Reuti writes:
>> I should qualify that by noting that ENABLE_ADDGRP_KILL has apparently
>> never propagated through remote startup,
>
> Isn't it a setting inside SGE which the sge_execd is aware of? I never
> exported any environment variable for this purpose.
Yes,
Hi,
> Am 01.08.2017 um 18:36 schrieb Dave Love :
>
> Gilles Gouaillardet writes:
>
>> Dave,
>>
>>
>> unless you are doing direct launch (for example, use 'srun' instead of
>> 'mpirun' under SLURM),
>>
>> this is the way Open MPI is working :
Gilles Gouaillardet writes:
> Dave,
>
>
> unless you are doing direct launch (for example, use 'srun' instead of
> 'mpirun' under SLURM),
>
> this is the way Open MPI is working : mpirun will use whatever the
> resource manager provides
>
> in order to spawn the remote orted
Dave,
unless you are doing direct launch (for example, use 'srun' instead of
'mpirun' under SLURM),
this is the way Open MPI is working : mpirun will use whatever the
resource manager provides
in order to spawn the remote orted (tm with PBS, qrsh with SGE, srun
with SLURM, ...).
then
"r...@open-mpi.org" writes:
> Oh no, that's not right. Mpirun launches daemons using qrsh and those
> daemons spawn the app's procs. SGE has no visibility of the app at all
Oh no, that's not right.
The whole point of tight integration with remote startup using qrsh is
to
gt; From: users [mailto:users-boun...@lists.open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Reuti
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 9:25 AM
> To: Open MPI Users <users@lists.open-mpi.org>
> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Questions about integration with resource
> distribution systems
>
>
>>
ehalf Of Reuti
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2017 9:25 AM
To: Open MPI Users <users@lists.open-mpi.org>
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Questions about integration with resource
distribution systems
> Am 26.07.2017 um 15:09 schrieb r...@open-mpi.org:
>
> mpirun doesn’t get access to that
;
>> Regards,
>> Vipul
>>
>>
>>
>> From: users [mailto:users-boun...@lists.open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of
>> r...@open-mpi.org
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:16 PM
>> To: Open MPI Users <users@lists.open-mpi.org>
>> Subject:
Hi,
> Am 26.07.2017 um 15:03 schrieb Kulshrestha, Vipul
> :
>
> Thanks for a quick response.
>
> I will try building OMPI as suggested.
>
> On the integration with unsupported distribution systems, we cannot use
> script based approach, because often these
lto:users-boun...@lists.open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of
> r...@open-mpi.org
> Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:16 PM
> To: Open MPI Users <users@lists.open-mpi.org>
> Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Questions about integration with resource
> distribution systems
>
>
>
-mpi.org] On Behalf Of
r...@open-mpi.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 8:16 PM
To: Open MPI Users <users@lists.open-mpi.org>
Subject: Re: [OMPI users] Questions about integration with resource
distribution systems
On Jul 25, 2017, at 3:48 PM, Kulshrestha, Vipul
<vipul_kulshres...@m
Hi,
> Am 26.07.2017 um 02:16 schrieb r...@open-mpi.org:
>
>
>> On Jul 25, 2017, at 3:48 PM, Kulshrestha, Vipul
>> wrote:
>>
>> I have several questions about integration of openmpi with resource queuing
>> systems.
>>
>> 1.
>> I understand that openmpi
Hi,
> Am 26.07.2017 um 00:48 schrieb Kulshrestha, Vipul
> :
>
> I have several questions about integration of openmpi with resource queuing
> systems.
>
> 1.
> I understand that openmpi supports integration with various resource
> distribution systems such as
> On Jul 25, 2017, at 3:48 PM, Kulshrestha, Vipul
> wrote:
>
> I have several questions about integration of openmpi with resource queuing
> systems.
>
> 1.
> I understand that openmpi supports integration with various resource
> distribution systems such as
14 matches
Mail list logo