Re: [OMPI users] Tool communication

2007-10-16 Thread Oleg Morajko
Jeff, Thank you for your thoughts. Some more comments inlined. Regards, --Oleg On 10/9/07, Jeff Squyres wrote: > > Interesting idea. > > One obvious solution would be to mpirun your controller tasks and, as > you mentioned, use MPI to communicate between them. Then you can use > MPI_COMM_SPAWN

Re: [OMPI users] Tool communication

2007-10-09 Thread Jeff Squyres
Interesting idea. One obvious solution would be to mpirun your controller tasks and, as you mentioned, use MPI to communicate between them. Then you can use MPI_COMM_SPAWN to launch the actual MPI job that you want to monitor. However, this will only more-or-less work. OMPI currently poll

Re: [OMPI users] Tool communication

2007-10-03 Thread Amit Kumar Saha
Hello Oleg :-) I am a newbie as far as MPI is concerned. Still I will take a shot: On 10/2/07, Oleg Morajko wrote: > Hello, > > In the context of my PhD research, I have been developing a run-time > performance analyzer for MPI-based applications. > My tool provides a controller process for each

[OMPI users] Tool communication

2007-10-01 Thread Oleg Morajko
Hello, In the context of my PhD research, I have been developing a run-time performance analyzer for MPI-based applications. My tool provides a controller process for each MPI task. In particular, when a MPI job is started, a special wrapper script is generated that first starts my controller proc