There are no missing calls to MPI_WIN_FENCE as the code is using passive
synchronization (lock/unlock). The test code looks correct, I think this
is a bug in Open MPI. The code also fails on the development trunk, so
upgrading will not fix the bug. I've filed a bug (#2809). Unfortunately,
I'm
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Ole Kliemann <
ole-ompi-2...@mail.plastictree.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 07:24:24AM -0600, Ralph Castain wrote:
> > Oh my - that is such an old version! Any reason for using it instead of
> something more recent?
>
> I'm using the cluster of the
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 07:24:24AM -0600, Ralph Castain wrote:
> Oh my - that is such an old version! Any reason for using it instead of
> something more recent?
I'm using the cluster of the university where I work und I'm not the
admin. So I'm going with what is installed there.
It's the first
Oh my - that is such an old version! Any reason for using it instead of
something more recent?
On Jun 11, 2011, at 8:43 AM, Ole Kliemann wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I'm trying to use MPI on a cluster running OpenMPI 1.2.4 and starting
> processes through PBSPro_11.0.2.110766. I've been running
