Re: [OMPI users] building openmpi-v1.10-dev-59-g4e9cea6 still breaks

Hi, > Just fixed it - thanks! > > > On Jun 10, 2015, at 10:31 AM, Nathan Hjelm wrote: > > > > Looks like a bug in the CM optimization that went into 1.10 yesterday. I > > will let the author know to fix this one. Today I could build openmpi-v1.8.5-50-g793344d,

Re: [OMPI users] building openmpi-v1.10-dev-59-g4e9cea6 still breaks

Just fixed it - thanks! > On Jun 10, 2015, at 10:31 AM, Nathan Hjelm wrote: > > > Looks like a bug in the CM optimization that went into 1.10 yesterday. I > will let the author know to fix this one. > > -Nathan > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:19:04AM +0200, Siegmar Gross

Re: [OMPI users] building openmpi-v1.10-dev-59-g4e9cea6 still breaks

Looks like a bug in the CM optimization that went into 1.10 yesterday. I will let the author know to fix this one. -Nathan On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 11:19:04AM +0200, Siegmar Gross wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > > Bah. Another proc->super usage. Thought I got them all. Will fix now. > > Today I tried

Re: [OMPI users] building openmpi-v1.10-dev-59-g4e9cea6 still breaks

Hi Nathan, > Bah. Another proc->super usage. Thought I got them all. Will fix now. Today I tried to build openmpi-v1.10-dev-70-g5fefddb and I still get an error. CC pml_cm.lo In file included from ../../../../../openmpi-v1.10-dev-70-g5fefddb/ompi/mca/pml/cm/pml_cm.c:25:0:

Re: [OMPI users] building openmpi-v1.10-dev-59-g4e9cea6 still breaks

Bah. Another proc->super usage. Thought I got them all. Will fix now. -Nathan On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 12:43:50PM +0200, Siegmar Gross wrote: > Hi, > > today I tried to build openmpi-v1.10-dev-41-g57faa88 on my machines > (Solaris 10 Sparc, Solaris 10 x86_64, and openSUSE Linux 12.1 > x86_64)

[OMPI users] building openmpi-v1.10-dev-59-g4e9cea6 still breaks

Hi, today I tried to build openmpi-v1.10-dev-41-g57faa88 on my machines (Solaris 10 Sparc, Solaris 10 x86_64, and openSUSE Linux 12.1 x86_64) with gcc-4.9.2 and Sun C 5.13 and I got the following error on all platforms with cc. I have already reported the problem a few days ago. Nathan wanted to