Ok, we're up and running. There is a new mailing list available:
d...@open-mpi.org
You must be subscribed in order to post. Subscribe here:
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/docs
The web archives of this list on the www.open-mpi.org web site
currently give a
Sorry, but LaTex is not a viable solution for open source community
development of documentation. DocBook (XML) is one solution, another is
DITA.
I'm looking into some other open source communities that I'm familiar
with to see what they're using.
The general requirement for
>
> Docbook gets my vote, especially when one considers the html and pdf
> output. I'd prefer LaTeX, but then I come from an academic background
> :-)
I prefer LaTex too, the reason is same. Academic background :) and new
found love in LaTex
Regards,
Amit
--
Amit Kumar Saha
On 13/09/2007, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> So there are at least a few people who are interested in this effort
> (keep chiming in if you are interested so that we can get a tally of
> who would like to be involved).
A docs project for OpenMPI is a great idea. I can chime in some
Jeff Squyres wrote:
What name/address do we want? d...@open-mpi.org? (or suggest an
alternative)
Sounds right to me. Only alternative might be docs_t...@open-mpi.org
<>
On Sep 13, 2007, at 4:17 PM, richard.fried...@sun.com wrote:
As more people start chiming in wanting to help with OpenMPI
documentation (a good thing!), maybe we should think about starting
forum or separate email list just for this discussion.
At least, initially to get the ball rolling.
As more people start chiming in wanting to help with OpenMPI
documentation (a good thing!), maybe we should think about starting
forum or separate email list just for this discussion.
At least, initially to get the ball rolling.
Do we have the capability of creating a new mail list at
Jeff,
Count us in at the UofA. My initial impressions of Open MPI are very
good and I would be open to contributing to this effort as time allows.
Thanks!
Jeff F. Pummill
Senior Linux Cluster Administrator
University of Arkansas
Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701
(479) 575 - 4590
So there are at least a few people who are interested in this effort
(keep chiming in if you are interested so that we can get a tally of
who would like to be involved).
What kind of resources / organization would be useful for this
group? Indiana University graciously hosts all of Open
Jeff,
I would also be interested. I am getting questions from my customers
about the location of documentation.
Thanks,
Pat
Jeff Squyres
Hi
I would like to contribute something as well.
I have about half a year of experience with OpenMPI,
and i used LAM MPI for some more than half a year before.
Jody
I would be very happy to help setup a documentation community --
goodness knows we need more/better documentation for Open MPI!
Who else would be interested?
On Sep 13, 2007, at 5:13 AM, Amit Kumar Saha wrote:
Hi Richard,
On 9/12/07, Richard Friedman wrote:
Amit:
Well,
Amit:
Well, as far as I know a documentation community within OpenMPI has not
yet been formed, but maybe it is time to send out a general call to the
OpenMPI members to see about creating one.
I'm new to the OpenMPI community myself, so I'm not yet sure how this
can be done. But we can find
Hi Richard and all concerned,
On 9/12/07, richard.fried...@sun.com wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. Actually, I'm working with the MPI team at Sun and
> I was wondering if there was already a team within the OpenMPI community
> thinking about developing a doc set for OpenMPI. Such
Thanks for the reply. Actually, I'm working with the MPI team at Sun and
I was wondering if there was already a team within the OpenMPI community
thinking about developing a doc set for OpenMPI. Such doc communities
exist for the other open source communities I've worked with, such as
Open MPI adheres to the MPI standard (www.mpi-forum.org), but as for
specific docs for the Open MPI software package itself, the best we
have at the community level is the README and man pages in the
tarball and the web site FAQ (www.open-mpi.org/faq/).
Sun is actually considering
16 matches
Mail list logo