued up to commit in a few hours (we try not to commit autogen/configure-worthy changes during the US workday). On Jan 14, 2010, at 11:54 AM, Aleksej Saushev wrote: > > Hello! > > Flawed logic: Linux isn't the only system with procfs. > NetBSD has procfs too and may

[OMPI users] More NetBSD fixes

Hello! Flawed logic: Linux isn't the only system with procfs. NetBSD has procfs too and may have /proc/cpuinfo as well, but it isn't Linux. I didn't check if FreeBSD has "cpuinfo" as well, FreeBSD 6.3 doesn't but it's being desupported soon. Difference against openmpi-1.5a1r22193 snapshot.